Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

nslu2-linux · NSLU2-Linux (http://www.nslu2-linux.org)

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 9462
  • Category: Hardware
  • Founded: Jul 31, 2004
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 25083 - 25112 of 25172   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#25083 From: "Brian" <b88zhou@...>
Date: Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:24 am
Subject: Re: optware package git_1.7.12.1-1_powerpc.ipk buggy?
brian_zhou
Send Email Send Email
 
I don't have an explanation. But I tried it on a ds209j with the same feed and
it's working fine.

$ mkdir test
$ cd test
$ git init
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/bzhou/tmp/test/.git/
(master)$ echo hi > hi
(master)$ git add hi
(master)$ git commit -m 'first commit'
[master (root-commit) 2cd372e] first commit
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
  create mode 100644 hi

This probably points to a buggy libc on ds101g+?

$ /lib/libc.so.6
GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.3, by Roland McGrath et al.
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled by GNU CC version 3.3.4.
Compiled on a Linux 2.4.22-uc0 system on 2004-12-09.
Available extensions:
         GNU libio by Per Bothner
         crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others
         linuxthreads-0.10 by Xavier Leroy
         BIND-8.2.3-T5B
         libthread_db work sponsored by Alpha Processor Inc
         NIS(YP)/NIS+ NSS modules 0.19 by Thorsten Kukuk
         software FPU emulation by Richard Henderson, Jakub Jelinek and others
Report bugs using the `glibcbug' script to <bugs@...>.

hmm, libc is also pretty old on ds209j. Wonder what are the other differences?

-Brian

--- In nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com, "ghiro2000" <ghiro2000@...> wrote:
>
> Hi dear folks, I've spent three full days trying to get git working on a
> synology ds101g+ diskstation with no result. My aim is to enable ds101g+
> to host git repositories.  The error is trivial to describe and to
> reproduce. After installing all the necessary packages (core-utils, ssh,
> git, ...) I connected to the diskstation via ssh and performed this
> simple test:
>
> - initialize an empty repository
>      DiskStation> cd /volume1/repos/
>      DiskStation> mkdir test
>      DiskStation> cd test
>      DiskStation> git init
>      Initialized empty Git repository in /volume1/repos/test/.git/
>
> - add a single file and commit
>      DiskStation> echo 'hi' > hi
>      DiskStation> git add hi
>      Diskstation> git commit -m "first commit"
>      error: unable to find 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057
>      fatal: 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057 is not a valid
> object
>
> - What's that? Let's check the filesystem
>      DiskStation> git fsck
>      notice: HEAD points to an unborn branch (master)
>      Checking object directories: 100% (256/256), done.
>      error: unable to find 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057
>      fatal: failed to read object
> 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057: Bad file descriptor
>
> - the funny part is that the objects DO EXIST in the filesystem:
>      DiskStation> find .git/objects/ -type f
>      .git/objects/45/b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057
>
> The bottom line is that git do not accept any commit. This is really a
> strange error which seems to depend on the git package. To confirm this
> suspect I mounted the git repository via ssh and perfomed the same check
> from a PC (this time using git on the PC):
>      PC> sshfs git@diskstation:/volume1/repos/test ~/test
>      PC> cd test
>      PC> git fsck
>      notice: HEAD points to an unborn branch (master)
>      notice: No default references
>
> NO ERRORS! Which implies that the repository is not corrupted. So what?
> Am I doing right? Anyone out there have an idea of what's going on?
> Thanks a lot
>

#25084 From: "ghiro2000" <ghiro2000@...>
Date: Tue Oct 16, 2012 8:34 am
Subject: Re: optware package git_1.7.12.1-1_powerpc.ipk buggy?
ghiro2000
Send Email Send Email
 
Thanks Brian for your answer. I followed your advice and checked the ds101g+ libc, but "unfortunatelly" it looks like yours:

DiskStation> /lib/libc.so.6
GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.3, by Roland McGrath et al.
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled by GNU CC version 3.3.4.
Compiled on a Linux 2.4.22-uc0 system on 2004-12-09.
Available extensions:
    ...


What makes me suspicious of this situation is that I couldn't find one single user with this sort of problem on the web. I started with an original ds101g+ and added just the few packages needed to host repositories (no other hacking whatsoever).  Ok the device is pretty old and likely most of the users dealt with these issues years ago. But here comes my point: isn't it possible that maybe older git packages were working fine on ds101g+ ? I wonder if I there is a way to install one of those old packages and see what happen (ipkg -force-downgrade makes no difference).

