Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
new-energy-solutions · New "Space Energy" Science & Technology
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
18Sep05 - "This will change everything" - Dalai Lama, Science and H   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #220 of 365 |
18Sep05 - "This will change everything" - Bruce DePalma on science
Dalai Lama, Science and Hopi Prophecy - human mind and physics -

In 2005 His Holiness Dalai Lama once again participates in conferences
relating principles of religion, the mind, and science. Below is overview
of related information carried by the peace walks including new energy
technologies to replace nuclear and fossil fuel power, available but not
yet implemented due to factors of the human mind, faith, belief, etc.

- About human mind dynamics - Telepathy & Paranormal Debate
stuns Royal Society re interspecies "mind meld"
- DePalma defines atom of consciousness as "psion"
- Physical Evidence of Noncorporeal Awarenesses, by Robert Neil Boyd
- "This will change everything," Scientists Tap The Free Energy Of Space
- According to Tewari, the movement of "voids" in the spinning magnetized
cylinder of his Space Power Generator liberates free energy
- DePalma and Delvers change energy simply spinning a ball

- Enterprise Mission re Bruce DePalma, a long-time investigator into
Faraday's famed "anomalous Homopolar Generator experiment"
may hold the key to what should now happen as a result of
NASA's latest 'failure': a full-scale investigation of the
real physics and potential of 'space power.'"


http://www.tibet.com/teachings.html

September 19 His Holiness will give a public talk/interfaith dialogue
at the Tucson Convention Centre being organised by the Arizona Friends
of Tibet. Contact: 520-885-6527; Email: aztibet@...

September 20 His Holiness will give a public talk at the University
of Texas-Austin. Admission free with ticket. Ticket distribution
information will be posted as of April 1, 2005 at
www.utexas.edu/student/txunion -- Contact: Dr. Patricia Teed,
The Texas Union, P.O. Box 7338, Austin, TX 78713-0338;
Tel: 512-475-6604 Email: patriciat@...

September 25 His Holiness will give a Public Talk on "Peace,
War and Reconciliation" at Rutgers University, New Jersey
Contact: Dr. Linda G. Schulze, Assistant Vice President for
Academic Affairs, Rutgers , The State University of New Jersey
Tel: 732-932-8068 Fax: 732-932-1956
Email: lschulze@...

San Francisco (Stanford University)
November 4 Dialogue between Religion and Neurosciences
November 5 Meditation and public talk; Discussion on Non-violence
(Contact: Elaine Enos at Phone:650-723-2551 Fax: 650-723-8231
Email: elaine.enos@...

November 8 - 13 Programme in Washington, DC

November 8 - 10 Mind and Life Conference
Contact: Mind and Life Institute; Phone: 303-665-7659,
email info@...

November 13 Public talk
Contact: International Campaign for Tibet
Phone: 202-785-1515, email info@...

Contact address of visit coordinator for His Holiness'
visit programmes to North and South America:
The Office of Tibet, 241 East 32nd Street,
New York, NY 10016 (USA)
Tel: (212) 213-5010 Email: otny@...
The Office of Tibet, New York, is the official agency of
His Holiness the Dalai Lama for the Americas)

---end Dalai Lama schedule excerpts from
http://www.tibet.com/teachings.html


During the week of Janary 1990 Rainbow Uprising Campaign events in
Santa Barbara before he took part in the Global Forum in Moscow USSR,
Hopi interpreter/messenger Thomas Banyacya and other spiritual leaders
including Chumash Bear Clan Mother Pilulaw Khus, Haudenosaunee
Iroquois Mohawk Chief Jake Swamp, Buddhist Monk Yusen Yamato, et al,
met and spoke heart to heart with pioneering free energy scientist inventor
Bruce DePalma who showed them his n-Machine experimental prototype
of this device portending to replace nuclear and fossil fuel power and
duplicated by Paramahamsa Tewari in India, Shiuji Inomata in Japan, et al.
http://www.depalma.pair.com -- http://www.tewari.org
http://www.treeofpeacesociety.info
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/rainbow-uprising.html
Original n-Machine (Sunburst Machine) independently tested in 1986 by
Stanford University professor Robert Kincheloe is in possession of
its sponsor Norman Paulsent http://www.solarlogosfoundation.org

The next morning during a sunrise ceremony in a Kiva in Santa Barbara,
Banyacya offered his prayers in the sacred circle ceremony for the success
of the work of Bruce DePalma. Thomas had many times over the years
mentioned the Hopi prophecy predicting the advent of many new inventions.
DePalma was in the circle when the Hiroshima Peace Flame was installed
at the UCSB eternal flame monument, and he was on a panel discussion
during that week at UCSB's Isla Vista Theater including Thomas Banyacya,
Jake Swamp, Marc McGinnes, Gene Knudsen Hoffman, Hymon Johnson,
a Hiroshima A-bomb survivor, and one of the coordinators of the 1990
Global Walk for a Livable World which carried the Hiroshima Peace Flame
across America to the UN where Banyacya spoke at walk end outside UN.
These events also had the participation of the Nipponzan Myohoji monks,
Chumash medicine priest Cho'y S'lo, and actor Jon Voight who recounted
how the Hopi elders originally discovered what the "house of mica" was,
the United Nations building, whose existence was foreknown to the Hopi
since many centuries ago.

A subsequent conference was held at UCSB June 1, 1997, as a briefing
for His Holiness Dalai Lama's science advisor Dr. Robert Livingston,
with presentations by experts on these new advanced energy technologies
and developing science to explain how they "harness the void" of the
space in which matter resides. One of the participants was Buddhist
Monk and Global Peace Walk initiator Rev. Yusen Yamato who then
included this issue as one carried by the Global Peace Walks thereafter.
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/gpw.html

Bruce DePalma passed from this world in the Fall of 1997 and Banyacya
on February 6, 1999. In the mid-1980's DePalma had a meeting with
Miniconjou Lakota Medicine Chief Archie Fire Lame Deer during which
Bruce offered his hope that the indigenous nations people could somehow
take part and profit from the development of the new energy technologies
he felt his discoveries would lead to that will replace nuclear and fossil
fuel power. This could happen if Hopi and Navajo people united to do it
and inspire the other indigenous nations to join in some kind of global
powers consortium to implement these new energy techs apparently
suppressed by governments and universities due ignorance and fear
of the world they portend where very nearly "energy is free".

The below compilation discusses implications of experiments done
by Bruce DePalma and Ed Delvers, and also cite some of DePalma's
ideas from his experiments regarding the "observer to observed
connectivity principle," the relationship of mind between observer
and observed responsible also for paranormal mind over matter effects,
in the hope that those with insight can get these experiments done
again and again to verify them by universities and hobbyists to
integrate new Science and Technology in Society and Public Policy
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dcwilliams

One of the first articles below was written before 1996 and mentions
a key figure in US science involved in government sponsored research
into the paranormal effects of mind-matter interactions and a
leading US Department of Energy advisor on "zero point energy"
quantum physics theory which does not account for "connectivity,"
ie, Dr. Harold Puthoff who is associated with the Institute for
Advanced Studies located in Austin, Texas
http://www.pureenergysystems.com/events/conferences/2004/teslatech_SLC/index
.html

http://www.nidsci.org/articles/puthoff_bookreview.php
Review of Paul Hill's Unconventional Flying Objects
(ISBN 1-57174-027-9)

by Hal Puthoff, Ph.D.
Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin
http://www.earthtech.org/iasa/index.html

To the degree that the engineering characteristics of UFOs can be estimated
by empirical observation, in this reviewer's opinion the above-referenced,
recently-published book by Paul Hill provides the most reliable, concise
summary of engineering-type data available. The data were compiled over
decades of research by a Chief Scientist-Manager at NASA Langley Research
Center who acted as an informal clearinghouse for UFO-related data. The
strength of the compilation lies in its thoughtful separation of wheat from
chaff, and the analysis of the former into coherent patterns, including
detailed calculations. Perhaps surprising to the casually interested, under
careful examination the observations, rather than defying the laws of
physics as naive interpretation might suggest, instead appear to be solidly
commensurate with them, as the following discussion shows. ---snipped----

H.E. Puthoff, Ph.D.
Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin
4030 W. Braker Lane, Ste. 300
Austin, TX 78759
E-mail: Puthoff@...

--end excerpt

about human mind dynamics - Telepathy & Paranormal Debate
stuns Royal Society re interspecies "mind meld"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dcwilliams/message/340

This article is a big deal because it is in one of the most prestigeous
"hard science" journals in the world, Nature Magazine, which was highly
criticized for its first such article on "the paranormal" in its October 17,
1974 article about the "psychic abilities" of Uri Geller per experiments
at Stanford Research Institue in the then CIA funded studies by
Dr. Harold Puthoff now the leading DOE recognized theoretical
expert on the "zero point energy" physics theories trying to explain
the various different new energy technologies in this "breakthrough
energy technologies genre" to replace nuclear and fossil fuel power
per http://groups.yahoo.com/group/new-energy-solutions and
lobbying per http://groups.yahoo.com/group/drums-of-peace


Subject: Telepathic & Paranormal Debate at Royal Society of Arts;
Parrot's Oratory Stuns Scientists

Nature 427, 277 (22 January 2004); doi:10.1038/427277b

Telepathic charm seduces audience at paranormal debate

JOHN WHITFIELD http://www.nature.com

[LONDON] Scientists tend to steer clear of public debates with advocates of
the paranormal. And judging from the response of a London audience to a rare
example of such a head-to-head conflict last week, they are wise to do so.

Lewis Wolpert, a developmental biologist at University College London, made
the case against the existence of telepathy at a debate at the Royal Society
of Arts (RSA) in London on 15 January. Rupert Sheldrake, a former biochemist
and plant physiologist at the University of Cambridge who has taken up
parapsychology, argued in its favour. And most of the 200-strong audience
seemed to agree with him.

Wolpert is one of Britain's best-known public spokesmen for science. But few
members of the audience seemed to be swayed by his arguments.
Sheldrake, who moved beyond the scientific pale in the early 1980s by
claiming that ideas and forms can spread by a mysterious force he called
morphic resonance, kicked off the debate.

