Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
primeform · User group for PFGW & PrimeForm programs
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 3039 - 3068 of 9803   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
3039
and how about the status of the 10-a,b,c- conjecture? (about 1 February 2002) rob ... From: <Hans.Rosenthal@...> To: PrimeForm...
Rob Binnekamp
robdine2001
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2003
1:50 pm
3040
... repdigit, so two word records in one prime (again: see message #2403) ... digits !!! ... Well done. You might like the print out of the decimal expansion...
paulunderwooduk <paul...
paulunderwooduk
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2003
9:03 pm
3041
... David, 2^364289-2^182145+1 in binary looks like: 111..111000..001 Not a palindrome, not even on a two digited soul As for the "Phi's" I can't say... Paul...
paulunderwooduk <paul...
paulunderwooduk
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2003
9:26 pm
3042
... You can see all in the Patrick De Geest's site: http://www.worldofnumbers.com/em_wing.htm ... I use a home sieving programme with GMP (only up to 2^31) ...
Daniel Heuer
heuer@...
Send Email
Feb 6, 2003
6:54 am
3043
... Correct me if I am wrong but I think these are the top binary near repetitive digit primes (Binary NRD): 898 7*2^177977-1 53578 gb 2000 ...
paulunderwooduk <paul...
paulunderwooduk
Offline Send Email
Feb 6, 2003
3:59 pm
3044
Yes, I reckoned that the answer was: none of the above. The ones with +1 at the end should have -1. And I think that the Phi's have the same defect. So Daniel...
David Broadhurst <d.b...
djbroadhurst
Offline Send Email
Feb 7, 2003
3:07 pm
3045
(What follows is only meant for those who are interested in ECPP.) The following list of primes is intended to give you an impression of how uncertain ECPP...
Hans.Rosenthal@...
prime13117532
Offline Send Email
Feb 7, 2003
10:35 pm
3046
Thanks for the stats, Hans. No time to digest the version-variance now, ... As a 2.0.x user, I'm interested. However, Marcel has wiped himself out of the...
David Broadhurst <d.b...
djbroadhurst
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2003
12:40 am
3047
... Please cancel that; I now see it was Tx 2.1.0. So my belief that Primo 2.0.6 is state-of-art is intact. I am _very_ happy with Primo 2.0.x. David...
David Broadhurst <d.b...
djbroadhurst
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2003
12:54 am
3048
... and don't criticise what you can't understand ... ... the old versions were rapidly changing ... ... if you can't get a new one, then just lend a hand ... ...
David Broadhurst <d.b...
djbroadhurst
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2003
1:01 am
3049
I found the actual words: http://www.newyouth.com/archives/music/bobdylan.asp ... but I quite like my own mis-rememberings. David (unreconstructed 60's...
David Broadhurst <d.b...
djbroadhurst
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2003
1:10 am
3050
Ah, Bob Dylan, whenever I'm feeling down, I use to listen to that song. Bob Dylan-songs are what I'm listening to when searching for prime numbers (and also...
Hans.Rosenthal@...
prime13117532
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2003
7:19 am
3051
... 2 2^394034-3 118617 M. Frind & P. Underwood 09/2002 4 2^354946-3 106850 M. Frind & P. Underwood 08/2002 Are larger *but* they are only PRPs ;-) Not much...
paulunderwooduk <paul...
paulunderwooduk
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2003
7:16 pm
3052
Paul: Those 111....101 binary near-repunit PrPs are impressive but if you had gone for pali as well, then they would have been provable, I think? David...
David Broadhurst <d.b...
djbroadhurst
Offline Send Email
Feb 9, 2003
2:35 pm
3053
... Yes the pailindromes would be provable beacuse then 50% of N+1 would be divisible by 2 only. The 111..101 pattern was chosen because the FFT PRP test PFGW...
paulunderwooduk <paul...
paulunderwooduk
Offline Send Email
Feb 10, 2003
6:33 pm
3054
Paul: After 3*2^164987-1 49667 gb 1999 it seems that Wilfrid and Ingo stopped at n=191600 http://www.prothsearch.net/riesel2.html...
