Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ntms-hsmm · North Texas High Speed MultiMedia
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
WiFi and ARRL Band Plan   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1418 of 1678 |
Re: [ntms-hsmm] WiFi and ARRL Band Plan

Kip,

Please keep in mind that the ARRL Band Plan was written almost a decade
before 802.11 came into wide use. Also, recall that the ARRL Band Plan is
only a recommendation. Local frequency coordination is decided by the
Repeater Councils, most commonly for frequency pairs, but often for simplex
channel use too.

I suggest that for all practical purposes you simply ignore the ARRL 2.4 GHz
band plan, and focus more attention on coordinating with your local repeater
council. That is exactly what they do too, anyway! (HI)

73,
John K8OCL

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Kipton Moravec <kip@...> wrote:

>
>
> Wifi Channels
> Lower Center Upper
> Channel Freq Freq Freq
> 1 2.401 2.412 2.423
> 2 2.404 2.417 2.428
> 3 2.411 2.422 2.433
> 4 2.416 2.427 2.438
> 5 2.421 2.432 2.443
> 6 2.426 2.437 2.448
> 7 2.431 2.442 2.453
> 8 2.436 2.447 2.458
> 9 2.441 2.452 2.463
> 10 2.451 2.457 2.468
> 11 2.451 2.462 2.473
> =================================
> ARRL Band Plan
>
> 2300.0-2303.0 High-rate data
> 2303.0-2303.5 Packet
> 2303.5-2303.8 TTY packet
> 2303.9-2303.9 Packet, TTY, CW, EME
> 2303.9-2304.1 CW, EME
> 2304.1 Calling frequency
> 2304.1-2304.2 CW, EME, SSB
> 2304.2-2304.3 SSB, SSTV, FAX, Packet AM, Amtor
> 2304.30-2304.32 Propagation beacon network
> 2304.32-2304.40 General propagation beacons
> 2304.4-2304.5 SSB, SSTV, ACSSB, FAX, Packet AM,
> Amtor experimental
> 2304.5-2304.7 Crossband linear translator input
> 2304.7-2304.9 Crossband linear translator output
> 2304.9-2305.0 Experimental beacons
> 2305.0-2305.2 FM simplex (25 kHz spacing)
> 2305.20 FM simplex calling frequency
> 2305.2-2306.0 FM simplex (25 kHz spacing)
> 2306.0-2309.0 FM Repeaters (25 kHz) input
> 2309.0-2310.0 Control and auxiliary links
> 2390.0-2396.0 Fast-scan TV
> 2396.0-2399.0 High-rate data
> 2399.0-2399.5 Packet
> 2399.5-2400.0 Control and auxiliary links
> 2400.0-2403.0 Satellite
> 2403.0-2408.0 Satellite high-rate data
> 2408.0-2410.0 Satellite
> 2410.0-2413.0 FM repeaters (25 kHz) output
> 2413.0-2418.0 High-rate data
> 2418.0-2430.0 Fast-scan TV
> 2430.0-2433.0 Satellite
> 2433.0-2438.0 Satellite high-rate data
> 2438.0-2450.0 WB FM, FSTV, FMTV, SS experimental
>
> Note: The 2300 MHz band plan was adopted by the ARRL Board of Directors
> in January 1991
>
> ========================================================
> It does not look like Texas has a different band plan than ARRL in these
> frequencies. Like they do in other bands.
> ========================================================
>
> So now we have the data. Here are the questions:
>
> According to the ARRL Band Plan, our WiFi equipment operates in the
> Satellite, Satellite High Data Rate, and WB FM, FSTV, FMTV, SS
> experimental parts of the ARRL band plan. Does anyone see a problem with
> this?
>
> The other problem is that WiFi uses 22MHz of bandwidth and "High-rate
> data" is 4 or 5 MHz wide. There are no places in the band plan for a 22
> MHz wide signal.
>
> --
>
> Kipton Moravec AE5IB .- . ..... .. -...
> ==============================================
> Four Way Test
> Is it the Truth?
> Is it Fair to all concerned?
> Will it build Goodwill and Better Friendships?
> Will it be Beneficial to all concerned?
> - Herbert J Taylor (1932)
>
>
>
>



--
Nisciune nasce imparate

"When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in
numbers, you know something about it." [Lord Kelvin 1824-1907]


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:01 am

k8ocl5
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1418 of 1678 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Wifi Channels Lower Center Upper Channel Freq Freq Freq 1 2.401 2.412 2.423 2 2.404 2.417 2.428 3 2.411 2.422 2.433 4...
Kipton Moravec
kipton_moravec
Offline Send Email
Jun 21, 2009
6:13 pm

... I could say a lot on this subject. But I can't speak any area other than where I live. To be a "good ham." I've used a down converter to monitor 2.4 GHz...
Steve
kb9mwr
Offline Send Email
Jun 22, 2009
1:16 am

Many thanks for your remarks and experiences. We live in changing times.  Everyone understands that without some sort of coordination super valuable RF...
Glenn Currie
kd5mfw_7
Offline Send Email
Jun 22, 2009
2:03 am

... By FCC enforcement and the ARRL, following the band plan is 'good operating practice'.... You can use the gear under part 15 rules that states you can not...
icra@...
icra150
Offline Send Email
Jun 22, 2009
5:37 am

We live in a changing world. It could be helpful for HSMM to have some band plan changes. Let's think this through on what would make sense and negatively...
Glenn Currie
kd5mfw_7
Offline Send Email
Jun 22, 2009
5:58 am

Kip, Please keep in mind that the ARRL Band Plan was written almost a decade before 802.11 came into wide use. Also, recall that the ARRL Band Plan is only a...
John Champa
k8ocl5
Offline Send Email
Jun 22, 2009
7:03 am

... I assume this topic was brought up due to: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2009/01/23/10585/?nc=1 Chairman and Liaison Appointments: Microwave Band...
Steve
kb9mwr
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2009
8:23 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help