He presented the results of tests of extrasensory perception, together with
his own research on whether people know who is going to phone or e-mail
them, on whether dogs know when their owners are coming home, and on the
allegedly telepathic bond between a New York woman and her parrot. "Billions
of perfectly rational people believe that they have had these experiences,"
he said.

Wolpert countered that telepathy was "pathological science", based on tiny,
unrepeatable effects backed up by fantastic theories and an ad hoc response
to criticism. "The blunt fact is that there's no persuasive evidence for
it," he said. "An open mind is a very bad thing - everything falls out."

For Ann Blaber, who works in children's music and was undecided on the
subject, Sheldrake was the more convincing. "You can't just dismiss all the
evidence for telepathy out of hand," she said. Her view was reflected by
many in the audience, who variously accused Wolpert of "not knowing the
evidence" and being "unscientific".

In staging the debate, the RSA joins a growing list of London organizations
taking a novel approach to science communication (see Nature 426, 6; 2003).
"We want to provide a platform for controversial subjects," says Liz Winder,
head of lectures at the RSA.


Parrot's oratory stuns scientists

By Alex Kirby

BBC News Online environment correspondent, Monday, 26 January, 2004,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3430481.stm

The finding of a parrot with an almost unparalleled power to communicate
with people has brought scientists up short.

The bird, a captive African grey called N'kisi, has a vocabulary of 950
words, and shows signs of a sense of humour.

He invents his own words and phrases if he is confronted with novel ideas
with which his existing repertoire cannot cope - just as a human child would
do.

N'kisi's remarkable abilities, which are said to include telepathy, feature
in the latest BBC Wildlife Magazine.

N'kisi is believed to be one of the most advanced users of human language in
the animal world.

About 100 words are needed for half of all reading in English, so if N'kisi
could read he would be able to cope with a wide range of material.
Polished wordsmith

He uses words in context, with past, present and future tenses, and is often
inventive.

One N'kisi-ism was "flied" for "flew", and another "pretty smell medicine"
to describe the aromatherapy oils used by his owner, an artist based in New
York.

When he first met Dr Jane Goodall, the renowned chimpanzee expert, after
seeing her in a picture with apes, N'kisi said: "Got a chimp?"

He appears to fancy himself as a humourist. When another parrot hung upside
down from its perch, he commented: "You got to put this bird on the camera."
Dr Goodall says N'kisi's verbal fireworks are an "outstanding example of
interspecies communication".

In an experiment, the bird and his owner were put in separate rooms and
filmed as the artist opened random envelopes containing picture cards.
Analysis showed the parrot had used appropriate keywords three times more
often than would be likely by chance.

Captives' frustrations

This was despite the researchers discounting responses like "What ya doing
on the phone?" when N'kisi saw a card of a man with a telephone, and
"Can I give you a hug?" with one of a couple embracing.

Professor Donald Broom, of the University of Cambridge's School of
Veterinary Medicine, said: "The more we look at the cognitive abilities of
animals, the more advanced they appear, and the biggest leap of all has been
with parrots."

Alison Hales, of the World Parrot Trust, told BBC News Online: "N'kisi's
amazing vocabulary and sense of humour should make everyone who has a pet
parrot consider whether they are meeting its needs.

"They may not be able to ask directly, but parrots are long-lived, and a bit
of research now could mean an improved quality of life for years."

[For more information, see the 352-page book by Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, Dogs
That Know When Their Owners are Coming Home and Other Unexplained
Powers of Animals, Crown Books, NY, 1999]

Sent as a courtesy from www.integrityresearchinstitute.org
----------end fwd articles

The root of this controversy in science is the presumption that "reality is
exclusively objective in nature" and that to be considered by science (as
the empirical discipline of thought relying on measurement to authenticate
human observation of "what we see is what is real") an event must fit the
pigeonhole of science's fundamental notion of the "observer" as a detached
objective "entity" separate from that being observed with the key caveat
that says "to be 'real' a particular observation has to be identically
reproducible by all observers". This is beyond the simple and now well
disputed concept of quantum physics where experiments have shown that the
very process and act of measurement influences that being measured or
"observed" and addresses the fact, obvious to all but scientists conditioned
to this notion/fallacy that to be "real" something must be "identically
observable and reproducible by all observers" -- clearly nonsense if such
widely documented and observed "psi phenomena" or "paranormal" events are to
be taken seriously as part of "true reality" as per above and many articles
on this theme linked from
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/ScienceSolution.html

Is the above parrot story an example of an interspecies "mind meld"?

All My Relations,

David Crockett Williams 661-867-2877
gear2000@...
Chartered Life Underwriter
Bachelor Science Chemistry
Global Emergency Alert Response 2000
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000
Author of Tetron Natural Unified Field Theory
"For the direct cause of true peace and harmony among
all life with free natural abundance as paradise on Earth"
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/tetron2.html

New Energy Technologies to Replace Nuclear & Fossil Fuel
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/new-energy-solutions research
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Global-Powers-Consortium implement

http://www.earthregenerationsociety.org
http://www.infinite-energy.com
http://www.depalma.pair.com
http://www.projectearth.com
http://www.padrak.com/ine
http://www.cheniere.org
http://www.tewari.org

-----end fwd

DePalma defines atom of consciousness as "psion"
- Physical Evidence of Noncorporeal Awarenesses, by Robert Neil Boyd
http://www.rialian.com/rnboyd/empiricism.htm

Physical Evidence of Noncorporeal Awarenesses

(c) Robert Neil Boyd - rnboyd@...

My understandings are vastly divorced from those of Burrow in terms of
conceptual fundamentals and foundations. His thesis seems to be based on
psychoanalytical abstractions. (Which, as near as I can tell, have done
little to improve the overall human condition...) I am an empiricist. In
other words, a pure scientist, in the original sense of the term. I am
primarily interested in reproducibly observable facts. My Spiritual
inclinations have exactly the same foundations.

However, Barron's contribution in the form of "extra-corporeal DNA" seems to
me to have some merit. It is probably the same understanding as Rupert
Sheldrake's "morphological field". The thesis is empirically supported by V.
Poponin's "DNA Phantom Effect" experiments (See:
http://twm.co.nz/~sai/DNAPhantom.htm, which demonstrate that the vacuum
itself has a memory).

This thesis was first produced by Bruce DePalma, an MIT graduate.
(See: http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity08/FaradayDisc.html)

DePalma said:

"Twentieth century particle physics and the hypothesis of the neutrino
opened the way to a conceptualisation of space filled with a sea of
particles. A space filled with a sea of particles, interpenetrating matter
and possessing a relaxation time such that the internal condition of matter
was impressed on them and was thus conveyed to the surrounding space, could
be the mechanism for a transport process wherein the internal condition of
matter; electric, magnetic, gravitational, heat, charge, radioactivity,
inertial et al. was conveyed to the surrounding space.

"I call the particle whose condition is an impression or memory of its
passage through matter, a psion. Thus the basic condition of empty space is
a psion field. Radiation laws of emissivity vs. temperature and intensity
drop off with distance, i.e. 1/r, 1/r2, and 1/r3 dependencies are related to
the relaxation time of the impression created on the particles by their
passage through matter. One could assume these particles, psions, travel at
the speed of light. The term psion is meant to imply an atom of
consciousness which retains an impression of the internal condition of
matter through which it has passed."


So, the basis of Barron's theory is supported in terms of the FPU lattice
description of V. Poponin, in terms of DePalma's "psions", and in terms of
Sheldrake's "morphogenic field". Additionally, the works of Mishyin, Frolov,
and other Russian researchers involved with structurings of the physical
vacuum, such as A. Shpilman, A. Akimov, and Shipov, support such a view.

See this important document by Frolov:
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/frolov1.htm. The special human capability
known as "psychometry" strongly implies this thesis of the memory of space.
Barron may not yet realize it, but his admirably bold initiative regarding
his "extra-corporeal DNA", is in complete opposition to the psychophysical
paradigm, as it may be found eventually to have a non-material basis. In
1995, I suggested to Karl Pribram that consciousness could be modeled in
terms of the quaternions. On examining this perspective, he agreed, and went
on to publish works with such a foundation. As you may know, Pribram proved
empirically that the human consciousness and the human memory do not reside
in the same volume as the physical brain. Rather, these reside in a
multidimensional holographic system, which may, or may not, reside in the
volume contiguous with the physical brain. (See: Talbot, "The Holographic
Universe) I realized a few years ago, that the Consciousness is better
described in terms of the Clifford algebra, and suggested this to Tony
Smith. (See: http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/QuanCon2.html#clifford)

The underpinnings of my approach stand upon the physics. In terms of
harmony, I am interested in the actual, factual experience of Harmony, not
some abstract conception about harmony. Philosophically, I am in strong
alignment with J. Krishnamurti. I have simply taken the results of
Krishnamurti to the next step.

http://www.rialian.com/rnboyd/harmonydynamics.htm
Refer to The Freedom Series -- a Harmony Dynamics(TM) Method.
Harmony Dynamics has yielded reproducibly observable, factual results.

----end fwd

"This will change everything"
- Scientists Claim To Tap The Free Energy Of Space,
by Richard Walters ("For the People" magazine)
http://www.mufor.org/nmachine.html

Scientists Claim To Tap The Free Energy Of Space

by Richard Walters ("For the People" magazine)

Physicist Bruce DePalma has a 100 kilowatt generator, which he invented,
sitting in his garage. It could power his whole house, but if he turns it
on, the government may confiscate it.

Harvard educated DePalma, who taught physics at the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology for 15 years, claims that his electrical generator can provide
cheap, inexhaustible, self sustaining and non polluting source of energy,
using principles that flout conventional physics and are still not fully
understood. His N machine, as it is called, is said to release the "free
energy" latent in the space all around us. DePalma views his device as an
innovation that could help to end the worlds's dangerous dependence on
finite supplies of oil, gas, and other polluting fossil based fuels.


