Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
palanthsci · Paleoanthropology, science, and society
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 32831 - 32860 of 36142   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
32831
... A great game:-) Now you guys have to lift yourselves against the Kiwis;-)...
Mikey Brass
mikearchaeology
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2008
12:52 pm
32832
All: Questioning has again broken out about the 7 myr old Toumai fossil. It's not wuat it's "supposed" to be. You can read about it here, though there isn't a...
Anne Gilbert
shanidar9
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2008
7:21 pm
32833
TO ALL WHO KNOW ME: Due to a massive spam attack which started today, I could technically receive your e-mails for the next while, but to find your messages, I...
Greenwich
greenwyk
Offline Send Email
Sep 1, 2008
7:45 pm
32834
Sahelanthropus was clearly a hominin. It shares 14 cranio-dental similarities with Australopithecus and 10 with humans while only sharing 5 cranio-dental...
Marcel
newpapyrus
Offline Send Email
Sep 2, 2008
4:03 am
32835
Could I request that when statements like this are made, the data be referenced to the original literature? Otherwise it is difficult for others on this list...
catalhoyukbalter
catalhoyukba...
Offline Send Email
Sep 2, 2008
9:38 pm
32836
Marcel: FWIW, I'm in agreement with you that Sahelanthropus was a hominin. But remember, we are looking at Paleoanthropologyland, where the inhabitants tend...
Anne Gilbert
shanidar9
Offline Send Email
Sep 2, 2008
9:47 pm
32837
Hominin it may be, but the questions about dating seem valid to me. A lot of desert finds are on the surface. Now somebody who was there says this one was,...
David Timpe
dptimpe
Offline Send Email
Sep 2, 2008
11:38 pm
32838
I wonder if you're referring to the Russian 'Returned Mail' attacks which periodically flood my inbox, even tho my server provides a virus/spam filter.. Even...
maria guzman
pelarg
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2008
12:44 am
32839
That's the nature of science. But the hard evidence eventually decides which of the proposed models are correct. So those who have criticized the proposed...
Marcel
newpapyrus
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2008
4:22 am
32840
The cranio-dental evidence for the hominin status for Sahelanthropus can be found in my most recent paper on Oreopithecus which can be found in the files...
Marcel
newpapyrus
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2008
4:23 am
32841
... Fine. However, a serious cloud is placed over the provenance and reliability of the fossil should the objections to its published dates prove to be...
Mikey Brass
mikearchaeology
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2008
7:02 am
32842
The Brunet paper (Cosmogenic nuclide dating of Sahelanthropus tchadensis and Australopithecus bahrelghazali: Mio-Pliocene hominids from Chad/Proc Natl Acad Sci...
Marcel
newpapyrus
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2008
8:15 am
32843
I'm not sure what you mean by serious. The Brunet paper (Cosmogenic nuclide dating of Sahelanthropus tchadensis and Australopithecus bahrelghazali:...
Marcel
newpapyrus
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2008
8:22 am
32844
... No it is not clear: it is the correlation between the cranial remains and the claimed stratigraphic layers which is being called into question....
Mikey Brass
mikearchaeology
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2008
2:29 pm
32845
... question. ... That is correct. The provenance of surface finds is not reliably established by dating of surrounding surface, by other nearby surface ...
Dale Hoogeveen
iaafoyi
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2008
2:51 pm
32846
So your argument is that the primitive fauna that Sahelanthropus was associated with may somehow not be associated with Sahelanthropus and that they were...
Marcel
newpapyrus
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2008
7:58 pm
32847
So your argument too is that the primitive fauna that Sahelanthropus was associated with may somehow not be associated with Sahelanthropus and that they were...
Marcel
newpapyrus
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2008
8:09 pm
32848
Don't play with words, Marcel. You know what I wrote and you know the objections raised by one of the prominent scientists of the original expedition....
Mikey Brass
mikearchaeology
Offline Send Email
Sep 3, 2008
8:38 pm
32849
Bloglines user AnneGilbert (avgilbert@...) has sent this item to you, with the following personal message: All: This is a short piece from Dieneke's...
avgilbert@...
shanidar9
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
3:12 am
32850
Would you please tell us what you argument is. The primitive fauna associated with the sahelanthropine remains suggest that it was older than less primitive...
Marcel
newpapyrus
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
5:03 am
32851
... The association has been called into question by one of the leading scientists on the original expedition. It is really easy to understand, therefore, that...
Mikey Brass
mikearchaeology
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
6:56 am
32852
... Sahelanthropus was ... Sahelanthropus and ... There was an incredible context of skepticism in France, from the start, about sahelanthropus, Brunet told...
jsarfati2000
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
7:36 am
32853
Calling the 2002 TM-266 (Sahelanthropus skull) into question is one thing. But I read nothing in the article that questioned the fossil remains from the two...
Marcel
newpapyrus
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
9:29 am
32854
... The latter fossils were given the same genus and species designation as the former. Call the former's dating into question and you call the latter's...
Mikey Brass
mikearchaeology
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
10:06 am
32855
All: Julien Riel-Salvatore's "A Very Remote Period Indeed" blog has a nice roundup of some surveys of Paleolithic sites in Greece, India, and Iran. Lots of...
Anne Gilbert
shanidar9
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
5:28 pm
32856
Bloglines user AnneGilbert (avgilbert@...) has sent this item to you, with the following personal message: All: Hmmmmm. . . . it seems the last...
avgilbert@...
shanidar9
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
5:54 pm
32857
Bloglines user AnneGilbert (avgilbert@...) has sent this item to you, with the following personal message: All: More on that "woolly mammoth" story. ...
avgilbert@...
shanidar9
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
6:12 pm
32858
The Anthracotheriid Unit simply reveals what animals were there despite any dating technique. And some of the animals that were there, a primitive suid and a...
Marcel
newpapyrus
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
8:44 pm
32859
Testing for my spam filter. Ignore this message....
Greenwich
greenwyk
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
9:52 pm
32860
Anne, It also looks like there were probably several species of woolly mammoth, too, and probably also a pretty good time interval between when they were...
Dale Hoogeveen
iaafoyi
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2008
10:01 pm
Messages 32831 - 32860 of 36142   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help