Hi Danna -

ha ha ha....Yes, I do. I think it is mostly to do with the spike.
There is a big leaf <?!> behind that flower you see, and the other two
buds are not evenly spaced on the spike. So it looks "off" somehow. I
have another one of these that is much bigger, but it blasted it's spike
last year and ticked me off. I might get rid of that one too.

I noticed when I uploaded my photos that I have a lot of space on that
webshots account. Maybe I will upload some other pictures?! I have
several in flower right now - like Edna Radcliffe and what I believe
might be Lady Isabel? I say that it "might" be Lady Isabel because it
was marked as paph rothschildianum x Prime Child and I don't think it
looks like that is correct. Maybe you might have a guess as to it's
identity? It looks to me like there is some stonei involved, but it's
hard to say.

~Denise

Danna Spayde wrote:
>
>
> Hi Denise,
>
> You think that one is ugly? You can ship it to me anytime!
>
> Danna
>
> --- On *Tue, 6/16/09, djnash@... /<djnash@...>/* wrote:
>
>
> From: djnash@... <djnash@...>
> Subject: [paphiopedilums] From djnash@... - 2009-06-16 11:25
> To: paphiopedilum-orchids@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 1:37 PM
>
> webshots <http://www.webshots.com>
>
> *You have received a new
> eCard from djnash@comcast. net.*
>
> Here are the ugly paph photos. I hope it works this time! We'll
> see... ~Denise
>
>
> *View your eCard now
> <http://cards.webshots.com/ecard/pickup/147941477OpKRmQ>*
>
> Your eCard is available until Jul 16
>
>
>
> <http://cards.webshots.com/ecard/pickup/147941477OpKRmQ>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> H
>
>
>
> ©1997-2008 AG.com, Inc. all rights reserved
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4162 (20090617) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com