Deceptive Simplicity

The DePalma generator is essentially a simple magnetized flywheel, ie a
magnetized cylindrical conductor rotating at high speed with the help of a
motor. His astonishing claim is that the present versions of the N machine
can generate up to five times more power than it consumes. This, of course,
defies the basic law of the conservation of energy, which says that the
output of energy cannot be more than the input. Most physicists simply
refuse to look at DePalma's findings and dismiss his theories out of hand.

Yet "proof of principle" for his invention was apparently provided when a
large N machine, dubbed the Sunburst, was built in 1978 in Santa Barbara
California. The Sunburst machine was independently tested by Dr. Robert
Kincheloe, professor emeritus of electrical engineering at Stanford
University. in his 1986 report (presented to the Society for Scientific
Exploration, San Francisco, 6/21/86), Kincheloe noted that the drag of the
rotating magnetized gyroscope is only 13 to 20 percent of a conventional
generator operating at an ideal 100 percent efficiency, the DePalma N
machine could produce electricity at around 500 percent efficiency.


In Kincheloe's cautious summary:

"DePalma may have been right in that there is indeed a situation here
whereby energy is being obtained from a previously unknown and unexplained
source. This is a conclusion that most scientists and engineers would reject
out of hand as being a violation of accepted laws of physics and if true has
incredible implications".

"The jury is still out on the DePalma N machine," says physicist Harold
Puthoff, a senior fellow at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Austin,
Texas. "It isn't clear where the reported excess energy is coming
from--whether out of the electromagnetic field or as the result of some
anomaly associated with rotating bodies in terms of inertia. The DePalma
machine needs to be replicated on a broad scale to see if it actually works.
Though I'm rather skeptical, I certainly would encourage independent
laboratory experimentation. While such a phenomenon would have seemed to
absolutely go against the law of energy conservation a number of years ago,
we now recognize that the potential for extracting energy out of so called
empty space is in fact a reality".


Not So Empty Space

Puthoff, a PhD. from Stanford University, believes that a new, non polluting
energy source may be achieved by tapping the force random fluctuations
jostling atomic particles within a vacuum. Scientists now know that "empty"
space seethes with waft are called vacuum fluctuations: huge amounts of
energy that suddenly burst forth, jiggling particles to and fro. Puthoff has
developed his own theory, zero point energy, in an attempt to tap the
abundant power found in the vacuum of space. He and associates in a new
company, Jupiter Technologies, may soon try to manufacture zero-point energy
machines.

DePalma described his N machine and outlined a theory to explain its
workings in a paper, "On the Possibility of Extraction of Electrical Energy
Directly From Space", published in the British science journal, Speculations
in Science and Technology (Sept 1990, Vol 13 No 4). So far, the scientific
establishment either has ignored DePalma's controversial claims or remains
unaware of them.


Patent *Not* Pending

No one has ever obtained a patent for an N machine in the U.S., although in
the San Francisco area alone, there are some 200 patent applications
relating to such devices. The U.S. Patent office automatically denies a
patent to any gizmo which purports to produce more energy than it consumes,
on the grounds that its personnel are not equipped to evaluate such claims.
DePalma is quick to point out that the N machine is not a perpetual motion
machine, that mythical contraption long sought by frustrated inventors. "The
perpetual motion machine is only supposed to run itself. It could never put
out five times more power than is put into it. Perpetual motion schemes used
conventional energy sources, whereas the N machine is a new way of
extracting energy from space".

Other scientists-inventors who attempted to build and operate free energy
machines have been intimidated and harassed by the U.S. government. At least
one inventor had his device confiscated by the Defense Department on the
grounds that its free energy technology endangered national security
interests. This inventor was put under a gag order, so that he could not
even tell the press that his N machine had been confiscated. This is ironic
when one considers that the idea for the N machine came directly from a
famous experiment performed by Michael Faraday in 1831.
U.S. Not Interested

The U.S. energy monopoly, which pushes for the development of oil, gas,
coal, and nuclear power--while defunding solar energy and other non
polluting alternatives--apparently does not want to see free energy emerge
as a viable option.

Meanwhile, other countries, notably India and Japan, are vigorously pursuing
what might prove to be a technological breakthrough. (is this yet one more
example of the Invented in USA/Made in Japan" syndrome, the outcome of
American shortsightedness and vested interests?) In India, eminent engineer
Paramahamsa Tewari is currently testing his invention, called the Space
Power Generator (SPG), which essentially replicates DePalma's N machine.
With 5 kilowatt total input, the SPG is reportedly yielding 30 kilowatt
electrical output (correspondence to B. DePalma 8/13/90).

Tewari, a senior engineer with India's Department of Atomic Energy-Nuclear
Power Corporation, also directs the Kaiga Project, India's largest atomic
power facility, in Karnataka. He freely acknowledges his dept to DePalma,
who has shared his experimental results with Tewari for many years.
According to Tewari, "The electrical power generated by the Space Power
Generator is indeed commercially viable and should be brought to the notice
of the general public." He has urged India's Atomic Energy Commission to
create an independent research group to advance free energy technology.
Tewari also credits John Wheeler, the prominent American physicist and
discoverer of the black hole, for his steady encouragement. Wheeler, who had
been searching for a mathematical theory that would predict free energy,
applauded Tewari for his effort to develop such a theory, and the two
scientists corresponded for several years.


Japanese Interest

The Japan Science Foundation, under Japanese government auspices, awarded
grants to two universities and one company to produce models of the N
machine and to investigate how it works. Kazama Giken Corporation is
commercially supplying small N machines for research and educational
purposes. Another Japanese company, Panasonic/National, is also pursuing
this technology. Shiuji Inomata, Ph D president of the Japan Psychotronics
Institute and senior scientist at the Electrotechnical Laboratory in
Ibaraki, has been instrumental in sparking the interest of Japan's
scientific community in the N machine.

"One day man will connect his apparatus to the very wheel work of the
universe... and the very forces that motivate the planets in their orbits
and cause them to rotate will rotate his own machinery" predicted Nikola
Tesla, the Croatian born American electrical genius whose discoveries and
inventions rival those of Edison. Proponents of the N machine believe that
it taps directly into a primordial energy source, meshing with the wheel
work of the cosmos.


A Wrong Turn

"Electrical engineering took a wrong turn 160 years ago," according to
Tewari, referring to English scientist Michael Faraday's pioneering work of
the world's first dynamo. In 1831, Faraday performed a series of experiments
which led to the modern electric induction generator, having two moving
parts--a rotor and a stator. Faraday moved a wire near the pole of a magnet,
producing an electrical potential across the ends of the wire. This
induction principle is used in all the electrical generators we use today.
And that's precisely what Tewari means by a "wrong turn."

In that same year, 1831, Faraday also performed a simple yet ingenious
experiment with a rotating magnetized conductor. The resulting phenomenon
(free energy?) has yet to be explained in terms of conventional scientific
theory.

By cementing a copper disc on top of a cylinder magnet, and rotating the
magnet and disc together, Faraday created an electrical potential. After
pondering this phenomenon for many years, he concluded that when a magnet is
rotated, its magnetic field remains stationary. Thus, he reasoned, the metal
of the magnet moves through its own field, and the relative motion is
translated into electrical potential.

Faraday's experiments led him to the revolutionary conclusion that a
magnetic field is a property of space itself, not something attached to the
magnet, which merely serves to induce or evoke the field.


A Prototype

Known for over 150 years, the Faraday homopolor generator, as his
contraption is called, has been viewed by a handful of visionary inventors
as a basis for evoking the free energy latent in space. They see is as the
prototype for a generator capable of providing its own motive power with
additional energy to spare. When the world embraced Faraday's two piece
induction generator, whose drawbacks include mechanical friction and
electrical losses, the enormous potential of the Faraday homo polar
generator was abandoned, in the opinion of free-energy proponents.

Following in Faraday's footsteps, DePalma in 1978 speculated that free
energy could be tapped from the matrix of space simply by magnetizing a
gyroscope. "I reasoned that the metal of the magnetized gyroscope moving
through its own magnetic field, when rotated would produce an electrical
potential between the axle and the outer edge of the rotating magnetized
flywheel," he explains.

This insight led to his N machine, essentially a one piece rotating
magnetized flywheel, "Instead of having a rotor and a stator, as do
conventional generators, the n machine only has a rotor.. Half of the
flywheel is the north pole, the other half is the south pole. One electrical
contact is put on the axle, another contact is placed on the outer edge of
the gyroscope, and presto, electricity is taken directly out of the magnet
itself."


Idea Put to the Test

For 150 years after Faraday's controversial experiment, no one bothered to
see whether or not a rotating magnet generator would have to to the same
amount of work as a conventional induction generator in order to produce and
identical power output. Then, in 1978, the aforementioned Sunburst homopolar
generator was built. Tests determined that is output power greatly exceeded
the input needed to run the machine, that it was much more efficient that an
induction generator. Opinions differ as to the exact mechanisms by which the
N machine generates energy. In 1977 Tewari created a minor sensation when he
put forth the theory that space is filled with a dynamic medium whose
swirling motion is the source of all matter and energy. In his Space Vortex
Theory, more fully developed in his 1984 book, Beyond Matter, the Indian
engineer inventor postulated that a void lies at the heart of the electron--
a void whose high speed rotation within a vacuum could produce energy from
space. Tewari's theory is based on the assumption that the electron has a
definite structure, and is not just a homogeneous "droplet" of charge.

According to Tewari, the movement of "voids" in the spinning magnetized
cylinder of his Space Power Generator liberates free energy out of the space
between the machine's axis and the magnet. He readily admits that this
sounds incredible, by the yardstick of known laws of physics. Tewari says he
never would have developed his theory had he been trained as a physicist
rather than as an engineer, since his ideas differ so radically from
conventional physics.

"Tewari's explanation is perfectly possible," comments DePalma. "He is
attempting to conceptualize what's happening between the atoms and where the
energy is liberated."


