It really depends on your needs. Check out IBM HTTP Server, that's an IBM-built apache server. They're a number of releases behind, but they may give you some...
Yanbin Ma
yma@...
May 2, 2005 12:26 pm
53536
I got it working ! Here is my solution. Questions 1 & 4 still remain. The additional module (ssl_error) also works, although I need to fine-tune it. Feel free...
sternmarc@...
May 2, 2005 12:42 pm
53537
... If the action is required to compensate for a browser bug, wouldn't it be better to leave it as an environment variable and set it with BrowserMatch?...
Rici Lake
rici@...
May 2, 2005 2:25 pm
53538
Why do I suddenly have the "I Have A Dream" speech flashes? ;-) - Dmitri....
Dmitri Tikhonov
dmitri@...
May 2, 2005 7:15 pm
53539
--On Friday, April 29, 2005 3:45 PM -0700 Paul Querna ... ++1. -- justin...
Justin Erenkrantz
justin@...
May 2, 2005 7:18 pm
53540
I'm +1 for branching 2.2-alpha... However, there are 2 outstanding show-stoppers. Do we expect these to be addressed before the branch. I think so, especially...
Jim Jagielski
jim@...
May 2, 2005 7:27 pm
53541
--On Monday, May 2, 2005 3:26 PM -0400 Jim Jagielski <jim@...> ... Why couldn't we fix those up after the branch? The point would be to stop making...
Justin Erenkrantz
justin@...
May 2, 2005 7:28 pm
53542
... I thought the whole idea about having a 2.1 dev version was to avoid monkeying around with the API and the problems when we were doing 1.3 and 2.0. Once we...
Jim Jagielski
jim@...
May 2, 2005 7:35 pm
53543
... +1 on that. Not on the timing, though: I won't have time for apache until after Xtech[1], so that's a definite abstension on anything happening on May...
Nick Kew
nick@...
May 2, 2005 7:35 pm
53544
--On Monday, May 2, 2005 3:33 PM -0400 Jim Jagielski <jim@...> ... Paul proposed branching 2.1.x not 2.2.x. -- justin...
+1 Brad ... Hash: SHA1 I think that most other developers agree that 2.1.x/trunk has enough features for a 2.2.x GA branch. I believe 2.1.x is a moving target....
Brad Nicholes
BNICHOLES@...
May 2, 2005 7:41 pm
53547
... You're absolutely right. I put the blinders on to environment variables when I saw that mod_env didn't do anything until the fixup hook, which is too...
Jeff Trawick
trawick@...
May 2, 2005 8:19 pm
53548
... +1 on branching. No preference on time, the sooner the better IMO. Sander...
Sander Striker
striker@...
May 2, 2005 8:45 pm
53549
... +1 ... +/- 0. I see the tree is fairly stable, has some decent bug fixing activity, and nothing destabling. To the extent that 'I want this feature in...
William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrowe@...
May 2, 2005 9:10 pm
53550
... I would like to request a zone for httpd. Thanks, Paul...
Paul Querna
chip@...
May 2, 2005 9:22 pm
53551
... Bill makes some good points... it seems that branching would simply be "renaming" trunk. The good thing is that with svn this is cheap and easy, but will...
Jim Jagielski
jim@...
May 2, 2005 9:29 pm
53552
... Yes. I think it is almost 90% about perception. This is about 'drawing the line in the sand'. Personally, I have held off on starting refactors of code,...
Paul Querna
chip@...
May 2, 2005 9:48 pm
53553
... If the trees are so in sync that the same patch applies it's trivial to do the backports. ... If there was a 2.1.x beta out there right now I would agree...
Sander Striker
striker@...
May 2, 2005 10:26 pm
53554
... I submit that we can't have it both ways, and expect 2 trees to be both "easily" in sync and yet one where major refactoring is taking place... Look at the...
Jim Jagielski
jim@...
May 3, 2005 2:35 am
53555
... Tag, fix, retag, fix, and bless. Once the candidate is 99% of where the beta should be, such cosmetics are trivial. ... Not so much ... Do we all believe...
William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrowe@...
May 3, 2005 4:05 am
53556
... First - let me say I TOTALLY agree with your concept for more async features and design!!! Second - there is no way that disconnected/async events that can...
William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrowe@...
May 3, 2005 4:07 am
53557
... I agree, a sandbox would be good for these types of changes, but I haven't even started a sandbox, because I do not want to try to land it back into the...
Paul Querna
chip@...
May 3, 2005 8:20 am
53558
... Whats wrong with updating the STATUS File today? AFAIK, the only other major issue is to do with apr-iconv 1.x conflicting with apr-iconv 0.9.x. -- and as...
Paul Querna
chip@...
May 3, 2005 8:33 am
53559
Hi... I'm still fighting (probably for a lost cause.. but my boss ask me to do this). In the socket activity there are some troubles dealing with timeouts. It...
Ivan Barrera A.
Bruce@...
May 3, 2005 3:36 pm
53560
... You are talking about beta showstoppers; and yes I will have iconv ready to release this week. Think we have consensus on the fix. But I'm asking about...
William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrowe@...
May 3, 2005 4:51 pm
53561
... Its a pretty dumb idea to ignore critical extensions, so I don't think this sounds like a great idea... -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html...
Ben Laurie
ben@...
May 3, 2005 4:55 pm
53562
Turn on accept filtering and this problem goes away. Or at least it moves to be a kernel-level issue instead of an Apache one. -Rasmus...
Rasmus Lerdorf
rasmus@...
May 3, 2005 5:22 pm
53563
... From: "Paul Querna" <chip@...> To: <dev@...> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 12:24 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Branch 2.1.x on May 13...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
