A disclaimer first, I have not used LLR, so I don't know its runtime options. However, I am wondering, if LLR has a round off checking function? If so, has...
Thanks for the correction, Jack. ... I checked my files and found: 1.4256 799929 ^^^^^ from NewPGen output for n < 0.8M. I must have misremembered 1.22; you...
... If ... [snip] ErrorCheck=1 in the "llr.ini" will turn this on. Natively linux, you can turn it on with "llr -m" etc The Win gui has a drop down menu. It...
Thanks to Jens for showing that t <=4 for n=m+10*t+ 0 / 2 (t=0,1,2,3,4) such that n^2+1 is prime for all t. And to Mike for finding tha smallest n^2+1 prime...
... If > so, has this been tested, and used? It could easily be that LLR can ... added Yes, I always use this option, unless performing diagnostics. It seems,...
Sincere thanks to those who helped answer my questions about 64-bit computers and PFGW. It looks like I will use 3.4 GHz P4 computers and leave 64-bit...
... Just for to see how fast it goes, I borrowed a 3GHz Xenon and ran llrp43slinux, with ForceIBDWT=1 obtaining ... .........^^^^ From which I conclude that...
... <d.broadhurst@o...> wrote: [snip] ... Yes, high frequency P4's are great for LLR. They are also good for PFGW. It seems that some computer science...
... Soon, PFGW will have the same speed than LLR on the P4. There already is a very early beta version I have done, but it is certainly NOT ready for prime...
... certainly > NOT ready for prime (pun intened) time. I hope, we can get a stable version, before the new year. If not, I may include a fast LLR, and the old...
... for ... them ... one"(2002), ... OpenPFGW is "Open". Simply read it's license file. It does state that you are "free" to use it in manners like you want...
Congrats to Curtis Cooper for a huge prime 21*2^1830919+1, 551163 digits! Currently ranked 16th largest. According to the page below he is using PRP, and...
The October 10 I sent the sequence A098845 to OEIS primes of the form 2^k*(2^k-1)-1 until A098845(33)=14610 Now I found A098845(34)=43401 and A098845(35)=45306...
pfgw -f0 -b137 -l -q137 PFGW Version 20031121.x86_Dev (Beta 'caveat utilitor') [FFT v22.13 w/P4] Output logging to file pfgw.out No factoring at all, not even...
See the "News" file. In the version 20040728, it lists this bug, and that it was fixed. NOTE pfgw will NOT do a PRP-137 test, but will perform a PRP-136 on...
I get identical results on a P4 2.4 running Mandrake 9.0 with llrp43slinux, and also on another P4 2.4 running Win2k with LLRP4. Steven Harvey ... ===== ...
Hello, Not only on linux version, I get it with the Win version too: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00 GHz CPU speed: 2992.83 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV,...
Having access, for a while, to a 3GHz Xenon, running linux, I decided to conduct a 4-way investigation of the accuracy of: 1) Wilfrid Keller's and Dale...
PS: The correction to http://www.geocities.com/primes_r_us/riesel/prime600.html ... .........nope!....... appears to be Calling Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge with...
... Yet http://www.geocities.com/primes_r_us/riesel/prime300.html has ... ....................?????? Steven: Any idea where [155000] came from, please? Noting...
Yes! Big congratulations to Curtis for his really big Proth. 21*2^1830919+1 !!! I am trying to collect the data on Vertical (fixed k) prothsearch in the...
Hello David, The same here (Win version) but "traditionally" LLR has been buggy with small n's (less than 250 ?), even the most accurate version released in...
Thanks, Predrag. Do you have any light to shed on these "hardware" errors, please? grep ILLEGAL x?/lr* x1/lresults.txt:Iter: 2/9, ERROR: ILLEGAL SUMOUT ...
Most likely these are false alarms. What version of LLR are you using? It happened before on some k/n pairs when using LLR released in April this year (2004)...
Thanks again, Predrag. I checked the LLRP43 residues that followed the error messages, using LLR21, and got the same ones. So they do seem to be false alarms....