Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
neat · NEAT Users Group
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 4027 - 4056 of 4887   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
4027
Hi Jeff, Thought provoking question. Here's my gut response: Seems to me that a hidden layer is a possibility (probability) space for hidden nodes: n^2 that...
Ken Lloyd
kalloyd2
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
12:45 pm
4028
Hello Jeff, I don't think that such assumptions about layered topology are the way to achieve this. There are two fundamental things associated with any...
petar_chervenski
petar_cherve...
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
4:02 pm
4029
Peter, these are interesting thoughts and similar to the way I think about it. When I think about evolving the substrate, I usually think of a distribution of...
Kenneth Stanley
kenstanley01
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
5:01 pm
4030
Hi Ken, I am happy that you find my thoughts interesting. I am trying to find a solution for this but not a constrained one like most. It has to be as general...
petar_chervenski
petar_cherve...
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
6:44 pm
4031
Hello Ken- I am glad you decided to continue the conversation. I fully agree that these are deep and difficult issues. I am also not sure how to solve them, or...
Jeff Clune
jeffreyclune
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2008
1:30 am
4032
This is an exhilarating conversation. I really like the ideas that have been expressed. I agree that, in the spirit of complexification, we would want to start...
Jeff Clune
jeffreyclune
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2008
2:34 am
4033
Brainstorming... and what about an evolution of a substrate in a fractal way? :P Instead of thinking to evolve the "main"substrate like neat, we could do that...
Luca_PI
Offline Send Email
May 7, 2008
9:43 pm
4034
Hi all, My colleague Faustino Gomez has an open PhD position that might be of ... We are seeking an outstanding PhD student in the field of evolutionary...
Julian Togelius
jtogel
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2008
2:10 pm
4035
Jeff, I think the issue of the right domain for evolving the substrate is very tricky. The risk is that in some domains there is little to gain by evolving...
Kenneth Stanley
kenstanley01
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2008
9:22 pm
4036
Luca, that could be interesting and makes sense but it moves a little bit more towards more traditional indirect encodings with explicit hierarchies. I'm...
Kenneth Stanley
kenstanley01
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2008
9:32 pm
4037
One domain I suggest is Alife. Imagine 2D creatures, whose bodies are directly derived from spatial CPPN's output and converted to mass- spring models. Now...
petar_chervenski
petar_cherve...
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2008
10:14 pm
4038
Joel Lehman and I are excited to announce our new publication to appear in the Eleventh International Conference on Articifial Life (ALIFE XI), called...
Kenneth Stanley
kenstanley01
Offline Send Email
May 9, 2008
2:00 am
4039
Hi Joal and Ken, This papers and the results presented there really turned my understandings for EC upside down. This kind of search is really innovative...
petar_chervenski
petar_cherve...
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
3:17 pm
4040
Peter, Most interesting that you bring up the concept of distance at this time. I have been reviewing various metrics of distance and weight in graphs and ...
Ken Lloyd
kalloyd2
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
4:26 pm
4041
Hi Peter, I am glad that you found this paper thought-provoking, while we were writing it my understanding of EC went through some large changes as well! You...
joel278
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
4:41 pm
4042
... how much ... of seeing ... Ken, I have to admit that although I was at UT Austin I was not very aware of the work of these two researchers. I do remember...
Kenneth Stanley
kenstanley01
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
6:13 pm
4043
Peter, just to add on to what Joel said, as Joel mentions, we've been further investigating some of the issues that you raise. For example, it appears likely...
Kenneth Stanley
kenstanley01
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
6:50 pm
4044
I've read Ken's latest paper on novelty search and its a fascinating new approach. For the past couple of months I've been working on virtual creature...
peterberrington
Offline Send Email
May 13, 2008
7:39 pm
4045
Hi Peter, that's a good question and of course learning to control a virtual creature with novelty search is a complicated issue (and an appealing idea as...
Kenneth Stanley
kenstanley01
Offline Send Email
May 13, 2008
10:28 pm
4046
Thanks for your quick response Ken! You've given me a lot to think about, I just have to ponder the specifics of how to compare behaviours in an objective way...
peterberrington
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2008
2:41 am
4047
Hi Peter, I cannot add more to what Ken said, this is an entirely new field and a cutting edge of research but I suggest you take a look at my NEVH project as...
petar_chervenski
petar_cherve...
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2008
3:57 pm
4048
Peter C's message brings up another issue that might be useful to Peter B: For ambulation, it might be more effective to use leaky integrator neurons than the...
Kenneth Stanley
kenstanley01
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2008
4:44 pm
4049
Hi Ken, when you mentioned that Tyler used no inputs but just internal pattern generation, it reminded me about a question I wanted to ask you a few days ago. ...
petar_chervenski
petar_cherve...
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2008
4:56 pm
4050
Peter, there is no indication that the maze solvers produced by novelty search are any less "smart" than those produced by fitness-based search. As we mention...
Kenneth Stanley
kenstanley01
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2008
5:39 pm
4051
But didn't the agent reached the goal just because the goal is very different from the start position? It's like the objective function was embedded in the...
Rafael C.P.
kuraminhabr
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2008
6:12 pm
4052
Rafael, What you are saying is true -- if you are interested in finding a specific behavior with novelty search, then you need to design the novelty measure so...
joel278
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2008
7:47 pm
4053
Hi everyone! I have some comments based on my recent work with Risto Miikkulainen here at UT Austin. I evolved controller networks for quadruped and hexapod...
Vinod K. Valsalam
valsalam
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2008
8:16 pm
4054
My goal is to evolve a stock trader. The inputs are various technical indicators, but I like the output to indicate five states--Buy/Sell (going long),...
Todd Owen
jtoddowen
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2008
8:20 pm
4055
Well I don't understand what does HyperNEAT to do with it. Unless you believe there is some geometric regularities in those time series there is no point to...
petar_chervenski
petar_cherve...
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2008
9:22 pm
4056
Hi Joel, What I'm saying about the embedding is that there's a high degree of correlation between the specific chosen novelty function and an objective ...
Rafael C.P.
kuraminhabr
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2008
9:37 pm
Messages 4027 - 4056 of 4887   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help