Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
openpfgw · Co-ordination of the OpenPFGW project
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Current source?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1892 of 2071 |
Re: Current source?

Mark & all,
I have ample free time (been sick, but getting better now) and am
willing to help / work to put together the appropriate Linux versions.
(32 bit dynamic & static, AND (if possible) 64 bit gmp libs & topside
with the updated 32 bit libraries.

Please let me know if I can be of assistance.

Chuck



--- In openpfgw@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Rodenkirch" <mgrogue@...> wrote:
>
> Where is the current source for PFGW? The only source in the group
is for the version using
> the v23 Woltman libraries. The newer executable (the one supporting
IBDWT and v24
> Woltman libraries) does not seem to have any source for it.
>
> It would be nice to get it so that I can build it on MacIntel and
update to the v25 libraries. Is
> there a project in SourceForge? If not, there should be one.
>





Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:23 am

lasher_chuck
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1892 of 2071 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Where is the current source for PFGW? The only source in the group is for the version using the v23 Woltman libraries. The newer executable (the one...
Mark Rodenkirch
mgrogue
Offline Send Email
Sep 10, 2008
11:44 pm

Mark & all, I have ample free time (been sick, but getting better now) and am willing to help / work to put together the appropriate Linux versions. (32 bit...
lasher_chuck
Offline Send Email
Sep 11, 2008
12:23 am

I have had no contact from anyone with access to the source built on the v24 gwnum library. Jim Fougeron has not answered any e-mails so I don't know if he is...
Mark Rodenkirch
mgrogue
Offline Send Email
Oct 7, 2008
2:38 am

Maybe just a side remark: Please check the sources, if you happen to get the newest ones. I have been checking the prime 847*2^519964 + 1, which I found by...
ruediger_eckhard
ruediger_eck...
Offline Send Email
Oct 14, 2008
8:04 am

Hi Rüdiger, Your statement that ... shows ... is disturbing. However as can be seen below it is fine on my machine ( are you overclocking?) ...
Ken Davis
kradenken
Offline Send Email
Jan 10, 2009
5:47 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help