Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
mtt-11 · MTT-11 General Measurements Forum
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re:   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #11 of 29 |
In general, we only use NISTCal for 4-port calibrations. If you are
performing 2-port calibrations, you would better off using MultiCal or
StatistiCAL. Here are some partial answers to your questions.

At 11:09 AM 2/1/2005 +0200, you wrote:

>I would like to know if you have software available to load the 12-term
>VNA calibration coefficients from statistiCAL into the HP8510 VNA.

Sorry, but I do not have such software.


>
>
>In NISTcal, I am unable to click the "DEEMBED AND SAVE 2-PORT PARAMETERS"
>button. The "devices in this directory" indicator does not switch on.

The device directory must be filled with device measurements taken by
NISTCal before this button will light up. That is a possible problem.

>I am not sure in what format file the device must be, but is currently
>named dut.s2p. In the "calibrate 2-port" menu there is another indicator
>between the thru and reflect indicators called the "Switching Terms File".
>The text-box is hidden on my PC (windows XP) and I am not sure what to
>enter there. I think that I understand the rest of the program. It would
>be nice to have a test example.

You need switch terms for a first-tier calibration, but not for a
second-tier calibration. So perhaps that is the problem. Usually we
automatically save the switch terms in a file "GXXX" where XXX is the name
of the thru measurement, but we only do that for first-tier calibrations.


>
>
>Is there a publication available on the optimum number of lines for a
>multiline trl calibration or the effect of using more lines. On page 1212
>of IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 39, NO. 7,
>JULY 1991, A Multiline Method of Network Analyzer Calibration, Roger B.
>Marks, Member, IEEE it states:
>
>Although we have no proof, an
>
>optimal design seems to require one line to be a quarter
>
>wavelength long at the band center and the other line to
>
>be three times that length .
>
>Has further research been done in this field and is there a rule of thumb?

No, little research has been done. But the program FINDLEN will allow you
to design these calibration sets.


>
>
>Thank you.
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>ADVERTISEMENT
><http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129nj9bb6/M=298184.6018725.7038619.3001176/D=group\
s/S=1705083291:HM/EXP=1107966231/A=2532114/R=2/SIG=12kostlrd/*http://clk.atdmt.c\
om/NFX/go/yhxxxnfx0020000014nfx/direct/01/&time=1107879831238949
>1d8c5b09.jpg
>1d8c5b38.jpg
>
>
>----------
>Yahoo! Groups Links
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> *
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mtt-11/
> *
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> *
>
<mailto:mtt-11-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>mtt-11-unsubscrib\
e@yahoogroups.com
>
> *
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Tue Feb 8, 2005 4:44 pm

dylanmtt
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Attachment
1d8c5b09.jpg
Type:
image/jpeg
Attachment
1d8c5b38.jpg
Type:
image/jpeg


-----------------------------------------------------
Dylan Williams <dylan@...>
NIST 818.01 <dylan@...>
325 Broadway [+1] (303)497-3138 (TEL)
Boulder CO 80305 USA [+1] (303)497-3970 (FAX)
http://www.boulder.nist.gov/div813/dylan/
-----------------------------------------------------

Visit the new MTT-11 Measurement Website at www.mtt.org/measurements for
answers to all your microwave measurement questions. You will find oodles
of useful measurement links and information, as well as nine friendly
measurement forums moderated by MTT's top measurement experts !

Forward
Message #11 of 29 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

In general, we only use NISTCal for 4-port calibrations. If you are performing 2-port calibrations, you would better off using MultiCal or StatistiCAL. Here...
Dylan Williams
dylanmtt
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2005
5:10 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help