Concept of Magnetism

"My own approach," continues DePalma, "is that space is all around us like
the sea of water the fish swim in. The only way you know it's there is to
distort it in some way, and the simplest way to distort space is with a
magnet." DePalma maintains that his own conception of magnetism as a
distortion of a pre-existent homogeneous field is "the first new thought on
the fundamental nature of magnetism since Oersted."

Having taught at MIT as a lecturer in physics for 15 years, DePalma grew
increasingly dissatisfied with mainstream physics' explanation of the way
things work. His current view of the universe would strike many conventional
scientists as heresy.

For example, modern science says that energy is a constant substance in the
universe, and that the conversion of energy from one form to another will
lead to the heat-death of the universe eon from now. In contrast, says
DePalma, "My cosmos is an open-ended universe, one in which energy can be
evoked from space itself. All energy come from space," he maintains, "and
there are various processes which can release this energy, the simplest of
which is lighting a match or rubbing two sticks together."

Suppose you light a candle. The heat in the flame derives from the release
of latent heat stored in the wax, according to the textbooks. Nonsense says
DePalma. "The law of energy conservation is pure assumption," he insists. In
his theory, the heat of a lit candle comes from space, and this substrate is
slowly consumed by the energy of space flowing through it.

When you drive a car, the heat latent in the gasoline is extracted through
burning, which propels the pistons. Right? Wrong says DePalma. His
understanding of the process is that the gasoline-air mixture, catalyzed by
an electric spark, acts as a "molecular antenna" to release energy from
space. Heat energy thus released cooks or burns the substance which is
evoking it in the first place, producing exhaust.

Likewise, when a magnet is rotated in the N-machine, DePalma theorizes, the
electrical current comes from the space through which the magnet is drawing
its energy, not from the magnets mechanical rotation.

DePalma's approaches to other basic phenomena are equally unorthodox. In the
mid-1970's he performed the "Spinning Ball Experiment," which purportedly
demonstrated that a rotating object will fall faster or go higher than an
identical non rotating object with the same initial velocity. If true, these
results fly in the face of all knows physics. The experimental procedure is
simple: Take a steel ball bearing (the kind used in a pinball machine), set
it rotating, drop it, and measure how fast it falls. Compare its time with
that of an identical but non-rotating control ball.

DePalma explained his anomalous results in terms of free energy added to the
motion of the rotating object. Those and other experiments led him to
formulate radical new concepts of rotation, gravity, inertia and motion in
general building on the work of pioneers in the field. He published his
findings on the Spinning Ball Experiment in the British Scientific Research
Association Journal in 1976. He also outlined the Spinning Ball Experiment
to Dr. Edward Purcell, a Harvard physics professor, one of the most eminent


experimental physicists at that time. According to DePalma, Purcell, after
contemplating the experiment for several minutes, blurted, "This will change
everything."


Applying New Technology

"Applied physics is not engraved in stone," says Don Kelly, president of the
Space Energy Association (SEA/US), a group of engineers, scientists, and
inventors dedicated to developing free-energy technology. Today's
free-energy scene encompasses a bewildering array of devices, including N
machine, Russian plasma generators, a Swill hybrid converter (combining
free-energy components and solid state methods), permanent magnet motors
(PMMs), the multiple-coil Hubbard Generator, and various hydrogen power
systems.

A standout among the latter group is the "Enerex" H20 unit invented by
Yoshiro Nakmatsu, known as the "Edison of Japan." This prolific
inventor--father of the floppy disk--claims that his pollution free Enerex
unit runs on tap water alone and can generate three times as much power as a
standard gasoline engine. An H20 splitter, the Enerex produces hydrogen as
the working fuel.

Kelly notes that Germany, Switzerland, Japan, Korea and the Netherlands all
have active free-energy research associations, with which SEA/US exchanges
information. Nevertheless, he feels that the nascent free energy technology
faces opposition in the United States from government agencies, academics,
and vested industrial interests. Kely envisions free energy eventually
gaining acceptance and application through a grassroots movement of
do-it-yourselfers around the country.

SEA/US publishes an interesting quarterly newsletter, available to members.
(Contact : Jim Kettner, Space Energy Association, PO Box 1136, Clearwater,
FL 33757-1136, USA. Tel : 954-749-6553 Membership dues are $35 per year).


Economics of the N machine

DePalma Energy Corporation has not sold a single machine yet. To build an N
machine by hand, the company charges around $500,000. Bruce DePalma claims
that, if mass produced, the cost of his machine would drop to a mere $400 to
$500. He points out that a typical 100 kilowatt AC generator costs a little
over $100,000, and add that an N machine putting out the same amount of
power could be manufactured for one third to one half the cost in regular
production. His goal is to set up technology sharing agreements with clients
who would manufacture his machine.

Surveying the variety of electro-magnetic free energy units available or on
the drawing boards, Don Kelly concluded that most of them are plagued by
fuzzy applied physics, lack of technical and financial support, and "a
distinct cost effectiveness problem." However, Kelly singled out the DePalma
N machine as "the mainstay for this F/E category" and "the best of the F/E
units for its potential today." He gave the N machine a high "KISS rating"
(KISS=Keep it simple and stupid) due to the machines simple, one-piece rotor
performs better than today's conventional two piece generators.


Other Applications

The gyroscope with its anomalous properties, so crucial to the N machine, is
also finding applications in antigravity and space propulsion. Eric
Laithwaite, electrical engineering professor at Royal Imperial Technical
College, London England, employed the gyroscope in an antigravity machine
which he invented. Laithwaite is best know as the discoverer of the linear
electrical motor use to propel high speed trains in Japan. After making
contact with a couple of English inventors who, in dreams, had seen how a
gyroscope could be used to generate a force against space, he devised his
antigravity device and, in 1974, demonstrated it in front of an audience at
the Royal Imperial Technical College.

The machine, which weighed approximately 20 pounds when not running,
reportedly DECREASED in weight to 15 pounds when running. This effect was
said to be due to antigravity. Laithwaite's experiment created a sensation
and was written up in papers around the world.

A more sophisticated version of the Laithwaite antigravity machine, invented
by Scottish engineer Sandy Kidd, is being tested at Edinburgh University.
British Aerospace and the European Commission (the body which runs the
Economic Community) are helping to fund the test, which may prove whether it
is possible to defy gravity and Newtonian principles.

The test will investigate several other similar antigravity devices as well.
Testing is under the supervision of Stephen Salter, a professor of
engineering design, well known for his work in deriving energy from ocean
wave power using large floating objects crammed full of gyroscopes.

The Kidd antigravity machine consists of a system of gyroscopes said to
produce inertial thrust without reciprocal reaction, thus turn on its head
Newton's Third Law of Motion. (The third law states that when a force acts
on a body--every action produces an equal and opposite reaction).

Kidd claims that a spacecraft powered by his propulsion design could travel
millions of miles into space, carrying a minimal payload of fuel to power
the gyroscopes.

So far, the amount of thrust claimed to have been produced under laboratory
conditions has been measured in ounces. But his is a claim which can not be
ignored, according to Dr. Ron Evans, Principal Engineer for Future Concepts
in British Aerospace's military aircraft division. While Evans expressed
skepticism about the underlying cause of Kidd antigravity machines's
anomalous effects, he said, "If the laws we have been brought up to believe
in are wrong, then we would be silly to ignore this. It would be nice if it
(the Kidd machine) worked and would open whole new fields."

External Link http://www.depalma.pair.com

-----end fwd

man of science would change energy simply spinning a ball
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dcwilliams/message/368

Date: Wed May 19, 2004 11:27 am
Subject: "music in the room"
- Ed Delvers, man of science would change energy simply spinning a ball


"I feel like I did when I was a litle boy, " DePalma says as he
demonstrates the experiments. "I was trying to convince
my mother, while I was making a radio, that there was
music in the room." http://www.depalma.pair.com


Bedminster man would change energy simply spinning a ball

The Daily Intelligencer, Doylestown PA, p.3

"Tradition tells us that Galileo dropped two objects from the Leaning
Tower of Pisa and observed that they landed at the same time.
If one had been spinning, one would have fallen faster."

First Photo, not shown here, captioned:

Linear force

Bruce DePalma (left) of Bedminster Township, research physicist,
demonstrates experimental machine with his teaching assistant
Edward Delvers to show force developed by thrust against space.
(Staff Photos by Rudy Millarg)

Second Photo, captioned:

Showing spin effect

Edward Delvers, teaching assistant to Bruce DePalma, uses a hand-held
machine to toss a spinning and non-spinning ball bearing into the air to
demonstrate differences in behavior.


Storybox quote:

"Tradition tells us that Galileo dropped two objects from the Leaning
Tower of Pisa and observed that they landed at the same time.
If one had been spinning, one would have fallen faster."


Bedminster man would change energy simply spinning a ball

By F. P. Schaffhausen
Intelligencer Staff Writer

A spacious living room in one of Bedminster Township's 18th century country
houses is an energy laboratory.

Events going on in that room for the past five years may determine how we
generate energy, communicate and travel -- both on Earth and to the
starts -- a few years from now.

Bruce DePalma, formerly on the faculty of the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, has made what he believes is a discovery, simple yet
revolutionary: Spinning changes an object's mechanical properties.

Physics today, he concedes, does not accept this assumption.

DePalma's discovery is simple enough to demonstrate to a fourth grader
but its possible inplications tax the imagination of the physicst and
theoretical mathematician.

There is a second part to his discovery.

The physicist maintains that not only does spinning change the
mechanical properties of the object but it also creates a field around
itself and the properties of anything within that field are also changed.

The visitor to DePalma's laboratory will see a sizable engine swinging
like a pendulum from the beams of the ceiling.

The machine houses two gyroscopes which rotate in opposite directions.
The visitor can feel for himself how the suspended machine behaves when
both gyroscopes are spinning and gyroscopic effect is eliminated. Seated
on a movable object, he can propel himself in one direction by alternately
thrusting the machine away from himself and pulling it back towards
himself.

