Hello,

Perhaps you are aware of the limit Gmail puts on the number of emails available
for download at one time. This limit is somewhere between 270-400 or so. If more
emails are in the POP server, they may not show up in nPOPuk until some older
ones are deleted, causing new mail to not be seen.

One work around is this, for each Gmail account, create 2 account mailboxes in
nPOPuk. Create one the normal way, and the second with "recent:" (notice the
colon after recent) before the username, which causes all of the mail for the
last 30 days to be available, including sentmail. The username for the first
account mailbox would be...

username@...

The username for the second account mailbox would be...

recent:username@...

In the mailbox pane of nPOPuk two Gmail accounts could be named something like
this...

1GmailPOP
--1Gmail30days
2GmailPOP
--2Gmail30days

The POP boxes could be set to auto-check mail every so many minutes if wanted,
and the "recent" boxes could be checked manually when wanted, to see if there is
new mail not showing in the POP boxes, or to view/search all of the mail the
last 30 days, including sentmail.

In the "recent" box, mail older than 30 days automatically disappears after 30
days. Also, mail deleted from server is moved to the webmail trash, a good way
to keep the webmail a little more tidy.

In the POP box, the setting in webmail can be set so when mail is deleted from
server it moves from POP to Allmail.

-Craig

Indeed, finally got around to checking system information on Shiho's
Vista notebook and it's version 6.0 where mine with Win 7 is 6.1. And
yet they seem rather different in quite a few ways. Ah well, plenty of
comparison essays out there, no need to go into it. Mine's settling in
well enough now that I've found some more bumps to iron flat.



    Gerard Ivan Samija
    http://www.luthier.ca/



npop is fast <npop_is_fast@...> wrote:
(12/25/2009 08:38)

> On 2009/12/25 00:56, the following characters came from the keyboard of Gerard
Ivan Samija <gerard@...>:
>
> > Is Windows 7 a 'point release' of Vista?
>
> Check the OS major and minor version codes for the real facts.  If you have
Vista on Shiho's machine, and 7 on your netbook, you should be able to compare
and report the numbers.  I'm just going by what others have reported online,
since I have neither of them here at the moment.
>
> I think the case is that Vista is 6.0 and 7 is 6.1, just like 2000 was 5.0 and
XP was 5.1.  NT had versions at least of 3.5 and 4.0, and maybe some earlier
ones that never hit my radar screen.  Of course, 2000, XP, Vista, and 7, are all
NT based, and that is lineage from which they get their version numbers.
>
>
> Glenn
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

On 12/25/2009 03:56, Gerard Ivan Samija <gerard@...> wrote:
>
> Time for sleep. In about 7 hours I've got a 3-1/2 year old (born
> June 25) waking up and freaking out over presents. And I think my
> stepdaughter (16 earlier this month) is going to do a little dance
> as well, as I found a nifty old Toshiba m200 tablet and set it up
> with Windows 7 this week. $300 goes a long way with Craigslist
> sometimes.

Indeed!

> Merry Christmas everybody.

and to you and everyone from me, as well.

On 2009/12/25 00:56, the following characters came from the keyboard of Gerard
Ivan Samija <gerard@...>:

> Is Windows 7 a 'point release' of Vista?

Check the OS major and minor version codes for the real facts.  If you have
Vista on Shiho's machine, and 7 on your netbook, you should be able to compare
and report the numbers.  I'm just going by what others have reported online,
since I have neither of them here at the moment.

I think the case is that Vista is 6.0 and 7 is 6.1, just like 2000 was 5.0 and
XP was 5.1.  NT had versions at least of 3.5 and 4.0, and maybe some earlier
ones that never hit my radar screen.  Of course, 2000, XP, Vista, and 7, are all
NT based, and that is lineage from which they get their version numbers.


Glenn

npop is fast <npop_is_fast@...> wrote:
(12/24/2009 23:59)

> Which doubles the cost of doing business.  But that is a good thing, because
it doubles M$'s profit, too, eh?

