--- In prep2003discuss@y..., "mutley1926" <rockdogs@h...> wrote:
> Just an observation. But why are those of you who don't believe in
> PX, coming to this site?
I am interested in finding out more about this phenomenon. I am an
astronomer, and have seen no evidence whatsoever that there is a
Planet X at all, and indeed there is copious evidence that suggests
there is no Planet X. However, I am researching this idea so that I
can write about it, and this seems like the logical place to do it.
I'll read Mr. Hazlewood's book as well. I have made it, well, more
than a hobby but less than a career, to look into astronomy-based
myths and misconceptions.
I have seen a few errors stated here, and I try to correct errors
when I find them to the best of my ability. I want to make sure that
if people are going to make decisions based on the available data,
then they have the best data available.
Just an observation. But why are those of you who don't believe in PX, coming to this site? If you think it is all hog-wash. Why continue to frequent the...
... I am interested in finding out more about this phenomenon. I am an astronomer, and have seen no evidence whatsoever that there is a Planet X at all, and...
Yes I believe you when you say you're a bad astronomer. This means you've studied all the dogmatic theories & don't understand what a theory is. They're not...
... <snip> ... Mark, he said "I'll read Mr. Hazlewood's book as well." Chill out, he isn't attacking your book. ... No need to call him a liar! Philip Plait...
I knew of the badastronmer before you told me here. The options I included for my idea of who he is included a couple of possiblities of which you conveniently...
Wow Mark, why the personal attack? This person wasn't even engaged in conversation with you, yet you post this long personal attack. Why? This is certainly...
It was late and I misread what he said. I thought he said he read my book and still saw no evidence for PX. My fault. Mark H ... in ... means ... a ... read ...
Dictionary definitions of Belief form unabridged dictionary.(verbatim) Belief : 1. A persuasion of the truth, on the ground of evidence, distinct from personal...
Hi V, Haven't seen much of you lately. Glad to see you have a good dictionary <g>. Any luck finding that encyclopedia graphic for the debate group? See you...
... This is not factually correct. A theory, in scientific terms, is far more than a guess. What a layman calls a guess a scientist calls a hypothesis. A...
... *No matter how much farther you take that theory down an infinite line you will never reach a fact. ... *Your definition of a theory here is completely...
... That is not true. My definition of a theory is the one generally accepted by the scientific community. When a scientist talks about the "theory of...
... That's exactly true "the way the scientists thionk the Universe work." They don't know! It's not a fact. A theory will always be just what it is and...
... [...] I won't continue to argue this point with you; clearly wre cannot even agree on the terms. However... ... theories. ... other ... You said: "It's...
You may not want to continue to want to debate this but now that you are down I'm going to kick you. The definition of the word theory has never changed....
Mark a first off a hypothesis is a educational guess to what will happen after experimentation, jr. high science book. A theory is a hypothesis that cannot be...
Mark, In the paragraphs below you criticize celestial mechanics because it is built on several theories. These theories have all been tested by observation and...
Testing how a theory works, given a set of circumstances, does not prove the theory is a fact. A theory is a best guess. It does not show absolutely how the...
... Where ... It's not so much a fact as it is a hypothesis that has alot of tests backing it up, but you still haven't got enough information to say for...
... built on several theories. These theories have all been tested by observation and our ability to send probes out into the solar system with great accuracy....
... the probes ... I mentioned this in an earlier post: the problems were in the engineering, and not the basic science. We understand how gravity works pretty...
... *Here we go again. The why AND the how of gravity is thoery. Get over it. We can only watch or make observations as to how nature works. The rest is...
... "How": a description of the way something works. "Why": the underlying cause of the way something works. Example: I do not understand why (in detail) my...
Ok, I agree with you about "the how." Thank you so much for this statement: "Why gravity works is unknown" This was the statement I was attempting to get from...
... been ... No, it *doesn't*. That's the whole point! We have observed gravity and how it works for so long that we can safely predict how an object will...
ENOUGH ALREADY..!! You are becoming a real pain in the a--. Why don't you test your "theory" of gravity by dropping on your head.. Who knows, it might help.. ...
Mark has to insist that orbital mechanics could be wrong because of the very specific descriptions by Zetatalk on the movements of Planet X. These descriptions...
Orbital mechanics are based on theories. Theories are neither wrong nor right they are just best guesess. Jim, How could I have said someting was wrong or...
Mark, It doesn't take God to see that the speeds required for PX to arrive are absurd. Very basic math is all that is required. How the force of gravity acts...
... You're right it just takes people that have not seen it before to say that. ... You're observational math does not apply to what you have not observed. Why...
Offline 
Send Email
