Jens Wilkinson kirjoitti:
>--- Florent Garet <florentgaret@...
<mailto:florentgaret%40yahoo.fr>> wrote:
>> I liked the suggestion made by "etherman23" on
>> Worldlang ML: mi/ti/ta. Despite the 3 words are not
>> ideally differenciated, they obey a logical system:
>
> Florent, it's not a bad idea. For the moment, I have
> adopted mi/yu/ta, which is good in that the three
> words are easy to distinguish, but bad in that it is
> biased toward English. The mi/ti/ta system is nice
> because it has one English, one Chinese, and one
> Romance-sounding word. The problem for me would be
> that I use "di" as the Chinese possessive. Having both
> "di" and "ti" in such important places would be
> confusing. Hmmm.

Those pronouns sound nice in my opinion too. Two of them also are
identical with Nostratic pronouns, namely "mi" and "ti", if that's worth
anything.

--
Risto Kupsala
http://www.kupsala.net/risto

Pandunia - a cross-cultural IAL
http://www.kupsala.net/risto/pandunia/