Suggestion to the California Public Utilities Commission,
California Energy Commission,
California Power Authority,
California Governor Gray Davis:

October 9, 2002, 11:11 AM PDT

Either shut down the Mohave Power Plant or overunity retrofit it!
Install fuel-less power system for less cost than scrubbers, making
more electricity for cheaper and at higher profit.

Overunity power technologies are described below, along with
observations and testimonies about facets of the observer
phenomenon, the variable observer effect of humanity's
mind-consciousness-matter relationship dynamic --

The tetron hypothesis -- variable observer effect -- progression
of the tetronic age from science -> psience ->saience*

See below misc recent email exchange excerpts discussing
the observer phenomenon and the variable observer effect,
humanity's mind-consciousness-matter-relationship dynamic,
and its influence on the fruition of overunity power technologies
under development to replace nuclear and fossil fuel power.

This post is archived at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/new-energy-solutions/message/62
and mirrored in archives of other yahoogroups in cc field.above

Also, please read precursor preceding exchanges, reference::
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/new-energy-solutions/message/60
on correcting the ethics of modern science to inaugurate its golden age

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/new-energy-solutions/message/61
Overunity Power Technologies -- Let us simply deal with the science

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/new-energy-solutions/message/63
Dr. Felix Ehrenhaft on electromagnetism, fwd Evan Soule' of
the Joseph Newman Power Company "JNPCo."
http://www.josephnewman.com



---------------------------------------begin compilation

Tom Bearden
http://www.cheniere.org
[a P.S. to his article/letter/email, recent technical article,
Overunity Power Technologies -- Let us simply deal with the science]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/new-energy-solutions/message/61

"As a comment on your observer phenomenon: overunity EM systems are highly
nonlinear systems. Hence they become sensitive to initial conditions. Many
such systems exhibit peculiar phenomena as a result: you can sometimes turn
it off, and the next time it starts it will behave differently with
different COP. By starting and stopping it several times, one can adjust
back to a more usual "initial condition" so as to resume performance. There
is also much other odd phenomenology involved that does not appear in the
textbooks. There is, e.g., a decay mechanism that nature uses for such
"excited" far from equilibrium states. The trick the researcher has to
learn how to do is to establish what is known in advanced thermodynamics as
a stable disequilibrium state. See discussions in Kondepudi and Prigogine,
Modern Thermodynamics, 1998 (corrected copy 1999). Also see p. 459 therein
for a summary of several known areas that seriously violate thermodynamics
theory, and are recognized to do so."

-------end Tom Bearden excerpt, a P.S., to his technical article:
Overunity Power Technologies -- Let us simply deal with the science
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/new-energy-solutions/message/61

---------begin forwarded excerpted posts:

From: "Nate Rushfinn"
To: "David Crockett Williams"
Subject: Re: response to Rushfinn discussing
variable observer effect and absurdity of uncertainty
Date: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:10 AM
<private parts snipped>

David,

The consiousness factor is NOT something I have ever ignored. I began
working with Christopher Hills whom Bearden spoke with and new back in the
early 70's. I have read your in depth personal accounts of [your] trip to
India and Sai Baba, whom I also consider one of the highest living beings
on the planet (in addition to other "immortal beings" whom I visited by
introduction of Leonard Orr).

I did not volunteer to help you out with The Global Peace Walk
across America, nor did I take my son and wife up to walk across
D.C because I was interested in a "buck"

I took a year out of my life (which I will never regret) and my life
savings which at $30,000 are insignificant because it was something I had to
do. The time was not in vain and every minute was well worth it.

I don't doubt for a minute your understanding of consciousness and your
theories. I am more inclined to believe a consiousness factor explanation
before anything else.

I even believe that it is the scientific method that actually creates
reality. If I showed you an experiment of a new energy machine and you
believed it and saw it, we could then create a new scientific law.

I probably shouldn't have even responded to your email last night as
...I was in an especially bad mood....

Nate

--------------------next:

From: "David Crockett Williams"
To: "rushfinn"
Cc: "Thomas Bearden"; "Hal Fox";
"Gary Vesperman"; "Dr. Fred B. Wood Sr.";
"Evan Soule'" <josephnewman@...>;
"Joy Crocker"
Subject: response to Rushfinn discussing
variable observer effect and absurdity of uncertainty
Date: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:50 AM

See interspersed response comments below.

