Hello Mikael!
Excellent work!!
Apart from bandwidth, personally I mainly prefer one big binary. It seems
somewhat tidier to manage somehow, without all the files around. But it is
just a personal feeling and preference, not really a rational issue.

Cheers!

Thomas de Groot

----- Original Message -----
From: "mikael_aronsson" <mikael_aronsson@...>
To: <magiclight@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:54 AM
Subject: [MagicLight] File size question ?


> Hi !
>
> Any preferences on how to distribute the files, on Windows an
> application that use MFC (the GUI framwork used by MagicLight) can
> be distributed as a "small" binary and a bunch of dll files or as
> one big binary without any dlls (the dll code is linked into the exe
> file), the dll files normally never changes so you would only need
> to download them one time with some luck.
>
> So if you don't have much bandwith i would guess that you prefer to
> separate the application between the dlls and the actual exe file ?
>
> I am using Visual Studio 7, and this means that I am using a new dll
> file, MFC70.DLL, most of you possibly already have a MFC42.DLL
> installed but this is not of any use for MagicLight any longer.
>
> So any ideas on what would be best, I would prefer to only have one
> choice so I don't have to compile a zillion files for each update.
>
> Mikael
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>