... Interesting how anybody is keen on telling me I am doing it wrong, which I sort of already had figured because it doesn't work... On the other hand nobody...
291488
DTNX Postmaster
postmaster@...
Feb 21, 2013 6:19 pm
... You keep blaming the documentation and the software, when the problem is most likely in your understanding of it. Simplify your configuration. Don't assume...
291489
Noel Jones
njones@...
Feb 21, 2013 6:30 pm
... You've shared too much. By now no one has any idea what you're doing. Overview: Postscreen is a front-end listener for smtpd. It's not a proxy. Incoming...
291490
Erik Slagter
erik@...
Feb 21, 2013 6:40 pm
... Yes I blame the documentation, but not the software. I've been using postfix for, well, something like ten years or more, I think it's the best thing since...
291491
Erik Slagter
erik@...
Feb 21, 2013 7:03 pm
... I'm just following the "REPORT A PROBLEM" procedure I was kindly pointed at... ... Yes at this point the smtpd/master has no knowledge of the ...
291492
Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-users@...
Feb 21, 2013 7:08 pm
... Take a DEEP breath, relax and don't *try* implementing new configurations you don't yet understand. The shots in the dark will just get you more confused. ...
291493
Jeroen Geilman
jeroen@...
Feb 21, 2013 8:24 pm
... How is DNS set up in comparison with the previous server ? Badly configured DNS can certainly slow things down, especially on outgoing mail. Any even...
291494
Jeroen Geilman
jeroen@...
Feb 21, 2013 8:35 pm
... ... how ? Either pickup(8) or smtpd(8) do the queueing; the qmgr only SENDS mail. There could be disk I/O contention, sure, but that would never translate ...
291495
Erik Slagter
erik@...
Feb 22, 2013 10:04 am
... And THAT is exactly the clue I was looking for! It works! The only thing that would have to be in the README file is the need to use "smtpd service names"...
291496
Jose Borges Ferreira
underspell@...
Feb 22, 2013 11:48 am
After reading this email i was under the impression that Postfix wont deal with UTF8 email addresses and made the test to check it out. Test was made with...
291497
Jan P. Kessler
postfix@...
Feb 22, 2013 12:42 pm
Dear list, we are trying to establish enforced TLS with a partner that hosts about 2000 recipient domains. All of these point to the same four MX records: ...
291498
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Feb 22, 2013 1:49 pm
Jose Borges Ferreira: [about sending 8-bit envelope into non-UTF8SMTP MTA] ... Postfix currently does not announce UTF8SMTP support. Therefore, a client that...
291499
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Feb 22, 2013 1:50 pm
... Surely, the policy table is indexed by MX hostname as well as recipient domain. Wietse...
291500
Geoff Shang
geoff@...
Feb 22, 2013 3:10 pm
Hi, I guess the following makes sence. I was just wondering if this is intended behaviour, and if so, why. As I posted in my previous messages, I'm setting up...
291501
Reindl Harald
h.reindl@...
Feb 22, 2013 3:24 pm
... surely - what else should it do? there is no protocol communication for the sendmail binary to reject http://www.postfix.org/pickup.8.html...
291502
Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-users@...
Feb 22, 2013 4:06 pm
... No, it is not. Only the nexthop domain is used since the MX host is derived from unauthenicated MX lookups and is trivially subject to MITM attacks. Just...
291503
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Feb 22, 2013 4:34 pm
... I see. This was a property of the legacy tls-per-site table. Wietse...
291504
Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-users@...
Feb 22, 2013 4:56 pm
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:04:34AM +0100, Erik Slagter wrote: First, a quick comment, all of the sturm and drang in this thread is the result of a peculiar...
291505
Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-users@...
Feb 22, 2013 5:03 pm
... Yep, security is a pain. I did not want to provide a false sense of security with the new policy table. None of the fancy certificate verification is worth...
291506
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Feb 22, 2013 5:48 pm
... This was changed from "private" into "public", so that postdrop could directly submit mail into cleanup, using the maildrop directory only as a fall-back...
291507
Deeztek.com Support
support@...
Feb 22, 2013 6:39 pm
I'm trying to accomplish the following: I'm trying to filter e-mail based on the to: field using a regexp header_checks file as follows: /^To:...
291508
Noel Jones
njones@...
Feb 22, 2013 7:01 pm
... Mail uses envelope recipient(s) to determine routing, never the To: header. In postfix, use transport_maps to define the envelope recipient next-hop...
291509
Deeztek.com Support
support@...
Feb 22, 2013 7:07 pm
Sorry I guess I wasn't very clear. This is what i want to do: I want to be able to route e-mail send to bob@... to 1.1.1.1 however, I also want to...
291510
Noel Jones
njones@...
Feb 22, 2013 7:14 pm
... [please don't top-post] Header_check is the wrong tool. Use transport_maps. bob@... smtp:[1.1.1.1] mary@... smtp:[2.2.2.2] example.com...
291511
Deeztek.com Support
support@...
Feb 22, 2013 8:13 pm
... Sorry about the top-posting. Okay this is a little bit closer. So, I'm assuming if I use the domain in conjuction with recipients for the same domain the...
291512
Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-users@...
Feb 22, 2013 8:40 pm
... You can, but the bob entry is redundant. I don't recommend per-mailbox transport entries at all, it is best to stick to per-domain transport entries only,...
291513
Deeztek.com Support
support@...
Feb 22, 2013 9:02 pm
On February 22, 2013 3:40:22 PM Viktor Dukhovni ... I am afraid i am not following. I thought virtual alias allowed only for forwarding mail to recipients such...
291514
Wietse Venema
wietse@...
Feb 22, 2013 9:13 pm
... Typically this would be done with virtual aliases that send bob@... to bob@... Wietse...
291515
Fabian von Romberg
fromberg100@...
Feb 24, 2013 1:30 am
Hi All, Im trying to compile Postfix 2.10. Actually I can compile it, the only problem is that whatever I define as install prefix, all binaries and config...
291516
Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-users@...
Feb 24, 2013 4:03 am
... All I see is a made-up "PREFIX" setting that has no documented or actual effect on Postfix compilation. For non-fictional settings see: ...
