> > To me, the screen shot which is clearly pre-Windows XP is a better
>> clue. But <http://www.visimap.com/us/news.html> tells you the last
> > release was in 2004.
>
>The "Windows Classic" appearance is available as an option within
>Windows XP. Quite a few users prefer it because it uses less
>resources than the XP appearance.

Fewer pixels, I hadn't heard about resources. But I think it's a bad
idea to take screen shots with anything but the default
configuration. (I've been guilty of this, but over 2 years I would
have fixed it.)

>(Just a point of information. I take it the Mac is your main
>platform.)

True. Which is why I didn't also mention the Microsoft icons looked
rather dated in that screen shot.

If they are in active development, I hope they update the web site to
reflect it.
--

David Dunham A Sharp, LLC
Voice/Fax: 206 783 7404 http://a-sharp.com
Efficiency is intelligent laziness.