Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
primeform · User group for PFGW & PrimeForm programs

Group Information

  • Members: 946
  • Category: Number Theory
  • Founded: Sep 26, 1999
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Visit the Groups blog for the latest Yahoo! Groups information

Home

 

Activity within 7 days:

Description

Discussion group for PrimeFormGW (PFGW) primality-testing program. Use the list to discuss anything prime-related. Theory, algorithms, methods, and other computer programs are suitable topics.

OpenPFGW v1.2 - Official Release Feb 11, 2005
Win32 (95/98/ME/NT/2000/XP)
Linux binary Static linked Linux binary
FULL Source code Builds under Win32 and Linux, and other x86 systems

Download the correct version for your OS and unzip to a location of your choice. The packages include full instructions, information, and a tutorial. Open a command prompt or a shell, and you're ready to go!

Most Recent Messages

  (View All)
(Group by Topic)
Advanced
   Start Topic
Re: Crump penalty for too much factorization
... But then you should divide x by 3, to optimize the sextics. Hence I have been running with n=subst(y*(2*y-11)^2/9,y,(2*x^3-10*x-3)^2); which is an integer
Posted - Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:11 pm
djbroadhurst
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: Crump penalty for too much factorization
Interesting. For sextics, I get your exact same degree split if I substitute 18*x^3-10*x-1 instead of 18*x^2-11*x-2. i.e. n=subst(121*x^2-396*x^4+324*x^6, x,
Posted - Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:35 am
Joe
jkcmagic
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: Crump penalty for too much factorization
... {for(k=0,10,f=factor(n-k)[,1]; print([k,vector(#f,j,poldegree(f[j]))]))} [0, [2, 4]] [1, [3, 3, 6]] [2, [4, 8]] [3, [12]] [4, [2, 2, 4, 4]] [5, [12]] [6,
Posted - Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:57 am
djbroadhurst
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: Crump penalty for too much factorization
Cool, I'll be looking forward to hearing from you on your results. I found a few other promising polynomials, such as: n=subst(121*x^2-396*x^4+324*x^6, x,
Posted - Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:32 pm
Joe
jkcmagic
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: Crump penalty for too much factorization
... Thanks Jarek. That is indeed my aim. But I may need to cross my toes, as well as my fingers :-) David
Posted - Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:51 am
djbroadhurst
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Add primeform to your personalized My Yahoo! page Add to My Yahoo! XML What's This?

Message History

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 83 92 52 67 26 23 33 91 25 19 53
2008 39 11 33 22 11 65 34 35 34 94 32 19
2007 147 109 93 31 101 36 33 58 33 6 18 20
2006 113 148 143 189 112 99 24 40 106 70 204 157
2005 148 83 192 194 175 166 137 100 40 203 72 67
2004 74 31 64 54 100 60 145 62 104 168 126 111
2003 32 52 13 26 126 162 123 114 77 194 90 79
2002 24 20 43 25 21 13 54 27 31 34 75 165
2001 88 49 26 84 109 157 130 51 40 35 12 50
2000 116 127 86 55 42 55 27 92 57 177 236 224
1999 16 73 98 162
What is Yahoo! Answers?

Yahoo! Answers, a new Yahoo! community, is a question and answer exchange where the world gathers to share what they know...and make each other's day. People can ask questions on any topic, and help others out by answering their questions.

What is Yahoo! Answers?

Yahoo! Answers, a new Yahoo! community, is a question and answer exchange where the world gathers to share what they know...and make each other's day. People can ask questions on any topic, and help others out by answering their questions.

Questions in Science & Mathematics > Mathematics

  • Questions are currently unavailable.

Want to help answer other questions? Go to Yahoo! Answers

Group Email Addresses


Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help