... and how should this be supposed to use postscreen with "smtpd" instead of "postscreen" as command?...
291483
Erik Slagter
erik@...
Feb 21, 2013 4:38 pm
If I set up postscreen as closely as possible to the postscreen README document, I get this (diff to previous message) (I'm sorry lots of it has been folded)....
291484
Erik Slagter
erik@...
Feb 21, 2013 4:46 pm
Another variation I tried ("pass" and "postscreen" the other way around). This works, but gives the original problem, the smtpd options are not honoured...
291485
Reindl Harald
h.reindl@...
Feb 21, 2013 4:59 pm
... postscreen != smtpd so why should it do so? http://www.postfix.org/postscreen.8.html The Postfix postscreen(8) server provides additional pro- tection...
291486
Geoff Shang
geoff@...
Feb 21, 2013 5:05 pm
... You're right. This was the problem. My initial mistake was taking a postgresql example of a relay_domains lookup which I assumed to be functional, and...
291487
Erik Slagter
erik@...
Feb 21, 2013 5:28 pm
... Interesting how anybody is keen on telling me I am doing it wrong, which I sort of already had figured because it doesn't work... On the other hand nobody...
291488
DTNX Postmaster
postmaster@...
Feb 21, 2013 6:19 pm
... You keep blaming the documentation and the software, when the problem is most likely in your understanding of it. Simplify your configuration. Don't assume...
291489
Noel Jones
njones@...
Feb 21, 2013 6:30 pm
... You've shared too much. By now no one has any idea what you're doing. Overview: Postscreen is a front-end listener for smtpd. It's not a proxy. Incoming...
291490
Erik Slagter
erik@...
Feb 21, 2013 6:40 pm
... Yes I blame the documentation, but not the software. I've been using postfix for, well, something like ten years or more, I think it's the best thing since...
291491
Erik Slagter
erik@...
Feb 21, 2013 7:03 pm
... I'm just following the "REPORT A PROBLEM" procedure I was kindly pointed at... ... Yes at this point the smtpd/master has no knowledge of the ...
291492
Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-users@...
Feb 21, 2013 7:08 pm
... Take a DEEP breath, relax and don't *try* implementing new configurations you don't yet understand. The shots in the dark will just get you more confused. ...
291493
Jeroen Geilman
jeroen@...
Feb 21, 2013 8:24 pm
... How is DNS set up in comparison with the previous server ? Badly configured DNS can certainly slow things down, especially on outgoing mail. Any even...
291494
Jeroen Geilman
jeroen@...
Feb 21, 2013 8:35 pm
... ... how ? Either pickup(8) or smtpd(8) do the queueing; the qmgr only SENDS mail. There could be disk I/O contention, sure, but that would never translate ...
291495
Erik Slagter
erik@...
Feb 22, 2013 10:04 am
... And THAT is exactly the clue I was looking for! It works! The only thing that would have to be in the README file is the need to use "smtpd service names"...
291496
Jose Borges Ferreira
underspell@...
Feb 22, 2013 11:48 am
After reading this email i was under the impression that Postfix wont deal with UTF8 email addresses and made the test to check it out. Test was made with...
291497
Jan P. Kessler
postfix@...
Feb 22, 2013 12:42 pm
Dear list, we are trying to establish enforced TLS with a partner that hosts about 2000 recipient domains. All of these point to the same four MX records: ...
291498
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Feb 22, 2013 1:49 pm
Jose Borges Ferreira: [about sending 8-bit envelope into non-UTF8SMTP MTA] ... Postfix currently does not announce UTF8SMTP support. Therefore, a client that...
291499
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Feb 22, 2013 1:50 pm
... Surely, the policy table is indexed by MX hostname as well as recipient domain. Wietse...
291500
Geoff Shang
geoff@...
Feb 22, 2013 3:10 pm
Hi, I guess the following makes sence. I was just wondering if this is intended behaviour, and if so, why. As I posted in my previous messages, I'm setting up...
291501
Reindl Harald
h.reindl@...
Feb 22, 2013 3:24 pm
... surely - what else should it do? there is no protocol communication for the sendmail binary to reject http://www.postfix.org/pickup.8.html...
291502
Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-users@...
Feb 22, 2013 4:06 pm
... No, it is not. Only the nexthop domain is used since the MX host is derived from unauthenicated MX lookups and is trivially subject to MITM attacks. Just...
291503
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Feb 22, 2013 4:34 pm
... I see. This was a property of the legacy tls-per-site table. Wietse...
291504
Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-users@...
Feb 22, 2013 4:56 pm
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:04:34AM +0100, Erik Slagter wrote: First, a quick comment, all of the sturm and drang in this thread is the result of a peculiar...
291505
Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-users@...
Feb 22, 2013 5:03 pm
... Yep, security is a pain. I did not want to provide a false sense of security with the new policy table. None of the fancy certificate verification is worth...
291506
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Feb 22, 2013 5:48 pm
... This was changed from "private" into "public", so that postdrop could directly submit mail into cleanup, using the maildrop directory only as a fall-back...
291507
Deeztek.com Support
support@...
Feb 22, 2013 6:39 pm
I'm trying to accomplish the following: I'm trying to filter e-mail based on the to: field using a regexp header_checks file as follows: /^To:...
291508
Noel Jones
njones@...
Feb 22, 2013 7:01 pm
... Mail uses envelope recipient(s) to determine routing, never the To: header. In postfix, use transport_maps to define the envelope recipient next-hop...
291509
Deeztek.com Support
support@...
Feb 22, 2013 7:07 pm
Sorry I guess I wasn't very clear. This is what i want to do: I want to be able to route e-mail send to bob@... to 1.1.1.1 however, I also want to...
291510
Noel Jones
njones@...
Feb 22, 2013 7:14 pm
... [please don't top-post] Header_check is the wrong tool. Use transport_maps. bob@... smtp:[1.1.1.1] mary@... smtp:[2.2.2.2] example.com...
291511
Deeztek.com Support
support@...
Feb 22, 2013 8:13 pm
... Sorry about the top-posting. Okay this is a little bit closer. So, I'm assuming if I use the domain in conjuction with recipients for the same domain the...