The simplest demonstration of the theoriy is done by tossing two steel ball
bearings into the air from a handheld machine which spins one and not the
other. It can be observed that the spinning ball goes up higher and falls
faster than the nonspinning ball. DePalma, who taught photographic science
at MIT, has taken many photographs of the phenomenon.

The physicist explains, "Tradition tells us that Galileo dropped two
objects from the Leaning Tower of Pisa and observed that they landed at the
same time. If one had been spinning, this one would have fallen faster."

DePalma feels that the discovery has been a long time coming, but that
he is the first to investigate it in a fundamenal basis. He has spent two
and a half years perfecting experiments and another two and a half trying
to get a hearing by the world's leading scientists.

During this time, he and his teaching assistant, Edward Delvers, have
lived quietly on the Kelly farm on [-lers] Church Road. Former students
who work throughout the Bucks-Mont, have helped suppoprt the work.

None of the major scientific journals have accepted his papers. None of the
world's leading scientists have observed his experiments, although they
concede they have not been done before.

It was something of a breakthrough recently when he lectured to 60
students at the Moore School of Engineering, University of Pennsylvania,
on the subject "Is Antigravity Possible?"

DePalma's anwser is an emphatic "yes."

He believes that propulsion, in any desired direction, will be one of the
important results of taking his discovery into account when designing
machines. He has designed a linear force machine to power a car with one
moving part and one or two horspower.

DePalma would like to see this as the first application of his discovery to
relieve the current energy price and resource squeeze.

Just as important in the energy picture, he believes, is the application of
his findings to generation of fusion atomic power.

"I don't want to see millions appropriated for current programs," he says.
"I think these are on the wrong track. They are much too complicated and
expensive."

The lay visitor to the laboratory can hardly resist asking questions about
space travel.

Since propulsiotn, using his theory, is thrusting against space itself,
there is no sound. Since the direction is opiontal, vertical or horizontal
movement is equally possible. Since the moving object continues to
accelerate, speeds are high. Since objects within the field of the spinning
vehicle have their inertia affected by the field being created, they are
made temporarily more or less immovable.

DePalma points out that most of the observed characteristics of vehicles
believed to be extra-terrestrial conform to his concept.

Space communication, DePalma believes, will be as imporant as space
travel.

The field created by the spinning object, he maintains, is the key to
instantaneous communication -- the ony kind possible if we are to
communcate with fellow beings millions of light years away.

There is not a grand finale to the DePalma story.

Today there are no simple linear-thrust engines, no
inexpensive fusion power, no instantaneous communication.

Some visitors to the laboratory shrug off his findings, insisting that
physical properties of matter -- spinning or non-spinning -- are well known
from military research.

Some refuse to look at the experiment, read the papers, hear him out.

Some have insufficent training to understand what they have seen.

Some come away looking dazed. This was the case recently when a
mathematician who had come to DePalma's conclusions theoretically, saw the
experiments. "I wish I hadn' t seen this, " he said again and again as he
left the room. "It changes everything."

------end article dated Saturday, May 24, 1975, next article:, titled:


Bedminster inventor's machine draws in 'free' space energy

The Daily Intelligencer, July 2, 1977, Doylestown PA

Photo, not shown here, captioned:

"Free Energy"

Bruce DePalma (left), his right hand on the generaor of his "energy
equivalency machine," prepares to turn the knob on the oscillator to
increase the machine's rate of vibration. When the rate of vibration is
increased to more than the frequency for which the motor is designed,
the motor ceases to vibrate although the fly wheel on the generator
goes faster and faster. The meter reads one milliwatt of electricity.
This, DePalma says, is "free" energy from space. Edward Delvers,
his teaching assistant, observes. (Staff Photo by Eric Eberhardt)


Bedminster inventor's machine draws in 'free' space energy

By F. P. Shaffhausen

Intelligencer Staff Writer

Bruce DePalma of Bedminster, the Bucks-Mont's equivalent of the "mad
scientist," has invented a machine he says draws in "free" energy from
space.

This energy, he says, is part of the force that continually flows
through everything around us and can be transformed into electricity and
other usable forms if we have the key. That's where DePalma's machine
comes in.

As he demonstrates it in the spacous living room-laboratory on the Kelly
farm in Bedminster, the machine vibrates to the touch of one's hand at about
the same frequency as a fly wheel.

The machine is a four-piece assembly not much more complicated than
many one would find on work benches or shops in the Bucks-Mont. The
assembly consists of an oscillator, amplifier, meter, and motor.

DePalma, an engineer and physicist and brother of Brian DePalma
(director of the movie "Carie"), calls the motor an energy equivalence
machine.

It consists of a small generator wth a flywheel conneced to a motor by a
shaft. The motor is designed to work at 60 cycles per second at 110 volts.
The difference is in the operation. It is set up to vibrate rather than
rotate.

The oscillator registers 60 cycles. Then DePalma turns the knob on the
oscillator to speed up the vibration rate. As he turns the knob, the
vibration of the fly wheel feels faster and faster, but the motor
(now beyond its normal resonances) no longer vibrates.

It feels entirely quiet to the touch.

The meter registers one milliwatt of power. This, says DePalma, is the
"free" energy flow, which the machine, locked into space, is bringing in.

DePalma then turns the oscillator knob back to 60 cycles and the motor
begins to vibrate again. The flywheel feels as though it were vibrating at
the slower rate.

The meter reading is low, the scientist says, because the motor is
essentially a conventional unit designed to rotate rather than vibrate.
His next step, he says, is to develop a motor designed to rotate.

Rotation is the key.

All DePalma's experiments are predicated on his hypothesis that rotating
objects (and the space around them) have different physical properties than
those which do not rotate.

For the past six years he has had no luck in getting the academicians at
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he was a lecturer, or
Princeton and Harvard to observe his experiments.

So, rather than continue the futile battle with what he calls the
"scientific establishment," he and his teaching assistant, Edward Delvers
of Bedminster, are going ahead with a practical application of one of the
many uses they see for putting the theory into practice. The have chosen
the option of working on the energy problem as being one of the most urgent.

"I feel like I did when I was a litle boy, " DePalma says as he demonstrates
the experiments. "I was trying to convince my mother, while I was making a
radio, that there was music in the room."

Asked to explain the role of the motor in the equivalency machine, Delvers
uses the analogy of the waterwheel.

If you just flung it downstream, you'd get no energy. You have to lock it
into something."

DePalma freely admits that he believes that his discovery of the property
of rotating objects is so fundamental that it will upset modern physics
based on the Einstein's theory of relativity.

He adds, "This experiment is so simple, you can do it for fourth graders
even though its implications are so revolutionary."

"Anyone who wants to question or confront me is welcome."


Photo, not shown here, captioned:

"Free Energy"

Bruce DePalma (left), his right hand on the generaor of his "energy
equivalency machine," prepares to turn the knob on the oscillator to
increase the machine's rate of vibration. When the rate of vibration
is increased to more than the frequency for which the motor is designed,
the motor ceases to vibrate although the fly wheel on the generator
goes faster and faster. The meter reads one milliwatt of electricity.
This, DePalma says, is "free" energy from space. Edward Delvers,
his teaching assistant, observes. (Staff Photo by Eric Eberhardt)

===========above retyped from originals, May 19, 2004, DCW
[please excuse any typos, same for following]

From: David Crockett Williams <gear2000@...>
Subject: principle of variable inertia
and reactionless mechanical propulsion
Date: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:56 AM

The principle of variable inertia and its application to the understanding
of reactionless mechanical propulsion units

Abstract:

Experiments demonstrating the variability of inertia and attendant field
phenomena have been conducted. These experiments together with an
analysis of existing non-conventional propulsion unit designs and UFO
data provide the basis for an understanding of interplanetary travel,
communications, and fusion energy generation.

Edward C. Delvers
P. O. Box 176, Bedminster, PA 18910
July 15, 1975

Introduction:

There is much accurate information on the observed characteristics and
phenomena associate with UFOs and their flight. These include long-range
observations of flight patterns, maneuvers, and speed calculations, and
short-range accounts of sounds, lights, vibrations and electro-magnetic
effects noticed during landings, takeoffs, and fly-bys. A comprehensive
review leads only to general conclusions about the propulsion methods
used, and no hard data to aid in the design and construction of machinery
to duplicate their behavior. Although we see what is possible in general,
specific effects of UFOs can only be recognized if we proceed along the
right lines of development of space flight independently and know what to
look for in the mass of data available.

What are the present trends towards our own development of the technology
necessary to fly freely in our skies and the space beyond? I have learned
of some promising developments during my recent involvement with researches
in physics and have recorded them here.

Over the years there have been many investigators of space travel who have
had some interesting experiments and theories. An excellent review of all
of these is provided by James E. Cox (1) in The Anti-Gravity Handbook.
Most known possibilities are discussed comprehensively, with an historical
list of over 100 means of space propulsion and a complete bibliography of
over 200 references.

The most promising type of propulsion unit is the "reactionless space
drive," a machine capable of providing a thrust against the space around
it rather than on material objects. Some mechanical models have registered
weight losses on scales, while others have passed the "pendulum test" by
displacing a pendulum mass from its rest position. Now, corroboration of
these effects with recent experiments makes possible a rational
understanding of some of the underlying physical principles.


Variabe Inertia

Recent experiments illustrate that inertia is a variable property, and that
inertial variability can be induced in an object at will, through several
mechanical motions:

I. An object accelerated linearly at different rates exhibits inertial
variability. This effect is especially noticed at high rates of
acceleration. (2)

II. A spinning object accelerated linearly exhibits inertial variability
proportional to the acceleration applied. (3,4)

III. A spinning object accelerated or decelerated in rotational velocity
exhibits inertial variability.

IV. A gyroscope undergoing precession exhibits inertial variability.
(5,6,7)

Also, a field pheonmenon has been demonstrated to exist in the vicinity
of rotating objects which affects the interia of objects immersed in it,
such as a tuning fork oscillator. (8) This field interacts with the
gravitational field and affects the behavior of any rotating object in a
gravitational field, (9, 10) and also interacts with electronic circuits.
(11) The new field has been called the "mass field" (Wolfe), "od field"
(DePalma) and "inertial field" (others).

