Interviewed by CNN on 16/06/2012 16:26, Dido told the world:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoteTab
>
>

...by the way, that page sure needs an overhaul. It was still listing
the "latest stable" version as 6.0 (I updated it to 6.2; 7.0 will have
to wait for it being, you know, actually available on the site), and has
other problems I don't have enough info to fix, such as claiming that
the first version with regexp was 5.4...

--
MCBastos

This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will
be prosecuted under the DMCA.
-=-=-
... Sent from my DeLorean DMC-12, parked in 1955.
* Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey 2.9 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla

I'll agree with Dido on this one.  Pasteboard is cool.  I use it often
as well.  I also use it as my calculator since it's already open.

One other annoyance as we gather those (in addition to the resetting of
search settings after a clip) is the inability to "expand" the search
box so that I can see my entire search string.

On the other hand I love being able to click anywhere blank in the
search dialog box and going to the top of the document.

On 6/16/2012 3:26 PM, Dido wrote:
> 3. Which NoteTab feature(s) do you use the most?
>
> :Pasteboard
> "The pasteboard is one of the most powerful (and unusual) features,"
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoteTab
>
> 4. Which NoteTab feature would you miss the most if you had to use
> another editor?
> Pasteboard

What is the limit on Highlighted text that can be copied to the Replace
dialog?

If I highlight a large section it doesn't go. I have manually copy it
first then paste it in. THEN if I have another thing to replace with I
have to use a token because I can not copy to the  clipboard with
Directory search open.

From: ntb-html@yahoogroups.com [mailto:ntb-html@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Eric Fookes
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 10:33 AM
To: notetab@yahoogroups.com; ntb-html@yahoogroups.com;
ntb-clips@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NH] What is it you like most about NoteTab?





Dear Notetabber,

I'd love to have your opinion. Can you spare me a minute and reply to
this email?

Your answers to the following questions will help me develop the copy
for the new NoteTab website. They will also give me guidance for future
program enhancements.

1. What do you mostly use NoteTab for?
(HTML editing, copywriting, note taking, poetry, data processing, ...)
HTM, PHP & CSS editing
2. What is it you like most about NoteTab?
Good text processor, good tools to edit HTML Tags and CSS statements
3. Which NoteTab feature(s) do you use the most?
The clip books and Tidy
4. Which NoteTab feature would you miss the most if you had to use
another editor?
Probably the clip books
5. Which feature do you miss the most in NoteTab that competing editors
offer?
Don't use competing editors - settled on this one several years ago and
don't plan to change anytime soon.  Sorry, I know this is not much help, but
it is factual.
6. What is the top benefit you get from using NoteTab?
Compact, standard compliant web pages.  I use NoteTab principally as an
editor for web page development.  Works well in writing PHP code, CSS and
HTML tags.  The clip books help me remember all the things this old brain
gets foggy about so NoteTab and I get along really well.
Feel free to share your answers in this discussion group. You can also
send them to me directly at eric.fookes@...
<mailto:eric.fookes%40gmail.com>  if you prefer. Thanks!

--
Regards,

Eric Fookes
http://www.fookes.com/





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On 16-6-2012 19:32, Eric Fookes wrote:

> 1. What do you mostly use NoteTab for?
> (HTML editing, copywriting, note taking, poetry, data processing, ...)

Just about anything to do with unformatted text. My ideal is to do away
with word processors altogether, maybe except for the very last stage,
actually converting to some kind of formatted text.

I may be able to achieve that best under Unix/Linux with vi(m) and
LaTex, but I have never tried the combination. I do use vi(m) a lot
though. Besides, I prefer dedicated Windows applications when under Windows.

>
> 2. What is it you like most about NoteTab?

That NTB offers many, easy to access features for working with
unformatted text. I am not a programmer, nor an html coder nor anything
like that. I like that part of NTB too, but I do not really need it. For
me those 'techy' features are just (very handy) fun really.

>
> 3. Which NoteTab feature(s) do you use the most?

