We are introducing a
brand new project management software and would like to get your input on it. The
product is called Erudition For Project Managers. This software has many distinctive
features that allows it to stand out among top project management tools on the
market today. We'd like to offer a free trial to the members of this group to
try out the software and enjoy the benefits of its features.
Among the features are:
- Dashboard view to quickly track deadlines
and budgets
- Managers can adjust staff skills and Erudition
will automatically adjust the timeline for the affected project(s) accordingly
- Erudition is enterprise in scope allowing
multiple departments or groups to work together seamlessly
- Managers can sponsor or propose a project
- Software will identify and suggest staff to
the correct project tasks
- Erudition allows you set project thresholds
Find out what other
features it has and benefits it holds for you today!
Just posted some photos of my "down time" hobby. Building and having
fun with teardrops! I enjoy my R&R!
Just curious as to what others do with down time...?
You know how hard it can be to find other project managers to talk with. Sometimes it's such a relief to find someone else who even understands what you mean when you say "scope." And you're not taliking about submarines. Other times you just need to ask a question, but don't know where you can find an answer.
Well, you can ask questions and find answers here. We're an international group of project managers who love to talk about project management. Our membership encompasses the globe - that's why we use it as our symbol.
We ask questions, pose theories, express opinions,
share experience - and so much more. All in the comfort and security of http://www.sdbpluspm.com/index.php.
The SdB+PM Forum is like a club - a place for people with the shared bond of managing projects. Instead of eating a fine meal, we read other members' posts. Smoking a good cigar is replaced with writing posts for other members to read.
If all of this sounds good to you, and you meet the requirements of membership, just click on http://www.sdbpluspm.com/index.php and then the Register button. Your request for membership in the forum will be reviewed and you will be notified of the decision. If you are a recruiter, please clearly mention it.
Remember, you need to be either of the
following:
an experienced1 project manager, or
a project manager who is certified by an internationally accepted certification body for project managers, or
If you're not presently a member of LinkedIn, let us know on the registration form. It's easy (and free) to join LinkedIn and start networking globally.
1Experienced or senior project manager - project manager having managed projects across multiple functional areas and also across different cultures and countries
Knowing the line is a must - jumping over it is a sin
--- In pmtr@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Schophuizen"
<frankschophuizen@...> wrote:
>
> What makes knowing the line a sin?
>
> Frank.
>
--- In pmtr@yahoogroups.com, "Meade Rubenstein" <meader_nj@...> wrote:
>
> It's been some time since we had a discussion about currently used PM
> tools. I'm still using MS Excel 99% of the time for all PM needs -
> making templates, etc. Has anyone come across a cure all tool?
>
You might want to try Erudition for Project Managers by DataVelocity.
I believe you can request a free trial on thier site, if not send a
request to thier info address and they should set one up for you.
There has been word about them in the media and I believe they added
new functionality which they will be debuting at the NY C3 show in two
weeks.
Thier website is htpp://datavelocity.com
It's been some time since we had a discussion about currently used PM
tools. I'm still using MS Excel 99% of the time for all PM needs -
making templates, etc. Has anyone come across a cure all tool?
Thanks Darell
Excellent comparison.
Imtiyaz
--- In pmtr@yahoogroups.com, "Darrell Ross" <darrellross@...> wrote:
>
> Imtiyaz,
>
> I posted your question on another board, and here is the response:
>
> Hi Darrell,
> Suggest you check out the PMForum
>
http://www.pmforum.org/certification/Certifications_Compared2006.pdf
> site.
> For two years running, my graduate students have made a comparison
> of the
> major PM certification credentials.
>
> Please feel free to pass this along/share it with other boards.....
>
> BR,
> PDG, Jakarta
>
>
>
> --- In pmtr@yahoogroups.com, "imhussain123" <imhussain123@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > There are so many project management professional accredition
> institute
> > like PMI, IPMA, Prince2 etc. I am looking for any comparative
> study
> > done on there technique, course material, templates and processes
> etc...
> >
> > Your personal views are also welcomed.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Imtiyaz
> >
>
Imtiyaz,
I posted your question on another board, and here is the response:
Hi Darrell,
Suggest you check out the PMForum
http://www.pmforum.org/certification/Certifications_Compared2006.pdf
site.
For two years running, my graduate students have made a comparison
of the
major PM certification credentials.
Please feel free to pass this along/share it with other boards.....
BR,
PDG, Jakarta
--- In pmtr@yahoogroups.com, "imhussain123" <imhussain123@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> There are so many project management professional accredition
institute
> like PMI, IPMA, Prince2 etc. I am looking for any comparative
study
> done on there technique, course material, templates and processes
etc...
