... No-one did. I had intended to set a max processes limit.. As I understand it, this would be setting the Max Processes limit. smtphotmail unix - - - - 3...
264188
Sahil Tandon
sahil@...
Mar 30, 2010 2:07 am
... That is how you set maxproc, but why do you need 3 for this transport? ... That is how you set the timer. ... What version of Postfix is this? -- Sahil...
264189
Simon Waters
simonw@...
Mar 30, 2010 10:12 am
One domain is advertising an MX record of "0.0.0.0" which postfix correctly reports as "numeric domain name in resource data of MX record for ..." Then (on...
264190
lst_hoe02@...
Mar 30, 2010 10:24 am
... If it don't pass your restrictions, don't bother. If you built extensive lists of IP-addresses/e-mail addresses you have to manage those to prevent future...
264191
Chaminda Indrajith
indrajith@...
Mar 30, 2010 11:06 am
Hi rob0, It works... Thanks for your support. Regards Indrajith On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:45:52 -0500...
264192
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Mar 30, 2010 11:09 am
... You're right. Hoewever, with smtphotmail...rate_delay, Postfix will make at most one connection at a time. ... We need to know what Postfix uses, not what...
264193
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Mar 30, 2010 11:14 am
... Use check_sender/recipient_mx_access to eliminate IP addresses in 10.0.0.0/8, 127.0.0.0/8 and so on. Obviously, these addresses cannot be blocked by...
264194
Sharma, Ashish
ashish.sharma3@...
Mar 30, 2010 2:43 pm
Hello, I am running my postfix with 3 mail filters and 2 content filters (actually one of the content filter (amavisd) is piping it's output to the other). My...
264195
Kenneth Marshall
ktm@...
Mar 30, 2010 3:15 pm
... One approach that can be used is to use monitoring to determine the "health" of the filters. Then you can restart them or update the postfix configuration...
264196
Jon Giles
JGiles@...
Mar 30, 2010 4:52 pm
Hello There! I have looked around the net for an answer to this with no luck. Our company has a pair of Postfix relays that relay mail in and out of our...
264197
Victor Duchovni
Victor.Duchovni@...
Mar 30, 2010 5:06 pm
... DO NOT use fallback_relay here. Rather use internal DNS MX records, to specify a single relayhost domain name with multiple underlying hosts. ... DO NOT...
264198
Jon Giles
JGiles@...
Mar 30, 2010 5:17 pm
Very good. Thanks very much for the help! jg On 3/30/10 1:06 PM, "Victor Duchovni" <Victor.Duchovni@...> ... Jon Giles Network Engineer The CDM...
264199
Noel Jones
njones@...
Mar 30, 2010 6:51 pm
... The rhetorical question is: If you don't care if your mail is filtered, why bother with any filtering? Your first step should be to set up some monitoring...
264200
Mike Hutchinson
packetloss@...
Mar 30, 2010 7:16 pm
... This transport points to a rather fragile mail server, in other words, we are going over their acceptable delivery rate and our Server IP gets banned ...
264201
Simon
greminn@...
Mar 30, 2010 7:41 pm
Hi There, I must have something a little wrong with my postfix config?? When someone sends a email to me as part of a BCC email (leaving the TO field blank)...
264202
Noel Jones
njones@...
Mar 30, 2010 7:46 pm
... What do you think is should say? Have you looked at http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#undisclosed_recipients_header -- Noel Jones...
264203
Terry Barnum
terry@...
Mar 30, 2010 7:47 pm
I moved our company over to postfix (v2.6.2) last Friday and have been mesmerized by the log. One thing I'm seeing is a lot of 'lost connections from unknown[...
264204
Victor Duchovni
Victor.Duchovni@...
Mar 30, 2010 8:01 pm
... The rate control features introduced in 2.5.0 were improved in later patches, you must upgrade to the latest 2.5 release if you want to enforce...
264205
Noel Jones
njones@...
Mar 30, 2010 8:04 pm
... Postfix 2.5.1 is pretty old, the current 2.5 patchlevel is 10. There have been some changes that could affect your rate delay controls. Anyway, for...
264206
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Mar 30, 2010 8:12 pm
... According to the change log: 20090305 Bugfix: in the "new queue manager", the _destination_rate_delay code needed to postpone the job scheduler updates...
264207
Sahil Tandon
sahil@...
Mar 30, 2010 8:21 pm
On Mar 30, 2010, at 3:16 PM, "Mike Hutchinson" ... That's what I suspected. Upgrade; see RELEASE_NOTES for destination_rate_delay fix last year. Also show...
264208
Simon
greminn@...
Mar 30, 2010 8:26 pm
... I guess I was thinking that i didnt want our mailname in the to field. Some customers ring up "I dont know why, but its got your domain in the TO field"?...
264209
Noel Jones
njones@...
Mar 30, 2010 8:26 pm
... I believe these are all known spam sources. As a general rule you can ignore errors from clients you don't care to receive mail from. I see you have...
264210
Noel Jones
njones@...
Mar 30, 2010 8:31 pm
... Ok. Please see: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#undisclosed_recipients_header Either leaving undisclosed_recipients_header at its default value by...
264211
Mike Hutchinson
packetloss@...
Mar 30, 2010 9:01 pm
... Sounds interesting. I shall investigate and persue upgrading our Postfix to a more recent version. Thanks for the information Cheers, Michael Hutchinson...
264212
Mike Hutchinson
packetloss@...
Mar 30, 2010 9:02 pm
... Ahh, some direct logging would be nice. Thanks for the information and links. I will also check out whether my postfix needs to be upgraded. Cheers, ...
264213
Mike Hutchinson
packetloss@...
Mar 30, 2010 9:03 pm
... Excellent. Sounds like I have my answer. Thanks for the info, everyone, including Wietse. Hopefully all will be resolved today. Cheers, Michael Hutchinson....
264214
Terry Barnum
terry@...
Mar 30, 2010 9:08 pm
... Thank you Noel. That's the answer I was hoping for. I didn't notice any lost connections from servers that I cared about but wanted to ask here to make...
264215
Terry Barnum
terry@...
Mar 30, 2010 9:13 pm
On Mar 30, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Terry Barnum wrote: ... Thank you Noel. That's the answer I was hoping for. I didn't notice any lost connections from servers that...
264216
brian moore
bem@...
Mar 30, 2010 10:05 pm
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:13:27 -0700 ... ESMTP Pipelining? They could very well be rejected before DATA, except, well, with pipelining they may have already...