Pasteboard, Outline, working with files in multiple tabs simultaneously,
search (and replace), renaming + deleting files from inside NTB.
>
> 4. Which NoteTab feature would you miss the most if you had to use
> another editor?

See 3, but other editors do have at least some of these features but not
all.

>
> 5. Which feature do you miss the most in NoteTab that competing editors
> offer?

See also ad 1. Being able to work with Unicode.

>
> 6. What is the top benefit you get from using NoteTab?


It is one of the best ways I know of working with plain text files.

>


--
Gerard (E.G.P.) Huijing
2312 ZD Leiden
Netherlands
inboxgen@...

Op 16/06/2012 19:32, Eric Fookes schreef:

> 1. What do you mostly use NoteTab for?

html

> 2. What is it you like most about NoteTab?

Pasteboard - Search on disk - templates with ^? - opening multiple tpl's
- multi-tabbing - clips

And ... the supportgroups !!

> 3. Which NoteTab feature(s) do you use the most?

See 2

> 4. Which NoteTab feature would you miss the most if you had to use
> another editor?

Hard to say, because only using NoteTab. That template ^? option? -
Search on disk?

> 5. Which feature do you miss the most in NoteTab that competing editors
> offer?

- Macro recording (for clips perhaps, for minds that aren't programmers?
With a flow/diagram, from broad to narrow [what do you want? This, and
etc.])

- unicode

- improved table function, for an idea see:
http://www.stefan-pettersson.nu/site/table2html/

- able to choose for nummeric entitities, instead of things like:  

> 6. What is the top benefit you get from using NoteTab?

Comfort in work, see 1.

--
Adrien

> 1. What do you mostly use NoteTab for?
> (HTML editing, copywriting, note taking, poetry, data processing, ...)

* Gathering data with pasteboard
* Processing HTML files with clips and search/replace

> 2. What is it you like most about NoteTab?

* Quick
* Pasteboard
* Clips
* calculator

> 3. Which NoteTab feature(s) do you use the most?

* pasteboard
* regex search/replace
* sort lines to remove duplicates
* calculator

> 4. Which NoteTab feature would you miss the most if you had to use
> another editor?

* pasteboard

> 5. Which feature do you miss the most in NoteTab that competing editors
> offer?

* php/css syntax highlighting

> 6. What is the top benefit you get from using NoteTab?

* quick data gathering & processing

Rudi

I guess I took the below as a given, but it was actually pretty unique
when you first started it.  Tab driven programs have now become the norm.

I too use disk search often.

Eventually I'll wish I had listed 90% of the features others are listing
as well.  I am enjoying this thread a lot.

On 6/17/2012 2:24 AM, Gerard Huijing wrote:
> working with files in multiple tabs simultaneously

I guess I wish it had better block features too.  I mean they work with
the following caveats:
It is not what you see is what you get, so you have to work hard
sometimes to get the right columns and then I sometimes have to add
extra spaces to my last line so that I can get the block I want.  It
always seems a bit mysterious.  Also if I have tabs in content, then
block copy is really worthless.

I feature negatives only to get positives.  This is such an awesome
program I hate to even say what I don't like.

On 6/17/2012 4:49 AM, Adrien Verlee wrote:
> 5. Which feature do you miss the most in NoteTab that competing editors
>> offer?

1. What do you mostly use NoteTab for?
I use it as my plain text pkm;  that is, everything. My writing (with markdown
text  markup), my catalogs and lists, todos, notes  idea development and
projects. 


2. What is it you like most about NoteTab? The wiki style hyperlinks and the
clips.

3. Which NoteTab feature(s) do you use the most? The hyperlinks.

4. Which NoteTab feature would you miss the most if you had to use
another editor?  I do have to use other editors and I miss the hyperlinking.

5. Which feature do you miss the most in NoteTab that competing editors
offer? multi-level outlining.

6. What is the top benefit you get from using NoteTab?  plain text editing with
sophisticated utilities to manipulate and convert them to other formats as
needed.