>
> Your personal views are also welcomed.
>
> Thanks,
> Imtiyaz
>
Hi,
There are so many project management professional accredition institute
like PMI, IPMA, Prince2 etc. I am looking for any comparative study
done on there technique, course material, templates and processes etc...
Your personal views are also welcomed.
Thanks,
Imtiyaz
I am the Founder and Moderator of the SdB+ PM Forum, a Yahoo group specifically focused on Project Management.
I am a firm believer that networking is a must in terms of finding best practices and innovative solutions in our global work environment. To be more specific, sharing experiences and also posting day-to-day issues on a topic-specific forum is essential nowadays. It's the best way to get comments and solutions from experts and experienced people from other countries, cultures, and backgrounds.
Having had the opportunity to meet really interesting and knowledgeable people with LinkedIn, I realised that we could share much more by having our own forum and benefit from each others' experience and knowledge.
Our purpose: Get connected to people across the world using Project Management as our common language.
The membership criteria is that you are:
a senior PM
and/or PMP (or other internationally recognized Project Management certification credential e.g. Prince 2), AND
We are a
truly international group of project managers, and we'd love to have you join us.
Please state your full name and Project Management experience and certification so that I can give you access to the forum, looking forward to reading you there ;-)
I just completed another class (taking some certificate/masters
classes at Steven's Tech) - and an interesting topic was 'voice of the
customer' where you would track what the customer is asking for, the
priority, how it relates to an actual request (translation from
customer talk to developer talk) and how it will be addressed (if it
will be) - and example would be something like:
-------------------------------------------
Customer: End User
Comment: 'I would like to be able to print historic transactions'
Priority: Medium
Request: Keep a rolling 13 month history of transactions and allow the
customer to enter reporting date range - reporting at a monthly
level
Satisfied by: The current/planned reporting functionality for
transaction reporting supports this - we will review with the customer
once a test environment is in place.
-------------------------------------------
this would be in a spread sheet format with the info across and each
row a 'voice of the customer' request.
Has anyone used a tool to capture and track this info???
As you can tell the last message had nothing to do with Project Management - so
it
and the author have been removed. How legit the author was I do not know.
Currently I am preparing Schedule in Primavera for L3 Level for Jetty & Backup Yard (Port) Projects............Need some expert comment who had work on Jetty(Port Projects) Projects using Primavera or MSP................
While creating WBS I want to know that how the other organization is creating WBS.
My basis to attempt this exercise [& for this reasons vendors have shown interest (may be an added USP)], has been that:
almost all the practices of CMMI-PAs do come into play during execution of complete project life cycle,
which are being tracked via the PM-tools,
it is only concerned way of defining (by involving all the stakeholders) the project-objectves (in line with stated organization-policy & project goals)
built-in all its aspects in the WBS (for each task assign resources, define resultant work-product, use process template) and
then track the Risks/Efforts/Schedules/cost-variance &
track Quality-variance (defects noticed during reviews & testing) and
conduct regular management-review (also part of WBS) triggered by violation of variance-limits and
use CAR/DAR to execute 'Process Improvement' plans.
Is it making sense?
Thanks & Regards Goyal BE AN AMBASSADOR OF QUALITY rcgoyal@...;rcgoyal@...;rakeshchandragoyal@..., Mob:+919896463964 tel:+91 22 26490194
----- Original Message ---- From: Jay Pancholi <pancholijay@...> To: pmtr@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 9:25:26 AM Subject: Re: [pmtr] Project Management Tool to support Implementation of CMMI-PAs-SPs/GPs
Hi Rakesh,
Thats true, neither primavera nor their supplier will take interest for organization to achieve CMMI - L3 OR L5 Level. It will be organization develpoment to get it. Primavera or MSP are a tool which you will be required to tracking your project & Monitor it.
Good Example of following CMMI level & Six Sigma is Motorola for which i had work for 7 months.
Thanks & Regards,
Jay pancholijay@... Rakesh Chandra Goyal <rakeshchandragoyal@...> wrote:
Dear Jay
I am not sure if 'Primavera' development group would be interested to understake modification to help their user-organization to support their journey to achieve e.g. CMMI- L3 or L5 ?
Thanks & Regards Goyal BE AN AMBASSADOR OF QUALITY rcgoyal@...;rcgoyal@...;rakeshchandragoyal@..., Mob:+919896463964 tel:+91 22 26490194
----- Original Message ---- From: Jay Pancholi <pancholijay@...> To: pmtr@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:53:37 PM Subject: Re: [pmtr] Project Management Tool to support Implementation of CMMI-PAs-SPs/GPs
Hi Rakesh Chandra,
I was working with Primavera Vendors in India....worked with construction, mechanical and IT companies for implementing the Primavera software......