----- Original Message -----
From: "rushfinn"
To: <gear2000@lightspeed
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 3:42 PM
Subject: RE: Tesla
<private parts snipped>

> David,
>
> Excuse me?
>
> You think I might have found some success in the new energy field had you
briefed me earlier?

[David]
Yes, of course Nate, I warned you on the phone before you started about the
dangers of ingoring the "consciousness factor" which I offered to spend a
day explaining and conditioning you for, so you would know better how to
seek and evaluate what you were looking for.

[Nate]
> I flew all over the country visiting anyone who could claim to
substantiate any success in new energy. No one proved squat. Unless you are
holding out something on your own, no one today, NOT HAL Ken Puthoff, Not
Shoulders, NOT Bearden, no one has anything that works.

[David]
??? Ridiculous! Then, you don't know what "works" means. I suspect that
just nothing that you "saw" fit your financial exploitation parameters.
Had you asked I would have consulted with you and advised getting proper
information and orientation before expending time and money travelling. You
never once contacted me after that call, for advice during that whole year,
so don't blame me. You failed to adequately consider the "in gold we trust
factor" :-)

Bearden's initially published reports indicated successful tests of MEG
overunity operation. I accept that as confirmation rather than your denials
here. Again, the mysteries of anomalous variations in observed results from
observer to observer are due (excluding errors and deceit which I reject as
contributory factors with capable and honest folks like Bearden et al cc
above) to effects of the "hidden variable" describable as the "variable
observer effect" which is understandable consequent to my Tetron Hypothesis
equations developed 1974-77 and discussed for the first time publicly last
year in my speech at CSUN http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gcsc-csun/message/6

These factors are extremely complicated by "money mentality" avaricious
thinking which mucks up the "mind dynamics" and inevitably "short circuits"
results via unconsciously distorting these dynamics. What I'm wrestling
with here is the "mechanism" by which the "mind over matter factor" is
unknowlingly and unconsciously influencing experimental results in this
particular area of new-energy technolgies from observer to observer with its
variations from observer to observer and in the combined "field of
awareness" of "groups" of observers.

[Nate]
> Gary Vesperman still sends me daily letters on how he is ready to pursue
his Electro vehicle. Last week it was using Bearden's MEG device.

[David]
If Bearden is having trouble with consistent results, as are all in this
field it seems to me, it's because he too is not controlling the experiment
for the "variable observer effect". His colleage Dr. Wood (whom your mom
Joy Crocker met at our conference in Berkeley in 1999) heard my lecture last
year September 10th on my Tetron Hypothesis addressing this matter and
afterwards said "I will think seriously about what you said". In a private
conversation in the 1980's DePalma said he observed this effect in his
experiments as well, but he was not prepared to publicly deal with it or
equipped to "control" for it in his experiments. DePalma is the only
scientist to have told me after reviewing my Tetron Hypothesis equations
that he understood my theory. I have suggested such kind of controlled
testing of Joseph Newman's device, or any other, and am still considering
how to develop the protocol for it with appropriate experts' collaboration.

[Nate]

>
> I invested a year of my time and all of my life savings to find someone
that has some prototype that did something.

[David]
Unfortunate. I should have been more clear with you that you would waste
your time and money without getting the perspective I offered to impart to
you. At least you have had a year's experience of...traveling around
having inventors consider you seriously because you claimed
to have some major funding source. I could not in good conscience refer you
to anyone I know without knowing more of the reality and parameters behind
"your mind" and that "source" you claimed.

[Nate]
> If you have even one Prototype that does anything that it claims to...
then give me a call otherwise put a sock in it!!!

>
> Nate
>

[David]
You can be assured that if I did, such an attitude would preclude your
seeing it.

No need to be rude. You didn't believe me apparently. Now it's water under
the bridge. I don't know you personally and only agreed to speak to you out
of respect for your mother who I have met and respect.

It's not just you and the folks mentioned above, this "variable observer
effect" is responsible for widespread confusion in the scientific community
due to unconsciously produced results consequent to how the human mind works
as applied through folks' acceptance and belief in the "uncertainty
principle" which came out of Heisenberg's reasoning in the climate of Nazi
philosophy, Hitler's lingering grip on the mind of humankind.