________________________________
  From: Eric Fookes <egroups@...>
To: notetab@yahoogroups.com; ntb-html@yahoogroups.com; ntb-clips@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 10:32 AM
Subject: [Clip] What is it you like most about NoteTab?


 
Dear Notetabber,

I'd love to have your opinion. Can you spare me a minute and reply to
this email?

Your answers to the following questions will help me develop the copy
for the new NoteTab website. They will also give me guidance for future
program enhancements.

1. What do you mostly use NoteTab for?
(HTML editing, copywriting, note taking, poetry, data processing, ...)

2. What is it you like most about NoteTab?

3. Which NoteTab feature(s) do you use the most?

4. Which NoteTab feature would you miss the most if you had to use
another editor?

5. Which feature do you miss the most in NoteTab that competing editors
offer?

6. What is the top benefit you get from using NoteTab?

Feel free to share your answers in this discussion group. You can also
send them to me directly at eric.fookes@... if you prefer. Thanks!

--
Regards,

Eric Fookes
http://www.fookes.com/




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On 6/17/2012 4:49 AM, Adrien Verlee wrote:
>
> - improved table function, for an idea see:
> http://www.stefan-pettersson.nu/site/table2html/
>
Thanks for this pointer!

Bob

--
'I am only one;but I am still one.
I cannot do everything,but still I can do something.
I will not refuse to do the something I can do.'
-- Helen Keller


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Originally I had no intention of responding to the group, then I thought
why not?

I'm one of the legions across the planet using this wonderful software.

I downloaded NoteTab Lite nearly a decade or more ago. I used it and
paid my dues. I later upgraded to the "paid for" Pro version. I still
recommend it on my site and everywhere else when the opportunity occurs.

In fact? I'm checking right now? I have "NoteTab 4.95/fp full version"

Archaic? Yes.

Redundant? Maybe.

Should I upgrade?

NO

Am I a professional webmaster? No I am not.

What are the features I love? [in order], the ones I actually use.

1. "Search Disk" - with replace

2. "HTML - Hyperlink"

3. "HTML - Image"

4. Many other features I can't immediately remember. I don't use Clips
and other stuff because to me it is totally irrelevant.

My modest post isn't to "bag" Eric Fookes and Notetab, it's to
congratulate Eric.

I, personally am grateful for your wonderful creation and pleased I paid
for the [then] Pro version.

Just my .02c worth from a non-professional.


Thanks! :)

Ian C. Purdie
Budgewoi N.S.W. Australia -
http://www.electronics-tutorials.com/

Idiot Yahoo Groups. I receive email yet can't reply. I'll try again:

[POST]

Originally I had no intention of responding to the group, then I thought
why not?

I'm one of the legions across the planet using this wonderful software.

I downloaded NoteTab Lite nearly a decade or more ago. I used it and
paid my dues. I later upgraded to the "paid for" Pro version. I still
recommend it on my site and everywhere else when the opportunity occurs.

In fact? I'm checking right now? I have "NoteTab 4.95/fp full version"

Archaic? Yes.

Redundant? Maybe.

Should I upgrade?

NO

Am I a professional webmaster? No I am not.

What are the features I love? [in order], the ones I actually use.

1. "Search Disk" - with replace

2. "HTML - Hyperlink"

3. "HTML - Image"

4. Many other features I can't immediately remember. I don't use Clips
and other stuff because to me it is totally irrelevant.

My modest post isn't to "bag" Eric Fookes and Notetab, it's to
congratulate Eric.

I, personally am grateful for your wonderful creation and pleased I paid
for the [then] Pro version.

Just my .02c worth from a non-professional.


Thanks! :)

Ian C. Purdie
Budgewoi N.S.W. Australia -
http://www.electronics-tutorials.com/

[/POST]

Thanks to all who have taken the time to answer my questions. I've
received more replies than I expected, both here and at my personal
email address.