I am currently involved in reviewing Project Management Tools (similar to Pimavera) from Indian Vendors and suggest modification to enable Project team to be guided/mandated (in compliance to CMMI) execution of WBS-scheduled activities and to check-in Work-products (as result of the activity)into designated folder of CM-library-structured in VSS (also through the PM-tool).
Main efforts are to define (project-sopecific modified) detailed WBS (via SDLC-based prestructured WBS-template) including reviews/audits and Management-Reviews and Unit/Integration/System-Testing.
The workflow of task-type (design, coding, testing, reviews, audit) would guide, mandate the doer of the activity to populate the predefined template (for the desired work-product) and/or log-in defects/issues/NCs.
Attempt is to
automate collection of DA/IA in project documentation VSS-controlled folders and tracking the Plan/Actual-varaition of schedule, efforts & defects(nrs) would enable measure and track the project performance as well as process-capability against organization-defined limts of varinace.
This to the extent doable & achieved would enable regular noticing the gaps in implementation & proactive efforts for process improvemnts since the violations of variance-limit are notified to designated management level to be addressed via CAR / DAR work-flow i.e. identified stake holders are invited for review-meetings (scheduled actvitity in WBS) and log-in decisions against preventive action plan recommended after analysing the resons recorded (by PM) for the violation (of variance limits).
I request your critique and suggestions, which would provide me 'Improvement Opportunities'
Reagrds Goyal
Yahoo! Mail Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
Yahoo! Mail Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
Thats true, neither primavera nor their supplier will take interest for organization to achieve CMMI - L3 OR L5 Level. It will be organization develpoment to get it. Primavera or MSP are a tool which you will be required to tracking your project & Monitor it.
Good Example of following CMMI level & Six Sigma is Motorola for which i had work for 7 months.
Thanks & Regards,
Jay pancholijay@... Rakesh Chandra Goyal <rakeshchandragoyal@...> wrote:
Dear Jay
I am not sure if 'Primavera' development group would be interested to understake modification to help their user-organization to support their journey to achieve e.g. CMMI- L3 or L5 ?
Thanks & Regards Goyal BE AN AMBASSADOR OF QUALITY rcgoyal@...;rcgoyal@...;rakeshchandragoyal@..., Mob:+919896463964 tel:+91 22 26490194
----- Original Message ---- From: Jay Pancholi <pancholijay@...> To: pmtr@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:53:37 PM Subject: Re: [pmtr] Project Management Tool to support Implementation of CMMI-PAs-SPs/GPs
Hi Rakesh Chandra,
I was working with Primavera Vendors in India....worked with construction,
mechanical and IT companies for implementing the Primavera software......
I am currently involved in reviewing Project Management Tools (similar to Pimavera) from Indian Vendors and suggest modification to enable Project team to be guided/mandated (in compliance to CMMI) execution of WBS-scheduled activities and to check-in Work-products (as result of the activity)into designated folder of CM-library-structured in VSS (also through the PM-tool).
Main efforts are to define (project-sopecific modified) detailed WBS (via SDLC-based prestructured WBS-template) including reviews/audits and Management-Reviews
and Unit/Integration/System-Testing.
The workflow of task-type (design, coding, testing, reviews, audit) would guide, mandate the doer of the activity to populate the predefined template (for the desired work-product) and/or log-in defects/issues/NCs.
Attempt is to automate collection of DA/IA in project documentation VSS-controlled folders and tracking the Plan/Actual-varaition of schedule, efforts & defects(nrs) would enable measure and track the project performance as well as process-capability against organization-defined limts of varinace.
This to the extent doable & achieved would enable regular noticing the gaps in implementation & proactive efforts for process improvemnts since the violations of variance-limit are notified to designated management level to be addressed via CAR / DAR work-flow i.e. identified stake holders are invited for review-meetings (scheduled actvitity in WBS) and log-in
decisions against preventive action plan recommended after analysing the resons recorded (by PM) for the violation (of variance limits).
I request your critique and suggestions, which would provide me 'Improvement Opportunities'
Reagrds Goyal
Yahoo! Mail Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
Yahoo! Mail Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
I am not sure if 'Primavera' development group would be interested to understake modification to help their user-organization to support their journey to achieve e.g. CMMI- L3 or L5 ?