HO HO HO! Merry Christmas to Steve B and the boys! It's going to be
another great morning, diving into those piles of money and laughing
those great big belly laughs. But to be fair, just a little, when I
glance through the piles and piles of MVP spam I get now and see just
how many fingers Microsoft tries to keep in how many pies... well, it
gets a bit dizzying. So it isn't too surprising that they've not yet
sent out a SINGLE notice of any event, development, conference call,
livemeeting, not any slightest crumb regarding Windows Mobile over the
past two months. No soup for me. Sadly, Microsoft is encouraging me to
be less and less a WM user. Even the guy who nominated me and was
supposed to be my contact link with MS has resigned, moving on to
greener corporate pastures.

Is Windows 7 a 'point release' of Vista? Kinda feels like it in a lot
of ways, but not in others. There are levels here, stuff I never
encountered in Vista on Shiho's machine. It's like this endless
layering of graphical prettiness, practically everywhere I look except
Explorer. And it hides functionality very successfully. I've had to go
online a bunch of times already just to figure out how to use Control
Panel or the Printers settings. And the printer, a Lexmark x4550,
still isn't working. Managed to get it as far as an automated install
without local drivers after jumping through hoops for a few hours -
when I should have been making Christmas presents dangit! - but no
joyful meeting of ink and paper so far. The latest (Lexmark-GUI'd)
install step is hung at what looks to be about 10%, and no Cancel
button. Oh joy.

Time for sleep. In about 7 hours I've got a 3-1/2 year old (born June
25) waking up and freaking out over presents. And I think my
stepdaughter (16 earlier this month) is going to do a little dance as
well, as I found a nifty old Toshiba m200 tablet and set it up with
Windows 7 this week. $300 goes a long way with Craigslist sometimes.
This should put an end to the almost daily struggles over her mom's
computer, while satisfying her green instincts which hold that she
doesn't need her own computer. Funny, but she's grown into an
embodiment of LeGuin's character Odo from The Dispossessed, one of my
favourite philosophers. "Excess is excrement" really stuck with me
when I was her age. She's not read that one yet. Oh dear, rambling...
But I did manage one non-tech gift between all the setting up of
computers - a dancing bear between levered sticks for my boy,
something I once saw on the Woodwright's Shop on PBS and think I might
have had as a kid too.

Merry Christmas everybody.


    Gerard Ivan Samija
    http://www.luthier.ca/

On 2009/12/24 11:24, the following characters came from the keyboard of Gerard
Ivan Samija <gerard@...>:

> I'm guessing that a developer might
> actually find this much more frustrating as it is, unless and until
> permissions on anything and everything get gone. Tried logging in as
> Administrator for a bit, but that was just about as bad.


Of course, as a developer, one needs to test in the environment that users have,
too... so one might need to keep a "default configuration" machine around, as
well as (if it can be achieved) an "annoyance free" machine.  Which doubles the
cost of doing business.  But that is a good thing, because it doubles M$'s
profit, too, eh?


Glenn

It's early going yet for me, but my feeling at the moment is that if
Windows 7 doesn't let me trim the nonsense considerably, my
frustration at the costs to efficient use is going to drive me back to
XP. Then again, the tablet tools will be great if I ever manage to
find time to graft in the touchscreen purchased last spring...

I've used Vista a fair bit as that's what is on my wife's big
notebook. It wasn't too hard to take care of the UAC garbage
initially. Seems to me that the whole permissions thing is much more
deeply out of control with 7. With Vista, Shiho became so frustrated
in the first few days that she actually suggested maybe I should just
install XP Pro on the thing. Amazing considering how averse she is to
my tinkering with computers generally, but it was that bad. But some
research got it settled. I'll just hope the same applies to 7 so I can
soon get on with a 'normal' sort of life with this computer, with the
hand-holders of Redmond getting the heck out of the way and just
letting me get some work done. I'm guessing that a developer might
actually find this much more frustrating as it is, unless and until
permissions on anything and everything get gone. Tried logging in as
Administrator for a bit, but that was just about as bad.



