To do the mechanical simulation (nit magnetic simulation this time allthough the
program can handle that) I used Working Model 2D.

To make the animation I use [PrintScrn], mspaint and javascript.

Eric.

--- In minatowheel@yahoogroups.com, mgulk1234 <mgulk1234@...> wrote:
>
> hi eric,
>  
> thank you for posting: http://fdp.nu/ dualpistondevice ,
> which is an interesting web site with really appreciable works by you .
>  
> One of the intersting things to me is the simulation program you use.
> Could I learn its name and relevant web for that?
>  
> My work brief info is available below for you, if might it be interesting.
>  
> Thank you.
>  
> Musa
>  
>  
>  
> Despite we seem to have similar focus of interest, there is a major
difference:
> You use magnets whereas I use the garvitational force field as the primary
source for power generation. Perhaps I am mechanical engineer as for the main
reason but not all. The power potential and magnetic field effects difference
also leads me to choose so.
>  
> Besides some youtube vids refering to some fantasy concepts (like levitation
etc) frequently talk about some hinderences also, such as when so many magnetic
device work together in our daily life what might be its inpact on earth's own
natural magnetic field structure. A kind of environmental concern. They say it
is a forbidden field of study in USA etc but I don't have any detailed
investigation on this. you can find them in youtube using key words if
interested.
>  
> Just for your info here is some progress related to my work:
> http://sites.google.com/site/energravity 
>  
> and here is a particular application project submission to Google Project
10^100:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHwI2aVBIns
> (our project vids are at the top ranks among those vids submitted for the
Project 10^100 as many as 150,000. Presumably only about 3,000 submissions has
vid supplement. Verify by typing Project 10100 to youtube search bar and sort
the list by view count. look at ratings too).
> Hovewere people still wait for google's announcement for first 100 (delayed
twice so far).
> (It is at www.project10tothe100.com if interesting)
>  
> Despite I haven't disclose the details of my designs in my web pages yet (they
don't resemble yours aperantly, but lean structures similarly) and there might
be some way to communicate for some hints, if you may interested.
>  
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> musa
>  
>  
>  
>
>
> --- On Fri, 5/22/09, Eric <> wrote:
>
>
> From: Eric <eric.vogels@...>
> Subject: [minatowheel] Re: Dual Piston Device version 2
> To: minatowheel@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, May 22, 2009, 3:33 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Ron.
>
> There is some energy spilled in the rubber string that I use to move the upper
lever. I'm not sure if I resuse that energy, at least not when the metal disc is
inserted into the field. I must find a way to store kinetec energy, like a
kinetic capacitor.
>
> Eric.
>
> --- In minatowheel@ yahoogroups. com, "iron1of1" <iron1of1@ .> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thats looking good Eric, I can see you have had your thinking cap on.
> > Does it seem like much power there? I am not to sure how to join that lever
up, one of those things were I would need to be there and study it.
> >
> > Ron
> >
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > I finally made my Dual Piston Device version 2. It's better then version 1
> > > but not perfect yet.
> > > It's here http://fdp.nu/ dualpistondevice
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Eric.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>