Thanks & Regards Goyal BE AN AMBASSADOR OF QUALITY rcgoyal@...;rcgoyal@...;rakeshchandragoyal@..., Mob:+919896463964 tel:+91 22 26490194
----- Original Message ---- From: Jay Pancholi <pancholijay@...> To: pmtr@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:53:37 PM Subject: Re: [pmtr] Project Management Tool to support Implementation of CMMI-PAs-SPs/GPs
Hi Rakesh Chandra,
I was working with Primavera Vendors in India....worked with construction, mechanical and IT companies for implementing the Primavera software......
I am currently involved in reviewing Project Management Tools (similar to Pimavera) from Indian Vendors and suggest modification to enable Project team to be guided/mandated (in compliance to CMMI) execution of WBS-scheduled activities and to check-in Work-products (as result of the activity)into designated folder of CM-library-structured in VSS (also through the PM-tool).
Main efforts are to define (project-sopecific modified) detailed WBS (via SDLC-based prestructured WBS-template) including reviews/audits and Management-Reviews and Unit/Integration/System-Testing.
The workflow of task-type (design, coding, testing, reviews, audit) would guide, mandate the doer of the activity to populate the predefined template (for the desired work-product) and/or log-in defects/issues/NCs.
Attempt is to
automate collection of DA/IA in project documentation VSS-controlled folders and tracking the Plan/Actual-varaition of schedule, efforts & defects(nrs) would enable measure and track the project performance as well as process-capability against organization-defined limts of varinace.
This to the extent doable & achieved would enable regular noticing the gaps in implementation & proactive efforts for process improvemnts since the violations of variance-limit are notified to designated management level to be addressed via CAR / DAR work-flow i.e. identified stake holders are invited for review-meetings (scheduled actvitity in WBS) and log-in decisions against preventive action plan recommended after analysing the resons recorded (by PM) for the violation (of variance limits).
I request your critique and suggestions, which would provide me 'Improvement Opportunities'
Reagrds Goyal
Yahoo! Mail Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
I am currently involved in reviewing Project Management Tools (similar to Pimavera) from Indian Vendors and suggest modification to enable Project team to be guided/mandated (in compliance to CMMI) execution of WBS-scheduled activities and to check-in Work-products (as result of the activity)into designated folder of CM-library-structured in VSS (also through the PM-tool).
Main efforts are to define
(project-sopecific modified) detailed WBS (via SDLC-based prestructured WBS-template) including reviews/audits and Management-Reviews and Unit/Integration/System-Testing.
The workflow of task-type (design, coding, testing, reviews, audit) would guide, mandate the doer of the activity to populate the predefined template (for the desired work-product) and/or log-in defects/issues/NCs.
Attempt is to automate collection of DA/IA in project documentation VSS-controlled folders and tracking the Plan/Actual-varaition of schedule, efforts & defects(nrs) would enable measure and track the project performance as well as process-capability against organization-defined limts of varinace.
This to the extent doable & achieved would enable regular noticing the gaps in implementation & proactive efforts for process improvemnts since the violations of variance-limit are notified to designated management level to be
addressed via CAR / DAR work-flow i.e. identified stake holders are invited for review-meetings (scheduled actvitity in WBS) and log-in decisions against preventive action plan recommended after analysing the resons recorded (by PM) for the violation (of variance limits).
I request your critique and suggestions, which would provide me 'Improvement Opportunities'
Reagrds Goyal
Yahoo! Mail Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
Dear Friends
I am currently involved in reviewing Project Management Tools (similar
to Pimavera) from Indian Vendors and suggest modification to enable
Project team to be guided/mandated (in compliance to CMMI) execution
of WBS-scheduled activities and to check-in Work-products (as result
of the activity)into designated folder of CM-library-structured in VSS
(also through the PM-tool).
Main efforts are to define (project-sopecific modified) detailed WBS
(via SDLC-based prestructured WBS-template) including reviews/audits
and Management-Reviews and Unit/Integration/System-Testing.
The workflow of task-type (design, coding, testing, reviews, audit)
would guide, mandate the doer of the activity to populate the
predefined template (for the desired work-product) and/or log-in
defects/issues/NCs.
Attempt is to automate collection of DA/IA in project documentation
VSS-controlled folders and tracking the Plan/Actual-varaition of
schedule, efforts & defects(nrs) would enable measure and track the
project performance as well as process-capability against
organization-defined limts of varinace.
This to the extent doable & achieved would enable regular noticing the
gaps in implementation & proactive efforts for process improvemnts
since the violations of variance-limit are notified to designated
management level to be addressed via CAR / DAR work-flow i.e.
identified stake holders are invited for review-meetings (scheduled
actvitity in WBS) and log-in decisions against preventive action plan
recommended after analysing the resons recorded (by PM) for the
violation (of variance limits).