    Gerard Ivan Samija
    http://www.luthier.ca/



npop is fast <npop_is_fast@...> wrote:
(12/24/2009 08:33)

> On 2009/12/24 01:06, the following characters came from the keyboard of Gerard
Ivan Samija <gerard@...>:
>
> > Not likely to offend, as I am a rank beginner with this UAC-dominated
> > OS. Bit of a nightmare setting it up really. I've read a lot of folks
> > commenting all over the interwebs about how this is the first time
> > since XP that MS has got so much right, some geeky types going a lot
> > further than that. And sure, it's got some nice tricks. But the
> > heavy-handed babysitting is out of control, far worse than anything
> > I've encountered before.
>
>
> Yes, see I think the problem is that people talking about Win 7 are the ones
that were willing to suffer the horrors of Vista, and Win 7 is a welcome
relief.... it seems like after being beaten daily with Vista's 40 stripes of
UAC, that being beaten daily with 7's 20 stripes of UAC is a huge improvement. 
What I haven't gotten a handle on is the ratio.  Is it half (as postulated by my
choice of numbers) or it is it one-third, or two-thirds, etc., for various use
cases.  Being a developer, I suspect that if it is even as low as one-quarter
the annoyance of Vista for operational use, that it will still be higher for
development use, and even one-quarter the annoyance of Vista I would fear would
be too much for me to be happy with.
>
> I haven't found many comments by people that have migrated from XP to Win 7,
but my local computer-shop guy made the comment that Win 7 is "just Vista with a
few fixes", and he is still installing XP, but has a machine each running Vista
and 7 so that he has a reference point for helping customers that want those
versions.
>
> Your comments are in line with his.  I'm figuring on buying a new computer
soon; I'm still contemplating on whether to run 64-bit Windows 7 (with the XP
box for compatibility) or Linux with an XP Virtual Machine for
compatibility).... or just stick with XP and 32-bits.  Unfortunately, my first
experience with Linux on an old machine, is that one morning I went to boot it
up (after reasonable success with many things for many weeks), and it wouldn't
boot up, and reports some inconsistency in the file system, which I haven't yet
taken the time to figure out if it means it is completely corrupted, or if it
means I just have to book from CD and run some fix-up utility, or just what it
means.
>
> Unfortunately, neither of those choices provide for running device drivers. 
My ESPON scanner does work as there are Linux drivers available, but with
restrictions... it scans pictures fine, but not film.  That may be the deciding
factor in choice of OS.  I'm still researching, but it is hard to find time to
do research when there are so many more-interesting projects to spend time with,
and so few people are publishing comparisons of XP and 7.
>
>
> Glenn
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

On 2009/12/24 01:06, the following characters came from the keyboard of Gerard
Ivan Samija <gerard@...>:

> Not likely to offend, as I am a rank beginner with this UAC-dominated
> OS. Bit of a nightmare setting it up really. I've read a lot of folks
> commenting all over the interwebs about how this is the first time
> since XP that MS has got so much right, some geeky types going a lot
> further than that. And sure, it's got some nice tricks. But the
> heavy-handed babysitting is out of control, far worse than anything
> I've encountered before.


Yes, see I think the problem is that people talking about Win 7 are the ones
that were willing to suffer the horrors of Vista, and Win 7 is a welcome
relief.... it seems like after being beaten daily with Vista's 40 stripes of
UAC, that being beaten daily with 7's 20 stripes of UAC is a huge improvement. 
What I haven't gotten a handle on is the ratio.  Is it half (as postulated by my
choice of numbers) or it is it one-third, or two-thirds, etc., for various use
cases.  Being a developer, I suspect that if it is even as low as one-quarter
the annoyance of Vista for operational use, that it will still be higher for
development use, and even one-quarter the annoyance of Vista I would fear would
be too much for me to be happy with.