Your feedback has been really helpful and I also appreciate the
suggestions some of you sent. New ideas have been added to the NoteTab
wish list.

We're in the final stages with the new web site and hope to release
NoteTab 7 by the 1st of July.

--
Regards,

Eric Fookes
http://www.fookes.com/


On 16/06/2012 19:32, Eric Fookes wrote:
> Dear Notetabber,
>
> I'd love to have your opinion. Can you spare me a minute and reply to
> this email?
>
> Your answers to the following questions will help me develop the copy
> for the new NoteTab website. They will also give me guidance for future
> program enhancements.
>
> 1. What do you mostly use NoteTab for?
> (HTML editing, copywriting, note taking, poetry, data processing, ...)
>
> 2. What is it you like most about NoteTab?
>
> 3. Which NoteTab feature(s) do you use the most?
>
> 4. Which NoteTab feature would you miss the most if you had to use
> another editor?
>
> 5. Which feature do you miss the most in NoteTab that competing editors
> offer?
>
> 6. What is the top benefit you get from using NoteTab?
>
>
> Feel free to share your answers in this discussion group. You can also
> send them to me directly at eric.fookes@... if you prefer. Thanks!

Dear Notetabber,

I'm happy to announce that NoteTab 7 has now been officially released.
There were a few hiccups after uploading the new site a few hours ago,
but these have now hopefully all been fixed.

Please visit the following page for upgrade instructions:
http://www.notetab.com/upgrade.php

Or go here if you just want to upgrade NoteTab Light:
http://www.notetab.com/download-now.php

Please tell your friends about NoteTab 7. If you need help to convince
them, visit one of the following pages. They explain how NoteTab differs
from competing products:

10 Great Reasons Why You’ll Love This Text Editor:
http://www.notetab.com/text-editor.php

This Prize-Winning HTML Editor Does It All and Saves Time!
http://www.notetab.com/html-editor.php

Enjoy!

--
Regards,

Eric Fookes
http://www.notetab.com/

Eric Fookes wrote:
> Were you able to view the new NoteTab site alright with your settings?

Sure, you at least value cleanliness, KISS, and standards, so even in my
CSS-less and imageless Netscape 4.8 it's fully functional. There are
some bugs though:

In HTML the reader, not you, decides about font size. This is what
happens, when you try to press it into a border of finite pixel size
regardless:

<http://berger-odenthal.de/upload/Clipboard03.png>

Without CSS all browsers leave a small margin between the window frame
and the leftmost letters. With CSS and a full reset you're responsible
for that yourself. This

<http://berger-odenthal.de/upload/Clipboard04.png>

is ugly and hard to read.
I suggest continuing this in the HTML list, where it isn't off topic.

N.B: I'm not sure if the list accepts attachments or not. As they're
only 18 kB and 7 kB I'll try attaching the two images.

Axel

--
             Dipl.-Ing. F. Axel Berger      Tel: +49/ 2174/ 7439 07
             Johann-Häck-Str. 14            Fax: +49/ 2174/ 7439 68
             D-51519 Odenthal-Heide       eMail: Axel-Berger@...
             Deutschland (Germany)         http://berger-odenthal.de

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Have any of you tried changing the default color value (128,0,0 or #800000) of
the new "Code in HTML" syntax color in the options?  It lets me change it to
another color however NoteTab still displays all html page CSS and JavaScript
code in the original default color instead of the color I set it to.  Rebooted
the computer and it still shows the default color.

On a Windows 7 Pro, 64 bit box.

John

I just upgraded to NoteTab 7 today and overall it's great, but I'm having a
problem with the hyperlink dialogue, which is missing an option I use for almost
every link.

Clicking the hyperlink button or Hyperlink in the HTML-CSS clipbook:

version 6.2/fv
Enter values for tag attributes
Link URL:
Target (transitional):
Link description:

version 7.0/fv
Enter values to build A tag
Link URL:
Link description:

What happened to Target (transitional)? I use this all the time on the pages I
edit most frequently to insert target="_blank" or  target="_top". Is this a bug
or a feature?