I request your critique and suggestions, which would provide me
'Improvement Opportunities'
Reagrds Goyal
There’s a difference between “XP” and “Agile”. Extreme Programming is all about how to develop software as fast and effectively as possible, given certain conditions. If you have a dedicated collocated team and an onsite customer, and can do all the practices, you can do very well with XP. Some organizations find it very hard or impossible to do XP given political or organizational constraints.
However, there are a broader set of approaches we call “Agile” that all focus on delivering business value incrementally and quickly. Broadly speaking, they go faster by replacing intermediate work products with face-to-face communication, and improved teamwork. However, you have to be careful; it’s easy to throw out so much process that you go past XP and past Agile straight into chaos.
Even if you can’t “do XP” there is value to looking at your current process and asking yourself whether you could replace some documents with real face-to-face interactions, or whether you could deliver some real business value within 1-month or smaller increments.
Plenty of large companies do this; one of my clients has a 200-person project using Agile techniques. They’re using many small teams of 5-15 people; each one leverages as many of the agile techniques as they can.
It’s true, there’s not a lot of room on an agile team for lazy people to hide, but in general, I’ve seen success with Agile on teams of all skill levels. Star programmers often hurt agile teams, because we rely so heavily on teamwork. Being held to produce working software every 2-4 weeks forces discipline on everyone, and forces you to focus on business value towards a goal, regardless of whether you do mini-waterfalls or XP within your iterations.
-Alex
On 01 28 2006 2:36 AM, "Manoj K" <kmanoj32@...> wrote:
Do you really want extreme methodologies? I know it is very effective, but for small teams and star programmers. It is like shackling yourself to be a small organization - small teams, star programmers (but not team players), politics, etc! Moreover, there is no 'middle ground' in XP, you either do it or don't. When you leave out certain processes, it is not XP anymore, right?
While tools can take care of changing requirements - an iterative development tool can be modified to suit XP, team politics alone would ensure the failure of this in many cases.
This is from the book "Case against XP" by Matt Stephens. http://www.softwarereality.com/lifecycle/xp/case_against_xp.jsp
As the author/editor says, I firmly believe XP is not right for many cases, but that's just my opinion :-)
Meade Rubenstein <meader_nj@...> wrote:
I'm a firm beliver in Agile/XP approachs and have found them very
effective. Short term deliverables are added, reprioritized, etc. -
based on cost/benefit as determined by the stakeholders. The project
ends when $ run out or x% of benefit is realized or dramatic change in
direction (company folds for example). But what is used to track the
ever changing goal(s)? and to show increasing/decreasing benefit
trending as the project progresses. For example as functionality is
delivered the overall benefit of any new functionality could decrease
based on the changing goal -- as more is provided it becomes less
meaningful - not base on what is being delivered, but what the goal is
changing into. Agile provides the flexability to change and the goal
value can be tracked - but is there a tool to handle both of these
things?
-meade
--- In pmtr@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Pukinskis" <Alex.Pukinskis@r...> wrote:
>
> That’s a great observation! Using the tools most of us are familiar
with,
> it’s easy to lose sight of the business value, since there are so
many tasks
> to be tracked, and those tasks don’t always have intrinsic value on
their
> own.
>
> The intention of Agile Project Management is to focus tracking and
project
> management around small units of business value, not tasks. Rather than
> deliver projects in phases of tasks, the agile approach advocates
producing
> increments of business value every 1-4 weeks; in each of these short
> iterations, we complete all phases of the project (analysis, design,
> development, test, etc) for a small increment of business value.
We keep a
> prioritized list of these small chunks of business value, and at the
start
> of each iteration, we select the highest-priority chunks to work on.
Every
> few weeks, we deliver some of the benefits promised by the goal of the
> project. Priorities of the other chunks lower down on the list can be
> changed at any time to ensure we deliver the most business value we can.
>
> Tracking progress is a lot more effective with this approach,
because you
> can easily measure, every 1-4 weeks, exactly how much value you’ve
> delivered.
>
> There are a lot of tools out there for doing this; many agile teams just
> plan their projects with simple spreadsheets or even on index cards
on the
> wall (one chunk of functionality per card). The company I work for
produces
> a web-based tool designed to help software teams keep track of business
> value. But to use a tool that’s effective at tracking real progress
towards
> a goal, you need to make this fundamental shift in how your project is
> organized. With phased development you never really know where things
> stand, because you don’t really deliver any usable piece of the goal
until
> the end. Working in smaller chunks helps you get around this.
