Maxq2000 and Maxq3120 has the same core, therefore, can use the same
compiler. I would recommend compiling C to asm and learn assembly.
The MAXQ instruction set seem to be well designed for assembly
language programming.

Try google "gcc maxq"
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2004-12/msg00319.html


--- In maxq-olimex@yahoogroups.com, "stric910r" <stric910r@y...>
wrote:
>
> But that is all for maxq2000. I need maxq3120...
> Thanks for the comment, either way.
>
>
> --- In maxq-olimex@yahoogroups.com, KD5NWA <KD5NWA@c...> wrote:
> >
> > SparkFun is a dealer of Olimex product which include MaxQ boards
> and
> > JTag ports at reasonable prices.
> >
> > < http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/categories.php >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 01:13 PM 1/24/2006, you wrote:
> > >Is there an alternative to programming the Maxq3120 in assembly.
> I
> > >know there is C, but I don't have the money for their libraries.
> It is
> > >alot of money for the software to do it. I know C, I like C...I
> just
> > >don't really get Assembly. Simple Assembly yes, but I want to do
> some
> > >trig stuff...and I have no clue how to do it with Assembly.
> > >
> > >Is there anywhat to get the headers for the MAXQ3120 for C with
> out
> > >paying for all that other software?
> > >
> > >Is there a development board for the MAXQ3120 that Maxim doesn't
> > >make. I'm a student, looking for alternatives to cut corners.
> Any
> > >ideas?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >----------
> > >YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > >
> > > * Visit your group
> > > "<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/maxq-olimex>maxq-olimex" on the
> web.
> > > *
> > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > *
> > > <mailto:maxq-olimex-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
> subject=Unsubscribe>maxq-olimex-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > *
> > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> > >
> > >
> > >----------
> >
> >
> > Cecil Bayona
> > KD5NWA
> > www.qrpradio.com
> >
> > I fail to see why doing the same thing over and over and getting
> the
> > same results every time is insanity: I've almost proved it isn't;
> > only a few more tests now and I'm sure results will differ this
> time ...
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>