--David [more below inspired by your mom's joke
about God, Tesla, and light]

> -----Original Message-----
> Date: Mon 09/30/02 12:24 PM
> From: David Crockett Williams
> To: jcrocker, Nate Rushfinn
> Subject: Tesla
>
> I had only read that Tesla put his notes encrypted in a mixture of five
> different languages that he was fluent in so that only someone so
> knowledgeable could read his most sensitive work.
>
> I'm not surprised Nathan did not find the success he was looking for in
the
> new energy field. It might have been different if he had visited me early
> on for an in depth briefing as was originally in the works, but...too much
> secrecy everywhere :-)
>
> Bearden claims Tesla knew the original form of Maxwell's equations and
> that enabled him to do what he did.

[Dr. Wood has indicated a similar position]

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "jcrocker"
> To: "David Crockett Williams"; "Nate Rushfinn";
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:47 AM
> Subject: Re: will Ira Einhorn retrial coverage (Larry King, CBS, ABC,
> Monday) expose related issues coverup?
>
>
> > Dear David and Nathaniel, (and Jim)
> >
> > My friend Jim Conners (the computer Geek who lives
> downstairs in our basement
> > apartment) cited an interesting "fact."
> > I hope I'm quoting you right, Jim.
> >
> > Tesla's Power Tower" and energy research was so
> powerful that he was afraid it
> > might be used to further war and greed and lethal
> competition among nations.
> > So he gave a parts of the jig-saw puzzle info to different countries
>> (esp Russia and US). So that nations could not use his hi-tech
>> stuff until they learned howto cooperate with each other.
>> Fascinating, if true.
> > Have you heard this?
> >
> >
> > Nature and Nature's laws lay hid in night:
> > God said, "Let Tesla be", and all was light.
> >

There is an overlooked property of the nature of light, ie, the C in E=mC^2,
by which light itself "identifies the observer" (the "relative identity of
the observer") because C is not "pegged" to the notion of an external
"objective reality" independent of the observer but is "pegged" to the
identity of the observer. Ignoring implications of this allows the human
mind to unknowingly be misapplied and many resultant "observed" effects are
in reality "created" effects consequent to the operation of the human mind.
A "correction factor" (tensor?) is needed in all equations where C or C^2
occur to remedy this problem. If my math terms definitions are correct,
Tetron is defined as the tensor correcting C^2 for an omission (compromise
about the nature of truth and the nature of light) by misapplication of a
"mathematical convention" to the square of the directional component of a
vector quantity (by "convention" defined as equal to "1") where (uniquely
with C) that component is not "pegged" to the notion of external "objective"
reality reference frame (eg, north, south, east, west, up, down) but with
light (C) is in fact "pegged" to the identity of the observer -- which is
the overlooked implication of the non-additivity of C, not just its
purported "experimentally observed" constant scalar value.

Bottom line, scientists by definition are conditioned to disbelieve in how
the mind operates as per spiritual and religious applications of it, and so
have yet to integrate a correct understanding of how the mind works into
science and technology. This is what the term "psychotronics" is attempting
to deal with, as per example of Japan Psychotronics Association head Dr.
Shiuji Inomata whose mind-consciousness-energy relationship theory he felt
was verified by his successful replication of DePalma's results.

For example, Joseph Newman is a very religious person whose faith is applied
through his theory as part of the mental dynamic by which his energy machine
operates. That's why he is the way he is about his theory being accepted
along with the results of his machine, theory and machine are linked by the
power of the human mind. But he is not consciously aware of this factor and
so, like most all others, just thinks he has discovered a new and better
"objective" theory and he apparently hasn't yet grasped the deeper "mind
dynamics" involved -- same for Bearden, Fox, Vesperman, et al, ie, basically
the entire scientific community.

Nate, thanks for this chance to offer my above "state of the art"
explanation of my "theory" for your and others' consideration. Keep in the
loop here and your efforts and sacrifice will not have been in vain.

Respecting all,

David Crockett Williams, C.L.U., B.S.
General Agent, Chartered Life Underwriter, Activist
Golden Hills, California
661-822-3309 gear2000@...
CLU degree 1971 American College
BS degree w/ honors, Chemistry 1969 CSUN
www.globalpeacenow.org

For the direct cause of true peace with harmony among all life and
free natural abundance as paradise on Earth via a future global
computer network psibernetics program called Torahk.
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/vision.html

Global Emergency Alert Response
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

Science and Technology in Society and Public Policy
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dcwilliams
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/new-energy-solutions

American Agenda Committee for Global Peace Now!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the-american-agenda

An American Peace Movement
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/an-american-peace-movement

Global Peace Zones Development Project for Global Peace Now
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/global-peace-zones

----------next forwarded post excerps post compilation segment:

From: "Hal Fox" <halfox@...>
To: "David Crockett Williams" <gear2000@...>
Subject: Thanks for including me
Date: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:31 PM

Subj: Thanks for including me

Dear Friend David Crockett Williams,

Long time no hear.