>
> -Alex
>
> --
> Alex Pukinskis - Agile Coach
> Rally Software Development
> http://rallydev.com/
> 303.565.2846
>
>
>
> On 01 27 2006 6:49 AM, "Meade Rubenstein" <meader_nj@y...> wrote:
>
> > Often the focus of a project is changed from the goal - such as better
> > customer service, reduced costs, increased performance, etc - to the
> > delivery of the tasks. These tasks are those that are 'guessed' at
> > during the project definition phase and in many cases become etched in
> > stone. This often results in projects being delivered 'successfully'
> > but without meeting hope for benefits (which could change over the
> > course of the project). Has anyone had any experience with a PM tool
> > that focuses on the goal and set's diviations to it instead of
> > predefined tasks, value, costs, etc.?? Is such as tool possible?
> >
> > -meade
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > * Visit your group "pmtr <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pmtr> "
on the web.
> > *
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > * pmtr-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:pmtr-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
> > *
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Do you really want extreme methodologies? I know it is very effective, but for small teams and star programmers. It is like shackling yourself to be a small organization - small teams, star programmers (but not team players), politics, etc! Moreover, there is no 'middle ground' in XP, you either do it or don't. When you leave out certain processes, it is not XP anymore, right?
While tools can take care of changing requirements - an iterative development tool can be modified to suit XP, team politics alone would ensure the failure of this in many cases. This is from the book "Case against XP" by Matt Stephens. http://www.softwarereality.com/lifecycle/xp/case_against_xp.jsp
As the author/editor says, I firmly believe XP is not right for many cases, but that's just my opinion :-)
Meade Rubenstein <meader_nj@...> wrote:
I'm a firm beliver in Agile/XP approachs and have found them very effective. Short term deliverables are added, reprioritized, etc. - based on cost/benefit as determined by the stakeholders. The project ends when $ run out or x% of benefit is realized or dramatic change in direction (company folds for example). But what is used to track the ever changing goal(s)? and to show increasing/decreasing benefit trending as the project progresses. For example as functionality is delivered the overall benefit of any new functionality could decrease based on the changing goal -- as more is provided it becomes less meaningful - not base on what is being delivered, but what the goal is changing into. Agile provides the flexability to change and the goal value can be tracked - but is there a tool to handle both of these things?
-meade
--- In pmtr@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Pukinskis" <Alex.Pukinskis@r...> wrote: > > Thatıs a great observation! Using the tools most of us are familiar with, > itıs easy to lose sight of the business value, since there are so many tasks > to be tracked, and those tasks donıt always have intrinsic value on their > own. > > The intention of Agile Project Management is to focus tracking and project > management around small units of business value, not tasks. Rather than > deliver projects in phases of tasks, the agile approach advocates producing > increments of business value every 1-4 weeks; in each of these short > iterations, we complete all phases of the project (analysis, design, > development, test, etc) for a small increment of business value. We keep a > prioritized list of these small chunks of business
value, and at the start > of each iteration, we select the highest-priority chunks to work on. Every > few weeks, we deliver some of the benefits promised by the goal of the > project. Priorities of the other chunks lower down on the list can be > changed at any time to ensure we deliver the most business value we can. > > Tracking progress is a lot more effective with this approach, because you > can easily measure, every 1-4 weeks, exactly how much value youıve > delivered. > > There are a lot of tools out there for doing this; many agile teams just > plan their projects with simple spreadsheets or even on index cards on the > wall (one chunk of functionality per card). The company I work for produces > a web-based tool designed to help software teams keep track of business > value. But to use a tool thatıs effective at
tracking real progress towards > a goal, you need to make this fundamental shift in how your project is > organized. With phased development you never really know where things > stand, because you donıt really deliver any usable piece of the goal until > the end. Working in smaller chunks helps you get around this. > > -Alex > > -- > Alex Pukinskis - Agile Coach > Rally Software Development > http://rallydev.com/ > 303.565.2846 > > > > On 01 27 2006 6:49 AM, "Meade Rubenstein" <meader_nj@y...> wrote: > > > Often the focus of a project is changed from the goal - such as better > > customer service, reduced costs, increased performance, etc - to the > > delivery of the tasks. These tasks are those that are 'guessed' at > >
during the project definition phase and in many cases become etched in > > stone. This often results in projects being delivered 'successfully' > > but without meeting hope for benefits (which could change over the > > course of the project). Has anyone had any experience with a PM tool > > that focuses on the goal and set's diviations to it instead of > > predefined tasks, value, costs, etc.?? Is such as tool possible? > > > > -meade > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > > > * Visit your group "pmtr <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pmtr> " on the web. > > * > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > >
* pmtr-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > <mailto:pmtr-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> > > * > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . > > > > > > > > >
Do you Yahoo!? With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Yahoo! Mail.
