Habitat Stewardship
Committee Report for 2006
Non-native invasive
species of plants such as English Ivy, Japanese Stiltgrass
and Kudzu are covering
the natural areas that we in the conservation movement
have worked so hard to
protect from habitat destruction, erosion and water
pollution. Just as
we are making progress on wetlands, stream bank stabilization,
and endangered species,
these plants from other parts of the world have typically
covered 20-90% of the
surface area of our forests, streams and meadows.
Many of us feel
demoralized and powerless to combat these invaders that
have few natural
herbivores or other controls.
The
are establishing a
program to provide local groups and public and private
landowners with several
models to draw upon in the region. We are assisting in
developing a major work
effort (three to five years) at each site to remove massive
populations of about a
dozen species. Regular stewardship projects are conducted
in all seasons including
winter, early spring, late spring, summer, and late summer.
This high-intensity
program is followed by a low-intensity annual maintenance
program to eliminate
plants we have missed, plants emerging from the seed bank,
and occasional plants
migrating in from neighboring areas.
Attachment A announces
regular monthly projects at over 40 sites in
almost all of which were
initially started as a result of on-the-ground workshops
conducted by current
MNPS members in
County. The Nature
Conservancy has also conducted projects on natural areas
for many years.
MNPS and the Sierra Club sponsor the monthly projects at
Park (1.5 square
miles). They co-sponsor Little Paint Branch Park (150 acres)
and
Society and provide
considerable assistance to the other projects.
These sites serve as a
visible example of what can be accomplished. MNPS
with
and Anacostia Watershed
Society developed signs, announcements, flyers,
safety and plant
identification handouts, sign in sheets and evaluation forms
(attachment B). A
summary of AWS generated invasive plant control progress
in 2006 (attachment C)
is in chronological order where AWS engaged a total
of 1082 volunteers at 12
selected parks including one native plant restoration
site.
The biggest challenge is
to ensure that in subsequent years all the successful
projects are carried on
by responsible entities. Our advice to others considering
similar projects are to
recognize that restoration of our native ecosystem is
realistic but requires
an appropriate level of work effort.
Many of us have done
extensive surveys of this area and find that at least 80%
of the natural areas are
salvageable with a combination of mechanical and
carefully targeted
chemical control and no requirement for re-vegetation.
The natives return on
their own since they initially covered the majority of
the surface area. We
remove all the class 1 and class 2 exotic species,
typically 5-20 species,
because otherwise if you just eradicate one exotic
another one may
replace the one removed.
Our policy is to use
carefully targeted, biodegradable herbicides in natural areas,
such as glyphosate and
triclopyr, that do not migrate through the soil to other
plants. Instead of
spraying invasive trees such as
and Chinese Privet we
inject concentrated herbicide into the tree either by
basal bark, hack and
squirt or cut stump. Seedlings are easy to hand pull. We
wait for wet soil after
a rain to hand pull, first loosening with a garden tool such
as a 4 prong spading
fork so the center of the plant rises perceptively. At the
200 acre
years, 17 of the 19
non-native species are eradicated or nearly so. Only Japanese
Stiltgrass and Garlic
Mustard remain serious.
All the methods,
techniques and/or findings of these projects can be used
where the initial cover
of non-native invasive species is less than 30% of the
total plant cover and
adequately where under 70% cover. At higher percent
coverage the chemical
component is more overwhelming and native plant
re-vegetation may be
necessary with native species that are not cultivars and
are obtained from the
wild or from nursery stocks originally collected locally
in the wild. There are
several well researched species mixes that include 12-16
herbaceous and shrub
species including nitrogen fixers. Attachment E
summarizes the status of
native plant restoration at
Over 120 professionals
and volunteers participated in The Demolition Derby
Field Session of the
WEED BUSTERS Invasive Plant Workshop at Frelinghuysen
Arboretum,
experience with sites where
it is best to use mechanical control and sites where
it is efficacious to
employ chemical control of Japanese Stiltgrass, Wineberry,
Garlic Mustard, Oriental
Bittersweet, Multiflora Rose, Japanese Barberry, and
Tree of Heaven.
Other invasive species include Porcelain-berry, Mile-a-Minute
and Japanese Knotweed.
My presentation was How Our Monthly Invasive Plant
Removal Project Restored
Habitats in 40+
invasive plant removal
reaches maintenance phase following major work efforts
at each site through a 5
year long combination of mechanical and carefully
targeted chemical
control.
Carole F. Bergmann
serves as Forest Ecologist/Field Botanist for the
MD and presented
Mobilizing Citizens to Battle Invasives in a
System” Learn from
our 8 years of experience of reaching out to educate,
encourage and train 480
citizen volunteers to direct their time and effort towards
forest stewardship as
WEED WARRIORS
Following is my original
exploration to a broad audience about the pros and
cons of combining true
prairie and native meadow restoration with alternative
energy. This was
followed up by a productive discussion this Fall (attachment F):
-----Original
Message-----
At the meeting today we
talked about the need for ecological research on growing
native American Switch
Grass as both a bio-fuel and component of prairie and
meadow restoration. We
at the Anacostia Watershed Society are planning to
grow Switch Grass along
the banks of the Anacostia as a component of restoration
and may be able to
contribute to the research.
The following article by
Danielle Murray, Earth Policy Institute, advocates
environmentally responsible
sources of biomass energy. In particular she notes that
"One likely
candidate is Switch Grass, a tall perennial grass used by farmers to
protect land from
erosion. It requires minimal irrigation, fertilizer, or herbicides
but yields 2-3 times
more ethanol per acre than corn does."
Research is urgent to
determine if switch grass is a practicable source of bio-fuel
when harvested from
native prairie and meadow restoration. It is great as a crop
but if it is also good
when harvested as a dominate component of native ecosystem
restoration we would
have an environmental benefit as well as an alternative energy
benefit. Native prairie
restoration would get a much needed boost across millions
of acres in vast areas
of the
times.
Fortunately the research
just takes a few years unlike forest restoration research.
Research will probably
yield good results but is still necessary for us to be sure.
Maintenance of these
open ecosystems is carried out by a mosaic pattern of fire
and/or grazing that
follows the natural pattern of fire and grazing by bison and
other grazers.
Maintenance mowing is done once a year in mid or late summer
about one foot above
ground. Switch grass is a dominant component of native
American prairie and
meadow species along with Indian Grass, Joe-pye Weed
and Bluestem.
It would be great to
have your opinion on the status of research on this issue and
what we should advocate.
Could you also forward this to researchers with the
Marc Imlay, PhD
Conservation biologist,
Anacostia Watershed Society
(301-699-6204, 301-283-0808)
Board member of the Mid-Atlantic Exotic Pest Plant Council,
Hui o Laka at Kokee State Park, Hawaii
Vice president of the Maryland Native Plant Society,
Chair of the Biodiversity and Habitat Stewardship Committee
for the Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club.
Thanks again everyone!
Marc
Remember our five year
goal: It is considered standard that such invasive plant
removal projects are
normally done throughout the region, the nation, and the world.