(continued from last post)
As said in last, I’d like to explore the relevance of H.Gans subdivisions of taste culture to attitudes towards landscapes. The subdivisions are: high culture, upper middle culture, lower middle, low culture and quasi-folk low culture.
The first two may be considered to constitute the cultural “elite”; both share familiarity with Literature, Music and Art, which might enable aesthetic appreciation in those subjects and, by extension, aesthetic appreciation of landscapes. Gans emphasizes that the dividing lines between the subdivisions is not
based so much in socio-economics but in the kind and level of education (although in countries like USA there seems to be a strong dependence of the latter on the former). Because of the sort of magazines and newspapers they prefer, both are bound to be strongly aware of environmental issues and, as a public, show concern for landscape preservation. A noteworthy sector within these two categories is made up by University students; although notoriously “cash stripped”, they are consumers of literature and frequent visitors at museums and concert-halls. They conform an important public for landscapes and, notably for out-of-the-way ones.
(to be continued in Next Post)
Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now.