I don't have an explanation. But I tried it on a ds209j with the same feed and
it's working fine.

$ mkdir test
$ cd test
$ git init
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/bzhou/tmp/test/.git/
(master)$ echo hi > hi
(master)$ git add hi
(master)$ git commit -m 'first commit'
[master (root-commit) 2cd372e] first commit
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
  create mode 100644 hi

This probably points to a buggy libc on ds101g+?

$ /lib/libc.so.6
GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.3, by Roland McGrath et al.
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled by GNU CC version 3.3.4.
Compiled on a Linux 2.4.22-uc0 system on 2004-12-09.
Available extensions:
         GNU libio by Per Bothner
         crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others
         linuxthreads-0.10 by Xavier Leroy
         BIND-8.2.3-T5B
         libthread_db work sponsored by Alpha Processor Inc
         NIS(YP)/NIS+ NSS modules 0.19 by Thorsten Kukuk
         software FPU emulation by Richard Henderson, Jakub Jelinek and others
Report bugs using the `glibcbug' script to <bugs@...>.

hmm, libc is also pretty old on ds209j. Wonder what are the other differences?

-Brian

--- In nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com, "ghiro2000" <ghiro2000@...> wrote:
>
> Hi dear folks, I've spent three full days trying to get git working on a
> synology ds101g+ diskstation with no result. My aim is to enable ds101g+
> to host git repositories.  The error is trivial to describe and to
> reproduce. After installing all the necessary packages (core-utils, ssh,
> git, ...) I connected to the diskstation via ssh and performed this
> simple test:
>
> - initialize an empty repository
>      DiskStation> cd /volume1/repos/
>      DiskStation> mkdir test
>      DiskStation> cd test
>      DiskStation> git init
>      Initialized empty Git repository in /volume1/repos/test/.git/
>
> - add a single file and commit
>      DiskStation> echo 'hi' > hi
>      DiskStation> git add hi
>      Diskstation> git commit -m "first commit"
>      error: unable to find 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057
>      fatal: 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057 is not a valid
> object
>
> - What's that? Let's check the filesystem
>      DiskStation> git fsck
>      notice: HEAD points to an unborn branch (master)
>      Checking object directories: 100% (256/256), done.
>      error: unable to find 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057
>      fatal: failed to read object
> 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057: Bad file descriptor
>
> - the funny part is that the objects DO EXIST in the filesystem:
>      DiskStation> find .git/objects/ -type f
>      .git/objects/45/b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057
>
> The bottom line is that git do not accept any commit. This is really a
> strange error which seems to depend on the git package. To confirm this
> suspect I mounted the git repository via ssh and perfomed the same check
> from a PC (this time using git on the PC):
>      PC> sshfs git@diskstation:/volume1/repos/test ~/test
>      PC> cd test
>      PC> git fsck
>      notice: HEAD points to an unborn branch (master)
>      notice: No default references
>
> NO ERRORS! Which implies that the repository is not corrupted. So what?
> Am I doing right? Anyone out there have an idea of what's going on?
> Thanks a lot
>

Hi,

I've had an NSLU2 for a good 4 years now and was just taking a peek at the other
offerings of similar devices.

One of the kits I was looking at is the Pogoplug Series 4. Does anyone on this
channel have any extended experience with it. In particular :

1) Whats its power consumption like compared with the NSLU2?
2) Is it as reliable as the Slug?
3) Does it have any overheating issues?
4) Is it worth the trouble switching over in general? Is OS support mature
enough on it to run Debian Squeeze with full functionality of all I/O ports e.g.
5) Is there any other platform that is perhaps better than the Pogoplug Series
4?

No way I'm going to give up on the NSLU2 - its got a VW Beetle like aura about
it so I'm going to keep it indefinitely :). But hardware failures do happen and
I have to consider alternatives for the future.

cheers,
H

Take a close look at the Raspberry Pi. It's a bare board for a
dirt-cheap price -- much faster and more memory than the NSLU2, with
video out.