Propulsion

The mechanics of propulsion based on variable inertia are simple.

Imagine an apparatus whose inertia can be altered, by a switch with a
"high inertia" position and a "low inertia" position. An operator could
propel himself forward by pulling the apparatus toward himself in the
"high inertia" condition, changing its condition, and pushing it away
from himself in its "low inertia" condition.

All mechanical reactionless drives can be analyzed to reveal this sort of
cyclic, including rotational, activity, with one of the four methods
mentioned above being employed to cause an inertial variability. The
Appendix is a reference list of mechanical reactionless drives and variable
inertia apparatus, classified according to the four mechanical motions
which generate the inertial variability which accounts for their behavior.


Correlations

In observations of UFO phenomena the electromagnetic effets noticed include
communications failure or interference. Although these may be caused by
electromagnetic disturbances the new field experiments represent the
possibility of interference from a non-electromagnetic source. Since the
field affects the inertia of physical objecets, the probable mechanics of
its interaction with electromagnetic phenomena would be to lower
frequencies or to inhibit or dampen impulses. This latter interaction could
account for the failure of automobile ignition systems due to the inhibition

of the spark discharge; diesel engines, which do not depend on sparks
for ignition, are sometimes unaffected by UFOs while in the vicinity of
gasoline engines which are.

(The field also presents an explanation for the characteristics of quasars.
Frequency shifts could be caused by the interaction of light with the field
generated by an astronomical process yet to be discovered. Their
existence confirms the possibility of the solid-state, electromagnetic or
chemical generation of the field.)

Flight characteristics of UFOs further indicate a control of inertia; the
ability of occupants to withstand high accelerations would indicate that
the propulsion unit affects the inertia of the whole vehicle including its
occupants, which move together as a unit. The unit might also inhibit
sonic booms or the buildup of frictional heat.

Just as we have propeller and jet planes, and steam and diesel locomotives,
there may be different propulsion mechanisms in use by UFOs. Not all
effects may be due to their proulsion systems, as there may be
energy-generating aparatus, communications and probing devices,
life-support systems, and defensive or or offensive mechanisms which
might be causing the observed phenomena. In sum, the data from UFOs
remains only corroborative, but encouragingly so.


Applications

The first experiments and observations of any phenomenon are always
basic and reveal only small changes, but developments isolate and
expand these to useful magnitude. Given a lodestone, the natural
magnet, we must comprehend that the magnetic forces of attraction
and repulsion represented by it are the basis for the electric motor,
the propulsive element in modern 10,000 horsepower locomotives.
The inertial variabilities as so far manifested by experiment are like
the lodestone in magnitude and need development to become useful,
since especially in communications and energy generation solid-state
methods or high power levels may be needed.

In nuclear fusion fuel containment (the process of confining fuel long
enough in a small enough region of space for a reaction to get started),
the most powerful lasers and the world's largest magnetic bottling schemes
have not produced economic reactions. Using the new field to create a
region of space in which the inertia of the reactants can be controlled, the
reaction could be made to work; a very compact fusion energy unit would
result.

The velocity of propagation of this phenomenon is not yet known, but
there is no reason to expect the "speed of light" to be in any way a limit.
This would make feasible applications to communications and eliminate
the time delay problems encountered in conventional radio transmissions,
which are noticable even on our astronauts' short trips to the Moon.


Conclusion

Further research can only continue in one direction. A whole new body
of physical and scientific understanding is being formulated from
philosophical, experimental, and theoretical considerations. (12, 13)
The philosophical approach which led to DePalma's experiments in
variable inertia (14, 15, 16) concerns the connectedness of the
experiment and the experimenter, a conclusion being researched
by others. (17) Most of the research conducted to date has been
done privately, as there is resistance to new data.

I hope that this report provides useful information and references to
those interested in research, and to others the knowledge that this
sort of work is being done though it may not be widely known.



Appendix

List of Mechanical Reactionless Drives and Variable Inertia Aparatus

(Mechanisms described in Cox's Handbook are marked with an asterisk.)

(U. S. Patents are available from the U.S. Patent office, Washington DC
20231 for 50 cents a copy.)


I. Inertial variability produced by variable acceleration of mass:

1) Bull, Harold W., space drive entitled "Impact/Impulse Drive," 1934.*

2) Farral, Arthur W., space drive entitled "Inertia Propulsion Device,"
U. S. Patent 3,266,233, August, 16, 1966.*

3) Jones, Robert, variation on Bull's "Impact/Impulse Drive."*


II. Inertial variability produced by variable linear acceleration of a
rotating mass:

1) Auweele, Albert J. V., space drive entitled "Prime Mover," U. S. Patent
3,492,881, February 3, 1970.*

2) Dean, Norman L., space dreive entitled "A System for Converting Rotary
Moton into Unidirectional Motion," U. S. Patent 2,886,976, May, 1959;
variation entitled "Variable Oscillator System," U. S. Patent 3,182,517,
May 1965.*

3) DePalma, Bruce E., space drive entitled "Linear Force Machine, Type II,"
May 15, 1974. (18)

4) DePalma Bruce E., "Linear Force Machine, Type III." February 1975 (18)


III. Inertial variability produced by accleration/deceleration of
rotational speed of a rotating mass:

1) Goddard, Rober H., space drive proposal for "weight whirling around a
longitudinal shaft moving more rapidly above than below."*

2) [N]owlin, Aubrey, space drive entitled "Device for Obtaining Directional
Force from Rotary Motion," U. S. Patent 2,350,248, May 30, 1944.


IV. Inertial variability produced by precession of a gyroscope:

1) Bella, Alfiodi, space drive entitled "Apparatus for Imparting Motion to
a Body," U. S. Patent 3,404,854, October 8, 1968.*

2) DePalma, Bruce E., space drive entitled "Linear Force Machine, Type I,"
April 22, 1974. (18)

3) DePalma, Bruce E., anti-gravity device entitled "Force Machine," 1970

4) Laithwaite, Eric, et. al., sace drive entitled "Generating Device,"
British Patent Pending application 34007/74 filed August 1, 1974.

5) Wolfe, John S., "mass field" generator entitled "Generation of Rotations
About a Fixed Point with Symetric and Near Symetric Distribution of
Tangential Velocity Components and Rotary Components," U. S. Patent
3,287,981, November 29, 1966.

6) Young, Hersey W., space drive entitled "Directional Force Generator,"
U. S. Patent 3,555,915, January 19, 1971.*


Mechanical reactionless drives not yet analysed:

1) Llamozas, Juan D. Mendez, "Direct Push Unit," U. S. Patent 2, 636,340,
April 28, 1953.

2) Quisling, Sverre, "Propulsion Mechanisms, " U. S. Patent 1,743,978,
January 14, 1930.


References

1) Cox, James E., The Anti-Gravity Handbook, P.O.Box 793, Pomona,
California, 91768. Historical and technical review of all known propulsion
methods.

2) Davis William O., "The Fourth Law of Motion," Analog, May 1962.
Discusses anomalous mass conditions related to d(a)/d(t), or "surge."

3) DePalma, Bruce E., The Conversion of Rotational Energy to Linear
Mechanical Force, P. O. Box 176, Bedminster, Pennsylvania, 18910,
May 15, 1974. Discusses radiation of energy from a linearly accelerated
rotating object, application to propulsion by "Linear Force Machine, Type
II." (See reference 18)

4) Delvers, Edward C., and DePalma, Bruce E., Elastic Collision
Experiment Data, February 10, 1975. Effects of an elastic collision
between a rotating object and non-rotating object suspended as pendula;
release distances, rebound distances. Experiment first suggested by
Prof. Edward Purcell, Harvard University October 1973.

5) Wolfe, John S., and Wolfe, Peter K., Additional Laws of Motion, 281
Sherbrooke Drive, Kettering Ohio, 45429, June 1, 1960. Mathematical and
physical treatise on three-dimensional motion: theoretical description of
the phenomenon of "locking in space."

6) Delvers, The Force Machine Experiments, December 6, 1973. Describes
measurement of inertia of a precessing gyroscope; interaction between
rotating and non-rotating flywheels suspended and swinging as pendula; other
experiments and implications.

7) DePalma, The Generation of a Unidirectional Force, April 22, 1974.
Describes propulsion unit consisting of reciprocating gyrosopes precessed
in one direction of travel only, the "Linear Force Machine Type I;" proposal
for magnetic space drive (reference 18)

8) DePalma, Simple Experimental Test for the Inertial Field of a Rotating
Real Mechanical Object, June 18, 1975, An Accutron watch loses 1 second in
1000 due to its tuning fork oscillator being lowered in frequency due to
inertial variation caused by a 7600 rpm, 29-1/2 pound flywhel.

9) Delvers and DePalma, The Effect of Gravity on Rotating Objects, March
18, 1974. An experiment to compare the rate of fall of a spinning ball (1"
diameter ball bearing, 26,000 rpm) vs. a non-spinning identical one shows
the spinning ball falling faster.

10) Delvers and DePalma, Pendulum Experiment Data, March 17, 1975.
Measurements of the period of a pendulum with an enclosed rotating bob
show an inertial anisotropy for different orientations of the spin axis.

11) DePalma, The OD Effect - Radio Frequency Shift Experiment, June 17,
1973. Rotating masses moved toward and away from a well-shielded FM tuner
cause the local oscillator to shift in frequency compared to a reference
oscillator at the station being received , 70 miles distant; flywheels were
two, 20-lb., 10,000 rpm, located 30 ft. from the tuner.

12) Wolfe, Historic Perspective on the Mass Invariance Concept, June 10,
1974. Describes first challenge to mass invariance concept from
Einstein's relativisitic theories, then notes that invariance occurs on a
macroscopic scale at much less than relativistic velocities.

13) Jones, Robert W., A Critical Review of Certain Laws of Nature, 28
Wheathsheaf Road, Clark, New Jersey 07066, 1975. Reviews "accepted"
physical theories in light of recent experiments, suggests modifications.