Thanks for including me in your recent response to Nate.

I find your observer comments interesting. If you have the time
and want to take the trouble -- send me an article that I can
consider for publication.

Best personal regards,
Hal Fox, Editor Journal of New Energy
http://www.pakrak.com/ine

-----and responding to Hal Fox, et al---fwd excerpts:

From: "David Crockett Williams"
To: "Hal Fox"; "Robert Dorman"
Cc: "Thomas Bearden"; "Evan Soule'" <josephnewman@...>;
"Eugene Mallove - IE Mag."; "Thomas Valone"; "Gary Vesperman"; "Dr. Fred B.
Wood Sr."; "Dean House"; "Mark Comings"
Subject: until? Oct.11 unique CA opportunity for new energy tech info media
outreach
Date: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:21 PM

Dear Hal, et al,

[high priority part starts with ==== re Mojave plant hearings/public-input]

[this first part is response to friend Hal Fox]

I've been email inactive most of the summer because the heat here shuts down
my clunker '92 computer.

A couple of years ago before we were well acquainted I sent you an article
on my "Tetron thesis" which you said was a long way from usable for your
publication. I'm still working on such a publishable explanation of these
equations that "came to me" 1974-77 and it will take some collaboration with
others' work in this area in order for me to get up to speed on how to
utilize more accepted vernacular in this field of physics which overlaps
with religion and spirituality in respect that my thesis deals with the
question of "what is wrong with the way humanity understands and applies the
nature of faith and belief and how can it be corrected in order to foster
the direct cause of true peace and harmony among all life with free natural
abundance as paradise on Earth" -- hardly the normal topic for a new energy
journal :-)

An interdisciplinary thesis bridging fields of chemistry, physics,
psychology, religious studies, and political science finds little
understanding audience in any of these fields separately, let alone
advisors/collaborators with sufficient interdisciplinary background in their
combination. :-)

The best I have at the moment is what I sent as addendum to talk at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gcsc-csun/message/6

==================[high priority part for all recipients]

I'm preparing now a media campaign following up on our visit to CA
governor's office and CEC last year on occasion of hearing Oct.11 by Cal
Public Utilities Commission soliciting public input regarding whether the
Mojave coal-fired plant should be shut down or if CPUC should authorize $58
million to put scrubbers on the smokestacks. This plant burns coal from
Black Mesa and is in the middle therefore of the Hopi - Navajo "land
dispute" and related issues (water table drainage, expansion of coal mining
and coal fired plant new constructions suggested by Hopi Tribal Council,
etc. This issue has international attention.

Adam Trombly told me in 1997 that he had propose in 1989 retrofit of those
coal fired plants with his then new solid state oscillating system e/m
overunity device later in continuous successful test operation for 6 years
(before US Marshalls destroyed it and its lab in '96) but in '89 all he got
in response were more death threats. I forgot the figure he gave for how
much he proposed it would cost for such retrofit but when I later mentioned
the figure to Dean House who is following these issues he said that was
approximately the amount it would cost for smoke scrubbers.

Now we have a $58 million figure to use in appealing to CA governor, Cal
Energy Commission, and CPCU for option of retrofit now using whatever best
available device is appropriate. Since Davis is in final 3weeks of his
re-election campaign, this hearing is now, and I have not heard a peep from
Davis' office or from CEC about what we gave them last year and I have been
posting to them since, it adds up to a chance to get strong attention paid
to all this now by my complaining publicly about their lack of response in
light of CA energy problems and now hearing on Mohave plant.

I expect I will get a phone call from Davis' office within 24hrs after I
sent out my release later today if I can get it done soon.

Since we presented Bearden (and Newman) info to Governor's office and CEC
last year I intend to lean hard on that in this release given that Tom got
his patent on MEG _since then?_, our Aug.1, 2001 overture there in
Sacramento.

The CA energy czar, David Freeman, knows Brian O'Leary from energy hearings
in congress in the 70's and we had a followup briefing for Freeman by
O'Leary scheduled within a month or so after that Sacto visit but Freeman's
office cancelled a few days before the meeting date. National security
concerns as we warned them in initial input?

I phoned CPUC public advisor's office today and they said welcome to submit
public comments/input by email regarding fate/alternatives for Mohave plant,
sending to public.advisor@... I will phone Freeman's secretary
today and see what's up with them before I rag on them in my release going
out soon which I will copy to you all and all new energy info network for
their offerings on this occasion.