Thanks,
Will

cwcooknc wrote:
> Is this a bug or a feature?

I'd call it a feature, but this is just what is so good about NT clips:
If you want something to work differently, just change it. The stuff
coming with the program are just samples, until you adpt stuff to your
own needs you miss most of what's on offer.

Axel

Thanks! I've been using the program for years, but hadn't explored the ability
to edit the clipbook. I was able to add the TARGET= field back easily. Cool
feature!

--- In ntb-html@yahoogroups.com, Axel Berger <Axel-Berger@...> wrote:
>
> cwcooknc wrote:
> > Is this a bug or a feature?
>
> I'd call it a feature, but this is just what is so good about NT clips:
> If you want something to work differently, just change it. The stuff
> coming with the program are just samples, until you adpt stuff to your
> own needs you miss most of what's on offer.
>
> Axel
>

cwcooknc wrote:
> Cool feature!

Two additional hints:

1) Save that Clipbook under another name, e.g. by prepending "my" or
something like that. When updating NoteTab the standard libraries get
overwritten by new versions, so protect your own.

2) Subscribe to the "Clips" list too. We have one or five real artists
there who'll solve your most convoluted problems and lots of plodders
like me, who'll help with more mundane stuff.

Axel

Hi Will,

Sorry my reply comes a bit late.

I had indeed removed all transitional attributes so they would adhere to
the latest standards in HTML coding. But I do agree that the Target
attribute is useful and has no reasonable non-transitional alternative.
So I'm putting it back in the next update.

--
Regards,

Eric Fookes
http://www.fookes.com/


On 16/07/2012 21:56, cwcooknc wrote:
> I just upgraded to NoteTab 7 today and overall it's great, but I'm having a
problem with the hyperlink dialogue, which is missing an option I use for almost
every link.
>
> Clicking the hyperlink button or Hyperlink in the HTML-CSS clipbook:
>
> version 6.2/fv
> Enter values for tag attributes
> Link URL:
> Target (transitional):
> Link description:
>
> version 7.0/fv
> Enter values to build A tag
> Link URL:
> Link description:
>
> What happened to Target (transitional)? I use this all the time on the pages I
edit most frequently to insert target="_blank" or  target="_top". Is this a bug
or a feature?
>
> Thanks,
> Will

Interviewed by CNN on 28/07/2012 04:51, Eric Fookes told the world:
> Hi Will,
>
> Sorry my reply comes a bit late.
>
> I had indeed removed all transitional attributes so they would adhere to
> the latest standards in HTML coding. But I do agree that the Target
> attribute is useful and has no reasonable non-transitional alternative.
> So I'm putting it back in the next update.
>
Actually, in HTML5 the "target" attribute is back. I'm quoting from
<http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/>:

The |target
<http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/links.html#attr-hyp\
erlink-target>|
attribute of the |a
<http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/text-level-semantic\
s.html#the-a-element>|
and |area
<http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-map-element.htm\
l#the-area-element>|
elements is no longer deprecated, as it is useful in Web applications,
e.g. in conjunction with |iframe
<http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-iframe-element.\
html#the-iframe-element>|.


--
MCBastos

This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will
be prosecuted under the DMCA.
-=-=-
... Sent from my TRS-80
* Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey 2.11 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla

I'm back again with the same need but a different situation.

I want to use an include within and include.