ghiro


--- In nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com, "Brian" <b88zhou@...> wrote:
>
>
> I don't have an explanation. But I tried it on a ds209j with the same feed and it's working fine.
>
> $ mkdir test
> $ cd test
> $ git init
> Initialized empty Git repository in /home/bzhou/tmp/test/.git/
> (master)$ echo hi > hi
> (master)$ git add hi
> (master)$ git commit -m 'first commit'
> [master (root-commit) 2cd372e] first commit
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> create mode 100644 hi
>
> This probably points to a buggy libc on ds101g+?
>
> $ /lib/libc.so.6
> GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.3, by Roland McGrath et al.
> Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
> There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
> PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> Compiled by GNU CC version 3.3.4.
> Compiled on a Linux 2.4.22-uc0 system on 2004-12-09.
> Available extensions:
> GNU libio by Per Bothner
> crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others
> linuxthreads-0.10 by Xavier Leroy
> BIND-8.2.3-T5B
> libthread_db work sponsored by Alpha Processor Inc
> NIS(YP)/NIS+ NSS modules 0.19 by Thorsten Kukuk
> software FPU emulation by Richard Henderson, Jakub Jelinek and others
> Report bugs using the `glibcbug' script to bugs@....
>
> hmm, libc is also pretty old on ds209j. Wonder what are the other differences?
>
> -Brian
>
> --- In nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com, "ghiro2000" ghiro2000@ wrote:
> >
> > Hi dear folks, I've spent three full days trying to get git working on a
> > synology ds101g+ diskstation with no result. My aim is to enable ds101g+
> > to host git repositories. The error is trivial to describe and to
> > reproduce. After installing all the necessary packages (core-utils, ssh,
> > git, ...) I connected to the diskstation via ssh and performed this
> > simple test:
> >
> > - initialize an empty repository
> > DiskStation> cd /volume1/repos/
> > DiskStation> mkdir test
> > DiskStation> cd test
> > DiskStation> git init
> > Initialized empty Git repository in /volume1/repos/test/.git/
> >
> > - add a single file and commit
> > DiskStation> echo 'hi' > hi
> > DiskStation> git add hi
> > Diskstation> git commit -m "first commit"
> > error: unable to find 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057
> > fatal: 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057 is not a valid
> > object
> >
> > - What's that? Let's check the filesystem
> > DiskStation> git fsck
> > notice: HEAD points to an unborn branch (master)
> > Checking object directories: 100% (256/256), done.
> > error: unable to find 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057
> > fatal: failed to read object
> > 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057: Bad file descriptor
> >
> > - the funny part is that the objects DO EXIST in the filesystem:
> > DiskStation> find .git/objects/ -type f
> > .git/objects/45/b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057
> >
> > The bottom line is that git do not accept any commit. This is really a
> > strange error which seems to depend on the git package. To confirm this
> > suspect I mounted the git repository via ssh and perfomed the same check
> > from a PC (this time using git on the PC):
> > PC> sshfs git@diskstation:/volume1/repos/test ~/test
> > PC> cd test
> > PC> git fsck
> > notice: HEAD points to an unborn branch (master)
> > notice: No default references
> >
> > NO ERRORS! Which implies that the repository is not corrupted. So what?
> > Am I doing right? Anyone out there have an idea of what's going on?
> > Thanks a lot
> >
>

#25085 From: BuRaK <aspedisca@...>
Date: Tue Oct 16, 2012 2:48 pm
Subject: NSLU2 push button
aspedisca
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi all,

I kind of broke the push button of my NSLU2. Do you know the part number some how so I can replace it.  I looked everywhere but I guess I am the first one to broke it. 


Thanks in advance.

#25086 From: "harshbaste" <harshbaste@...>
Date: Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:11 am
Subject: Pogoplug Series 4
harshbaste
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi,

I've had an NSLU2 for a good 4 years now and was just taking a peek at the other
offerings of similar devices.

One of the kits I was looking at is the Pogoplug Series 4. Does anyone on this
channel have any extended experience with it. In particular :

1) Whats its power consumption like compared with the NSLU2?
2) Is it as reliable as the Slug?
3) Does it have any overheating issues?
4) Is it worth the trouble switching over in general? Is OS support mature
enough on it to run Debian Squeeze with full functionality of all I/O ports e.g.
5) Is there any other platform that is perhaps better than the Pogoplug Series
4?

No way I'm going to give up on the NSLU2 - its got a VW Beetle like aura about
it so I'm going to keep it indefinitely :). But hardware failures do happen and
I have to consider alternatives for the future.

cheers,
H

#25087 From: "Mike Westerhof (mwester)" <mwester@...>
Date: Fri Oct 26, 2012 4:28 am
Subject: Re: Pogoplug Series 4
mjwest61
Send Email Send Email
 
Take a close look at the Raspberry Pi. It's a bare board for a
dirt-cheap price -- much faster and more memory than the NSLU2, with
video out.

You may (or may not) want to add a case.  I power mine from a iPod charger.

-Mike (mwester)


On 10/25/2012 10:11 PM, harshbaste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had an NSLU2 for a good 4 years now and was just taking a peek at the
other offerings of similar devices.
>
> One of the kits I was looking at is the Pogoplug Series 4. Does anyone on this
channel have any extended experience with it. In particular :
>
> 1) Whats its power consumption like compared with the NSLU2?
> 2) Is it as reliable as the Slug?
> 3) Does it have any overheating issues?
> 4) Is it worth the trouble switching over in general? Is OS support mature
enough on it to run Debian Squeeze with full functionality of all I/O ports e.g.
> 5) Is there any other platform that is perhaps better than the Pogoplug Series
4?
>
> No way I'm going to give up on the NSLU2 - its got a VW Beetle like aura about
it so I'm going to keep it indefinitely :). But hardware failures do happen and
I have to consider alternatives for the future.
>
> cheers,
> H
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

#25088 From: Christian <krys3d@...>
Date: Fri Oct 26, 2012 7:00 am
Subject: Re: Pogoplug Series 4
comdiftelecom
Send Email Send Email
 
I have ordered 2 pcs Raspberry PI two monthes ago and make test on it
with all available linux distributions, this device is 100% incredibly slow
and is just money lost.