Anyone who emails CPUC new energy tech comments related to alternatives to
spending $58 million on smoke scrubbers, please copy to me so I can post to
appropriate archival lists, CA governor, CEC, activists lists, and media
etc.

Sierra Club and other new-energy-tech-underinformed major organizations are
involved in this and related Big Mountain Relocation issue to in this
context is our chance to get status of this info into mainstream
eco-activism groups.

David
661-822-3309

From: "Robert Dorman" <redorman@...>
To: <BIGMTLIST@...>
Subject: BIGMTLIST MOHAVE GENERATING PLANT
-NEW DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
Date: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:37 PM



September 25, 2002 PUC: 87 Docket #: A.02-05-046

Media Contact: PUC Press Office - 415.703.1366 - news@...

PUC SETS NEW DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND
PREHEARING CONFERENCE ON MOHAVE GENERATING PLANT
The California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) today set a new date
for its Public Participation Hearing (PPH) and Prehearing Conference
(PHC) on Southern California Edison's request that the PUC either
recognize the end of Mohave Generating Station's operations at the end
of 2005, or authorize Edison to spend up to $58 million in 2003 on
pollution control measures.

WHEN: Friday, October 11, 2002
Noon - 4 p.m. MDT (observed by Tuba City, unlike the rest of Arizona)

WHERE: The Chapter House, Tuba City, Arizona

A PPH/PHC had previously been scheduled for September 13, 2002, but was
canceled when a State of Emergency was declared in the Tuba City area by
the Navaho Nation Commission on Emergency Management due to localized
flooding that was threatening the property and safety of residents.
The assigned Commissioner for this issue, President Loretta Lynch, will
be in attendance.

The Mohave Generating Station is a two-unit, coal-fired plant located in
Laughlin, Nevada, with a total plant generating capacity of
approximately 1,580 MW.

Edison has concluded that it most likely will not be possible to extend
the operation of Mohave as a coal-fired power plant beyond the end of
2005 because of issues related to the coal supply and the amount of
capital that must be expended on the plant.

On May 17, 2002, Edison filed an application requesting that the
Commission either recognize the end of Mohave's coal-fired operations
after 2005 and authorize appropriate balancing accounts, or authorize
Edison to spend up to $58 million in 2003 on air pollution control.
If specialized accommodations are needed for the PHC/PPH, please call
the PUC Public Advisor's Office at 866-849-8390 or 415-703-2074 or TTY
415-703-5282 or 1-866-836-7825. Email public comments to
public.advisor@...

###

------------next forwarded post:

From: "Gary Vesperman"
To: "Nathaniel Rushfinn"; "David Crockett Williams";
Cc: "Tom Bearden"; "Hal Fox"; <josephnewman@...>;
Dr. Wood,
Subject: Photos of water influenced by consciousness
Date: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:13 AM
<some parts snipped for length>

Hi David and Nate!

I just read through David's record of an exchange of emails between you two
discussing people's minds biasing energy source test results.

Water is truly a strange substance. Take a look at
http://www.mercola.com/2002/may/8/prayer.htm
that was forwarded to me a few days ago. It shows photographs of water being
affected by consciousness!

I have heard in a Tesla Society conference Dr. Glen Rein describing his
experiments with water having a memory.

I wonder if there is a relationship between mind interactions with water and
with energy sources.

Here is another interesting related story I have heard about but haven't
seriously experimented with. When I learned Reiki healing years ago, I was
told that a Reiki healer can recharge in a few minutes a discharged battery
simply by holding it between his or her hands and saying Reiki mumbo jumbo.
What makes it a little uncertain is that a dead (heavily sulfated) battery
can't be recharged anyway because there is nothing to recharge.

And then we have George Wiseman's experiments with bubbling Brown's gas
through water which leaves the water hydrated as well as oxygenated. George
Wiseman's Brown's gas site
http://www.eagle-research.com/browngas/fabuses/possib.html has this
key statement's:

[excerpted]

"hydrated water for health.

When Brown's Gas is bubbled through clean water, the water absorbs oxygen
and hydrogen. We think there is an additional energy (electrical in nature)
added to the water as well.

Maybe what we have here is simply some kind of complex biochemistry and no
woo woo mind control stuff. I still would like to see a scientifically
conducted comparative study of mind interactions with Brown's gas hydrated
water, chlorinated water, bottled water, ..., and
various other formulations of water."