I would like to use a master menu as an include for each of my pages.
The master is here:
http://epicroadtrips.us/master_menu.php

I want to use the master include in this include:
<div id="navwrapper">
<div id="navigation">
<?php include("w1navigation.php"); ?>
</div>
</div>

This would be the file w1navigation.php with the "master_menu.php" include.
I am hoping for this result for each page menu:
http://epicroadtrips.us/2012/escape/
The above link uses a copy and paste to include the master menu.


~~~~~~~~w1navigation.php~~~~~~~~~
<h4>Mike Breiding's Epic Road Trips<br /> Spain: 10 Days in Segovia</h4>

<ul>
<li class="week">Week 1</li>
<li<?php if ($thisPage=="day1-03september2010") echo "
id=\"currentpage\""; ?>><a href='http://epicroadtrips.us/2010/spain/d1/'
title="Day 1: My First Flight East - Pittsburgh, DC, Madrid,
Segovia">Day 1: My First Flight East - Pittsburgh, DC, Madrid,
Segovia</a></li>

<?php include("master_menu.php"); ?>

li style="font-size: 100%; margin-left: 15px; margin-top:
15px"><strong><a href="http://EpicRoadTrips.us" target="_blank"
title="Mike Breiding's Epic Road Trips">
ERT - HOME</a></strong></li>
</ul>

<div id="dedication">
<p><a href='http://EpicRoadTrips.us/dad' target="_blank" title=" My
dad's web site ">This site is dedicated to my father:<br />
<strong style="font-size:105%">George H. Breiding</strong><br />
Read more...</a></p>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The question is the same as before.
How to direct each current page menu to the same master_menu.php file so
it is added to the current page menu.

I am not sure this is clear or not.

Thanks,
-Mike




On 3/6/2012 6:49 PM, Rudolf Horbas wrote:
> Mick Housel wrote:
>
>>
include("http://epicroadtrips.us/2011/mtown2gv_nov_2011_p1/w1navigation.php");
>> (long line above)
>>
>> You can't get any more straightforward than completely defining the
>> path, my preference.
>
> Yes, you can. Not only will this fail in certain configs
> (allow_url_fopen, allow_url_include): There's no point using a slow http
> request via the network when the file is on the same disk.
> Use an absolute path instead, and prepend it with the server var
> DOCUMENT_ROOT:
>
> <?php
> include $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] .
>      '/2011/mtown2gv_nov_2011_p1/w1navigation.php';
> ?>
>
> Rudi
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Fookes Software: http://www.fookes.com/
> NoteTab website: http://www.notetab.com/
> NoteTab Discussion Lists: http://www.notetab.com/groups.php
>
> ***
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

I've never tried that, but if not supported, I would break the master include
into two parts, then call the first one,
then the 'sub' include, then the second part of the master include.

Regards,
John
RecipeTools Web Site: http://recipetools.gotdns.com/


-----Original Message-----
From: ntb-html@yahoogroups.com [mailto:ntb-html@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Mike Breiding - Morgantown WV
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 10:05
To: ntb-html@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Rudolf Horbas
Subject: Re: [NH] Need help with path for PHP incude

I'm back again with the same need but a different situation.

I want to use an include within and include.

I would like to use a master menu as an include for each of my pages.
The master is here:
http://epicroadtrips.us/master_menu.php

I want to use the master include in this include:
<div id="navwrapper">
<div id="navigation">
<?php include("w1navigation.php"); ?>
</div>
</div>

This would be the file w1navigation.php with the "master_menu.php" include.
I am hoping for this result for each page menu:
http://epicroadtrips.us/2012/escape/
The above link uses a copy and paste to include the master menu.


~~~~~~~~w1navigation.php~~~~~~~~~
<h4>Mike Breiding's Epic Road Trips<br /> Spain: 10 Days in Segovia</h4>

<ul>
<li class="week">Week 1</li>
<li<?php if ($thisPage=="day1-03september2010") echo "
id=\"currentpage\""; ?>><a href='http://epicroadtrips.us/2010/spain/d1/'
title="Day 1: My First Flight East - Pittsburgh, DC, Madrid,
Segovia">Day 1: My First Flight East - Pittsburgh, DC, Madrid,
Segovia</a></li>

<?php include("master_menu.php"); ?>

li style="font-size: 100%; margin-left: 15px; margin-top:
15px"><strong><a href="http://EpicRoadTrips.us" target="_blank"
title="Mike Breiding's Epic Road Trips">
ERT - HOME</a></strong></li>
</ul>

<div id="dedication">
<p><a href='http://EpicRoadTrips.us/dad' target="_blank" title=" My
dad's web site ">This site is dedicated to my father:<br />
<strong style="font-size:105%">George H. Breiding</strong><br />
Read more...</a></p>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The question is the same as before.
How to direct each current page menu to the same master_menu.php file so
it is added to the current page menu.

