--- Florent Garet <florentgaret@...> wrote:

> I liked the suggestion made by "etherman23" on
> Worldlang ML: mi/ti/ta. Despite the 3 words are not
> ideally differenciated, they obey a logical system:

Florent, it's not a bad idea. For the moment, I have
adopted mi/yu/ta, which is good in that the three
words are easy to distinguish, but bad in that it is
biased toward English. The mi/ti/ta system is nice
because it has one English, one Chinese, and one
Romance-sounding word. The problem for me would be
that I use "di" as the Chinese possessive. Having both
"di" and "ti" in such important places would be
confusing. Hmmm.



Jens Wilkinson
Neo Patwa language: http://patwa.pbwiki.com



________________________________________________________________________________\
____
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping