... what do you mean here? the advantage I see is that the connect...
mouss
usebsd@...
Nov 22, 2005 6:26 pm
186719
... I'm using a host that has no A record (NXDOMAIN) as the dead primary in some of my configurations. While it applies less of a penalty, it isn't ...
Jorey Bump
list@...
Nov 22, 2005 6:40 pm
186720
... The IP is a network boundary address. i.e., if it were a class C network (/24). the address would be x.x.x.0, rather than 1-254 or broadcast (255)....
Nathanael Hoyle
nhoyle@...
Nov 22, 2005 6:40 pm
186721
... spam is generally sent with a forged sender address. bouncing it results in backscatter. see the backscatter readme. Try to reject instead of bounce. in...
mouss
usebsd@...
Nov 22, 2005 6:45 pm
186722
I have received over 20,000 attempts on my servers in the last 24 hours. Also my postmaster account (postmaster@...) has been used as the...
jhendrickson@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:01 pm
186723
... Oh yes it can. Your broadcast address is meaningful only for hosts on your subnet. Your broadcast address has no meaning for hosts on other subnets. Assign...
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:05 pm
186724
... If you would please note, I used the bottom end network boundary, not the top-end broadcast address. To my understanding, this would be accurate in...
Nathanael Hoyle
nhoyle@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:09 pm
186725
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:01:00 -0200 ... Try /home/vmail/"username"/Maildir/ - note the final '/'. -- Due to excessive spam as a result of archiving of this...
Keith Matthews
postfix@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:11 pm
186726
... It does not matter. The all-bits-0 (old broadcast) and all-bits-1 broadcast address have meaning only for hosts on your own subnet. The all-bits-0 (old...
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:19 pm
186727
... The remote system has no idea how your network is subnetted. so the failure will mostly be caused by a routing error (no route to host) generated in your...
mouss
usebsd@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:19 pm
186728
... I meant send a message via postfix and look at the above. My feeling is that it has to do with trusted_users....
mouss
usebsd@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:21 pm
186729
... - We live in CIDR. so remote client don't care. - broadcast and network addresses are valid (try a ping). so as Wietse says, packets will timeout, unless...
mouss
usebsd@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:25 pm
186730
Hi list, I need any help with Maildir delivery process. When a message is received It isn´t delivered to Maildir, but It is send back to sender and postfix...
Sérgio Ferreira
sergio.ferreira@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:27 pm
186731
... Postfix doesn't work that way. Check your logs to see what happened with 67C304C09C Show complete logs for a delivery of a mail that should go to a local ...
Ralf Hildebrandt
Ralf.Hildebrandt@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:32 pm
186732
Hi Ralf, ... I thought that because I changed the transport either virtual or local and the output was like I wrote above. ... Below, It is the log concerning...
... Didn't need all that, thank you. key word: masquarade....
tallison@...
Nov 22, 2005 8:11 pm
186734
... the sendmail daemon is not running, but the sendmail command is used by your mail program. configure /etc/mailer.conf to use postfix sendmail compatibility...
mouss
usebsd@...
Nov 22, 2005 8:22 pm
186735
... There's your problem maildrop doesn't know the user. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Ralf.Hildebrandt@...) spamtrap@... Postfix - Einrichtung,...
Ralf Hildebrandt
Ralf.Hildebrandt@...
Nov 22, 2005 9:29 pm
186736
On Tuesday, November 22, 2005 at 15:55 CET, ... In any case you obviously don't have to remove those tools from your system, but since procmail does not really...
Magnus Bäck
magnus@...
Nov 22, 2005 9:45 pm
186737
Guys, This is what I've setup: fauxmx01.plusone.com MX 10 (fake MX, non-responding <network> IP) nymeta01.plusone.com MX 20 (real MX) nymeta02.plusone.com MX...
Covington, Chris
Chris.Covington@...
Nov 22, 2005 9:59 pm
186738
Hi Mouss, I ran Maildrop -V 9 -d ..... This is what I found in tmp.out HOME=/home/data/sergio.ferreira/Maildir/, MAILDIR=/home/data/sergio.ferreira/Maildir/ ...
Sérgio Ferreira
sergio.ferreira@...
Nov 22, 2005 11:59 pm
186739
Hi Mouss, I did It too, I forgot to mention about that on early mail. The file remains empty, no entries was recorded. Bye, Sergio...
Sérgio Ferreira
sergio.ferreira@...
Nov 23, 2005 12:22 am
186740
... no, this is different than GL: here, every host (legit or not) will try MX1, then if compliant, will try MX2. legit systems are thus somewhat penalized. In...
mouss
usebsd@...
Nov 23, 2005 1:20 am
186741
This was relatively easy to implement, given that all the building blocks were already lying around somewhere. The updated transport manual page summarizes how...
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Nov 23, 2005 2:24 am
186742
... Nothing yet. Just wanted a little clarification before I started. Thanks Varun...
varun
varun_saa@...
Nov 23, 2005 3:09 am
186743
version : postfix-2.2.5-3.rhel4.rpm OS : Centos 4.2 local host : chinamail (only for intranet, not fqdn) public domain : newhonest.com I have my new postfix...
Jason
pg@...
Nov 23, 2005 3:53 am
186744
Hi! ... Unless I'm reading the headers of his message wrong he is using Mailscanner with Postfix... *** Need I say more... Have a nice day! *** not a...
Nicolas Riendeau
knightr@...
Nov 23, 2005 4:13 am
186745
So, will it be the problem of rpm? Or do I have to switch back to the standard centos' 2.1.x distribution of postfix to resolve the problem? Jason ... From:...
Jason
pg@...
Nov 23, 2005 4:13 am
186746
No, I'm NOT using the postfix server that I'm asking for help to send this email. In fact, this email is not sent by postfix, it's by sendmail + Mailscanner....
Jason
pg@...
Nov 23, 2005 4:23 am
186747
... This is a new behaviour of the Postfix 2.2 release, to spread the word that Postfix now has a complete "A-to-Z" feature set. Some cynics argue instead that...