Le 26/10/2012 06:28, Mike Westerhof (mwester) a écrit :
 

Take a close look at the Raspberry Pi. It's a bare board for a
dirt-cheap price -- much faster and more memory than the NSLU2, with
video out.

You may (or may not) want to add a case. I power mine from a iPod charger.

-Mike (mwester)

On 10/25/2012 10:11 PM, harshbaste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had an NSLU2 for a good 4 years now and was just taking a peek at the other offerings of similar devices.
>
> One of the kits I was looking at is the Pogoplug Series 4. Does anyone on this channel have any extended experience with it. In particular :
>
> 1) Whats its power consumption like compared with the NSLU2?
> 2) Is it as reliable as the Slug?
> 3) Does it have any overheating issues?
> 4) Is it worth the trouble switching over in general? Is OS support mature enough on it to run Debian Squeeze with full functionality of all I/O ports e.g.
> 5) Is there any other platform that is perhaps better than the Pogoplug Series 4?
>
> No way I'm going to give up on the NSLU2 - its got a VW Beetle like aura about it so I'm going to keep it indefinitely :). But hardware failures do happen and I have to consider alternatives for the future.
>
> cheers,
> H
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>


-- Comdif Telecom,
Landline +33469665501
Mobile +33689816533

#25089 From: Carlos Garces <carlos.garces@...>
Date: Fri Oct 26, 2012 7:06 pm
Subject: Installing lenny on NSLU2
carlosgarces...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi!

I'm trying again to install debian in my nslug.

The tarball from debian 6 not works for me and without serial port it's impossible see the boot log.

The other approach is use Debian lenny, but also not works.

The nslug boot and the installer runs ok over:
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-archive/debian/

But during the install, the usb HDD not is detected, but I don't now why.
I can see the logs (attached) from the installer, but I can't see any relevant error (I'm not skilled on linux)

Any idea about the problem?

3 of 3 File(s)


#25090 From: dR <dystopianrebel@...>
Date: Fri Oct 26, 2012 8:00 pm
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2807
dystopianrebel
Send Email Send Email
 
I have a silly number of Slugs (using SlugOS and OpenWRT). I also have a
SheevaPlug, a DNS-323, and a PogoPlug v2.

I only know my version of the PogoPlug, but it cost $20 new (yes, new) and
installing Arch Linux was easy. Of all the devices I have tested so far, it's
the one that I favour to replace the Slug.

I still like my Slugs, though.

>>> quoted below:
________________________________________________________________________

1a. Pogoplug Series 4
    Posted by: "harshbaste" harshbaste@... harshbaste
    Date: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:11 pm ((PDT))

One of the kits I was looking at is the Pogoplug Series 4. Does anyone on this
channel have any extended experience with it.

#25091 From: Brian Wood <bwood@...>
Date: Fri Oct 26, 2012 8:53 pm
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2807
beww307
Send Email Send Email
 
On 10/26/2012 02:00 PM, dR wrote:
 

I have a silly number of Slugs (using SlugOS and OpenWRT). I also have a SheevaPlug, a DNS-323, and a PogoPlug v2.

I only know my version of the PogoPlug, but it cost $20 new (yes, new) and installing Arch Linux was easy. Of all the devices I have tested so far, it's the one that I favour to replace the Slug.



I have a Pogoplug, I think it's the original. According to /cat/proc/cpuino it's a Marvell SheevPlug reference board. This means you could buy a Sheevaplug and get twice the RAM.

But the CPU is an order of magnitude faster than a slug, I have Debian running on it and it seems to work fine.


I still like my Slugs, though.


As do I, but I wouldn't buy one today, there are better alternatives.



#25092 From: Ralph Green <severian@...>
Date: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:04 am
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2807
severian@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Howdy,
   I have setup a few of the Pogo-E02 models and they work pretty well.
  I actually bought my first Pogoplug just after I bought my first
Slug.  I never got arounf to setting up the slug.  The Model 4
Pogoplug only has 128 meg of ram.  The Pogo-E02 has 256 meg.  The
Model 4 is a bit smaller and uses an external power supply.  The
Pogo-E02 has an internal power supply and still is found for about
$25.  Some of the model 4 units have built in wifi, which can be
handy.
Have fun,
Ralph


On 10/26/12, Brian Wood <bwood@...> wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 02:00 PM, dR wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have a silly number of Slugs (using SlugOS and OpenWRT). I also have
>> a SheevaPlug, a DNS-323, and a PogoPlug v2.
>>
>> I only know my version of the PogoPlug, but it cost $20 new (yes, new)
>> and installing Arch Linux was easy. Of all the devices I have tested
>> so far, it's the one that I favour to replace the Slug.
>>
>
>
> I have a Pogoplug, I think it's the original. According to
> /cat/proc/cpuino it's a Marvell SheevPlug reference board. This means
> you could buy a Sheevaplug and get twice the RAM.
>
> But the CPU is an order of magnitude faster than a slug, I have Debian
> running on it and it seems to work fine.
>
>>
>> I still like my Slugs, though.
>>
>
> As do I, but I wouldn't buy one today, there are better alternatives.
>
>
>

#25093 From: Harsh <harshbaste@...>
Date: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:00 am
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2807
harshbaste
Send Email Send Email
 
Thanks for the feedback everybody. I'll probably evaluate more than one of the suggested options and settle on one that fits best. 

