>
> This is a new behaviour of the Postfix 2.2 release, to spread the word
> that Postfix now has a complete "A-to-Z" feature set.
>
> Some cynics argue instead that there may be issues with your hardware
> or the Centos compiler toolchain, userland or kernel, but they are
> clearly wrong as evidenced by this message, sent from my system which
> only has Postfix 2.2 in common with yours and yet still includes the
> offending text.
>
Unless I'm reading the headers of his message wrong he is using
Mailscanner with Postfix... ***
version : postfix-2.2.5-3.rhel4.rpm OS : Centos 4.2 local host : chinamail (only for intranet, not fqdn) public domain : newhonest.com I have my new postfix...
Jason
pg@...
Nov 23, 2005 3:53 am
Hi! ... Unless I'm reading the headers of his message wrong he is using Mailscanner with Postfix... *** Need I say more... Have a nice day! *** not a...
Nicolas Riendeau
knightr@...
Nov 23, 2005 4:13 am
So, will it be the problem of rpm? Or do I have to switch back to the standard centos' 2.1.x distribution of postfix to resolve the problem? Jason ... From:...
Jason
pg@...
Nov 23, 2005 4:13 am
... This is a new behaviour of the Postfix 2.2 release, to spread the word that Postfix now has a complete "A-to-Z" feature set. Some cynics argue instead that...
Victor Duchovni
Victor.Duchovni@...
Nov 23, 2005 4:37 am
... show actual evidence....
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Nov 23, 2005 12:20 pm
Hi, ... From: "Wietse Venema" <wietse@...> To: "Jason" <pg@...> Cc: <postfix-users@...> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 8:19 PM ...
Jason
pg@...
Nov 24, 2005 2:34 am
... THIS MAIL WAS NEVER TOUCHED BY POSTFIX!! Postfix can be recognized by its message headers. THERE ARE NO POSTFIX MESSAGE HEADERS IN THE ABOVE EMAIL. Wietse...
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Nov 24, 2005 3:08 am
Sorry Viktor, I had this one started before I saw you declare the thread dead, and it pertains to an earlier post which does have some possibly relevant...
/dev/rob0
rob0@...
Nov 24, 2005 5:32 am
... From: "Wietse Venema" <wietse@...> To: "Postfix users" <postfix-users@...> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 10:38 AM Subject: Re: I'm...
Jason
pg@...
Nov 24, 2005 2:44 am
... Oh for hells sakes... -- Best regards, Chris A bird in the hand is dead....
Chris
racerx@...
Nov 24, 2005 2:49 am
... You're problem comes up without postfix touching the email. So how can postfix have anything to do with it? (hint: it can't) You'll have to find and fix...
Tom Allison
tallison@...
Nov 29, 2005 11:17 am
... What you want to do can't be anymore complex then using Exchange and having Postfix relay it. It's really not rocket science - if I can do it, anyone can....
Chris
racerx@...
Nov 24, 2005 3:15 am
... From: "Chris" <racerx@...> To: "Jason" <pg@...> Cc: "Postfix users" <postfix-users@...> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 10:49...
Jason
pg@...
Nov 24, 2005 3:32 am
Hi, ... I don't have Exchange. ... Thank you for your advice. But is this "aaazzz" problem related to dynamic ip, or linux, or a bug? Jason...
Jason
pg@...
Nov 24, 2005 4:04 am
... How should we know? You have access to the server(s) we do not. ... Who knows!! At this point I think it is PEBKAC. You have not provided ANY useful...
Tom Diehl
tdiehl@...
Nov 24, 2005 4:29 am
... Of course not. ... Of course not. ... Apparently not in Postfix. I would guess in sendmail or mailscanner, more likely the latter. Why in particular did...
/dev/rob0
rob0@...
Nov 24, 2005 4:55 am
... From: "Jason" <pg@...> To: <RacerX@...> Cc: "Postfix users" <postfix-users@...> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 11:03 PM ...
vg_us@...
Nov 24, 2005 4:27 am
... Barring a miracle (the OP posting clear, relevant and sufficient evidence supporting his anecdotal claims), this thread is dead. Rehashing the same...
Victor Duchovni
Victor.Duchovni@...
Nov 24, 2005 4:28 am
... I always thought this was a rather brutally arrogant mailing list. Good stuff and good people abound, but not everyone here is a level 4 smtp-mage....
Tom Allison
tallison@...
Nov 29, 2005 11:14 am
... - I actually found the user's problem, while others fumbled about in the dark. - Doing so required the right evidence, and getting everyone to stop wasting...
Victor Duchovni
Victor.Duchovni@...
Nov 29, 2005 2:36 pm
... It's nice and right if one can be nice and right at the same time :-) Wietse...
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Nov 29, 2005 2:42 pm
Hi, ... From: "/dev/rob0" <rob0@...> To: <postfix-users@...> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 12:16 PM Subject: Re: I'm sending...
Jason
pg@...
Nov 24, 2005 4:31 am
Hi, ... I think I have already posted my log on both servers, and in both cases : with generic and without generic. Here is part of the message I post earlier ...
Jason
pg@...
Nov 24, 2005 4:37 am
... [...] ... [...] ... [...] ... Ah, the problem is now clear: It appears that the sendmail machine receives the message 48 seconds before it is sent. Since...
Jorey Bump
list@...
Nov 24, 2005 5:28 am
Hi, ... In additional to the log I posted, here is the tcpdum -s 1500, captured during sending thru postfix : 12:40:11.520061 IP chinamail.33904 >...
Jason
pg@...
Nov 24, 2005 5:25 am
Hi, ... In additional to the log I posted, here is the tcpdum -s 1500, captured during sending thru postfix : 12:40:11.520061 IP chinamail.33904 >...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
Send Email