... Can you please be a little more descriptive of the situation? Please list, 1. Version of PFGW used. 2. exact number being tested (the above does not make...
1 - Version of pfgw used is 20040816.*_stable(V1.2 RCIa) 2 - When I tried to test the number:( 2 ^ 89000000 -1 ) for primality, I received the message:...
That number is beyond the limit of PFGW. PFGW does not have FFT's large enough to handle this. Jim. ... primality, ... Matrix!!! Please email this number to...
Laughing Out Loud It has been around since people started talking on the net, I think. Bouk. ... __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail...
... List Of Links Lots Of Luck Laughing Out Loud Lots Of Laughter Love Of Live Look On Line . . . . Where first? Chicken/Egg? Look On Line search: LOL slang. ...
There has been a new stable version of PFGW released. This version changes how deeply PFGW can trial factor. Prior to this change, 2^32 was the maximal depth...
... I can't access to Yahoogroups due to some registration problems. Is there another website where it can be downloaded? Luigi...
Luigi Morelli
l.morelli@...
Oct 3, 2004 1:02 pm
4799
Hello, This information courtesy of a beautiful web site I rediscovered today. http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Posters/1003.html Cheers, Dick...
... Alway working on (2^127 - 1)*2^(128*n + 1) - 1 I remark that it is (2^(2^k - 1) - 1)*2^((2^k)*n + 1) - 1 for k = 7 For k = 1 we have (2^(2^1 - 1) -...
... I conjecture that (2^63-1)*2^(64*n+1)-1 and (2^127-1)*2^(128*n+1)-1 are composite numbers for all integer n Is it a proof that it is wrong ? Pierre ... ...
... Think of this as (b-2)*b^n-1 with b=2^(2^k) ... In fact, (16-2)*16^n-1 is prime for n = 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 11, 44, 4595, 5632, 6139, 6527, 8714, 10489,...
... ********************** OK, sure i will remember now what you write ( hope so ) Sure i miss some primes as you seen it for k=2,3,5 but what about k=6 and 7...
... They have low weights and large bases and didn't strike lucky for small n. But it's crazy to believe that they are never prime. What possible reason do you...
... ************ I am only sure that for k=1 to 5 there are a lot of primes with low n ( and some more great ) For k=8 I found n=20 for the first prime it is...
... Yes that was a lucky break. Individual prime events like this cannot be predicted, else this list would not exist! ... For a finite range of n we expect...
... This is good news for all Primo users :) Although it is _most_ unlikely that a new Primo beta works slower than a previous one, it is not impossible. In...
Andy's site "Titanic Prime Generalized Repunits" http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~aads/titans.html has not been updated since 24 August 2003. What does this...
... It means than Andy does not choose to update it. When Bouk and I last heard from him, ... ..................!! Perhaps he decided that posting O(800) GRUs...
A few weeks ago, I reserved a few ranges on the primesearch webpage. http://www.mycgiserver.com/~primesearch/ I have been trying to update my ranges this...
I have been connecting to the website, but I have not been able to update reserved ranges. Has anyone tried to update reserved ranges? This is where I am...
1 - Version of pfgw used is 20040816.*_stable(V1.2 RCIa) 2 - When I tried to test the number:( 216968^16384 + 51 ) for primality, I received the message: was...
Please show the exact command line used. I test this number just fine. NOTE if you are running the command line version of PFGW on any winNT version...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