Just the idea that viable options exist is comforting since the slug has become an important part of my home setup and a serious geek hobby to boot :D big grin


From: Ralph Green <severian@...>
To: nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, 27 October 2012 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: [nslu2-linux] Digest Number 2807

 
Howdy,
I have setup a few of the Pogo-E02 models and they work pretty well.
I actually bought my first Pogoplug just after I bought my first
Slug. I never got arounf to setting up the slug. The Model 4
Pogoplug only has 128 meg of ram. The Pogo-E02 has 256 meg. The
Model 4 is a bit smaller and uses an external power supply. The
Pogo-E02 has an internal power supply and still is found for about
$25. Some of the model 4 units have built in wifi, which can be
handy.
Have fun,
Ralph

On 10/26/12, Brian Wood <bwood@...> wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 02:00 PM, dR wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have a silly number of Slugs (using SlugOS and OpenWRT). I also have
>> a SheevaPlug, a DNS-323, and a PogoPlug v2.
>>
>> I only know my version of the PogoPlug, but it cost $20 new (yes, new)
>> and installing Arch Linux was easy. Of all the devices I have tested
>> so far, it's the one that I favour to replace the Slug.
>>
>
>
> I have a Pogoplug, I think it's the original. According to
> /cat/proc/cpuino it's a Marvell SheevPlug reference board. This means
> you could buy a Sheevaplug and get twice the RAM.
>
> But the CPU is an order of magnitude faster than a slug, I have Debian
> running on it and it seems to work fine.
>
>>
>> I still like my Slugs, though.
>>
>
> As do I, but I wouldn't buy one today, there are better alternatives.
>
>
>



#25094 From: Andrea Di Dato <a.didato@...>
Date: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:42 am
Subject: Re: Digest Number 2807
napolicam
Send Email Send Email
 
Il 27/10/2012 12.00, Harsh ha scritto:
>
>
> Thanks for the feedback everybody. I'll probably evaluate more than one
> of the suggested options and settle on one that fits best.
>
> Just the idea that viable options exist is comforting since the slug has
> become an important part of my home setup and a serious geek hobby to
> boot :D big grin.

You can try the TP-LINK TL-MR3020 router too. It basicly is a 3G router
(no 3G modem inside, you have to use a dongle) but fundamentally it is a
nice and very economic piece of hardware that in many cases can
substitute the Slug.

Have a look to it!

    Andrea

#25095 From: "oddballhero" <oddballhero@...>
Date: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:45 am
Subject: Re: Pogoplug Series 4
oddballhero
Send Email Send Email
 
If you can love the slug you can love the plug.  A stock plug is comparable to a
beefed up slug running Unslung.  Probably the best plug is the 1.2 GHz V2, which
can run Debian Squeeze nicely (and last cost me less than $20).  It has 4 USB
and 1 GbE port. See http://forum.doozan.com/ , they have discussions about the
different plug variants.  I have one that has been running continuously since
2009 on a UPS.  Gets warm but not hot.  V4s have external power supplies, are
slower, but have IDE and USB3 ports.  Their CPU probably gets warmer due to less
ventilation.  Basically, an ARM is an ARM is an ARM.  Buy whatever suits you
whether it is the Pi, Beagleboard, or Plug and put whatever you want on it. 
Just remember to love your slug and replace its power supply every few years.

--- In nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com, "harshbaste" <harshbaste@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've had an NSLU2 for a good 4 years now and was just taking a peek at the
other offerings of similar devices.
>
> One of the kits I was looking at is the Pogoplug Series 4. Does anyone on this
channel have any extended experience with it. In particular :
>
> 1) Whats its power consumption like compared with the NSLU2?
> 2) Is it as reliable as the Slug?
> 3) Does it have any overheating issues?
> 4) Is it worth the trouble switching over in general? Is OS support mature
enough on it to run Debian Squeeze with full functionality of all I/O ports e.g.
> 5) Is there any other platform that is perhaps better than the Pogoplug Series
4?
>
> No way I'm going to give up on the NSLU2 - its got a VW Beetle like aura about
it so I'm going to keep it indefinitely :). But hardware failures do happen and
I have to consider alternatives for the future.
>
> cheers,
> H
>

#25096 From: "comdiftelecom" <krys3d@...>
Date: Mon Oct 29, 2012 8:46 am
Subject: Buffalo WBMR-HP-G300H
comdiftelecom
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi all

I read on DD-WRT website this Modem/router is supported device
with Atheros chipset.
I read something here
http://g300nh.blogspot.fr/2010/06/software-installation-on-dd-wrt-part-1.html
about the WZR-HP-G300NH and it seem same device except the modem.