A tool can only provide a framework , certain e-forms & work-flow (sometimes to manadate certain entries and/or sequence of tasks). However its proper use would greatly depend on the user's own desire/intentions.
Now-a-days PM-tools even manadate certain Organizational Forums to discuss at defined fequency within an Agenda (provided) and record MOM and/or log-in Issues and Action Items with tracking mechanism for adherence to the workflow.
Thanks & Regards Goyal BE AN AMBASADOR OF QUALITY goyal@...;rcgoyal@...;rcgoyal@...;rakeshchandragoyal@..., Mob:+919896463964 tel:+91 22 26490194
----- Original Message ---- From: Meade Rubenstein <meader_nj@...> To: pmtr@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 7:19:19 PM Subject: [pmtr] focus of a project
Often the focus of a project is changed from the goal - such as better customer service, reduced costs, increased performance, etc - to the delivery of the tasks. These tasks are those that are 'guessed' at during the project definition phase and in many cases become etched in stone. This often results in projects being delivered 'successfully' but without meeting hope for benefits (which could change over the course of the project). Has anyone had any experience with a PM tool that focuses on the goal and set's diviations to it instead of predefined tasks, value, costs, etc.?? Is such as tool possible?
I'm a firm beliver in Agile/XP approachs and have found them very
effective. Short term deliverables are added, reprioritized, etc. -
based on cost/benefit as determined by the stakeholders. The project
ends when $ run out or x% of benefit is realized or dramatic change in
direction (company folds for example). But what is used to track the
ever changing goal(s)? and to show increasing/decreasing benefit
trending as the project progresses. For example as functionality is
delivered the overall benefit of any new functionality could decrease
based on the changing goal -- as more is provided it becomes less
meaningful - not base on what is being delivered, but what the goal is
changing into. Agile provides the flexability to change and the goal
value can be tracked - but is there a tool to handle both of these
things?
-meade
--- In pmtr@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Pukinskis" <Alex.Pukinskis@r...> wrote:
>
> Thatıs a great observation! Using the tools most of us are familiar
with,
> itıs easy to lose sight of the business value, since there are so
many tasks
> to be tracked, and those tasks donıt always have intrinsic value on
their
> own.
>
> The intention of Agile Project Management is to focus tracking and
project
> management around small units of business value, not tasks. Rather than
> deliver projects in phases of tasks, the agile approach advocates
producing
> increments of business value every 1-4 weeks; in each of these short
> iterations, we complete all phases of the project (analysis, design,
> development, test, etc) for a small increment of business value.
We keep a
> prioritized list of these small chunks of business value, and at the
start
> of each iteration, we select the highest-priority chunks to work on.
Every
> few weeks, we deliver some of the benefits promised by the goal of the
> project. Priorities of the other chunks lower down on the list can be
> changed at any time to ensure we deliver the most business value we can.
>
> Tracking progress is a lot more effective with this approach,
because you
> can easily measure, every 1-4 weeks, exactly how much value youıve
> delivered.
>
> There are a lot of tools out there for doing this; many agile teams just
> plan their projects with simple spreadsheets or even on index cards
on the
> wall (one chunk of functionality per card). The company I work for
produces
> a web-based tool designed to help software teams keep track of business
> value. But to use a tool thatıs effective at tracking real progress
towards
> a goal, you need to make this fundamental shift in how your project is
> organized. With phased development you never really know where things
> stand, because you donıt really deliver any usable piece of the goal
until
> the end. Working in smaller chunks helps you get around this.
>
> -Alex
>
> --
> Alex Pukinskis - Agile Coach
> Rally Software Development
> http://rallydev.com/
> 303.565.2846
>
>
>
> On 01 27 2006 6:49 AM, "Meade Rubenstein" <meader_nj@y...> wrote:
>
> > Often the focus of a project is changed from the goal - such as better
> > customer service, reduced costs, increased performance, etc - to the
> > delivery of the tasks. These tasks are those that are 'guessed' at
> > during the project definition phase and in many cases become etched in
> > stone. This often results in projects being delivered 'successfully'
> > but without meeting hope for benefits (which could change over the
> > course of the project). Has anyone had any experience with a PM tool
> > that focuses on the goal and set's diviations to it instead of
> > predefined tasks, value, costs, etc.?? Is such as tool possible?
