On 2/23/06, Enric <enric@...> wrote:
sorry, I didn't get back to replying, has been crazy busy at work last few weeks! perhaps it's similar for others returning to work after the xmas break where lists were more chatty.
yeah I'd agree with this. and video attached to emails or links to videos on emails makes it spread even more. especially all those 'joke' lists at work which send links to videos also. they're not strictly videoblog videos I suppose, but video on the net nevertheless.
Kath
Previously I raised a topic I didn't have any stake in, distinguishing
Personal and Show vlogs. It didn't go anywhee probably because 1) the
categorization may be irrelevant and 2) I had not point of view to
express and develop on it.
sorry, I didn't get back to replying, has been crazy busy at work last few weeks! perhaps it's similar for others returning to work after the xmas break where lists were more chatty.
For this topic I want to look at the salient or essential quality of
video on a distributed network. The phrase "information wants to be
free" I see as for video on the network wants to travel where ever it
is allowed. Like a river, it will find any avenues that are open in
it's path. That it is the distributed nature of the web that defines
video. And that traveling everywhere it can is the essential element
of net video whether it's a videoblog, video podcast or another form
of distribution.
yeah I'd agree with this. and video attached to emails or links to videos on emails makes it spread even more. especially all those 'joke' lists at work which send links to videos also. they're not strictly videoblog videos I suppose, but video on the net nevertheless.
Kath
--
http://www.aliak.com