You may (or may not) want to add a case.  I power mine from a iPod charger.

-Mike (mwester)


On 10/25/2012 10:11 PM, harshbaste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had an NSLU2 for a good 4 years now and was just taking a peek at the
other offerings of similar devices.
>
> One of the kits I was looking at is the Pogoplug Series 4. Does anyone on this
channel have any extended experience with it. In particular :
>
> 1) Whats its power consumption like compared with the NSLU2?
> 2) Is it as reliable as the Slug?
> 3) Does it have any overheating issues?
> 4) Is it worth the trouble switching over in general? Is OS support mature
enough on it to run Debian Squeeze with full functionality of all I/O ports e.g.
> 5) Is there any other platform that is perhaps better than the Pogoplug Series
4?
>
> No way I'm going to give up on the NSLU2 - its got a VW Beetle like aura about
it so I'm going to keep it indefinitely :). But hardware failures do happen and
I have to consider alternatives for the future.
>
> cheers,
> H
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

 

Take a close look at the Raspberry Pi. It's a bare board for a
dirt-cheap price -- much faster and more memory than the NSLU2, with
video out.

You may (or may not) want to add a case. I power mine from a iPod charger.

-Mike (mwester)

On 10/25/2012 10:11 PM, harshbaste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had an NSLU2 for a good 4 years now and was just taking a peek at the other offerings of similar devices.
>
> One of the kits I was looking at is the Pogoplug Series 4. Does anyone on this channel have any extended experience with it. In particular :
>
> 1) Whats its power consumption like compared with the NSLU2?
> 2) Is it as reliable as the Slug?
> 3) Does it have any overheating issues?
> 4) Is it worth the trouble switching over in general? Is OS support mature enough on it to run Debian Squeeze with full functionality of all I/O ports e.g.
> 5) Is there any other platform that is perhaps better than the Pogoplug Series 4?
>
> No way I'm going to give up on the NSLU2 - its got a VW Beetle like aura about it so I'm going to keep it indefinitely :). But hardware failures do happen and I have to consider alternatives for the future.
>
> cheers,
> H
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

-- Comdif Telecom,
Landline +33469665501
Mobile +33689816533

I have a silly number of Slugs (using SlugOS and OpenWRT). I also have a
SheevaPlug, a DNS-323, and a PogoPlug v2.

I only know my version of the PogoPlug, but it cost $20 new (yes, new) and
installing Arch Linux was easy. Of all the devices I have tested so far, it's
the one that I favour to replace the Slug.

I still like my Slugs, though.

>>> quoted below:
________________________________________________________________________

1a. Pogoplug Series 4
    Posted by: "harshbaste" harshbaste@... harshbaste
    Date: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:11 pm ((PDT))

One of the kits I was looking at is the Pogoplug Series 4. Does anyone on this
channel have any extended experience with it.

 

I have a silly number of Slugs (using SlugOS and OpenWRT). I also have a SheevaPlug, a DNS-323, and a PogoPlug v2.

I only know my version of the PogoPlug, but it cost $20 new (yes, new) and installing Arch Linux was easy. Of all the devices I have tested so far, it's the one that I favour to replace the Slug.

I still like my Slugs, though.

Howdy,
   I have setup a few of the Pogo-E02 models and they work pretty well.
  I actually bought my first Pogoplug just after I bought my first
Slug.  I never got arounf to setting up the slug.  The Model 4
Pogoplug only has 128 meg of ram.  The Pogo-E02 has 256 meg.  The
Model 4 is a bit smaller and uses an external power supply.  The
Pogo-E02 has an internal power supply and still is found for about
$25.  Some of the model 4 units have built in wifi, which can be
handy.
Have fun,
Ralph


