Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
mda-discussion · Model Driven Architecture discussion
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Modelling Behaviour with State Machines   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #849 of 1125 |
Dear All

Subscribers to this list may remember some exchanges between myself and others
(notably my friend, H.S. Lahman) on the use of state machine modelling in the
context of MDA. As a result of these exchanges, I was prompted to think through
my ideas and try and explain them better. The article below was the result.

I think the bottom line is that there is more than one way of using state
machines to describe behaviour, and that the approach used within Executable UML
is only one. Certainly the ideas we have been using, as described in the
article, as the basis for executable modelling is significantly different from
Executable UML.

Perhaps this article will allow us to open up a wider debate on the different
ways that state machines can be used for modelling behaviour. I certainly hope
so.

Rgds
Ashley

Ashley McNeile
Metamaxim Ltd.
email: ashley.mcneile@...
web: www.metamaxim.com

----- Original Message -----
From: Springer Alerting
To: ashley.mcneile@...
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 10:10 PM
Subject: Springer Author Alerting


Dear Ashley McNeile:

We are very pleased to be the first to congratulate you on the electronic
publication of your article "Protocol modelling: A modelling approach that
supports reusable behavioural abstractions" published in "Software and Systems
Modeling". If your institution has access to this journal, you may view your
paper at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-005-0100-7 (you may need to copy and
paste the URL into your browser).

We encourage you to forward this email to your co-authors and colleagues who may
be interested in your work, in this topic, or in research being done in this
area. Please be aware that this e-mail has been prompted by your paper appearing
on SpringerLink in an electronic Online First article or in an electronic
paginated issue.

We thank you for your contribution and hope that your experience publishing with
Springer was a satisfying one. We look forward to your future contributions and
invite you to visit our website at http://www.springeronline.com/authors, where
you will find valuable services.

With kind regards,
Springer Author Services
-------------------------
This is an automated e-mail; please do not reply to this account. If you have a
query about your paper please contact the publishing editor of the journal or
use our author online form.
--------------------------------------------------
Springer Heidelberg
Tiergartenstraße 17
69121 Heidelberg
Germany
Tel.: +49 6221 487 0
Fax: +49 6221 487 8366

Springer New York
233 Spring Street
New York, NY 10013
USA
212-460-1500
Tel.: 800-SPRINGER
Fax: 201 348 4505

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Wed Nov 16, 2005 12:45 am

keplervic
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #849 of 1125 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Dear All Subscribers to this list may remember some exchanges between myself and others (notably my friend, H.S. Lahman) on the use of state machine modelling...
Ashley at Metamaxim
keplervic
Offline Send Email
Nov 16, 2005
12:46 am

Responding to Ashley... ... Not when one needs to be a paid subscriber to read it. B-) ************* There is nothing wrong with me that could not be cured by...
H. S Lahman
H.S.Lahman
Offline Send Email
Nov 16, 2005
7:12 pm

H.S. Sorry, I hadn't realised that they charge for access. There is a free version of the same paper at http://www.metamaxim.com/download/documents/OEPM.pdf . ...
Ashley at Metamaxim
keplervic
Offline Send Email
Nov 16, 2005
11:00 pm

Responding to Ashley, ... First, let me say that I think this version is a nice try at reconciling the notion of distributing a protocol state machine over...
H. S Lahman
H.S.Lahman
Offline Send Email
Nov 18, 2005
5:51 pm

H.S. Thanks for the comments. Your key problem with the paper seems be the idea of allowing multiple state machines per object. As you know, I think that...
Ashley at Metamaxim
keplervic
Offline Send Email
Nov 18, 2005
7:07 pm

... multiple state machines per object. As you know, I think that allowing multiple state machines per object is very powerful. ... others in the modelling...
Lee Riemenschneider
lwriemen
Offline Send Email
Dec 19, 2005
1:20 pm

Lee ... In the "Protocol Modelling" paper an "Account" is modelled using three state machines (Figures 7, 8 and 9). If you try modelling the same behaviour...
Ashley at Metamaxim
keplervic
Offline Send Email
Dec 20, 2005
1:56 pm

Responding to Ashley... ... But Harel /is/ a single, complex state machine, which was one of my points. Each object implements the entire Harel hierarchy. If...
H. S Lahman
H.S.Lahman
Offline Send Email
Dec 20, 2005
6:52 pm

Happy New Year to everyone! ... If you construct a matrix of possible events against current state, the 5 states identified above each has a different set of...
Ashley at Metamaxim
keplervic
Offline Send Email
Jan 6, 2006
4:43 pm

Responding to Ashley... ... That's true if one ignores alternative abstractions and models the events explicitly. But one of the jobs of OO problem space...
H. S Lahman
H.S.Lahman
Offline Send Email
Jan 6, 2006
9:23 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help