I haven't found many comments by people that have migrated from XP to Win 7, but
my local computer-shop guy made the comment that Win 7 is "just Vista with a few
fixes", and he is still installing XP, but has a machine each running Vista and
7 so that he has a reference point for helping customers that want those
versions.

Your comments are in line with his.  I'm figuring on buying a new computer soon;
I'm still contemplating on whether to run 64-bit Windows 7 (with the XP box for
compatibility) or Linux with an XP Virtual Machine for compatibility).... or
just stick with XP and 32-bits.  Unfortunately, my first experience with Linux
on an old machine, is that one morning I went to boot it up (after reasonable
success with many things for many weeks), and it wouldn't boot up, and reports
some inconsistency in the file system, which I haven't yet taken the time to
figure out if it means it is completely corrupted, or if it means I just have to
book from CD and run some fix-up utility, or just what it means.

Unfortunately, neither of those choices provide for running device drivers.  My
ESPON scanner does work as there are Linux drivers available, but with
restrictions... it scans pictures fine, but not film.  That may be the deciding
factor in choice of OS.  I'm still researching, but it is hard to find time to
do research when there are so many more-interesting projects to spend time with,
and so few people are publishing comparisons of XP and 7.


Glenn

npop is fast <npop_is_fast@...> wrote:
(12/23/2009 17:32)

> Well, that'll make Gerard feel like a second-class Win7 user!

Not likely to offend, as I am a rank beginner with this UAC-dominated
OS. Bit of a nightmare setting it up really. I've read a lot of folks
commenting all over the interwebs about how this is the first time
since XP that MS has got so much right, some geeky types going a lot
further than that. And sure, it's got some nice tricks. But the
heavy-handed babysitting is out of control, far worse than anything
I've encountered before.

As for my installation... I have nPOPuk in my D:\Program Files folder.
I've moved program files there with Junction Link Magic to save space
a bit on C: as I've only a 4GB SSD there, and it's rather a tight
shoehorn job. Only about 350MB of free space and still trying to
figure out what else can get to D: so I can have the 400MB minimum on
C: and allow my Lexmark printer to install. Good grief. I'll give a
try at putting the nPOPuk folder into my junction'd Users folder
somewhere and see if that helps.


    Gerard Ivan Samija
    http://www.luthier.ca/

On 2009/12/23 17:28, the following characters came from the keyboard of Craig
<craigjacob@...>:

> I am using Verify with Win7 retrieving from 3 gmail accounts, sending through
one and throu a yahoo account with SSL, and all is working ok. My nPOPuk folder
is in Documents.


Well, that'll make Gerard feel like a second-class Win7 user!

So it is good to know that Verify can be checked on Win7, though, and things
made to work... but it makes it mysterious what the differences are between your
setup and his (which could be the nPOPuk config, the Win7 config, or even his
ISP [less likely to be yours, since you seem to use a variety of them as you
travel]).


Glenn

>
> --------------------------------------------------
> npop is fast <npop_is_fast@...> wrote:
> (Wednesday, 12/23/09 5:18 PM)
>
> On 2009/12/23 16:43, the following characters came from the keyboard of
Geoffrey Coram <gjcoram@...>:
>
> > Is there another solution that involves getting a new set of server
> > certificates or something?
>
>
> Or putting a certificate in some file (I remember discussion about that, but
not the details of when that would be useful).
>
> I wouldn't think that Win7 would need new certificates, nor do I think Google
would be remiss at keeping their certificates up-to-date, like some web sites.

I am using Verify with Win7 retrieving from 3 gmail accounts, sending through
one and throu a yahoo account with SSL, and all is working ok. My nPOPuk folder
is in Documents.

-Craig

On 2009/12/23 16:43, the following characters came from the keyboard of Geoffrey
Coram <gjcoram@...>:

> Is there another solution that involves getting a new set of server
> certificates or something?


