Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
openpfgw · Co-ordination of the OpenPFGW project
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1083 - 1112 of 2064   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1083
Happy new year folks! Thanks for all the work on PFGW, seems to be running smooth with -a1. Here was a bit of miscommunication (p on my list is the n-th...
Good Question <caldwe...
primemogul
Offline Send Email
Jan 4, 2003
5:10 pm
1084
Pari is miscalulating Phi(n,x) for negative x's. For example, it reports Phi(255,-10708^6)/3061 is composite. PFGW output: PFGW Version 20020311.x86_Dev...
Good Question <caldwe...
primemogul
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2003
5:41 pm
1085
In a message dated 07/01/03 17:44:09 GMT Standard Time, caldwell@... ... Chris, I can't quite make out from your message whether you mean that Pari or PFGW...
mikeoakes2@...
mikeoakes2
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2003
6:14 pm
1086
... $ projects/maths/primes/primeform/pfgw-linux-20020311 -od -q'Phi(255,-10708^6)' > /tmp/pfgwphi Phi(255,-10708^6):...
Phil Carmody
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2003
6:48 pm
1087
... (255,-10708^6)' > /tmp/pfgwphi ... Ah, now I remember Mike's post. Someone might want to add a note to the operator precidence section of pfgwdoc.txt to...
Good Question <caldwe...
primemogul
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2003
7:19 pm
1088
I don't think these problems are simply due to needing (-n)^e Here look: c:\prime\openpfgw\openpfgw>pfgw -q"-1*(-10^3+1)" PFGW Version 20021224.Win_Dev (Beta...
jim_fougeron <jfoug@....
jim_fougeron
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2003
8:18 pm
1089
You are right Phil. It is op precidence (or parser design). The "flaw" also apears to be in bc: bc 1.03 (Nov 2, 1994) Copyright (C) 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994...
jim_fougeron <jfoug@....
jim_fougeron
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2003
8:29 pm
1090
... This doesn't show anything. The problem only shows up for EVEN exponents, for then -(x^e) <> (-x)^e Chris's suggested comment ... should read:- ... Mike...
mikeoakes2@...
mikeoakes2
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2003
9:03 pm
1091
... Just highlights why Chris needs reliable software! And I agree with Jim's implication this may not be a problem; at least it is not if the user is warned...
Chris Caldwell
primemogul
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2003
9:14 pm
1092
I have found this "fix". I will toss it out and see who bites at it: I have tried to remove the unary minus. Now a unary minus of -c is treated as 0-c What...
jim_fougeron <jfoug@....
jim_fougeron
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2003
9:32 pm
1093
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the openpfgw group. File :...
openpfgw@yahoogroups....
Send Email
Jan 7, 2003
10:06 pm
1094
... It's mathematically the purer way, IMHO, as there does exist an entity that has a value which when incremented by 2 becomes 0, i.e. -2 isn't something...
Phil Carmody
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2003
10:16 pm
1095
... As an (erstwhile) compiler-writer, I must put forward the view that, strictly, the best way to handle the unary minus is to do (what's known in the trade...
mikeoakes2@...
mikeoakes2
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2003
10:42 pm
1096
... becomes 0, ... defined and ... i. Until ... use j ... I see your point, but 2 + -2 and 2 + 0-2 and -2 + 2 and 0-2 + 2 all work out very happily to be the...
jim_fougeron <jfoug@....
jim_fougeron
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2003
11:16 pm
1097
... might lie, ... really "0-xxx") ... that ... evaluate as ... Here are some real quick tests, and they all "appear" to be OK. -q"4 * -5" 4 * -5 was negative,...
jim_fougeron <jfoug@....
jim_fougeron
Offline Send Email
Jan 7, 2003
11:30 pm
1098
... Calumny :-) It's the <something> *ng*n**rs who think that j^2=-1....
David Broadhurst <d.b...
djbroadhurst
Offline Send Email
Jan 8, 2003
12:21 am
1099
... Pah! Subset of physics Phil ===== The answer to life's mystery is simple and direct: Sex and death. -- Ian 'Lemmy' Kilminster ...
Phil Carmody
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Jan 8, 2003
1:02 am
1100
... Uh, no! Users of physics. Greg...
gchil0 <jgchilders@...>
gchil0
Offline Send Email
Jan 8, 2003
2:39 am
1101
At least we can agree to beat up the engineers ;-) <ducks as an engineer walks walks into the debate> ... __________________________________________________ ...
Paul Jobling
paul_joblinguk
Offline Send Email
Jan 8, 2003
9:26 am
1102
... (I could put in a topical (but not here!) remark about you being beaten up by engineers, but I refrain from doing that...*) ... "Duck sir!" "Where?" ... ...
Christ van Willegen
cvwillegen
Offline Send Email
Jan 8, 2003
1:49 pm
1103
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the openpfgw group. File :...
openpfgw@yahoogroups....
Send Email
Jan 8, 2003
7:40 pm
1104
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the openpfgw group. File :...
openpfgw@yahoogroups....
Send Email
Jan 8, 2003
7:42 pm
1105
I've got a number that PRP declared probably prime which then failed testing by both Proth and PFGW. Since this was the first time I've seen that happen and...
Jay Berg <jberg@...>
J_M_Berg
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2003
4:48 am
1106
... It's worth running pfgw with the '-a1' switch to force it to use extra safe FFTs. '-a2' for even more safety. The composites tell you their lowest 64-bits...
thefatphil <thefatphi...
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2003
8:53 am
1107 David Broadhurst <d.b...
djbroadhurst
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2003
9:56 am
1108
... The latest version of George Woltman's PRP also had the result 10971*2^200153+1 is not prime. Res64: 6C9E7820F43E1FE8 ___________ David Underbakke...
David Underbakke
dlunderbakke
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2003
3:16 pm
1109
... this is the same number? ... Good page on Psuedoprimes and I'll be certain to study up on it myself. However it turns out that he transcribed the number...
Jay Berg <jberg@...>
J_M_Berg
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2003
4:53 pm
1110
... Oops... Sorry about that. Next time I'll really use cut and paste. It was all my fault. I'm a dork... ;-) I ran proth.exe on the "correct" number and...
Joel Hopper <prime@...>
dochopper
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2003
5:06 pm
1111
I've just been trying to port one of my sieves to windows, and have hit wall at the formatted I/O format specifier strings. Can someone verify that I've...
Phil Carmody
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2003
5:15 pm
1112
You have the correct set of defines, but I think you should use: #if defined (_MSC_VER) ... #else ... #endif Mingw should use "%llu" and not the MS "%I64u"...
jim_fougeron <jfoug@....
jim_fougeron
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2003
5:27 pm
Messages 1083 - 1112 of 2064   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help