> >
> > -meade
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > * Visit your group "pmtr <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pmtr> "
on the web.
> > *
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > * pmtr-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:pmtr-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
> > *
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
That’s a great observation! Using the tools most of us are familiar with, it’s easy to lose sight of the business value, since there are so many tasks to be tracked, and those tasks don’t always have intrinsic value on their own.
The intention of Agile Project Management is to focus tracking and project management around small units of business value, not tasks. Rather than deliver projects in phases of tasks, the agile approach advocates producing increments of business value every 1-4 weeks; in each of these short iterations, we complete all phases of the project (analysis, design, development, test, etc) for a small increment of business value. We keep a prioritized list of these small chunks of business value, and at the start of each iteration, we select the highest-priority chunks to work on. Every few weeks, we deliver some of the benefits promised by the goal of the project. Priorities of the other chunks lower down on the list can be changed at any time to ensure we deliver the most business value we can.
Tracking progress is a lot more effective with this approach, because you can easily measure, every 1-4 weeks, exactly how much value you’ve delivered.
There are a lot of tools out there for doing this; many agile teams just plan their projects with simple spreadsheets or even on index cards on the wall (one chunk of functionality per card). The company I work for produces a web-based tool designed to help software teams keep track of business value. But to use a tool that’s effective at tracking real progress towards a goal, you need to make this fundamental shift in how your project is organized. With phased development you never really know where things stand, because you don’t really deliver any usable piece of the goal until the end. Working in smaller chunks helps you get around this.
-Alex
--
Alex Pukinskis - Agile Coach
Rally Software Development http://rallydev.com/
303.565.2846
On 01 27 2006 6:49 AM, "Meade Rubenstein" <meader_nj@...> wrote:
Often the focus of a project is changed from the goal - such as better
customer service, reduced costs, increased performance, etc - to the
delivery of the tasks. These tasks are those that are 'guessed' at
during the project definition phase and in many cases become etched in
stone. This often results in projects being delivered 'successfully'
but without meeting hope for benefits (which could change over the
course of the project). Has anyone had any experience with a PM tool
that focuses on the goal and set's diviations to it instead of
predefined tasks, value, costs, etc.?? Is such as tool possible?
Often the focus of a project is changed from the goal - such as better
customer service, reduced costs, increased performance, etc - to the
delivery of the tasks. These tasks are those that are 'guessed' at
during the project definition phase and in many cases become etched in
stone. This often results in projects being delivered 'successfully'
but without meeting hope for benefits (which could change over the
course of the project). Has anyone had any experience with a PM tool
that focuses on the goal and set's diviations to it instead of
predefined tasks, value, costs, etc.?? Is such as tool possible?
-meade
I've been using PersonalBrain from TheBrain
Technologies Corp (www.thebrain.com) for many years.
It's a package where you can define a network of nodes
which are interconnected in 3 directions: up, down and
sideways.
I use it to connect subjects (e.g. technologies,
methodologies, tools, interests), companies and
people, both for my professional life as for my
private life. Per node you can add notes, a URL or an
application. Changing relationships is just a matter
of drag-n-drop.
Well, it's a bit of extra work to keep it fully
up-to-day (I wish Outlook would allow me to do that
for the contact list), but you don't have to put in
everything, only what you think may be useful for the
future.
Anyway, it gives me a pretty good picture for
communication, and now and then I discover that people
are related to me in unexpected ways.
Frank.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Paul,
Thanks for the update. This morning the link was busted.
>-- Original Message --
>To: pmtr@yahoogroups.com
>From: Paul Hodgetts <phodgetts@...>
>Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:49:03 -0800
>Subject: [pmtr] Re: Project Management Graphics
>Reply-To: pmtr@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>Brian Furman asked:
>
> > I'd like to get a PDF of this. Do you have a PayPal account
> > where we send the fee? :-)
>
>After Glen Alleman wrote:
>
> > I have a PDF of this if anyone is interested, or you can
> > order it for a small fee
>
>There's a "Printable Version" button right above the graphic
>at Glen's link ( http://akss.dau.mil/ifc/index.htm ) that
>leads to a 34" by 22" downloadable PDF version at no cost.
>The purchase information for printed copies is also on that
>page.
>
>Paul
>-----
>Paul Hodgetts -- CEO, Coach, Trainer, Consultant
>Agile Logic -- www.agilelogic.com
>Training, Coaching, Consulting -- Agile Processes/Scrum/Lean/XP
>Complete solutions for adopting agile processes, Scrum and XP.
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Glen B. Alleman
Niwot, Colorado