Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
openpfgw · Co-ordination of the OpenPFGW project
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
failure of xGF test   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1930 of 2064 |
Re: failure of xGF test

Thanks to some enhancements from George and myself you can see that the next
release of PFGW will not require the -a switch for GFN factoring. You will also
see that it will take a lot less time to test certain numbers. I hope to get a
new release out this week.

pfgw -gxo -q63*2^1070449+1
PFGW Version 3.1.0 for Windows [FFT v25.11]

63*2^1070449+1 is a Factor of xGF(1070447,7,4)!!!! (2991.015000 seconds)
63*2^1070449+1 is a Factor of xGF(1070447,9,8)!!!! (3051.266000 seconds)

Enjoy,
Mark

--- In openpfgw@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Rodenkirch" <mgrogue@...> wrote:
>
> -a now works:
>
> pfgw -a1 -gxo -q"63*2^1070449+1"
> PFGW Version 3.0.0 for Windows [FFT v25.10]
>
> 63*2^1070449+1 is a Factor of xGF(1070447,7,4)!!!! (7330.773000 seconds)
> 63*2^1070449+1 is a Factor of xGF(1070447,9,8)!!!! (7633.427000 seconds)
>
> --- In openpfgw@yahoogroups.com, <mgrogue@> wrote:
> >
> > -a does not work in the build that George posted. I did fix -a (supposedly)
in a build that I have, but it isn't finding the xGFs either. I need to look
into it further.
> >
> > --Mark
> >
> > ---- Harvey563 <harvey563@> wrote:
> > > The console version also fails to find any XGFs.
> > >
> > > Steven Harvey
> > >
> > > --- In openpfgw@yahoogroups.com, "Harvey563" <harvey563@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > WinPFGW Version 3.0.0 fails to find 63*2^1070449+1 a factor of any xGF,
> > > > whether using the -a1 switch or not. [i.e. "-gxo" and "-gxo -a1"]
> > > > 63*2^1070449+1 is a factor of xGF(1070447,7,4) and xGF(1070447,9,8);
> > > > this is using WinPFGW on a PentiumD with Windows XP.
> > > > I am checking the console version now on the same machine and will
report those results.
> > > >
> > > > Steven Harvey
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>





Mon Jul 6, 2009 12:30 pm

mgrogue
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1930 of 2064 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

WinPFGW Version 3.0.0 fails to find 63*2^1070449+1 a factor of any xGF, whether using the -a1 switch or not. [i.e. "-gxo" and "-gxo -a1"] 63*2^1070449+1 is...
harvey563
Offline Send Email
Jun 16, 2009
3:49 pm

The console version also fails to find any XGFs. Steven Harvey...
harvey563
Offline Send Email
Jun 16, 2009
6:54 pm

-a does not work in the build that George posted. I did fix -a (supposedly) in a build that I have, but it isn't finding the xGFs either. I need to look into...
mgrogue@...
mgrogue
Offline Send Email
Jun 16, 2009
8:38 pm

-a now works: pfgw -a1 -gxo -q"63*2^1070449+1" PFGW Version 3.0.0 for Windows [FFT v25.10] 63*2^1070449+1 is a Factor of xGF(1070447,7,4)!!!! (7330.773000...
Mark Rodenkirch
mgrogue
Offline Send Email
Jun 18, 2009
12:41 pm

Thanks to some enhancements from George and myself you can see that the next release of PFGW will not require the -a switch for GFN factoring. You will also...
Mark Rodenkirch
mgrogue
Offline Send Email
Jul 6, 2009
12:31 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help