Or putting a certificate in some file (I remember discussion about that, but not
the details of when that would be useful).

I wouldn't think that Win7 would need new certificates, nor do I think Google
would be remiss at keeping their certificates up-to-date, like some web sites.


Glenn

> > > At least for testing, uncheck the "Verify" box under SSL setup?
>
> Seems that was a problem for Vista too, maybe it was Craig that
> reported it.

Is there another solution that involves getting a new set of server
certificates or something?

On 2009/12/22 21:20, the following characters came from the keyboard of Gerard
Ivan Samija <gerard@...>:

> Bingo. Thanks for that.
>
> npop is fast <npop_is_fast@...> wrote:
> (12/22/2009 21:02)
>
> >
> >
> > At least for testing, uncheck the "Verify" box under SSL setup?


Seems that was a problem for Vista too, maybe it was Craig that reported it.


Glenn

Bingo. Thanks for that.



    Gerard Ivan Samija
    http://www.luthier.ca/



npop is fast <npop_is_fast@...> wrote:
(12/22/2009 21:02)

>
>
> At least for testing, uncheck the "Verify" box under SSL setup?

On 2009/12/22 20:44, the following characters came from the keyboard of Gerard
Ivan Samija <gerard@...>:

> "Verify of SSL failed  unable to get local user certificate (20)"
>
> I've installed Windows 7 on my Eee. Some weird issues coming up
> earlier this week and since Microsoft gave me a copy of W7 anyway I
> thought what the heck, might as well. So now I've got it largely set
> up, and find that the above error comes up when trying to check the
> nPOPuk support account. I've tried the U version and the regular one
> but neither works. Any suggestions?


At least for testing, uncheck the "Verify" box under SSL setup?


Glenn

"Verify of SSL failed  unable to get local user certificate (20)"

I've installed Windows 7 on my Eee. Some weird issues coming up
earlier this week and since Microsoft gave me a copy of W7 anyway I
thought what the heck, might as well. So now I've got it largely set
up, and find that the above error comes up when trying to check the
nPOPuk support account. I've tried the U version and the regular one
but neither works. Any suggestions?




    Gerard Ivan Samija
    http://www.luthier.ca/

>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Geoffrey Coram <gjcoram@...> wrote:
> (Friday, 12/11/09 8:44 PM)
>
> On 12/11/2009 01:05, <craigjacob@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > "abshuhuhuhu" <abshuhuhuhu@...> wrote:
> > > (Thu, Dec 10, 2009 - 5:39 PM)
> > >
> > > hello everyone!
> > >   I come from china. and I find that npopuk is quit good in use. I
> > hope to recommand it to my workmates and friends. Though their
> > English is poor, I hope to localize nopopuk with Chinese. Maybe in
> > future it can easily surpport multi languages only with added single
> > language file on it.
> > >   Anyone interesting in it?
> >
> > Yes, I am interested. Will this work for Japanese also? We will have
> > to hear what the developer says.
> >
> > -Craig
>
> In my tenure as lead developer, we had interest in developing a German
> version and a Spanish version.  The German version even got so far as
> translating Strtbl.h, which is supposed to cover all the strings.
> However, the other half is creating nPOP.rc, which deals with the
> buttons and checkboxes, and unfortunately in other languages, the
> tightly-packed dialog boxes will need a little more work.
>
> For Japanese, there is a good start if one simply takes the files from
> the original nPOP.
>
> -Geoffrey

Sorry on my previous post, I was thinking of being able to send/receive Chinese
and Japanese messages, not thinking of the program itself.

-Craig

Greetings to All, and Thanks Geoffrey.
Actually I'd forgotten...but:
In the past I used YPOPs! as well as most of the similar alternatives mentioned
here:

http://ypopsemail.com/links/42-similar-apps

MrPostman was unreliable - but FreePOPs was the worst; not only unreliable, but
when I asked at their user forum for help with it I got flamed all to bits.