On 10/26/12, Brian Wood <bwood@...> wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 02:00 PM, dR wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have a silly number of Slugs (using SlugOS and OpenWRT). I also have
>> a SheevaPlug, a DNS-323, and a PogoPlug v2.
>>
>> I only know my version of the PogoPlug, but it cost $20 new (yes, new)
>> and installing Arch Linux was easy. Of all the devices I have tested
>> so far, it's the one that I favour to replace the Slug.
>>
>
>
> I have a Pogoplug, I think it's the original. According to
> /cat/proc/cpuino it's a Marvell SheevPlug reference board. This means
> you could buy a Sheevaplug and get twice the RAM.
>
> But the CPU is an order of magnitude faster than a slug, I have Debian
> running on it and it seems to work fine.
>
>>
>> I still like my Slugs, though.
>>
>
> As do I, but I wouldn't buy one today, there are better alternatives.
>
>
>

Il 27/10/2012 12.00, Harsh ha scritto:
>
>
> Thanks for the feedback everybody. I'll probably evaluate more than one
> of the suggested options and settle on one that fits best.
>
> Just the idea that viable options exist is comforting since the slug has
> become an important part of my home setup and a serious geek hobby to
> boot :D big grin.

You can try the TP-LINK TL-MR3020 router too. It basicly is a 3G router
(no 3G modem inside, you have to use a dongle) but fundamentally it is a
nice and very economic piece of hardware that in many cases can
substitute the Slug.

Have a look to it!

    Andrea

If you can love the slug you can love the plug.  A stock plug is comparable to a
beefed up slug running Unslung.  Probably the best plug is the 1.2 GHz V2, which
can run Debian Squeeze nicely (and last cost me less than $20).  It has 4 USB
and 1 GbE port. See http://forum.doozan.com/ , they have discussions about the
different plug variants.  I have one that has been running continuously since
2009 on a UPS.  Gets warm but not hot.  V4s have external power supplies, are
slower, but have IDE and USB3 ports.  Their CPU probably gets warmer due to less
ventilation.  Basically, an ARM is an ARM is an ARM.  Buy whatever suits you
whether it is the Pi, Beagleboard, or Plug and put whatever you want on it. 
Just remember to love your slug and replace its power supply every few years.

--- In nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com, "harshbaste" <harshbaste@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've had an NSLU2 for a good 4 years now and was just taking a peek at the
other offerings of similar devices.
>
> One of the kits I was looking at is the Pogoplug Series 4. Does anyone on this
channel have any extended experience with it. In particular :
>
> 1) Whats its power consumption like compared with the NSLU2?
> 2) Is it as reliable as the Slug?
> 3) Does it have any overheating issues?
> 4) Is it worth the trouble switching over in general? Is OS support mature
enough on it to run Debian Squeeze with full functionality of all I/O ports e.g.
> 5) Is there any other platform that is perhaps better than the Pogoplug Series
4?
>
> No way I'm going to give up on the NSLU2 - its got a VW Beetle like aura about
it so I'm going to keep it indefinitely :). But hardware failures do happen and
I have to consider alternatives for the future.
>
> cheers,
> H
>

Hi all

I read on DD-WRT website this Modem/router is supported device
with Atheros chipset.
I read something here
http://g300nh.blogspot.fr/2010/06/software-installation-on-dd-wrt-part-1.html
about the WZR-HP-G300NH and it seem same device except the modem.

Anyone try to install Optware on it and can confirm it's possible ?

I recently purchased a used NSLU2 with the intent of putting wview on it for
weather station support.

Upon installing the latest SlugOS per instructions, I cannot access the slug in
any way (telnet or via the web interface, nor any ping) once the installation is
complete and it reboots.  Reading around suggested I should install unslung OS
first and confirm the IP address is set to what I expect it to be.  Installing
unslung works fine.  I can install (including SSH) and configure as its
instructions suggest.  But then when installing SlugOS again, same response.  I
am not able to telnet or use the web interface (*.77 default).

Suggestions?

What instructions have you followed thus far?

Here's the definitive page (all others should be considered obsolete or
questionable at best):

http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/SlugO/InstallandTurnupABasicSlugOSSystem

As noted by Patrick already, SlugOS has neither a telnet server nor a
web server installed -- SSH is the only way to communicate with SlugOS,
at least until you get some external storage configured and install
either a web server or a telnet server.

