A probable CPAP-3 with 10042 digits: 19067408*2^33333-12539 + 6270*n, for n = 0, 1, 2 n=0 and n=1 give probable primes. 19067408*2^33333+1 for n=2 is a proven...
... [snip] ... Since ECPP is readily parallelizable it would be great if Francois Morain would release a single-PC multi-core (64-bit) version of fastECPP for...
... The record held. There wasn't even a non-consecutive AP-3 in the rest. The search gave 1492 gigantic prp's in total. A double hit was expected 1 in 586...
... (Projects) PrimeGrid and TwinPrime Search are showing some ~2k n=333333 primes between them -- about 60% of the number needed to give them a ~60% chance of...
Hello, for example with PFGW , use after PRPing "pfgw -tc filewithprps" regards Norman ... __________________________________ Alles was der Gesundheit und...
Hi, Group; and Paul Underwood. '2nd-kind' Proth number classification (as described by me); this number won't generate psuedoprimes when tested base two. ...
... see: http://primes.utm.edu/glossary/page.php?sort=StrongPRP and: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Iff.html You did not use "12.4999... % of the number of...
Hi all, Third time lucky 2^5900 + 469721931951 2^5900 + 469721934831 2^5900 + 469721937711 2^5900 + 469721940591 form a CPAP4 each with 1777 digits and...
Hi All! I actually try to find the most suitable journal to publish a paper intitulated: "Toward a ultimated and unified theory of factorization of Cunningham...
... Virtually no journal will publish a conjecture alone. Usually conjectures are buried in the midst of theorems and proofs, or shared in informal ways. CC...
Thank for your answer Chris, but unfortunately it doesn't help me. I have a lot of material (a small set of conjectures all based on a basic one). As I said my...
Posted by: "Sean A. Irvine" ... Erm, that's trivial. The first divides 2^4770873414614514823726411765367314130342678121207508100045009-1 Phil () ASCII ribbon...
Hi Sean, Right now it's difficult to say (probably not) if my conjectures could speed up the search of factors of Cunningham numbers, but who knows? I think my...
Hello group, today, I found a new (possible) triplet with 6223 digits (>20000 bits). Primo v2.2.0_b7 is running. After very long time I found this: ...
Thank you,Jens! A question to you: What is the running time for a 6.2k digit number ? My calculation is 3 or 4 months on a 2.133 Ghz Athlon MP. After 3 days I...
I was wondering how the conversion was done. From a regular 2357207 digit number to 28433·2^7830457+1. I am thinking it is called Scientific notation but i...
... The number is written 28433*2^7830457+1 in ASCII and it is the 9th largest known prime: http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=73145 * and + are normal...
Hi, Group. this program won't run when compiled as $scriptify.pl <bouris.pcs> bouris.scr ...am I missing something ??? SCRIPT // DIM L,3; DIM M,2^3; DIM...
I think I have fixed it. The comments explain what I did. NOTE the output is: Script File L=3,N=1 L=3,N=3 COMPOSITE COMPOSITE Is that what you expected? Jim....
Thanks, Jim... the output is correct. I wouldn't have got it without your help; my syntax was horrible. ... the ... alone ... formatting. ... outside ... ...
// Jim, alas... int iL=3; int M=2^3; int Z1; int Z2; int Z3; int Z4; int Z5; int Z6; int Z7; int Z8; for(N=1;N<=M;N+=2){ Z1=M*(M+N)+1; Z2=(((Z1-3)/2-1)/2-1)/2;...
Hi All. I've been using primeform for awhile and though I would see if there was a newer version and stumbled upon PFGW. I was curious to see how well it...
A lot more info is good for comparisons. Which primeform version? Which PFGW version? Which cpu? Were they running at normal cpu priority with no other cpu...