Anyone try to install Optware on it and can confirm it's possible ?

#25097 From: "underscoretom" <underscore05@...>
Date: Fri Nov 2, 2012 4:33 pm
Subject: Unable to access slug after installing SlugOS
underscoretom
Send Email Send Email
 
I recently purchased a used NSLU2 with the intent of putting wview on it for
weather station support.

Upon installing the latest SlugOS per instructions, I cannot access the slug in
any way (telnet or via the web interface, nor any ping) once the installation is
complete and it reboots.  Reading around suggested I should install unslung OS
first and confirm the IP address is set to what I expect it to be.  Installing
unslung works fine.  I can install (including SSH) and configure as its
instructions suggest.  But then when installing SlugOS again, same response.  I
am not able to telnet or use the web interface (*.77 default).

Suggestions?

#25098 From: Michael <hollaburoo@...>
Date: Fri Nov 2, 2012 10:34 pm
Subject: transmission on cs08q1armel
whyisntthist...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi,

So I tried to send this to the maintainer of the transmission package, oleo@..., but it looks like his email is no longer valid.

I've been trying to install transmission on a Buffalo Linkstation LS-WVL, the CPU is an armv5tel.

The latest verion of transmission in the ipkg repository http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/cs08q1armel/cross/stable/Packages is version 2.61-1, but when I installed and tried to run it it failed while trying to load libssl-0.9.7.
The openssl package downloaded and installed was of version 0.9.8

Looking it up, transmission needs at least openssl of version 0.9.8 or higher.
I also tried compiling it on my own, downloading the optware toolchain making the cpu-target and ipkg toolchain, and doing a make transmission-ipkg, but I ran into the same issue.
Is there a problem with the package, or am I doing something wrong?
Any pointers for how to debug and fix issues like these in the future when cross compiling other software using optware?

Thanks,
Michael

#25099 From: Carlos Garces <carlos.garces@...>
Date: Sat Nov 3, 2012 11:23 am
Subject: Re: transmission on cs08q1armel
carlosgarces...
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi!

Try the oficial repository of openwrt
http://downloads.openwrt.org/backfire/10.03.1/ixp4xx_generic/packages/



On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Michael <hollaburoo@...> wrote:
 

Hi,


So I tried to send this to the maintainer of the transmission package, oleo@..., but it looks like his email is no longer valid.

I've been trying to install transmission on a Buffalo Linkstation LS-WVL, the CPU is an armv5tel.

The latest verion of transmission in the ipkg repository http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/cs08q1armel/cross/stable/Packages is version 2.61-1, but when I installed and tried to run it it failed while trying to load libssl-0.9.7.
The openssl package downloaded and installed was of version 0.9.8

Looking it up, transmission needs at least openssl of version 0.9.8 or higher.
I also tried compiling it on my own, downloading the optware toolchain making the cpu-target and ipkg toolchain, and doing a make transmission-ipkg, but I ran into the same issue.
Is there a problem with the package, or am I doing something wrong?
Any pointers for how to debug and fix issues like these in the future when cross compiling other software using optware?

Thanks,
Michael




#25100 From: Patrick Mcgillan <patrick.mcgillan@...>
Date: Sat Nov 3, 2012 12:28 pm
Subject: Re: Unable to access slug after installing SlugOS
pmcgillan
Send Email Send Email
 
Can you ping it? Standard dos ping program should get answers which verifies not only that is alive, but you have the correct address. SSH is the only way as it doesn't have a telnet program. Go download Putty.exe, its free and works good.

I just upgraded mine to Slug OS BE 3.15. Works great! By the way, there is no web server loaded. I installed lighttpd.

Patrick


On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:33 AM, underscoretom <underscore05@...> wrote:
 

I recently purchased a used NSLU2 with the intent of putting wview on it for weather station support.

Upon installing the latest SlugOS per instructions, I cannot access the slug in any way (telnet or via the web interface, nor any ping) once the installation is complete and it reboots. Reading around suggested I should install unslung OS first and confirm the IP address is set to what I expect it to be. Installing unslung works fine. I can install (including SSH) and configure as its instructions suggest. But then when installing SlugOS again, same response. I am not able to telnet or use the web interface (*.77 default).

Suggestions?







#25101 From: "Mike Westerhof (mwester)" <mwester@...>
Date: Sat Nov 3, 2012 3:34 pm
Subject: Re: Unable to access slug after installing SlugOS
mjwest61
Send Email Send Email
 
What instructions have you followed thus far?

Here's the definitive page (all others should be considered obsolete or
questionable at best):

http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/SlugO/InstallandTurnupABasicSlugOSSystem

As noted by Patrick already, SlugOS has neither a telnet server nor a
web server installed -- SSH is the only way to communicate with SlugOS,
at least until you get some external storage configured and install
either a web server or a telnet server.

