Dear Fellow List Members, I thought the information below might be of interest for some of you. Best regards, Peter E. Hauer Linguasoft Vienna, Austria ... ...
Dear friends I Need you help in installing keyboard for sindhi. i heve a dounloaded keyboard file in my computer named Sindhi.ukb but i dint know how its work...
Dear List Members, I have posted the slides from my presentation at ATypI Conference: Between Text & Reader, Vancouver BC, 2003, titled "OpenType for Fine ...
Thanks for posting this, Mamoun. Very enlightening. We keep discovering more and more things the "Arabic Typesetting" font can do. Truly a "smart" font! It...
Dear Lameen Souag, ... It's definitely a misuse if *all* the final ya's in Arabic text (i.e., such ya's that are NOT "alif maqsura") are produced using U+0649...
... Persian and Urdu << Dear Paul, I was trying to reproduce this and typed 0664 0665 0666 0667 and 06F4 06F5 06F6 06F7 in a Word document, then selected...
Hi all, I am devlpment a free PDF_Maker and I need an arabic postscript fonts from adobe,can any one help me to get some fonts or get a tools to create adobe...
Hi, Fontographer from Macromedia can make PostScript fonts. When you create a font, just select PostScript option instead of TrueType. ... ===== Lateef Sagar...
Hello Said, ... U+06AB is the standard modern Pashto letter. U+06AF is used in Persian and Dari, and has been used in earlier orthographies for Pashto. ... ...
... Paul is completely correct here. ... Also correct. ... Paul has inadvertently missed out 0686 here. ... This is now replaced by 06AB in modern Pashto...
... This is incorrect. Look at the Unicode charts, at the glyphs for U+FBE9 and U+FBE9. It may be "misleading" for someone who want to use CLRA for Arabic...
... 1) It would be nice if you would stop trying to rubbish the CLRA standard with rhetoric like "fledgling". 2) The standard description does not use...
... Making that kind of orthographic change would have been outside the scope of the project. U+0649 is a letter used in Arabic. As such it can be found in...
... [...] It may be the case that it is simply advice for a human typist. Or it could be an *optional* autocorrection feature [...]<< Let me re-cite CLRA:...
... of the project.<< IMO, it cannot be argued that use of U+0649 + U+0670 is an "orthographic change". This proposal came from a native speaker, and is in...
Hi, I am trying to reposition glyphs through Uniscribe. http://www.codeguru.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=284771 shows a diagram of what I am trying to...
Hi, There appears to be another helper technology associated with Uniscribe, Microsoft's OpenType Layout Services (OTLS) which allows Glyph repositioning and...
Hi, Try out TTFDump ( http://www.microsoft.com/typography/tools/tools.htm ) tool. It gets table information from a font and returns it as text. I never used it...
... It sounds like a proposal for orthographic change to me. U+0649 is not a Pashto letter. It is an Arabic letter, recommended for use in Arabic-language,...
Font designers place marks where they want them to be. In approaching the task from direction you mention below, you are in effect that you know better than...
Paul Nelson (TYPOGRAP...
paulnel@...
Mar 8, 2004 3:21 pm
689
... You have, as you said yourself, *omitted* shaping rules. You claim, if I understand you correctly, that U+06CC FARSI YEH should be used as a substitute for...
... Have you any reference?<< Sure. Typesetting fonts such as the classical Naskhi styles (for the entire "extended" Arabic alphabet) by the Berthold...
... I have the hardcopy. Please supply a URL if you want me to download something "from the Internet". -- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * *...
HI, Nafees Naskh and Nafees Pakistani Naskh: =============================== Very good and beaufiull. Short comings: 1) Not able to handle Arabic ة eg. حجة...
Hi all, I want to include Latin script ranges in Tehreer (as I have in Naqsh) but I am not satisfied with the Latin glyphs of Naqsh. I tried to search for a...
... "Should" is optional. "Shall" and "must" are mandatory. See RFC 2199 at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt ... We have not suggested this. ... Arabic...