Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
liblf-dev · Lockfree data structure implementers
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 131 - 160 of 300   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
131
... Slightly off-topic but I was involved in a discussion about Java recently and it appears you cannot do this in Java :( Anyone disagree? volatile int...
Dave Cunningham
spark@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2006
3:26 pm
132
... There was confirmation of that a while ago on the concurrency- ... There was then a long discussion, after which it was concluded that there was no clever...
Chris Purcell
c_purcell_39
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2006
4:28 pm
133
... ahhah ... For the ring buffer in question, you would use an AtomicIntegerArray, no? If you wanted to process 8 bit values you might have to waste a lot of...
Dave Cunningham
spark@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2006
7:24 pm
134
... I thought making the offsets volatile sufficed? Cheers, Chris...
Chris Purcell
c_purcell_39
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2006
8:15 pm
135
Bob or Chris: How about posting the test source code somewhere (the yahoogroups file repository for lack of a better place)... then we can all check it out and...
Ross Bencina
ross_bencina
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
3:17 am
136
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the liblf-dev group. File :...
liblf-dev@yahoogroups...
Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
9:32 am
137
It has run for three days without an event. I will leave it running on my dual G5 (OSX) for a month. Bob ... -- AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL,...
Robert McGwier
rwmcgwier
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
9:55 pm
138
... On my dual G5 it dies instantly every time: [James-McCartneys-Computer:~/downloads/ring-buffer] jamesmcc% ./run wr0 0 queue-worker.h:39: failed assertion...
James McCartney
james_e_mcca...
Offline Send Email
Jun 3, 2006
8:33 am
139
Hmm... So why isn't Bob's failing? Is it possible you two have different CPUs / memory implementations? (me knowing nothing about G5 Macintoshes) apparently...
Ross Bencina
ross_bencina
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
1:49 am
140
This reply is a bit out of date, but could you explain the following advice. I've seen that line in kernel code and not yet understood why the "memory" part is...
Robert Shelton
ticti
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
2:55 am
141
It's also possible I accidentally compiled the thread-safe version for Bob. Chris...
Chris Purcell
c_purcell_39
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
10:35 am
142
It appears to be a "magic" instruction to GCC telling it not to reorder memory accesses across the instruction. (GCC doesn't try to understand assembler; it...
Chris Purcell
c_purcell_39
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
10:55 am
143
Woops, this has been in my outbox for a while.... ... Interestingly, Alphas have the worst ordering or any of the popular architectures[1], but it's not...
Bjorn Roche
bejayoharen
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
2:56 pm
144
I am not surprised that the ring-buffer test fails to show any signs of store/load reordering. The code is pretty complex, so I may be mistaken, but it seems...
Bjorn Roche
bejayoharen
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
3:00 pm
145
... Actually, the value written is incremented every time, making it trivial to spot data reordering. ... I don't believe so, though have no assurances on that...
Chris Purcell
c_purcell_39
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
3:07 pm
146
... What I thought was that the same data was always written to the same memory location in the buffer, not that the same data was always pushed into the...
Bjorn Roche
bejayoharen
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
3:43 pm
147
Hey all, I have a situation which is best described in pseudo-code: thread one (high performance not required): loop ... if( some unusual condition ) ...
Bjorn Roche
bejayoharen
Offline Send Email
Jun 11, 2006
4:24 pm
148
Dear Abby: I am disgusted that yahoo has chosen to remove the "no-html" delivery option and has begun to cover us up with the crap. At least (temporarily?)...
Robert McGwier
rwmcgwier
Offline Send Email
Jun 12, 2006
2:25 pm
149
Yeah, it's not so good.. looks like it might be time to look elsewhere for a list provider.. R. ... From: Robert McGwier To: softrock40@yahoogroups.com ;...
Ross Bencina
ross_bencina
Offline Send Email
Jun 13, 2006
10:07 am
150
... votes++ gmail is probably worth considering -- joq...
Jack O'Quin
joq@...
Send Email
Jun 13, 2006
3:06 pm
151
Richard and others: Thank you for pointing this out and I look forward to using it. http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups is the page and in the upper right hand...
Robert McGwier
rwmcgwier
Offline Send Email
Jun 13, 2006
7:44 pm
152
James and Robert, Did you guys discuss this privately? James: perhaps you could send your binary to Robert? Best wishes Ross. ... From: "James McCartney"...
Ross Bencina
ross_bencina
Offline Send Email
Jun 14, 2006
4:02 am
153
We did not discuss this privately. The results are straightforward and have been reported elsewhere in this forum by another person who has run the code....
Robert McGwier
rwmcgwier
Offline Send Email
Jun 14, 2006
4:34 am
154
Hi Bob Ah, I must have missed your post saying you had it fail on your machine (I have been having some email problems lately)... I agree that it should be a...
Ross Bencina
ross_bencina
Offline Send Email
Jun 14, 2006
5:12 am
155
One of the more helpful architectures I've come across actually provides explicit barrier instructions for every circumstance (read before read, read before...
Chris Purcell
c_purcell_39
Offline Send Email
Jun 14, 2006
7:55 am
156
Technique for passing data to other threads requiring only atomic write and atomic read. http://www.ddj.com/dept/cpp/189401457 Each pair of threads needs a...
Reed Hedges
stranger2323
Offline Send Email
Jun 15, 2006
5:12 pm
157
Note that the article appears to be using "lock-free" to mean "without locks", not the technical definition of "guaranteed progress". The reader can be blocked...
Chris Purcell
c_purcell_39
Offline Send Email
Jun 15, 2006
6:04 pm
158
... <chris.purcell.39@...> wrote: Hi there- new Mad Computer Scientist (Member in good standing of the Mad Scientist's Union, Local 42... :-) to the list...
Frank C. Earl
earlconsult
Online Now Send Email
Jun 19, 2006
5:11 am
159
... Not true. "Lock-free" means "there exists some bound n such that if any thread takes n steps, the system as a whole will always make progress". ...
Chris Purcell
c_purcell_39
Offline Send Email
Jun 19, 2006
8:22 am
160
The week 11 notes on this page might be of interest. http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/lorenzo/corsi/cs380d/04F/welcome.html week 11 notes: ...
James McCartney
james_e_mcca...
Offline Send Email
Jun 21, 2006
4:18 am
Messages 131 - 160 of 300   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help