-Mike (mwester)



On 11/2/2012 11:33 AM, underscoretom wrote:
> I recently purchased a used NSLU2 with the intent of putting wview on it for
weather station support.
>
> Upon installing the latest SlugOS per instructions, I cannot access the slug
in any way (telnet or via the web interface, nor any ping) once the installation
is complete and it reboots.  Reading around suggested I should install unslung
OS first and confirm the IP address is set to what I expect it to be. 
Installing unslung works fine.  I can install (including SSH) and configure as
its instructions suggest.  But then when installing SlugOS again, same response.
I am not able to telnet or use the web interface (*.77 default).
>
> Suggestions?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

#25102 From: Patrick Mcgillan <patrick.mcgillan@...>
Date: Sat Nov 3, 2012 10:02 pm
Subject: Re: Unable to access slug after installing SlugOS
pmcgillan
Send Email Send Email
 
I did pretty much everything on the page, except the Optware stuff at the bottom. I then installed lighttpd, perl, and rsync. When launching lighttpd, it will give erros about missing libraries. Just use the 'opkg install ???" where ? marked is replaced by the name of the missing library. Just use the name and not the version part. Let us know how you are doing and we can get you running out there.

Patrick


On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Mike Westerhof (mwester) <mwester@...> wrote:
 

What instructions have you followed thus far?

Here's the definitive page (all others should be considered obsolete or
questionable at best):

http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/SlugO/InstallandTurnupABasicSlugOSSystem

As noted by Patrick already, SlugOS has neither a telnet server nor a
web server installed -- SSH is the only way to communicate with SlugOS,
at least until you get some external storage configured and install
either a web server or a telnet server.

-Mike (mwester)



On 11/2/2012 11:33 AM, underscoretom wrote:
> I recently purchased a used NSLU2 with the intent of putting wview on it for weather station support.
>
> Upon installing the latest SlugOS per instructions, I cannot access the slug in any way (telnet or via the web interface, nor any ping) once the installation is complete and it reboots. Reading around suggested I should install unslung OS first and confirm the IP address is set to what I expect it to be. Installing unslung works fine. I can install (including SSH) and configure as its instructions suggest. But then when installing SlugOS again, same response. I am not able to telnet or use the web interface (*.77 default).
>
> Suggestions?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>




#25103 From: "underscoretom" <underscore05@...>
Date: Sun Nov 4, 2012 3:19 pm
Subject: Re: Unable to access slug after installing SlugOS
underscoretom
Send Email Send Email
 
I couldn't ping it, no.

As it turned out from googling I found a note that even if you use a static IP,
it should be in the DHCP range.  Once I did that, I was able to access things as
expected.

Thanks.

--- In nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Mcgillan <patrick.mcgillan@...>
wrote:
>
> Can you ping it? Standard dos ping program should get answers which
> verifies not only that is alive, but you have the correct address. SSH is
> the only way as it doesn't have a telnet program. Go download Putty.exe,
> its free and works good.
>
> I just upgraded mine to Slug OS BE 3.15. Works great! By the way, there is
> no web server loaded. I installed lighttpd.
>
> Patrick
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:33 AM, underscoretom <underscore05@...>wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > I recently purchased a used NSLU2 with the intent of putting wview on it
> > for weather station support.
> >
> > Upon installing the latest SlugOS per instructions, I cannot access the
> > slug in any way (telnet or via the web interface, nor any ping) once the
> > installation is complete and it reboots. Reading around suggested I should
> > install unslung OS first and confirm the IP address is set to what I expect
> > it to be. Installing unslung works fine. I can install (including SSH) and
> > configure as its instructions suggest. But then when installing SlugOS
> > again, same response. I am not able to telnet or use the web interface
> > (*.77 default).
> >
> > Suggestions?
> >
> >
> >
>

#25104 From: "Greg" <gregory.beat@...>
Date: Sun Nov 4, 2012 3:21 pm
Subject: Re: Unable to access slug after installing SlugOS
gbeat5
Send Email Send Email
 
THIS is or react Internet Link, for SlugOS.
Earlier link had a typo.

http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/SlugOS/InstallandTurnupABasicSlugOSSystem


--- In nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Westerhof (mwester)" <mwester@...>
wrote:
>
> What instructions have you followed thus far?
>
> Here's the definitive page (all others should be considered obsolete or
> questionable at best):
>
> http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/SlugO/InstallandTurnupABasicSlugOSSystem
>
> As noted by Patrick already, SlugOS has neither a telnet server nor a
> web server installed -- SSH is the only way to communicate with SlugOS,
> at least until you get some external storage configured and install
> either a web server or a telnet server.
>
> -Mike (mwester)
>
>
>
> On 11/2/2012 11:33 AM, underscoretom wrote:
> > I recently purchased a used NSLU2 with the intent of putting wview on it for
weather station support.
> >
> > Upon installing the latest SlugOS per instructions, I cannot access the slug
in any way (telnet or via the web interface, nor any ping) once the installation
is complete and it reboots.  Reading around suggested I should install unslung
OS first and confirm the IP address is set to what I expect it to be. 
Installing unslung works fine.  I can install (including SSH) and configure as
its instructions suggest.  But then when installing SlugOS again, same response.
I am not able to telnet or use the web interface (*.77 default).
> >
> > Suggestions?
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

#25105 From: Michael <hollaburoo@...>
Date: Sun Nov 4, 2012 4:39 pm
Subject: Re: transmission on cs08q1armel
whyisntthist...
Send Email Send Email
 
Thanks for the tip!
How do I get my optware config to point to the opkg feeds?
I tried adding the package url to /opt/etc/ipkg.conf like so:

and /etc/opt/ipkg/cross-feed.conf :

But I can't find or install any packages from those repositories.