14) DePalma, TheTheory of Reality, July 12, 1973, Philosophical
treatise dealing with Perfection and Defect, Simularity, and the relation
between experiments and the experimenter, called Connectivity.

15) DePalma, Antigravity, January 9, 1973. Philosophical basis
for experiments with the "Force Machine."

16) DePalma, Gravity and Relativity, March 5, 1974. Implications of the
Spinning Ball Experiment (reference 9 above).

17) Cahn, Halod A., Ph. D., Participatory Creationism, Box 841-D Rt. #1,
Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, in preparation 1975. Discusses "scientia of
reality," a new approach to science; complimentary to DePalma's and
Kozyref's work.

18) DePalma's three types of Linear Force Macines: Type I uses
reciprocating gyroscopes precessed in one direction of travel only, to
provide thrust; Type II uses eccentric rotors slidable on a shaft,
accelerated sideways once each revolution, to provide thrust; Type III
uses a balanced rotor accelerated sharply along its axis of rotation in
one direction and returned slowly in the other direction, to cause a
unidirectional force.


===end Edward C. Delvers research papers 19May04 compilation by

David Crockett Williams 661-867-2877
gear2000@...
Global Emergency Alert Response 2000
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

-----end fwd

Enterprise Mission re Bruce DePalma, a long-time investigator into
Faraday's famed "anomalous Homopolar Generator experiment"
may hold the key to what should now happen as a result of
NASA's latest 'failure': a full-scale investigation of the
real physics and potential of 'space power.'"

http://www.enterprisemission.com/tmm0010.html

THE MARS MISSION

TMM-0010
03/03/96 For Immediate Release

Researchers with The Mars Mission, an independent space research and policy
group based just outside of New York city, have tentatively concluded that
"an almost forgotten, 150-year-old physics experiment and subsequent
theoretical explanation, carried out by the two acknowledged 'fathers' of
modern physics -- English physicists Michael Faraday, and his successor,
James Clerk Maxwell -- may in fact ultimately explain the bewildering loss
of NASA's 'Tethered Satellite Experiment.' And Mars Mission associate, Dr.
Bruce DePalma, a long-time investigator into Faraday's famed 'anomalous
Homopolar Generator experiment,' may hold the key to what should now happen
as a result of NASA's latest 'failure': a full-scale investigation of the
real physics and potential of 'space power.'"

These ideas are offered by Mars Mission Founder and Principal Investigator,
Richard C. Hoagland -- winner of the Angstrom Foundation's 1993 First
International Angstrom Medal for Excellence in Science. (The Medal was
awarded for Hoagland's continuing exploration of the little-known field of
"hyperdimensional physics," and its technological implications.)

Hoagland's comments come as a result of what happened Sunday night, February
25; as the NASA/Italian tethered satellite" (TSS-1R) on the STS-75 mission
was almost fully deployed -- 12 miles above the Columbia space shuttle: the
"shoestring-sized tether" simply broke. The precise cause of this latest
space agency PR problem, now under intensive investigation by NASA engineers
and physicists, has created a lot of interest outside NASA in what
happened... and a lot of theories to explain it.

But according to Hoagland:

"The break occured at sunset -- that's the major clue; in our model, NASA
should find in its post-accident analysis a severe 'voltage spike'... which
arced over to the shuttle [at the tower], and literally fried the tether --
which then just pulled apart... This was simply an extraordinary, if totally
unplanned, major NASA experiment in '150-year-old hyperdimensional
physics' -- as we see it."

Says Hoagland:

"On this 'tethered satellite experiment' aboard the shuttle, according to
NASA, rising voltages and electrical currents [in the slowly unreeling
tether], even before it broke, apparently were significantly higher' than
expected -- based on pre-mission NASA computer models. This is confirmed by
post-accident official statements we've now seen, particularly those coming
from Dr. Noble Stone [TSS-1R NASA Mission Scientist]. According to Stone,
things in the data really pop out at you, that are [both] unexpected and
unexplained... Electrons detected by the [TSS-1R] satellite, when current
flowed in the tether, were much more energetic than expected [emphasis
added].'"

Adds Hoagland:

"These phenomena, however, are just about what we would expect: if the
tether and its attached satellite -- at over 17,000 miles per hour -- were
in fact experiencing electrical forces totally unmodeled [by NASA] in its
physics. We believe these forces may have been generated by processes
identical -- but on a planetary scale -- to those in Faraday's own
'anomalous' rotating experiments, over 150 years ago... later, elegantly
explained by Maxwell's little-known 'hyperdimensional mathematics.'"

According to DePalma (brother of the better-known Hollywood director),
"...most physicists [today] are fully unaware of the [Faraday] phenomena of
Homopolar Induction, consequently they could not imagine [an anomalous]
voltage induced in a wire radial to the surface of the earth and rotating
with it [emphasis added]..."

DePalma, whose own pioneering physics experiments 25 years ago at MIT and
Harvard overwhelmingly confirmed the highly anomalous power-generation
potential of the original Faraday experiments, subsequently has been
attempting independently to perfect a practical "space power-generation
technology," based on this revolutionary physics, for use right here on
Earth -- a rapidly rotating technology (like a miniature planet) DePalma
terms "the N-machine."

Perfection of such a technological breakthrough could literally unleash an
almost unlimited supply of environmentally benign electrical power anywhere
on Earth; NASA's inadvertent "test" of the Faraday/DePalma experiments with
the space shuttle "tethered satellite experiment" -- if confirmed by the
intensive NASA investigation now in process -- according to Hoagland:

"...should trigger a major NASA follow-up program on real space power
generation, based on practical application of hyperdimensional physics' to
millions of ordinary consumers here on Earth."

Hoagland then cautioned:

"Right now, NASA should not consider this experiment a failure; if we are
right, the now Untethered Satellite' -- still trailing its 12-mile tether
(pointed down toward the earth, because of gravity-gradient effects) --
should still be generating power. By continuing to radio back data from the
satellite, as long as its battery power lasts, NASA engineers should be able
to continue this priceless, large-scale hyperdimensional physics' experiment
in space... and thus gain invaluable information on a practical
power-generation technology to follow Faraday's and DePalma's pioneering
experiments."

DePalma's most recent scientific paper on his continuing experiments was
presented at the 26th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference
(IECEC), held in Boston, MA.: "Magnetism as a Distortion of a Pre-existent
Primordial Energy Field and the Possibility of Extraction of Electrical
Energy Directly from Space." This and other DePalma research papers are
available (at cost) from The Mars Mission (122 Dodd St., Weehawken, NJ,
07087). Copies of Dr. DePalma's 1991 IECEC paper are also available in the
Proceedings of the 1991 IECEC Meeting, American Nuclear Society, 55 North
Kensington Avenue, La Grange Pak, Il, 60525.


MIKE BARA:
mbara2@...

WEBSITE ISSUES ONLY:
webteam2@...
THE ENTERPRISE MISSION
P.O. BOX52017
ALBUQUERQUE , NM 87181
FAX (505)332-1164

-----end fwd excerpts

Enterprise Mission - Bruce DePalma -
- a very unorthodox (if brilliant) former MIT engineer and physicist.
http://www.enterprisemission.com/MTM.htm
[excerpts]

"Mission to Mars":
The NASA/Touchstone Version of
"The Monuments of Mars?"

© 2000 The Enterprise Mission

Almost a quarter of a century ago, an unmanned NASA robot -- Viking 1 --
looked down on Mars from a high orbit. And in a northern Martian desert
called "Cydonia" it photographed a remarkable collection of astonishingly
artificial-looking objects .

Including, a mile-long humanoid "face" . aligned with an equally
out-of-place, highly geometric grouping of massive "Martian pyramids!"

Thus began a generation-long, intense (some would even say "bitter")
political and scientific controversy. Long-standing, vehement government
denials (NASA) that Viking had spotted "anything unusual" ... confronted and
opposed by an equally vigorous series of independent scientific studies
attesting to the extraordinary scientific nature of "the Face":

As the centerpiece of a long-vanished, "Martian" extraterrestrial
civilization.

The head of one of those independent Cydonia research efforts for almost
twenty years, former NASA consultant and Angstrom Medal of Science Award
Winner, Richard C. Hoagland, has authored an extensive history of this
generation-long scientific controversy. In "The Monuments of Mars" (North
Atlantic, Berkeley, 4th Edition, 1996) Hoagland details both the painstaking
scientific research conducted by himself and a score of other scientists on
the strange features discovered at Cydonia, as well as the bizarre
quarter-of-a-century official NASA effort to categorically deny any of this
science.

Now, over a generation after it was initially discovered . and then
repeatedly, deliberately denied . a 120 million-dollar feature film from
Touchstone Pictures (Disney Corporation) - titled "Mission to Mars: Let
There Be Life" - will finally confront (and with NASA's backing, no less!)
the overwhelming controversies of "the Face" .

The major Hollywood personality recruited to oversee this unprecedented
film - nothing less than a NASA-supported "fictional confirmation of
Cydonia!" -- was award-winning veteran, Brian DePalma.

DePalma, in addition to his credits on a score of other major films, went
into this project with a (required?) "special insight" into the singular
possibilities inherent in an "alien science" . discovered "on location" on
the Planet Mars:

His own brother -- Dr. Bruce DePalma -- a very unorthodox (if brilliant)
former MIT engineer and physicist.

For Richard Hoagland -- working quietly on the science and engineering
implications of his Cydonia discoveries for almost ten years -- collaborated
heavily along the way (with, among others) one "Dr. Bruce DePalma"--

Yes, the same brother . of this very picture's esteemed Hollywood Director!
Their last joint "appearance" (before Dr. DePalma's unexpected death in
1998) was in 1996. The occasion was the highly popular national radio show,
"Coast-to-Coast," hosted by Art Bell. At that time, Hoagland evoked DePalma'
previous twenty years of exotic physics and engineering experiments to
explain the sudden and (still) mysterious loss of the highly-publicized
"tethered satellite experiment" by a NASA shuttle crew.

