... what do you mean here? the advantage I see is that the connect...
186719
Jorey Bump
list@...
Nov 22, 2005 6:40 pm
... I'm using a host that has no A record (NXDOMAIN) as the dead primary in some of my configurations. While it applies less of a penalty, it isn't ...
186720
Nathanael Hoyle
nhoyle@...
Nov 22, 2005 6:40 pm
... The IP is a network boundary address. i.e., if it were a class C network (/24). the address would be x.x.x.0, rather than 1-254 or broadcast (255)....
186721
mouss
usebsd@...
Nov 22, 2005 6:45 pm
... spam is generally sent with a forged sender address. bouncing it results in backscatter. see the backscatter readme. Try to reject instead of bounce. in...
186722
jhendrickson@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:01 pm
I have received over 20,000 attempts on my servers in the last 24 hours. Also my postmaster account (postmaster@...) has been used as the...
186723
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:05 pm
... Oh yes it can. Your broadcast address is meaningful only for hosts on your subnet. Your broadcast address has no meaning for hosts on other subnets. Assign...
186724
Nathanael Hoyle
nhoyle@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:09 pm
... If you would please note, I used the bottom end network boundary, not the top-end broadcast address. To my understanding, this would be accurate in...
186725
Keith Matthews
postfix@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:11 pm
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:01:00 -0200 ... Try /home/vmail/"username"/Maildir/ - note the final '/'. -- Due to excessive spam as a result of archiving of this...
186726
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:19 pm
... It does not matter. The all-bits-0 (old broadcast) and all-bits-1 broadcast address have meaning only for hosts on your own subnet. The all-bits-0 (old...
186727
mouss
usebsd@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:19 pm
... The remote system has no idea how your network is subnetted. so the failure will mostly be caused by a routing error (no route to host) generated in your...
186728
mouss
usebsd@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:21 pm
... I meant send a message via postfix and look at the above. My feeling is that it has to do with trusted_users....
186729
mouss
usebsd@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:25 pm
... - We live in CIDR. so remote client don't care. - broadcast and network addresses are valid (try a ping). so as Wietse says, packets will timeout, unless...
186730
Sérgio Ferreira
sergio.ferreira@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:27 pm
Hi list, I need any help with Maildir delivery process. When a message is received It isn´t delivered to Maildir, but It is send back to sender and postfix...
186731
Ralf Hildebrandt
Ralf.Hildebrandt@...
Nov 22, 2005 7:32 pm
... Postfix doesn't work that way. Check your logs to see what happened with 67C304C09C Show complete logs for a delivery of a mail that should go to a local ...
Hi Ralf, ... I thought that because I changed the transport either virtual or local and the output was like I wrote above. ... Below, It is the log concerning...
186733
tallison@...
Nov 22, 2005 8:11 pm
... Didn't need all that, thank you. key word: masquarade....
186734
mouss
usebsd@...
Nov 22, 2005 8:22 pm
... the sendmail daemon is not running, but the sendmail command is used by your mail program. configure /etc/mailer.conf to use postfix sendmail compatibility...
186735
Ralf Hildebrandt
Ralf.Hildebrandt@...
Nov 22, 2005 9:29 pm
... There's your problem maildrop doesn't know the user. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Ralf.Hildebrandt@...) spamtrap@... Postfix - Einrichtung,...
186736
Magnus Bäck
magnus@...
Nov 22, 2005 9:45 pm
On Tuesday, November 22, 2005 at 15:55 CET, ... In any case you obviously don't have to remove those tools from your system, but since procmail does not really...
186737
Covington, Chris
Chris.Covington@...
Nov 22, 2005 9:59 pm
Guys, This is what I've setup: fauxmx01.plusone.com MX 10 (fake MX, non-responding <network> IP) nymeta01.plusone.com MX 20 (real MX) nymeta02.plusone.com MX...
186738
Sérgio Ferreira
sergio.ferreira@...
Nov 22, 2005 11:59 pm
Hi Mouss, I ran Maildrop -V 9 -d ..... This is what I found in tmp.out HOME=/home/data/sergio.ferreira/Maildir/, MAILDIR=/home/data/sergio.ferreira/Maildir/ ...
186739
Sérgio Ferreira
sergio.ferreira@...
Nov 23, 2005 12:22 am
Hi Mouss, I did It too, I forgot to mention about that on early mail. The file remains empty, no entries was recorded. Bye, Sergio...
186740
mouss
usebsd@...
Nov 23, 2005 1:20 am
... no, this is different than GL: here, every host (legit or not) will try MX1, then if compliant, will try MX2. legit systems are thus somewhat penalized. In...
186741
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Nov 23, 2005 2:24 am
This was relatively easy to implement, given that all the building blocks were already lying around somewhere. The updated transport manual page summarizes how...
186742
varun
varun_saa@...
Nov 23, 2005 3:09 am
... Nothing yet. Just wanted a little clarification before I started. Thanks Varun...
186743
Jason
pg@...
Nov 23, 2005 3:53 am
version : postfix-2.2.5-3.rhel4.rpm OS : Centos 4.2 local host : chinamail (only for intranet, not fqdn) public domain : newhonest.com I have my new postfix...
186744
Nicolas Riendeau
knightr@...
Nov 23, 2005 4:13 am
Hi! ... Unless I'm reading the headers of his message wrong he is using Mailscanner with Postfix... *** Need I say more... Have a nice day! *** not a...
186745
Jason
pg@...
Nov 23, 2005 4:13 am
So, will it be the problem of rpm? Or do I have to switch back to the standard centos' 2.1.x distribution of postfix to resolve the problem? Jason ... From:...
186746
Jason
pg@...
Nov 23, 2005 4:23 am
No, I'm NOT using the postfix server that I'm asking for help to send this email. In fact, this email is not sent by postfix, it's by sendmail + Mailscanner....
186747
Victor Duchovni
Victor.Duchovni@...
Nov 23, 2005 4:37 am
... This is a new behaviour of the Postfix 2.2 release, to spread the word that Postfix now has a complete "A-to-Z" feature set. Some cynics argue instead that...
