Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
leanprogramming · Lean Programming
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 376 - 406 of 762   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
376
Hi, On the first page of chapter 2 Bloch states that his item 1 is not the Factory Method pattern described in gang four book. You can read it here ...
Aeden Jameson
bevelededges
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2008
3:28 am
377
... On the first page of chapter 2 Bloch states that his item 1 is not the Factory Method pattern described in gang four book. You can read it here ...
Bartels, Mel
Mel_Bartels
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2008
3:31 pm
378
I agree with Mel's response (below), and with Josh's original point, but will state it a little differently. Seeing things from multiple angles sometimes adds...
Scott L. Bain
slbain9000
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2008
4:33 pm
379
I will answer this question briefly hereĀ as I am not sure if this is the appropriate forum for discussing a Design Patterns question in a Lean Programming...
Murali Gopalakrishnan
murali80027
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2008
5:04 pm
380
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Bartels, Mel ... Are they strongly identiy coupled? If I had something like public interface Foo class FooOne implements Foo ...
Aeden Jameson
bevelededges
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
7:41 am
381
... public class Factory{ public static Foo Create( int choice ) {....} } This is static factory method. No? And it's as loosely coupled as you can design for....
Bartels, Mel
Mel_Bartels
Offline Send Email
Jul 19, 2008
12:58 am
383
I just got this question off-line but thought I would answer it here. Alan, I just read you presentation material "Design Patterns Explained: From Theory To...
Alan Shalloway
alshalloway
Offline Send Email
Jul 19, 2008
11:28 pm
384
Ok I think the heart of my confusion has been thinking that the Gof pattern was the general notion of a factory, As Scott said, "anything that produces an...
Aeden Jameson
bevelededges
Offline Send Email
Jul 20, 2008
4:11 am
385
"Containment?" "Dispersion?" "Proximity?" Max Guernsey, III Managing Member, Hexagon Software <http://www.hexsw.com/> http://www.hexsw.com ...
Max Guernsey, III
maxguernseyiii
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
3:18 pm
386
Here are some more: "Community" "Collection" "Concentration" seems to be the best choice, as it is the only antonym of "dispersion" that I could find and...
Max Guernsey, III
maxguernseyiii
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
3:40 pm
387
I'll take a run at trying to clear up the point here... at least, in the way I look at it. In OO design, one thing we try to do is to avoid coupling to...
Scott L. Bain
slbain9000
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
7:20 pm
388
This is kind of askew the main line of the conversation, but I'll say it anyway. Scott nailed one of the reasons why encapsulated constructors are so important...
Max Guernsey, III
maxguernseyiii
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
7:50 pm
389
Well said! From: leanprogramming@yahoogroups.com [mailto:leanprogramming@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Max Guernsey, III Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 12:50 PM ...
Scott L. Bain
slbain9000
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
7:56 pm
390
So, I've heard people say they dislike the "var" keyword in C# 3.0. Some people like it, too. I wanted to know what people generally think of it and why. ...
Max Guernsey, III
maxguernseyiii
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
7:57 pm
391
I like to think of type-safety in languages this a-way... We make mistakes. We try to minimize them, but we make them, and we know we make them, and so we...
Scott L. Bain
slbain9000
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
8:06 pm
392
... So, I've heard people say they dislike the "var" keyword in C# 3.0. Some people like it, too. I wanted to know what people generally think of it and why....
Bartels, Mel
Mel_Bartels
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
8:10 pm
393
I like this, Mel. If you combine my point (type safety helps prevent defects) and yours (type safety is more important under certain circumstances), I think...
Scott L. Bain
slbain9000
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
8:19 pm
394
To change the subject back - partially because I need to go look that other keyword up - I don't understand all of what you said. The "var" keyword has no...
Max Guernsey, III
maxguernseyiii
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
8:21 pm
395
... The "var" keyword has no potential to generate an exception related to type safety later on. To what exceptions down the line are you referring? <<< Sure,...
Bartels, Mel
Mel_Bartels
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
8:55 pm
396
If that were the case, then. renderer.scale(service.getSomething()); .would have thrown the exact same error, right? Max Guernsey, III Managing Member, Hexagon...
Max Guernsey, III
maxguernseyiii
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
9:20 pm
397
Okay. I just reread this. Are you saying that the parameter of renderer.scale used something like VariantType or System.Object for its type of argument and...
Max Guernsey, III
maxguernseyiii
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
9:29 pm
398
... renderer.scale(service.getSomething()); ...would have thrown the exact same error, right? <<< Yes. This was all part of a larger change request, so there...
Bartels, Mel
Mel_Bartels
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
9:39 pm
399
Perhaps the real different here is explicit vs. implicit intent? From: leanprogramming@yahoogroups.com [mailto:leanprogramming@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of...
Scott L. Bain
slbain9000
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
9:40 pm
400
... Perhaps the real different here is explicit vs. implicit intent? <<< Yes, good point. Depending upon context, switching to implicit might help...
Bartels, Mel
Mel_Bartels
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
9:46 pm
401
I'm really interested in this. In part because I don't understand it. Is there a way that we could see a compiling test that fails in such a way as to...
Max Guernsey, III
maxguernseyiii
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
9:46 pm
402
I agree. I'm interrogating Mel not because I disagree with him - I actually agree with the general rule of "use it as a way of saying the type doesn't matter"...
Max Guernsey, III
maxguernseyiii
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
9:50 pm
403
True. Has anyone found that, when using "var," they choose better, more intention-revealing variable names? Max Guernsey, III Managing Member, Hexagon...
Max Guernsey, III
maxguernseyiii
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
9:51 pm
404
... I'm really interested in this. In part because I don't understand it. Is there a way that we could see a compiling test that fails in such a way as to...
Bartels, Mel
Mel_Bartels
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
10:37 pm
405
I think it is kind of what I'm looking for in that it is validation that the failing code was equivalent to foo(bar()). Once the error was exposed, how was it...
Max Guernsey, III
maxguernseyiii
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
10:51 pm
406
... Once the error was exposed, how was it fixed? <<< Changed var to double. Mel Bartels...
Bartels, Mel
Mel_Bartels
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2008
10:53 pm
Messages 376 - 406 of 762   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help