Didn't notice, sorry. Werner already pointed this out privately, but
hey, I might as well suffer a bit of public humiliation for such an
oversight.

I included npopsupport@yahoogroups.com in my reply to that support
request because it seemed to belong there. Guess such support emails
don't get posted to Yahoo? Oh well, no harm, right?


Gerard Ivan Samija
http://www.luthier.ca/



<craigjacob@...> wrote:
(08/10/2009 13:42)

> [nPOPuk: text part complete but text/html is not; double-click to download]
>
> Gerard, did you notice this is the npopsupport board? Not much has happened
there lately.
>
> ----------------------------------------
> From: Gerard Ivan Samija <gerard@...>
> To: npopsupport@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:58:49 -0800
> Subject: re: [nPOPuk] re: incredibly slow
>
> There have been other messages, including the one to which I was
> responding with the one you quoted. Craig and Geoffrey have had a few
> exchanges regarding external editor functionality and the INI. Other
> stuff has cropped up. I'd guess something in your supply chain is
> messing up, perhaps a server-based filter. I had that problem for a
> time, where my email service was using SpamAssassin to expunge certain
> emails without ever letting me know they existed. It took several
> angry phone calls to get them to correct this misbehavior, so that
> finally I receive all (I think) email including loads of spam, with
> the supposed spam simply marked as such in the subject line. nPOPuk
> has no trouble filtering that to mark for deletion. I guess they
> figure most folks can't cope... but I was losing a lot of business
> related email and some web forum notifications for reasons I can't
> even guess at.
>
>
>
> Gerard Ivan Samija
> http://www.luthier.ca/
>
>
>
> "tim spofford" <spof22@...> wrote:
> (08/09/2009 19:04)
>
> > [nPOPuk: text part complete but text/html is not; double-click to download]
> >
> > This is the first message I've seen from this list since May 23. Is that
> > correct or has my mail been screwed up some how? (It's not a matter of it
> > being tossed as spam; I keep a regular eye on those for all my addresses and
> > there aren't any npopsupport messages there.)
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: npopsupport@yahoogroups.com [mailto:npopsupport@yahoogroups.com] On
> > Behalf Of Gerard Ivan Samija
> > Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 1:55 AM
> > To: asd
> > Cc: nPOP_Yahoo_group
> > Subject: [nPOPuk] re: incredibly slow
> >
> > Here is a page relating to settings found in the nPOPuk.ini file, should you
> > wish to edit behaviors there:
> > http://www.npopuk.org.uk/npopukini.htm
> >
> > But the items relating to loading mailboxes on launch and contacts are to be
> > found in the Global Options tabs. For mailbox loading behavior, go to File |
> > Global Options | Advanced and use the menu there to select your preference.
> > For speed I choose 'Automatically as needed' - if 'All at startup' is set in
> > yours now this would explain something about slow loading time.
> >
> > For contacts loading you need first decide what behavior works best for your
> > use. In my experience, loading the Contacts database on my WM phone is the
> > single biggest difficulty relating to startup delay, taking well over 10
> > seconds to scan for and load a few hundred email addresses from my 800+
> > contacts. If you wish to change this, loading nPOPuk without loading freshly
> > scanned contacts, then you will need to manually edit the nPOPuk.ini file in
> > your text editor of preference.
> > Search for the line there called LoadPOOMAtStart= and change the value to
> > LoadPOOMAtStart=0 - this will load the previously created Address.lst file
> > at startup, rather than creating a brand new one on every launch. When you
> > need to update your address list, you will need to open Address book from
> > the File menu within nPOPuk while running and then select Get Contacts and
> > wait for that to load, then OK.
> >
> > If you do not have Use Pocket Contacts address book selected under File |
> > Global Options | Other, then this does not apply, as you will be using a
> > manually created list of email addresses.
> >
> > There are other user defined options which may affect memory use and loading
> > speed. You should examine the commented INI from the support site to see
> > which of these might apply to your particular use for the program.
> > http://www.npopuk.org.uk/npopuk-ini.txt
> >
> >
> > Gerard Ivan Samija
> > http://www.luthier.ca/
> >
> >
> >
> > asd <asdsia@...> wrote:
> > (08/06/2009 21:54)
> >
> > > Have you changed the settings so that your Contacts database is
> > > freshly loaded on every launch?
> > >
> > > ** Wasn't aware of this settings. Where will I find this ?
> > >
> > > Thanks for your other sugggestions. Will also try a new stick type.
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > Gerard Ivan Samija <gerard@...> wrote:
> > > (07/08/2009 01:39)
> > >
> > > > Have you changed the settings so that your Contacts database is
> > > > freshly loaded on every launch? Have you set nPOPuk to load all
> > > > mailboxes and saveboxes at launch? This sort of thing can
> > > > dramatically slow nPOPuk opening. Further, have you recently
> > > > installed nPOPuk to a slow memory card, such as a Class 2 SD or SDHC
> > > > card? Class 2, and even Class 4 cards can be frightfully slow in
> > > > both read and write speeds. I recommend an 'ultra' or Class 6 type
> > > > card, whether it's microSD, miniSD, of full size SD. Or perhaps you
> > > > have changed the storage location to flash memory in your device,
> > > > such as with a WM5 or later phone? Built-in flash memory is often as
> > > > slow as a slow memory card, sometimes even slower.
> > > >
> > > > If you set nPOPuk to load contacts only when requested manually,
> > > > this speeds opening a lot when you have a large contacts database.
> > > > You may also choose to load only the mailboxes needed, as they are
> > opened.
> > > > Both save time in operation.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Gerard Ivan Samija
> > > > http://www.luthier.ca/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > asdsia@... (peter sauven) wrote:
> > > > (08/06/2009 14:51)
> > > >
> > > > > Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
> > > > > peter sauven (asdsia@...) on Thursday, August 6, 2009 at
> > > > > 23:51:52
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > ---------
> > > > >
> > > > > Message: Performance degraded. Takes ages to load and ages to close.
> > Wasn't like this before. What can be done to improve this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > ---------
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links