-Mike (mwester)



On 11/2/2012 11:33 AM, underscoretom wrote:
> I recently purchased a used NSLU2 with the intent of putting wview on it for
weather station support.
>
> Upon installing the latest SlugOS per instructions, I cannot access the slug
in any way (telnet or via the web interface, nor any ping) once the installation
is complete and it reboots.  Reading around suggested I should install unslung
OS first and confirm the IP address is set to what I expect it to be. 
Installing unslung works fine.  I can install (including SSH) and configure as
its instructions suggest.  But then when installing SlugOS again, same response.
I am not able to telnet or use the web interface (*.77 default).
>
> Suggestions?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

I couldn't ping it, no.

As it turned out from googling I found a note that even if you use a static IP,
it should be in the DHCP range.  Once I did that, I was able to access things as
expected.

Thanks.

--- In nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Mcgillan <patrick.mcgillan@...>
wrote:
>
> Can you ping it? Standard dos ping program should get answers which
> verifies not only that is alive, but you have the correct address. SSH is
> the only way as it doesn't have a telnet program. Go download Putty.exe,
> its free and works good.
>
> I just upgraded mine to Slug OS BE 3.15. Works great! By the way, there is
> no web server loaded. I installed lighttpd.
>
> Patrick
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:33 AM, underscoretom <underscore05@...>wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > I recently purchased a used NSLU2 with the intent of putting wview on it
> > for weather station support.
> >
> > Upon installing the latest SlugOS per instructions, I cannot access the
> > slug in any way (telnet or via the web interface, nor any ping) once the
> > installation is complete and it reboots. Reading around suggested I should
> > install unslung OS first and confirm the IP address is set to what I expect
> > it to be. Installing unslung works fine. I can install (including SSH) and
> > configure as its instructions suggest. But then when installing SlugOS
> > again, same response. I am not able to telnet or use the web interface
> > (*.77 default).
> >
> > Suggestions?
> >
> >
> >
>

THIS is or react Internet Link, for SlugOS.
Earlier link had a typo.

http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/SlugOS/InstallandTurnupABasicSlugOSSystem


--- In nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Westerhof (mwester)" <mwester@...>
wrote:
>
> What instructions have you followed thus far?
>
> Here's the definitive page (all others should be considered obsolete or
> questionable at best):
>
> http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/SlugO/InstallandTurnupABasicSlugOSSystem
>
> As noted by Patrick already, SlugOS has neither a telnet server nor a
> web server installed -- SSH is the only way to communicate with SlugOS,
> at least until you get some external storage configured and install
> either a web server or a telnet server.
>
> -Mike (mwester)
>
>
>
> On 11/2/2012 11:33 AM, underscoretom wrote:
> > I recently purchased a used NSLU2 with the intent of putting wview on it for
weather station support.
> >
> > Upon installing the latest SlugOS per instructions, I cannot access the slug
in any way (telnet or via the web interface, nor any ping) once the installation
is complete and it reboots.  Reading around suggested I should install unslung
OS first and confirm the IP address is set to what I expect it to be. 
Installing unslung works fine.  I can install (including SSH) and configure as
its instructions suggest.  But then when installing SlugOS again, same response.
I am not able to telnet or use the web interface (*.77 default).
> >
> > Suggestions?
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

You might try the optware feeds.

The instructions on the bottom of the installation page tell you how to
enable the optware feeds so that you can use "ipkg" to install from
optware (and "opkg" will continue to fetch the native SlugOS feed packages).

-Mike (mwester)

On 11/5/2012 8:53 AM, Patrick Mcgillan wrote:
>
>
> Its up and running fine, but I sure miss mc. Any quick clues on
> installing midnight commander. Maybe I missed something.
>
> opkg install mc - comes back and says can't find package.
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>

package: syno-e500 aria2 1.14.1

when I try to enable json rpc through cli... a error occured

    --unrecognized+option+'--enable-rpc

any idea?