I am not sure this is clear or not.

Thanks,
-Mike




On 3/6/2012 6:49 PM, Rudolf Horbas wrote:
> Mick Housel wrote:
>
>>
include("http://epicroadtrips.us/2011/mtown2gv_nov_2011_p1/w1navigation.php");
>> (long line above)
>>
>> You can't get any more straightforward than completely defining the
>> path, my preference.
>
> Yes, you can. Not only will this fail in certain configs
> (allow_url_fopen, allow_url_include): There's no point using a slow http
> request via the network when the file is on the same disk.
> Use an absolute path instead, and prepend it with the server var
> DOCUMENT_ROOT:
>
> <?php
> include $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] .
>      '/2011/mtown2gv_nov_2011_p1/w1navigation.php';
> ?>
>
> Rudi
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Fookes Software: http://www.fookes.com/
> NoteTab website: http://www.notetab.com/
> NoteTab Discussion Lists: http://www.notetab.com/groups.php
>
> ***
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>


------------------------------------

Fookes Software: http://www.fookes.com/
NoteTab website: http://www.notetab.com/
NoteTab Discussion Lists: http://www.notetab.com/groups.php

***
Yahoo! Groups Links

On 7/28/2012 1:21 PM, John Shotsky wrote:
> I've never tried that, but if not supported, I would break the master include
into two parts, then call the first one,
> then the 'sub' include, then the second part of the master include.   Regards,
John

Hi John,
My main brain twister is how to point all the pages to one include  file.
In other words - figuring out the path to use for each one.

If the include within an include is not supported I think I can work
with that. But the path question is my concern.

Thanks,
-Mike

Mike Breiding - Morgantown WV wrote:
> But the path question is my concern.

Not sure if I've got it, but could you write is as an absolute path
beginning with a slash "/" to make it work from everywhere?

Axel

On 7/28/2012 7:22 PM, Axel Berger wrote:
> Mike Breiding - Morgantown WV wrote:
>> But the path question is my concern.
>
> Not sure if I've got it, but could you write is as an absolute path
> beginning with a slash "/" to make it work from everywhere?

I will see what I can do with that.
Thanks,
-Mike


>
> Axel
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Fookes Software: http://www.fookes.com/
> NoteTab website: http://www.notetab.com/
> NoteTab Discussion Lists: http://www.notetab.com/groups.php
>
> ***
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

the following is failsafe:

$_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] . '/path/to/your/include.php'

Rudi

Mike Breiding - Morgantown WV schrieb am 29.07.2012 14:58:
> On 7/28/2012 7:22 PM, Axel Berger wrote:
>> Mike Breiding - Morgantown WV wrote:
>>> But the path question is my concern.
>>
>> Not sure if I've got it, but could you write is as an absolute path
>> beginning with a slash "/" to make it work from everywhere?
>
> I will see what I can do with that.
> Thanks,
> -Mike
>
>
>>
>> Axel

On 7/30/2012 11:07 AM, rhorbas@... wrote:
> the following is failsafe:
>
> $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'] . '/path/to/your/include.php'


Thanks.
I will play with this.
-Mike

>
> Rudi
>
> Mike Breiding - Morgantown WV schrieb am 29.07.2012 14:58:
>> On 7/28/2012 7:22 PM, Axel Berger wrote:
>>> Mike Breiding - Morgantown WV wrote:
>>>> But the path question is my concern.
>>>
>>> Not sure if I've got it, but could you write is as an absolute path
>>> beginning with a slash "/" to make it work from everywhere?
>>
>> I will see what I can do with that.
>> Thanks,
>> -Mike
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Axel