Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
openpfgw · Co-ordination of the OpenPFGW project
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1829 - 1858 of 2064   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1829
A beautifull day, Is there a date for the next release of openpfgw 1.3 . It would be nice, if someone knows it. Best regards from the primes Bernhard...
Bernhard Helmes
bhelmes_1
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2006
1:24 pm
1830
I believe there is a problem with writing exceptionally long pfgw.log files. I am using the command line pfgw -b107 xxx.inp with an input file coming from...
mikeoakes2@...
mikeoakes2
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2006
1:22 pm
1831
OpenPFGW (win32) uses FILE structures, which under VC (and MinGW), uses a 32 bit max sized file. I would assume that 70m values in the pfgw.log file pushed...
jim_fougeron
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2006
4:11 pm
1832
Thanks Jim. I understand that there are several ways round this. However... This problem came upon me unawares, and could do the same to anyone at any time. A...
mikeoakes2@...
mikeoakes2
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2006
7:40 pm
1833
hello, I have been following this thread about the log file of pfgw being too large. I use cygwin to run pfgw and I can manipulate files that are larger than...
Simon Plouffe
badaboum0
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2006
7:53 pm
1834
Hello Mike, ... What do you mean by "quarantineing" the files? What kind of filesystem do you use on your disk, by the way (FAT32? NTFS?) ? Have you tried to...
Peter Kosinar
pkosinar
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2006
10:45 pm
1835
... I agree with the conclusion (and of course, move each pfgw.log aside before ... Each pfgw.log line will be 4 characters longer than the above. "a b" ->...
Phil Carmody
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
7:03 am
1836
... PFGW doesn't write any files. It asks the OS to write data to the filesystem. That's what OSes are for. ... This OS bug. ... Same company - same mindset. ...
Phil Carmody
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
7:55 am
1837
... The HD file system is NTFS. After a reboot, you can /rename/ the file pfgw.log, but any attempt to delete it causes the command prompt to go to 99% cpu...
mikeoakes2@...
mikeoakes2
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
8:22 am
1838
... From: Phil Carmody <thefatphil@...> To: openpfgw@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 00:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [openpfgw] Re: Bug in...
mikeoakes2@...
mikeoakes2
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
9:06 am
1839
... You assume I am presuming. I'm not. I _know_ what an OS's job is, I don't have to make guesses. ... 1 fopen, many fprintfs/fputss, 1 fclose or many {...
Phil Carmody
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
1:12 pm
1840
This "bug" is most likely compounded due to the fseek in PFGW. However, step back for a second. First off, why are you using PFGW to PRP test a*71#+1 ?? PFGW...
jim_fougeron
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
2:58 pm
1841
... It's done in a very simple manner (don't have the actual sources by hand; checking somewhat older version but I really doubt it has changed much since...
Peter Kosinar
pkosinar
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
3:57 pm
1842
... That looks like 2^30 bytes minus just under 1 MB of unflushed cached writes. ... This sounds like a case for backing up your data - writable DVDs, CDRs, ...
Phil Carmody
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2006
4:00 pm
1843
No-one seems to have pinpointed code which could explain where misbehaviour at c. 1 Gb o/p file size is coming from. [BTW NewPGen, which Paul J tells me also...
mikeoakes2@...
mikeoakes2
Offline Send Email
Jun 8, 2006
8:54 am
1844
... Paul found it - it's either or both of the "t" in the fopen mode, and/or the unnecessary fseek. As DOS users like their carriage returns, I think even ANSI...
Phil Carmody
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Jun 8, 2006
11:34 am
1845
The problem doesn't seem to lie in fseek()s - see appended correspondence. Mike ... From: Paul Jobling <Paul.Jobling@...> To: 'mikeoakes2@...'...
mikeoakes2@...
mikeoakes2
Offline Send Email
Jun 9, 2006
9:18 am
1846
... Mike - you are backed up, I hope? Keep the fseeks out, and turn "at" into "a", and append a carriage return explicitly? Only "t" would explain non-Theta(1)...
Phil Carmody
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Jun 9, 2006
10:44 am
1847
Hello Which checksum is better for archive? pfgw 99*2^100006+1 is composite: [22E3D742CD3DC966] 99*2^100031+1 is composite: [27BFE3AFADCFC9A7] 99*2^100053+1 is...
Payam Samidoost
samidoost
Offline Send Email
Jun 24, 2006
4:47 pm
1848
PFGW and prp are the same (as long as pfgw is doing a Fermat-3 check). LLR is a totally different exponentation, and can not be used (AFAIK) to compare...
Jim Fougeron
jim_fougeron
Offline Send Email
Jun 24, 2006
6:04 pm
1849
Thanks Jim Thus I will use RES64 from PRP3. Your pfgw residue appears to have less than 64 bits? Regards Payam...
Payam Samidoost
samidoost
Offline Send Email
Jun 25, 2006
4:40 am
1850
... All PFGW from 1.2 and prior used only the lsb 62 bits. PFGW dev builds prior to 1.2 use a full 64 bit residue, as does PRP3. Jim....
jim_fougeron
Offline Send Email
Jun 25, 2006
12:48 pm
1851
One month later, and still no response at all on this pfgw Winxxx problem, or even for what Winxxx variant(s) it is :-( (I don't count responses which says...
mikeoakes2@...
mikeoakes2
Offline Send Email
Jul 10, 2006
8:37 am
1852
I know that several people use PFGW simply as a bignum expression evaluator due to its powerful expression syntax and speed. Some of those use that evaluation ...
Phil Carmody
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2006
1:49 pm
1853
I posted this on PrimeForm and didn't get a response. I'm trying to run PFGW to check for an xGF divisor across several networked (Linux to be precise)...
jbohanon3
Offline Send Email
Jul 31, 2006
4:31 pm
1854
$ ./pfgw.exe -q'85751#*292#*44#*17#*9#*6#*5#*3^3*2^9-1' PFGW Version 20050213.Win_Dev (Alpha/IBDWT 'caveat utilitor') Using v24fft.DLL, version FFTVer=24.9,...
Phil Carmody
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Aug 2, 2006
9:18 am
1855
Having bashed my head against a stack on and off for the last few weeks or so, I've decided to bodge together a little perl preprocessing script which /in ...
Phil Carmody
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
2:30 pm
1856
Hi Phil, PFGW Version 20050213 Doesn't work with trying to prove multifactorials either See http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/openpfgw/message/1828 Cheers Ken...
kradenken
Offline Send Email
Oct 28, 2006
5:31 am
1857
Hello, I've been running WinPFGW since April. I did a stop on the program, and it hadn't finished, during which the computer guy messed with the task manager ...
xsdogstar
Offline Send Email
Dec 7, 2006
8:41 am
1858
What were you running? the factor (-f) mode? If so, there is no resume, however, you can use the -s switch to startthe fractoring from some higher number...
Jim Fougeron
jim_fougeron
Offline Send Email
Dec 7, 2006
1:15 pm
Messages 1829 - 1858 of 2064   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help