Do I need to use opkg instead of ipkg?  If so, do you know how I can bootstrap that onto my WVL?

Thanks

On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Carlos Garces <carlos.garces@...> wrote:
 

Hi!

Try the oficial repository of openwrt
http://downloads.openwrt.org/backfire/10.03.1/ixp4xx_generic/packages/





On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Michael <hollaburoo@...> wrote:
 

Hi,


So I tried to send this to the maintainer of the transmission package, oleo@..., but it looks like his email is no longer valid.

I've been trying to install transmission on a Buffalo Linkstation LS-WVL, the CPU is an armv5tel.

The latest verion of transmission in the ipkg repository http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/cs08q1armel/cross/stable/Packages is version 2.61-1, but when I installed and tried to run it it failed while trying to load libssl-0.9.7.
The openssl package downloaded and installed was of version 0.9.8

Looking it up, transmission needs at least openssl of version 0.9.8 or higher.
I also tried compiling it on my own, downloading the optware toolchain making the cpu-target and ipkg toolchain, and doing a make transmission-ipkg, but I ran into the same issue.
Is there a problem with the package, or am I doing something wrong?
Any pointers for how to debug and fix issues like these in the future when cross compiling other software using optware?

Thanks,
Michael





#25106 From: Patrick Mcgillan <patrick.mcgillan@...>
Date: Mon Nov 5, 2012 2:53 pm
Subject: SLUG OS BE
pmcgillan
Send Email Send Email
 
Its up and running fine, but I sure miss mc. Any quick clues on installing midnight commander. Maybe I missed something.

opkg install mc - comes back and says can't find package.

Patrick


#25107 From: "Mike Westerhof (mwester)" <mwester@...>
Date: Mon Nov 5, 2012 3:48 pm
Subject: Re: SLUG OS BE
mjwest61
Send Email Send Email
 
You might try the optware feeds.

The instructions on the bottom of the installation page tell you how to
enable the optware feeds so that you can use "ipkg" to install from
optware (and "opkg" will continue to fetch the native SlugOS feed packages).

-Mike (mwester)

On 11/5/2012 8:53 AM, Patrick Mcgillan wrote:
>
>
> Its up and running fine, but I sure miss mc. Any quick clues on
> installing midnight commander. Maybe I missed something.
>
> opkg install mc - comes back and says can't find package.
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>

#25108 From: "Paulo Oliveira" <pjao.ct2jay@...>
Date: Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:24 pm
Subject: FW: Plz update transmission for arm
pjaopjaopjao
Send Email Send Email
 

Hello!

 

Can someone help? Need to update transmission ipk for my iomega ix-200…

 

Maintainer email is not available any more…

 

Thanks

Paulo Oliveira

 

 

De: Paulo Oliveira [mailto:pjao.ct2jay@...]
Enviada
: segunda-feira, 19 de Novembro de 2012 22:15
Para: oleo@...
Assunto: Plz update transmission for arm

 

Hi there,

Can you please update transmission package to the latest version available (transmission-2.73)?

The actual version as some annoying bugs on the web interface.

Thanks for your suport!

Chears

Paulo Oliveira

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/cs08q1armel/cross/unstable/Packages

Package: transmission

Version: 2.61-1

Depends: openssl, libcurl, libevent, zlib

Section: net

Architecture: arm

Maintainer: oleo@...

MD5Sum: bae39b48501f0e06d3592266a93ba40a

Size: 1475467

Filename: transmission_2.61-1_arm.ipk

Source: http://mirrors.m0k.org/transmission/files/transmission-2.61.tar.bz2

Description: Lightweight BitTorrent client and daemon, with web interface bundled.


#25109 From: "free2herb" <exherb@...>
Date: Fri Nov 9, 2012 5:12 pm
Subject: [package]syno-e500-aria2: json-rpc feathur seems is not enabled?
free2herb
Send Email Send Email
 
package: syno-e500 aria2 1.14.1

when I try to enable json rpc through cli... a error occured

    --unrecognized+option+'--enable-rpc

any idea?

#25110 From: Carlos Garces <carlos.garces@...>
Date: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:03 pm
Subject: Re: FW: Plz update transmission for arm
carlosgarces...
Send Email Send Email
 
Try the openWRT packages
http://downloads.openwrt.org/backfire/10.03.1

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Paulo Oliveira <pjao.ct2jay@...> wrote:
 

Hello!

 

Can someone help? Need to update transmission ipk for my iomega ix-200…

 

Maintainer email is not available any more…

 

Thanks

Paulo Oliveira

 

 

De: Paulo Oliveira [mailto:pjao.ct2jay@...]
Enviada
: segunda-feira, 19 de Novembro de 2012 22:15
Para: oleo@...
Assunto: Plz update transmission for arm

 

Hi there,

Can you please update transmission package to the latest version available (transmission-2.73)?