I think what ultimately stopped my using any of them was a combination of
broadband's arrival in my wee town and my own annoyance at yahoo constantly
making changes that would always break the connectors and require changes and
adjustments all too often.

For the moment I am using the Yahoo Mail Notifier for Firefox and it is kept
very, very well updated.

It would be grand if there could be a way that some smart programmer types could
figure out to use that notifier as a gateway for POP3 - then the updating would
happen and nPOPuk could always fetch the Y! email.
Sending is a non-issue AFAIC because I can use my own SMTP...

Thanks for the reminder and for being so wonderfully helpful !!!

mark
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~

On 12/10/2009 16:58, "smallhagridinvt" <smallhagridinvt@...>
wrote:
>
> I have quite a few POP mail accounts as well as yahoo, and I only
> wish there was a way to easily access yahoo via POP3 without having
> to pay them for it; other than that I'll get around to starting
> Thunderbird and pulling the emails off the server....someday (no
> hurry here.).

You can use "yPOPs" which is a free program that acts like a POP3
server on your machine and connects via http: to Yahoo! mail to get
the messages.  I ran it once or twice.  I am increasingly annoyed by
the formatting of messages I'm composing on Yahoo! -- how archaic of
me not to use html-formatted messages -- and I always wish for
nPOPuk's reflow capability.

In the world where I could work full-time on nPOPuk, I would see about
integrating ypops into nPOPuk.

-Geoffrey

On 12/10/2009 08:52, "smallhagridinvt" <smallhagridinvt@...>
wrote:
>
> Question 1:
> Is it possible to either just add the outbox file from one to the
> other, or to merge on into the other somehow ?

You should be able to copy SendBox.dat to the other computer; re-name
it, then Add Account and select "import savebox."

> Question 2:
> I added another account at the office which I want access to at
> home, and I know it only takes a minute to add a new account so this
> is more of a curiosity - if I copied and pasted in the accounts info
> from one instance of nPOPuk.ini to the other, will that make the
> account just appear where it wasn't before ?

You'd need to change the mailbox count, but in principle, you could do
this.

On 12/11/2009 01:05, <craigjacob@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > "abshuhuhuhu" <abshuhuhuhu@...> wrote:
> > (Thu, Dec 10, 2009 - 5:39 PM)
> >
> > hello everyone!
> >   I come from china. and I find that npopuk is quit good in use. I
> hope to recommand it to my workmates and friends. Though their
> English is poor, I hope to localize nopopuk with Chinese. Maybe in
> future it can easily surpport multi languages only with added single
> language file on it.
> >   Anyone interesting in it?
>
> Yes, I am interested. Will this work for Japanese also? We will have
> to hear what the developer says.
>
> -Craig

In my tenure as lead developer, we had interest in developing a German
version and a Spanish version.  The German version even got so far as
translating Strtbl.h, which is supposed to cover all the strings.
However, the other half is creating nPOP.rc, which deals with the
buttons and checkboxes, and unfortunately in other languages, the
tightly-packed dialog boxes will need a little more work.

For Japanese, there is a good start if one simply takes the files from
the original nPOP.

-Geoffrey

>
> --------------------------------------------------
> "abshuhuhuhu" <abshuhuhuhu@...> wrote:
> (Thu, Dec 10, 2009 - 5:39 PM)
>
> hello everyone!
>   I come from china. and I find that npopuk is quit good in use. I hope to
recommand it to my workmates and friends. Though their English is poor, I hope
to localize nopopuk with Chinese. Maybe in future it can easily surpport multi
languages only with added single language file on it.
>   Anyone interesting in it?

Yes, I am interested. Will this work for Japanese also? We will have to hear
what the developer says.

-Craig

hello everyone!
   I come from china. and I find that npopuk is quit good in use. I hope to
recommand it to my workmates and friends. Though their English is poor, I hope
to localize nopopuk with Chinese. Maybe in future it can easily surpport multi
languages only with added single language file on it.
   Anyone interesting in it?