Hi Paulo,
I also was in this situation but for ddwrt.
I successfully compiled the version 2.73 for ddwrt simply by changing
the version in the makefile under optware/make/transmission.mk. I
changed the line TRANSMISSION_VERSION=2.73

I then recompiled the package with make transmission-ipk.

Attached to this message, I provide a compiled version of transmission 2.73.

Regards,


Le 19. 11. 12 23:24, Paulo Oliveira a écrit :
>
> Hello!
>
> Can someone help? Need to update transmission ipk for my iomega ix-200…
>
> Maintainer email is not available any more…
>
> Thanks
>
> Paulo Oliveira
>
> *De:*Paulo Oliveira [mailto:pjao.ct2jay@...]
> *Enviada**:*segunda-feira, 19 de Novembro de 2012 22:15
> *Para:* oleo@...
> *Assunto:* Plz update transmission for arm
>
> Hi there,
>
> Can you please update transmission package to thelatest version
> available (transmission-2.73
> <http://download-origin.transmissionbt.com/files/transmission-2.73.tar.bz2>)?
>
> The actual version as some annoying bugs on the web interface.
>
> Thanks for your suport!
>
> Chears
>
> Paulo Oliveira
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/cs08q1armel/cross/unstable/Packages
>
> Package: transmission
>
> Version: 2.61-1
>
> Depends: openssl, libcurl, libevent, zlib
>
> Section: net
>
> Architecture: arm
>
> Maintainer: oleo@... <mailto:oleo@...>
>
> MD5Sum: bae39b48501f0e06d3592266a93ba40a
>
> Size: 1475467
>
> Filename: transmission_2.61-1_arm.ipk
>
> Source:
> http://mirrors.m0k.org/transmission/files/transmission-2.61.tar.bz2
>
> Description: Lightweight BitTorrent client and daemon, with web
> interface bundled.
>
>

I updated the makefile.  Binaries should pop up soon in the feeds.

Regards,
Ovidiu Sas

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:18 PM, nas <nas@...> wrote:
> Hi Paulo,
> I also was in this situation but for ddwrt.
> I successfully compiled the version 2.73 for ddwrt simply by changing
> the version in the makefile under optware/make/transmission.mk. I
> changed the line TRANSMISSION_VERSION=2.73
>
> I then recompiled the package with make transmission-ipk.
>
> Attached to this message, I provide a compiled version of transmission 2.73.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Le 19. 11. 12 23:24, Paulo Oliveira a écrit :
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Can someone help? Need to update transmission ipk for my iomega ix-200…
>>
>> Maintainer email is not available any more…
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Paulo Oliveira
>>
>> *De:*Paulo Oliveira [mailto:pjao.ct2jay@...]
>> *Enviada**:*segunda-feira, 19 de Novembro de 2012 22:15
>> *Para:* oleo@...
>> *Assunto:* Plz update transmission for arm
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Can you please update transmission package to thelatest version
>> available (transmission-2.73
>> <http://download-origin.transmissionbt.com/files/transmission-2.73.tar.bz2>)?
>>
>> The actual version as some annoying bugs on the web interface.
>>
>> Thanks for your suport!
>>
>> Chears
>>
>> Paulo Oliveira
>>
>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/cs08q1armel/cross/unstable/Packages
>>
>> Package: transmission
>>
>> Version: 2.61-1
>>
>> Depends: openssl, libcurl, libevent, zlib
>>
>> Section: net
>>
>> Architecture: arm
>>
>> Maintainer: oleo@... <mailto:oleo@...>
>>
>> MD5Sum: bae39b48501f0e06d3592266a93ba40a
>>
>> Size: 1475467
>>
>> Filename: transmission_2.61-1_arm.ipk
>>
>> Source:
>> http://mirrors.m0k.org/transmission/files/transmission-2.61.tar.bz2
>>
>> Description: Lightweight BitTorrent client and daemon, with web
>> interface bundled.