--- Roger Sperberg wrote:
>

> I don't believe that OpenReader as currently proposed is a
> legitimate reason to splinter the OEB format development. (I've
> expressed this sentiment to Jon Noring before and in blogs at
> Teleread.)
>
> I reiterate my position at Teleread in a post entitled "OpenReader
> manifesto."
>
...
>
> "OpenReader manifesto" http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=5011
>



Please note that Jon Noring has written a response also published at
Teleread:

‘OpenReader manifesto’ ignores business realities of e-book industry

http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=5012