When initially brought together in 1989, Hoagland and his colleagues had
just published the outlines of something termed "Hyper-dimensional
Physics" - decoded through the hyperdimensional geometry of the ruins
specifically grouped around "the Face." When placed alongside DePalma's
previous laboratory data, the "HD Model" seemed for the first time to be
able to explain several of the otherwise inexplicable and astonishing
laboratory results independently documented by DePalma . going back some ten
years before Cydonia was even photographed!

Those highly significant experimental results ranged from DePalma's
creation of a rotating energy device (the "N-Machine"), that (like stars and
planets) apparently taps into the seemingly "unlimited energy potential" of
free space . to gravity-defying, rapidly spinning and precessing, massive
systems. The latter is best exemplified by DePalma's disconcerting discovery
in the early 70's that - in opposition to all ideas in current physics -- a
rapidly spinning system (see graphic) flies higher and farther against
gravity than a non-spinning system!

These extraordinary experiments in fundamental physics even included
observation of exotic biological effects experienced by living organisms
directly exposed to those mysterious "rotational energetic processes."

Ultimately, much of DePalma's most remarkable experimental data, after
detailed comparison with the theoretical predictions (produced from the
geometric decoding of "the Message of Cydonia") were found to elegantly
conform to Hoagland's "Hyperdimensional Model." These impressive
confirmations were not only included in later editions of Hoagland's best
selling history of the Cydonia investigations ("The Monuments of Mars"), it
was a highlight of his many invited addresses to NASA over the years . and
even at the UN!

-----end excerpts

Toby Grotz, Commentary on the Death of Bruce DePalma [excerpts]
http://www.padrak.com/ine/DEPALMA2.html

Commentary on the Death of Bruce DePalma

By Toby Grotz

Oct. 10, 1997

Total truth is necessary.
You must live by what you say.
Men will hate you for telling the truth.
They will call you names. They may even kill you,
but you must always tell the truth.
If you live in truth, God will always stand with you

- Neem Karoli Baba

I heard that Bruce dePalma had crossed over from Paramahamsa Tewari. Tewari
told me that dePalma had bleed to death internally. This was not a surprise
considering the condition that I had seen Bruce in when I visited him in
December of 1993.

I had wanted to ask Bruce a question before he died, but my last letter sent
to him had come back "address unknown".

I got the new address and phone number from Tewari and called Andrew Mount
in New Zealand. Zealand. Andrew went into a rage and yelled and screamed at
me over the phone and accused me of being part of the control groups who
want to suppress free energy. He spoke as if Bruce was still here with us
and said that I had violated Bruce's wish that the video I made during my
visit to him in 1993 was to be given to Tewari and only Tewari. I tried to
apologize for any misunderstanding but he said I could never make it up and
that I would be cursed by my actions until death. I had not been able to
show the video to Tewari when I visited him because it was made on Hi-8
format and we had only a short time together. When I made the video it was
made with the understanding that it was to document Bruce's work and that it
might be used in a documentary about free energy. Some of the footage that I
shot on my trip was used in a documentary recently released called "Free
Energy, The Race to Zero Point". The video includes footage I shot in Japan
with Inomata and footage I shot in India with Tewari.

Bruce inspired many researchers in the field of free energy during his life.
Tewari credits him for providing the impetus to refine his 1977 hypothesis
constructing the universe of matter and the medium of space with a single
mobile entity (fluid substance) and with spurring him on to develop a new
series of N-Machine designs. The Kahn-Trombly design and research efforts
followed the work of dePalma. (For the record, there is no evidence that the
Kahn-Trombly device was ever tested over unity.)

Sadly all this drama trauma is of little or no concern to the soul when it
comes time to leave this world. Most of what we spend our time doing is of
little use when it comes to the moment of death. To understand life it is
necessary also to understand death. In this culture little or no time is
spent attempting to understand the purpose of our lives or what we are here
for. For those wishing to understand more about life and our purpose, I
recommend the "Tibetan Book of Living and Dying" by a contemporary Tibetan
master, Sogyal Rinpoche

http://www.users.dircon.co.uk/~m-brook/Rigpa/index.htm

The following words of wisdom are helpful also.
They could have been written by a Buddhist monk,
but they were written by a Catholic Nun.

Mother Teresa's Prayer:

Deliver me O Jesus

From the desire of being loved,
From the desire of being extolled,
From the desire of being honored,
From the desire of being praised,
From the desire of being preferred,
From the desire of being consulted,
From the desire of being approved,
From the desire of being popular,

From the fear of being humiliated,
From the fear of being despised,
From the fear of suffering rebukes,
From the fear of being calumniated,
From the fear of being forgotten,
From the fear of being wronged,
From the fear of being ridiculed,
From the fear of being suspected.

Inquiries:

Toby Grotz
Wireless Engineering, Inc
uVolts - mega volts, dc to light
760 Prairie Avenue
Craig, Colorado 81625 USA

wireless@...
Ph. 970-824-6834
Fax 970-824-7864
------------------------------------------------------
Return to the Institute for New Energy Main Page
www.padrak.com/ine
---------------------------------------------------------
www.padrak.com/ine/DEPALMA2.html
Oct. 10, 1997.

Note - Toby Grotz is now webmaster for http://www.tewari.org where
Paramahamsa Tewari's scientific and spiritual articles are available

-----end fwd documents, by

a David of California practicing to be Hopi,
September 18, 2005 - 5:45pmPacific

aka Karma Tsering Thrchen
http://www.dalailamafoundation.org

aka Daoud ibn Daoud Abdul Allah
http://www.islamctr.org
http://www.sathyasai.org

aka David Crockett Williams
gear2000@...
Global Emergency Alert Response 2000
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

Author of the Tetron Thesis about the human mind's consciousness
orientation function as an overlooked property of light, the C in
E=mC^2, by which any observable reality is related its observer.
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/tetron2.html
The Vision of Paradise on Earth per its future plan, Torahk
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/vision.html

General Agency Services -- Camp David California -- 661-867-2877
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/paradise-valley.html

2006 Four Corners USA Hopi Spiritual Unity Gathering, tba
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/World-Peace-Walk

Hopi Prophecy Life Plan Study Group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/banyacya
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/tbhopi.html
^Hopi Declaration of Peace and story of United Nations 1992

Nipponzan Myohoji (Fujii Guruji) Global Buddhist Family Study Group
Na Mu Myo Ho Ren Ge Kyo -- Medicine Word of The True One Law
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sun-reach --- mantra chanting drumming
http://www.dharmawalk.org -- http://www.peacepagoda.org

His Holiness Bagawan Swami Sri Sathya Sai Baba, 80th "birthday" 23Nov05
http://www.sathyasai.org --- Love, Peace, Truth, Right Conduct, Nonviolence
http://www.saibabamiracles.com --- Miracles are Baba's "calling cards"
http://www.saisathyasai.com --- Controversy of Love ALL, Serve ALL
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sathya-sai --- in every heart find Sai inside
Sri Sathya Sai Shanti Seva Sangha -- Sai Buddha Service Society

West Coast 22-29Oct05 Regional Rainbow Family Intertribal Gathering
Observing October 24, 2005, 60th anniversary of UN charter ratification
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rainbowsfbay
http://www.rainbowguide.info

Sacred Run 11Feb-Apr22, 2006 - San Francisco to Washington DC
Sacred Sites Walk 7-25Nov05 - SF Bay Area, Thanksgiving Ceremony
http://www.sacredrun.org -- Indigenous American Spiritual Action
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sacred-run

Bethlehem to Jerusalem Interfaith Peace Prayer Pilgrimage, 25Dec05
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/peacepole.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jerusalem-peace-walk
http://www.thehopiway.com


http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/tbhopi.html

THE HOPI DECLARATION OF PEACE

It is in the Power of the True Hopi People to unify the minds
and spirits of all true peace seeking peoples of the earth...

"Hopi" means "Peaceful People"... and the truest and
greatest power is the strength of Peace...because
Peace is the Will Of The Great Spirit...

But do not think that just because the True Hopi People
have been told by the Great Spirit never to take up arms...
that the True Hopi People will not fight...
even die for what we know to be the right way of Life.

The True Hopi People Know how to fight without killing or hurting...

The True Hopi People Know how to fight with Truth and
Positive Force In The Light Of The Great Spirit...

The True Hopi People Know how to Educate by clear thoughts...
good pictures... and by carefully chosen words...

The True Hopi People Know how to show to all the world's
Children the True Way of Life by setting an example...
by working and communicating in a way that reaches
the minds and hearts of all people who are truly seeking
the methods of a simple and spiritual Life which is
the only Life that will survive...

THE TRUE HOPI PEOPLE PRESERVE THE SACRED
KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE WAY OF THE EARTH
BECAUSE THE TRUE HOPI PEOPLE KNOW THAT
THE EARTH IS A LIVING... GROWING PERSON...
AND ALL THINGS ON IT ARE HER CHILDREN...

The True Hopi People Know how to show the Right Way of Life
to all the world's people who have ears to listen...
who have eyes to see...
and who have hearts to understand these things...

The True Hopi People Know how to generate enough Power
to link up the forces of the Minds and Spirits of all the
True Children of the Earth ... and to Unify them with the
Positive Force of the Great Spirit so that they may
put an end to affliction and persecution in all afflicted places in this
world...

THE TRUE HOPI PEOPLE DECLARE THAT HOPI POWER
BE A FORCE WHICH WILL BRING ABOUT WORLD CHANGE.

-----end Hopi Declaration of Peace from
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/tbhopi.html

"Internal peace is an essential first step to achieving peace in the world.
How do you cultivate it? It's very simple. In the first place by
realizing clearly that all mankind is one, that human beings in
every country are members of one and the same family."

-- His Holiness the Dalai Lama





Mon Sep 19, 2005 1:09 am

gear2000@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #220 of 365 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

18Sep05 - "This will change everything" - Bruce DePalma on science Dalai Lama, Science and Hopi Prophecy - human mind and physics - In 2005 His Holiness Dalai...
gear2000@...
Send Email
Sep 19, 2005
1:16 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help