David Broadhurst <d.b...
djbroadhurst
Offline Send Email
Feb 10, 2003
11:26 pm
3055
... 3 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 18, 34, 38, 43, 55, 64, 76, 94, 103, 143, 206, 216, 306, 324, 391, 458, 470, 827, 1274, 3276, 4204, 5134, 7559, 12676, 14898,...
paulunderwooduk <paul...
paulunderwooduk
Offline Send Email
Feb 10, 2003
11:39 pm
3056
Hi y'all, Which is quicker for 3*2^n-1 search? PRP.exe -- http://www.mersenne.org/ -- the site is down so I can't bench it? Or PFGW? Or Proth? If PRP.exe is...
paulunderwooduk <paul...
paulunderwooduk
Offline Send Email
Feb 11, 2003
7:51 pm
3057
Hello, Anyone used Givaro to implement primality testing? Any manuals or instructions on Givaro installation available? Thanks...
hx_yu <hx_yu@...>
hx_yu
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2003
2:12 am
3058
Hi Paul, ... I would say that PRP and PFGW will do a PRP test at the same speed. Proth will be slower. ... Here I would say LLR - it can perform a primality...
Paul Jobling
p_jobling
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2003
9:21 am
3059
... I would like to follow his example, if I knew how to do this with only one or two key strokes... (help from Yahoo! Groups welcomed)...
Hans.Rosenthal@...
prime13117532
Offline Send Email
Feb 13, 2003
12:11 am
3060
Thanks for your advice Paul but, on my P4, LLR wins outright; no need to do extra proving algorithm as well! I wonder what DWT timings we could expect in...
paulunderwooduk <paul...
paulunderwooduk
Offline Send Email
Feb 13, 2003
12:14 am
3061
I would hate to see your posts vanish (I miss being able to research some of Marcels, but I guess that was his choice). If you want to delete them, then simply...
jim_fougeron <jfoug@....
jim_fougeron
Offline Send Email
Feb 13, 2003
4:29 pm
3062
These are the timings on my Athon XP1700+. WinPFGW marginally wins the PRP race on this machine :-) (whereas LLR won by 10% on the P4.) WinPFGW results: ...
paulunderwooduk <paul...
paulunderwooduk
Offline Send Email
Feb 15, 2003
12:42 am
3063
I see the same on my Athlon XP 1800+. Once the proving time for found PRP's is added to the WinPFGW times, it looks like LLR is the program to use across the...
gchil0 <jgchilders@...>
gchil0
Offline Send Email
Feb 15, 2003
7:15 pm
3064
... found ... program ... This is the state of play most certainly with P4s. PFGW is still quicker than the others at PRPing on Athlons. Certainly LLR should...
paulunderwooduk <paul...
paulunderwooduk
Offline Send Email
Feb 15, 2003
10:30 pm
3065
Paul, What range of n are you intending to sieve for this 3.2^n-1 search? Because the fastest software would probably be a slight variant of the SoBSieve ...
Paul Jobling
p_jobling
Offline Send Email
Feb 17, 2003
9:41 am
3066
... I have a fixed-k sieve that on my machines is between 4 and 10 times faster than the NewPGen 2.71beta. It makes no assumptions about k, and is ready to run...
Phil Carmody
thefatphil
Offline Send Email
Feb 17, 2003
2:21 pm
3067
Hiya Paul I will be sieveing in blocks of 100,000. It is already done by Keller et al to n=191600. I will sieve the first block, fragment it, upload it to...
paulunderwooduk <paul...
paulunderwooduk
Offline Send Email
Feb 17, 2003
2:33 pm
3068
Hiya Phil, I have DJGPP under Windoze. If you send me the source for your sieve I will compile it and compare it to NewPGen 2.70. The ABC/NewPGen format...
paulunderwooduk <paul...
paulunderwooduk
Offline Send Email
Feb 17, 2003
3:05 pm
Messages 3039 - 3068 of 9803   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help