I like the
idea of a pidgin-like conlang. Simple grammar and limited vocabulary is ideal. The
purpose of a constructed language should be just to get your point across. It
doesn’t need to be able to convey subtle shades of meaning or to
translate great works of literature. Pandunia seems like a good project.
From: pandunia@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:pandunia@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of risto@...
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 2:28 AM
To: pandunia@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [pandunia] Re: Pandunia
Mark Graves wrote:
> I really like the idea of Pandunia. Have there been any updates?
Hi Mark and welcome to Pandunia group! A few new members have joined this
group lately and now there are in total 10 members. That's nice!
To answer Marks question, there haven't been any updates in a while, but
there will be in the near future. Often I just do stuff on my computer and
forget that there are some people who could be interested to see what's
going on. But I'm happy that people have expressed interest and joined
this group.
The Pandunia site is somewhat outdated currently. I will upload some new
files in the coming weeks and keep you posted about the changes.
In the meanwhile it would be nice to hear in more detail, what do you
think about Pandunia. Especially I'm curious to know would you really like
to learn it? Currently nobody speaks it (including me) and it will require
some team work to make it work.
-- Risto