Proposed values for LECIS_RESULT struct Each SLM interface operation should return a LECIS_RESULT structure: The TSC always knows the current device state. ...
thorsten.richter@...
Apr 11, 2001 1:27 pm
47
Is it necessary to split a SLM into Main- and Sub-Units? A reason for this discussion: In the ASTM LECIS standard, the TSC did not know which commands can be...
thorsten.richter@...
Apr 11, 2001 1:27 pm
48
Hi Valery, please post your comments to lecis-post@yahoogroups.com. Thanks :-) I agree that we should define the concurrent/parallel commands in the DCD. That...
thorsten.richter@...
Apr 12, 2001 11:30 am
49
Hi everybody, this morning we had a long discussion how to solve our problem with the main/ sub-unit architecture: We came to a solution that might be...
thorsten.richter@...
Apr 12, 2001 1:42 pm
50
Hello all, I have an question about ASTM LECIS and CORBA LECIS. The ASTM LECIS describes that an SLM can't report an event without received an NEXTEVENT ...
SCHUSS,UWE (A-Germany...
uwe_schuss@...
Apr 12, 2001 3:11 pm
51
... I agree with Thorsten on the macro issue. We cannot ignore macros/scripts, since most devices are controlled by them. To keep the control architecture ...
Torsten Staab
tstaab@...
Apr 12, 2001 4:05 pm
52
... It seems to me that the best that you can do with a black-box model for macros is to have: -metadata as described above; -a concepual execution model that...
Evan Wallace
ewallace@...
Apr 12, 2001 5:47 pm
53
Hello, after more discussions, we found a solution that does not necessarily require sub-units to control the SLM predictably. Requirements for this solution::...
thorsten.richter@...
Apr 18, 2001 2:34 pm
54
Hello all, I just wanted to let you know that I've updated the LECIS website (www.lecis.org). I've updated the NEWS and the PRODUCTS pages. I encourage you to...
Torsten Staab
tstaab@...
Apr 18, 2001 3:12 pm
55
Hello all, I just wanted to let everyone know that I've updated the LECIS PRODUCTS page (see http://lecis.org/products.htm). I've added four new LECIS-related ...
Torsten Staab
tstaab@...
Apr 24, 2001 3:34 pm
56
In the attached document are more thoughts about the grouping of SLMs. Regards, Thorsten...
thorsten.richter@...
Apr 25, 2001 4:00 pm
57
I'm a little concerned about the direction this discussionis taking. One thing I think we need to learn is to leverage knowledge from other industries. Some...
Jim Redman
jim@...
Apr 25, 2001 4:52 pm
58
I agree completely with Jim Redmans comment to my "grouping" posting. Regards, Thorsten Bitte antworten an lecis-post@yahoogroups.com An:...
thorsten.richter@...
Apr 26, 2001 7:26 am
59
One major aspect in developing CORBA LECIS is the possibility to map existing ASTM LECIS devices and products to a new CORBA LECIS interface. In the attached...
thorsten.richter@...
Apr 26, 2001 2:10 pm
60
Attached is a document that summarizes shortly, how a proposed CORBA LECIS device would work. Regards, Thorsten...
thorsten.richter@...
Apr 26, 2001 2:10 pm
61
At the last OMG meeting we decided to provide an optional SCD/DCD interface in the OMG CORBA LECIS spec. Based on the existing specs from ACD, NIST, WICIL,...
thorsten.richter@...
Apr 27, 2001 2:34 pm
62
These comments relate to several of the past e-mails and documents in the on-going topics on this list. We have not been able to respond individually due to...
Colin Read
Colin.A.Read@...
Apr 27, 2001 3:38 pm
63
... be ... a ... I would recommend to explicitly define a list of dependend/excluded commands for each command. In addition, if we define sub-units, commands...
thorsten.richter@...
May 2, 2001 1:26 pm
64
Attached is a XML-schema file containing a DCD (Device Capability Dataset) definition. The DCD definition is adapted from the CORBA interface I posted on...
thorsten.richter@...
May 2, 2001 5:15 pm
65
Hello all, I just wanted to give you a quick update on where we are standing with the OMG LECIS standardization. Those of you who have followed this effort ...
Torsten Staab
tstaab@...
Jun 18, 2001 4:13 pm
66
Hello, I would appreciate if someone could help me with the interpretation of the ASTM standard regarding the STATE_CHANGED message, in particular for the ...
dorothe_steidinger@...
Jul 17, 2001 1:57 pm
67
The OMG LECIS specification has been accepted by the OMG. In detail: The LSR (lifescience) taskforce has voted in favour of LECIS and the OMG Architectural...
thorsten.richter@...
Jul 17, 2001 1:57 pm
68
Dorothe, Did you get any responses one way or the other? Were they helpful? Did you get an answer to your question? I would be interested to know. You...
tony_parsons@...
Jul 20, 2001 1:55 pm
69
Hi Dorothe ... Yes. The ASTM standard does contain quite a few "ambiguities" that require clarification before it can be successfully (or at least...
Jon Wallis
jon.wallis@...
Jul 20, 2001 6:26 pm
70
Except that, since the SLM never returns to the "POWERED UP" state, the TSC needs to ask on each new connection whether it has just turned on or has been on...
Jim Redman
jim@...
Jul 20, 2001 10:15 pm
71
... I'm not quite sure why it should need to do this. Why should it matter? The TSC only needs to know if the SLM is there, and is in the POWERED UP state. ...
Jon Wallis
jon.wallis@...
Jul 21, 2001 4:54 pm
72
... The problem is that on loss of communication the SLM returns to IDLE, not POWERED UP. This means that everytime a connection is made from the SLM to the...
Jim Redman
jim@...
Jul 21, 2001 6:01 pm
73
... Yes, I agree such a scenario is possible. If this did happen, and connection failures occurred (which I agree is very likely) TCP would (or should) handle...
Jon Wallis
jon.wallis@...
Jul 22, 2001 3:29 am
74
... How do we change it, or at least make it a mandatory option. I can argue technology all day, but the most convincing argument for me is that in ...
Jim Redman
jim@...
Jul 22, 2001 3:22 pm
75
Hello, ... Never say never. Power-cycling the SLM is not the only way of sending it to POWERED UP; the transition from ESTOPPED to CONTROL FLOW is another one....
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