The actual version as some annoying bugs on the web interface.

Thanks for your suport!

Chears

Paulo Oliveira

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/cs08q1armel/cross/unstable/Packages

Package: transmission

Version: 2.61-1

Depends: openssl, libcurl, libevent, zlib

Section: net

Architecture: arm

Maintainer: oleo@...

MD5Sum: bae39b48501f0e06d3592266a93ba40a

Size: 1475467

Filename: transmission_2.61-1_arm.ipk

Source: http://mirrors.m0k.org/transmission/files/transmission-2.61.tar.bz2

Description: Lightweight BitTorrent client and daemon, with web interface bundled.



#25111 From: nas <nas@...>
Date: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:18 pm
Subject: Re: FW: Plz update transmission for arm
hacketiwack
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Paulo,
I also was in this situation but for ddwrt.
I successfully compiled the version 2.73 for ddwrt simply by changing
the version in the makefile under optware/make/transmission.mk. I
changed the line TRANSMISSION_VERSION=2.73

I then recompiled the package with make transmission-ipk.

Attached to this message, I provide a compiled version of transmission 2.73.

Regards,


Le 19. 11. 12 23:24, Paulo Oliveira a écrit :
>
> Hello!
>
> Can someone help? Need to update transmission ipk for my iomega ix-200…
>
> Maintainer email is not available any more…
>
> Thanks
>
> Paulo Oliveira
>
> *De:*Paulo Oliveira [mailto:pjao.ct2jay@...]
> *Enviada**:*segunda-feira, 19 de Novembro de 2012 22:15
> *Para:* oleo@...
> *Assunto:* Plz update transmission for arm
>
> Hi there,
>
> Can you please update transmission package to thelatest version
> available (transmission-2.73
> <http://download-origin.transmissionbt.com/files/transmission-2.73.tar.bz2>)?
>
> The actual version as some annoying bugs on the web interface.
>
> Thanks for your suport!
>
> Chears
>
> Paulo Oliveira
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/cs08q1armel/cross/unstable/Packages
>
> Package: transmission
>
> Version: 2.61-1
>
> Depends: openssl, libcurl, libevent, zlib
>
> Section: net
>
> Architecture: arm
>
> Maintainer: oleo@... <mailto:oleo@...>
>
> MD5Sum: bae39b48501f0e06d3592266a93ba40a
>
> Size: 1475467
>
> Filename: transmission_2.61-1_arm.ipk
>
> Source:
> http://mirrors.m0k.org/transmission/files/transmission-2.61.tar.bz2
>
> Description: Lightweight BitTorrent client and daemon, with web
> interface bundled.
>
>

1 of 1 File(s)


#25112 From: Ovidiu Sas <osas@...>
Date: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:39 pm
Subject: Re: FW: Plz update transmission for arm [1 Attachment]
ovi_sas
Send Email Send Email
 
I updated the makefile.  Binaries should pop up soon in the feeds.

Regards,
Ovidiu Sas

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:18 PM, nas <nas@...> wrote:
> Hi Paulo,
> I also was in this situation but for ddwrt.
> I successfully compiled the version 2.73 for ddwrt simply by changing
> the version in the makefile under optware/make/transmission.mk. I
> changed the line TRANSMISSION_VERSION=2.73
>
> I then recompiled the package with make transmission-ipk.
>
> Attached to this message, I provide a compiled version of transmission 2.73.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Le 19. 11. 12 23:24, Paulo Oliveira a écrit :
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Can someone help? Need to update transmission ipk for my iomega ix-200…
>>
>> Maintainer email is not available any more…
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Paulo Oliveira
>>
>> *De:*Paulo Oliveira [mailto:pjao.ct2jay@...]
>> *Enviada**:*segunda-feira, 19 de Novembro de 2012 22:15
>> *Para:* oleo@...
>> *Assunto:* Plz update transmission for arm
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Can you please update transmission package to thelatest version
>> available (transmission-2.73
>> <http://download-origin.transmissionbt.com/files/transmission-2.73.tar.bz2>)?
>>
>> The actual version as some annoying bugs on the web interface.
>>
>> Thanks for your suport!
>>
>> Chears
>>
>> Paulo Oliveira
>>
>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/cs08q1armel/cross/unstable/Packages
>>
>> Package: transmission
>>
>> Version: 2.61-1
>>
>> Depends: openssl, libcurl, libevent, zlib
>>
>> Section: net
>>
>> Architecture: arm
>>
>> Maintainer: oleo@... <mailto:oleo@...>
>>
>> MD5Sum: bae39b48501f0e06d3592266a93ba40a
>>
>> Size: 1475467
>>
>> Filename: transmission_2.61-1_arm.ipk
>>
>> Source:
>> http://mirrors.m0k.org/transmission/files/transmission-2.61.tar.bz2
>>
>> Description: Lightweight BitTorrent client and daemon, with web
>> interface bundled.

Messages 25083 - 25112 of 25172   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help