(end except)

My alma mater, University of Wisconsin-Madison, has a Limnology Department
which studies lakes and strong departments of biochemistry and psychology. I
think I will email them and see if I can get them interested in having their
graduate students doing such studies. The experimental apparatus should be
relatively cheap. The tricky part would be working with the people since
their minds can vary so much and also change from moment to moment. Maybe I
can even talk a local Las Vegas high school into doing these kinds of
experiments.

Gary Vesperman

--------------next forwarded post:

From: "JNPCo." josephnewman@...
To: "Gary Vesperman"
Cc: "Nathaniel Rushfinn"; "David Crockett Williams" ;
"Tom Bearden"; "Hal Fox"; "Dr. Wood"
Subject: Re: Photos of water influenced by consciousness
Date: Monday, October 07, 2002 12:23 PM

Consider also the important research with water and the photophoresis
effect that were originally conducted by Dr. Ehrenhaft. Included
below is Dr. Ehrenhaft's most interesting paper entitled, "The
Magnetic Current and Single Magnetic Charges."

ERS
[Evan Soule']


Subject: The Magnetic Current and Single Magnetic Charges
__________________________________________________________
BACKGROUND:
Regarding lectures concerning Dr. Felix Ehrenhaft's exper-
iments with Photophoresis. It would seem there exists
microphotographs of a Photophoresis phenomena for which
there was no general explanation. The microphotographs
were most interesting in their depiction of the activity
of submicroscopic particles suspended in liquids and/or
gases.

What was most unusual about the activity of these small
particles was the following:

During the course of the experiment, the motion of the
particles traced out a "spiral" path. However, upon
magnification of a given section of a given spiral, one
saw a "spiral" path within the path of the larger spiral.
When a section of this second order magnitude spiral path
was magnified one saw an even smaller "spiral" path
comprising this second order magnitude spiral path.....and
when the third order magnitude spiral path was magnified,
an even smaller spiral path was detected.

This continuing "spirals with spirals" paths were detected
down to the limits of the magnification technology
available to Dr. Ehrenhaft.

I have often wondered, over the years, if these "spirals
within spirals" are related to the hypothetical motion* of
the gyroscopic particle throughout the "shells of force"
comprising magnetic fields, as pictured on pages 10/11 of
the book, The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman.
[*spiraling helix and/or 3-dimensional toroid?]

Also curious is the fact that the winding shapes of some
of these spirals in the microphotographs reminded me of
the shapes described by Nikola Tesla with respect to Plate
XLVIII in which Tesla wrote: "One of the streamers is
wonderfully interesting on account of the curiously
twisted and curved appearance. It is hard to conceive
how a discharge can pass through the air in this way when
there exists a strong tendency to make it take the
shortest route."

In viewing these microphotographs, one had the distinct
impression that something phenomenal was happening, but no
definitive explanation for the observations was presented.

ERS

<balance of Evan Soule's post here snipped but posted at>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/new-energy-solutions/message/63
Dr. Felix Ehrenhaft:on electromagnetism, fwd Evan Soule' of
the Joseph Newman Power Company "JNPCo."
http://www.josephnewman.com

More overunity power tech info sources/networks:
http://www.projectearth.com
http://www.infinite-energy.com
http://www.cheniere.org
http://www.padrak.com/ine
http://www.depalma.pair.com
_________________________________________________
-------end forwarded posts, compilation


Above compilation assembled by:

David Crockett Williams, III, C.L.U., B.S., October 9, 2002
General Agent, Chartered Life Underwriter, PsychoActivist
American Scientist and Spiritual Practitioner
Golden Hills, California Paradise, via USA 93561
661-822-3309 gear2000@...
Chartered Life Unerwriter degree, 1971, American College, PA
Bachelor of Science degree w/ honors, Chemistry, 1969 CSUN, CA
http://www.globalpeacenow.org
http://www.dharmawalk.org
*http://www.sathyasai.org

For the direct cause of true peace with harmony among all life and
free natural abundance as paradise on Earth via a future global
computer network psibernetics program called Torahk.
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/vision.html

Global Emergency Alert Response
http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000

Science and Technology in Society and Public Policy
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dcwilliams
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/new-energy-solutions

American Agenda Committee for Global Peace Now!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the-american-agenda

An American Peace Movement
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/an-american-peace-movement

Global Peace Zones Development Project for Global Peace Now
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/global-peace-zones