Hi,

On 10 Dec 09 21:58 "smallhagridinvt" <smallhagridinvt@...> said:
> I only wish there was a way to easily access yahoo via POP3 without
> having to pay them for it;

You could always come to the UK!  Yahoo still offers free mail
accounts over here! :-)

Greg Chapman
http://npopuk.org.uk
Supporting nPOPuk - the Portable E-Mail Client.

I found this also, so I chose to skip my nPOPuk support account
(GMail) on check all accounts, and only manually check for new mail in
that account at times when I'm not in a hurry to check all mail.



    Gerard Ivan Samija
    http://www.luthier.ca/



"smallhagridinvt" <smallhagridinvt@...> wrote:
(12/10/2009 14:01)

> Ever since I added my 2 gmail accounts to my nPOPuk it has taken a very long
time connecting to those accounts.
> Is there any way to speed up that process ?

Yahoo's user options include the ability to forward your mail from
Yahoo to any POP account. That's what I do, and why I am able to read
all my nPOPuk developer group mail via nPOPuk instead of using some
other email client. No way I'm paying for Yahoo when I already have my
own email domain. If memory serves, I think there is an option to
leave forwarded mail on the Yahoo server, or not... but memory there
is weak. I have it auto-deleted from Yahoo by choice.



    Gerard Ivan Samija
    http://www.luthier.ca/



"smallhagridinvt" <smallhagridinvt@...> wrote:
(12/10/2009 13:58)

> Hi Paco and all.
> I would say that it may not have been intended as such when invented - but it
is sooo good, and soooo quick and sooo easy that I forget to use anything else
!!!
>
> I have quite a few POP mail accounts as well as yahoo, and I only wish there
was a way to easily access yahoo via POP3 without having to pay them for it;
other than that I'll get around to starting Thunderbird and pulling the emails
off the server....someday (no hurry here.).
>
> Best Wishes,
>
> mark

>
> --------------------------------------------------
> "smallhagridinvt" <smallhagridinvt@...> wrote:
> (Thu, Dec 10, 2009 - 5:52 AM)
>
> Hi Folks.
> I use nPOPuk every single day, constantly - both at home and at the office and
that is also why I have my questions.
>
> Background:
> The outbox on each is different because of the different emails I've sent and
I often find I need to refer at one place to an email I've sent at the other.
>
> Question 1:
> Is it possible to either just add the outbox file from one to the other, or to
merge on into the other somehow ?

Two options...
1. Open a new gmail account and set nPOPuk to auto Bcc all sent mail to that
account, from all other accounts.
2. Copy all sent mail to a savebox. Send the Outbox dat file as an attachment
from other device, save the file, import as a new savebox, then move to the
first savebox to merge all sent mail.

> Question 2:
> I added another account at the office which I want access to at home, and I
know it only takes a minute to add a new account so this is more of a curiosity
- if I copied and pasted in the accounts info from one instance of nPOPuk.ini to
the other, will that make the account just appear where it wasn't before ?

With the 2.13 version it is easy to add a new account from a template, likely
the easiest way.

> Thanks,
>
> mark

-Craig

>
> --------------------------------------------------
> "smallhagridinvt" <smallhagridinvt@...> wrote:
> (Thu, Dec 10, 2009 - 2:01 PM)
>
> Hi Folks.
> Ever since I added my 2 gmail accounts to my nPOPuk it has taken a very long
time connecting to those accounts.
> Is there any way to speed up that process ?

Are you using the latest 2.13p3 version? Creating the gmail accounts from the
template? If using a windows mobile device is the ini set at UseWindowsSSL=0?

-Craig

Hi Folks.
Ever since I added my 2 gmail accounts to my nPOPuk it has taken a very long
time connecting to those accounts.
Is there any way to speed up that process ?

Thanks !

mark