June 2009 Lunar Highlights (all times UT) 7th: Luna 0.6°N of Antares (0400) occultation from N. America except most of Canada, northern S. America, N Atlantic...
Dears Friends, i like to share with you "SELENOLOGY TODAY", available online the issue #14 Selenology Today 14 http://digilander.libero.it/glrgroup/ There is...
Bob might not be able to blow his own horn as the developer of Lunar Discover but I guess I can because I am just a happy customer. First, if you have not...
Pushing the list of named lunar valleys to a new level. See: http://the-moon.wikispaces.com/Lunar+Valleys (see at "Other"). Danny. [Non-text portions of this...
Hi all, I managed to squeeze in a session on Saturday, no doubt the last this year until the Moon gets a bit higher again in September. These images were taken...
Thanks... maybe I should post tonights? I accidentally overwrote an image at the end... I am Re-doing it now. Did it get quiet on this board? Is everyone out...
As usual, your work is masterful! Any shortcomings are (and, no pun intended) lost in the noise as these shots are spectacular. Most inspiring. Cheers Jim ...
Very very nice. I didn't find the noise too objectionable. How many frames did you have to process for them? ________________________________ From: Stefan...
On the 30th I went out to take some shots. Usually I whip out the 2x Barlow to get some detailed shots of areas of interest. That night the seeing was pretty...
Looks like it is a nice shot I think, but like I learned, Yahoo crunches it into a small image... Do you have someplace you could post a larger version to do...
Hello, Rev03FFL. A pretty good effort for a first attempt. Photos in the photos section come up fairly small for us, so I don't see the joins. However it is ...
Superb images as always, Stefan. However I was surprised you used a blue filter. When imaging is daylight, it is better to use a red or even better an...
... Not to be obsessive about this, but does your photo represent the Moon as seen at 7:45 EST (2009 May 31 00:45 UT)? or at 7:45 *EDT* (2009 May 30 23:45...
Nice mosaic, "rev03ffl"! You might consider adding the date and time at which it was taken, and your approximate observing location, and perhaps a link to the...
I am a bit puzzled by the comments about the reduced size of the images posted in the group's Photos area. If I click the "Original" button, I see the...
Thanks very much for your kind comments! Peter - I used the blue as I am still trying to get a feel for how worthwhile it is compared to my usual green. I...
Hey, I missed that link- a yahoo UI issue - too many links/stuff, and the right ones are not located in the best spot. And not a button. Thanks for mentioning...
EST- I didn't set the camera to DST- I got thinking about that later, after I posted. I am pretty sure it was 00:45 UT. Yes, I just checked- add an hour to...
In response to some folks here and elsewhere who privately emailed me (nicely, I should add), I just finished updating the web site. Some had described the...
You are right, Jim. I had never noticed the "original" button. Maybe others are as inattentive as I. Thanks for putting us right. Regards, Peter ... -- Peter...
Actually, Jim, he does say it was taken at 7:45 EST but it is not clear if that was in the morning or the evening. Also, what does EST mean? Can I appeal to...
Month in letters can be somewhat risky too, since it assumes that everyone speaks English (may be sensible on this forum, but elsewhere?) I use what I suspect...
The June 2009 issue of the A.L.P.O. Lunar Section's monthly newsletter, The Lunar Observer, has been uploaded to: http://moon.scopesandscapes.com/tlo.pdf ...
... Thanks for the comments everyone. I added a comment to the photo - it was taken May 30 between 9:13 PM and 10:16 PM MST (took about an hour to get all 18...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
