I would appreciate if someone could help me with the interpretation of the
ASTM standard regarding the STATE_CHANGED message, in particular for the
POWERED UP state.
According to 7.4.1.1 the SLM connects to the TSC, then changes to POWERED
UP, and needs to announce this with a STATE_CHANGED message.
On the other side, POWERED UP is the very default state (that of Control
Flow, which is the entry state of Operating, which is the entry state of the
top level state), from where connection to the TSC is started (6.1.1) and
from where state changes must be due to commands or event reports (7.3.1).
I think there is a contradiction between 7.4.1.1 and the other sections
dealing with POWERED UP and the state changed message, and I'm not convinced
that the state changed message should be sent (in the same way as the entry
in LOCAL CONTROL doesn't need to be announced) as at that point the SLM
hasn't really changed a state in a current interaction (7.5.1). The TSC can
always query the status of the Control Flow interaction if it wants to know
what state the SLM is in.
Does anyone agree/disagree?
Best regards,
Dorothe Steidinger
LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and
may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to
this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not an
addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this e-mail or
any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorised and
may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender
immediately.
Pfizer Limited is registered in England under No. 526209 with its
registered office at Ramsgate Road, Sandwich, Kent CT13 9NJ
PFIZER GLOBAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachment has been virus checked by the
PGRD Sandwich Data Centre.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hello, I would appreciate if someone could help me with the interpretation of the ASTM standard regarding the STATE_CHANGED message, in particular for the ...
dorothe_steidinger@...
Jul 17, 2001 1:57 pm
Dorothe, Did you get any responses one way or the other? Were they helpful? Did you get an answer to your question? I would be interested to know. You...
tony_parsons@...
Jul 20, 2001 1:55 pm
Hi Dorothe ... Yes. The ASTM standard does contain quite a few "ambiguities" that require clarification before it can be successfully (or at least...
Jon Wallis
jon.wallis@...
Jul 20, 2001 6:26 pm
Except that, since the SLM never returns to the "POWERED UP" state, the TSC needs to ask on each new connection whether it has just turned on or has been on...
Jim Redman
jim@...
Jul 20, 2001 10:15 pm
... I'm not quite sure why it should need to do this. Why should it matter? The TSC only needs to know if the SLM is there, and is in the POWERED UP state. ...
Jon Wallis
jon.wallis@...
Jul 21, 2001 4:54 pm
... The problem is that on loss of communication the SLM returns to IDLE, not POWERED UP. This means that everytime a connection is made from the SLM to the...
Jim Redman
jim@...
Jul 21, 2001 6:01 pm
... Yes, I agree such a scenario is possible. If this did happen, and connection failures occurred (which I agree is very likely) TCP would (or should) handle...
Jon Wallis
jon.wallis@...
Jul 22, 2001 3:29 am
... How do we change it, or at least make it a mandatory option. I can argue technology all day, but the most convincing argument for me is that in ...
Jim Redman
jim@...
Jul 22, 2001 3:22 pm
Hello, ... Never say never. Power-cycling the SLM is not the only way of sending it to POWERED UP; the transition from ESTOPPED to CONTROL FLOW is another one....
dorothe_steidinger@...
Jul 23, 2001 1:22 pm
Hello Jon, ... That would create another inconsistency: the change from 'nothing' to 'LOCAL CONTROL' then should have been listed in 4.6.5 as state change that...
dorothe_steidinger@...
Jul 23, 2001 1:22 pm
... That's not quite true, it stays where it is or it pauses. ... INIT should only be accepted if the SLM is in POWERED UP, from NORMAL OPERATION you'd need...
dorothe_steidinger@...
Jul 23, 2001 1:27 pm
... You're right, that opens up a whole new can of worms. The spec says that the SLM can drop information when the connection doesn't exist. If the ...
Jim Redman
jim@...
Jul 23, 2001 6:19 pm
Dorothe, ... True, but that's why we suggested you don't think of STATE_CHANGED (POWERED UP) as a state change, but as an "I'm here" message. ... There is no...
Colin Read
Colin.A.Read@...
Jul 24, 2001 4:26 pm
Colin, Jon, ... The standard only says that manual intervention is required. The way I interpreted it is as follows: - the 'one-way transition' means that the...
dorothe_steidinger@...
Jul 25, 2001 5:08 pm
Dorothe, ... Correct. ... back ... cell' ... Please do not confuse the standards requirements with individual SLM implementations. What you have described...
Colin Read
Colin.A.Read@...
Jul 26, 2001 3:07 pm
Hello, ... True, and as such it has to cater for both. I imagine though that a hardware reset entails dropping/re-establishing the connection whereas a...
dorothe_steidinger@...
Jul 27, 2001 1:16 pm
Hi Dorothe ... The definition of a *hard reset* is when the SLM's power is switched off and then on again (what is also sometimes called *power cycling*). A...