Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
primenumbers · Prime numbers and primality testing
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 15665 - 15696 of 21095   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
15665
Jean, Thank you for the new version in almost no time! I tried to test Kynea numbers. It's working but it's slower than pfgw. Two examples are given below. Now...
pminovic
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2004
9:53 am
15666
... The way to speed up searching Carol/Kynea numbers is through modular reduction. When reducing over 2^n+-2^k-1 ( k<70% of n ingeneral ) we can use additions...
Paul Underwood
paulunderwooduk
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2004
10:50 am
15667
Thank you for your tests ! I am not surprised if LLPP4 deterministic test is slower than pfgw PRP one, because the "Computing U0" loop is more time consuming...
Jean Penné
jpyah2001
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2004
12:50 pm
15668
... PRP ... This is true, it takes about 50 minutes to compute U0, I'll append the lresults.txt file tomorrow. ... No! To prove primality of a PRP using "pfgw...
pminovic
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2004
1:23 pm
15671
I have a 2004 addition for CPAP-4 (yes, it was very easy to find) 78006074.883#+k*2004+R is prime for k = [0...3] Using the special crafted R of: ...
jim_fougeron
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2004
9:42 pm
15672
... How fortunate that the year is divisible by 3#. Don't expect me to wait until 2010 to beat it :-) Congratulations on beating my ... erm ... improving your...
Jens Kruse Andersen
jkand71
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2004
12:32 am
15673
The following is posted on behalf of "Jean Penne" who sent his reply to "primenumbers-owner" instead of "primenumbers" by mistake. Cheers Ken ... pfgw ... the ...
Ken Davis
kraden
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2004
1:19 am
15674
Are perfect cubes + 1 ever prime? i.e.: Is any number of the form (a^3)+1 ever prime? ... It seems like there should be eventually... ... Better yet, is any...
patience_and_fortitude
patience_and...
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2004
2:42 pm
15675
In a message dated 02/12/2004 14:46:19 GMT Standard Time, ... No. If q is any odd number > 2, then a^q + 1 = (a+1) * (a^(q-1) - a^(q-2) + ... +1) and so has...
mikeoakes2@...
mikeoakes2
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2004
2:53 pm
15676
So after 1^q+1=2 there are no further primes for odd q. -Ray Chandler ________________________________ From: mikeoakes2@... [mailto:mikeoakes2@...] ...
Ray Chandler
rayjchandler
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2004
4:39 pm
15677
... We can say even more than that. All primes of the form (a^q + 1) are either 2 (i.e. a=1) or of the form (b^{2^n}+1) where b and n are integers. When...
Paul Leyland
xilmanuk
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2004
4:48 pm
15678
...and a similar rational holds for (a^q)-1 counterparts. Thanks, Shawn...
patience_and_fortitude
patience_and...
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2004
7:29 pm
15679
Dear interested primers Have appreciated feedbacks about my initial draft. I start disclosing "my" Goldbach partition count evaluation method and formula. ...
Didier van der Straten
didiervander...
Offline Send Email
Dec 2, 2004
11:48 pm
15680
Someone told me that one of either Goldbach or Riemann had been proven unprovable by current knowledge of mathematics. Can someone inform me as to which it...
gulland68
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2004
12:06 am
15681
My two cents... Original English Text: My love you are no where, and I want you now here Translating and translating back... My love you are no where, and I...
Jose Ramón Brox
ambroxius
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2004
12:50 am
15682
Hi I'm not sure if this is a new idea but I have not come across it . Its based on the fact that apart from 2 and 5 all primes have a last digit of 1,3,7 or 9....
Jim Doyle
ozyjim2004
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2004
12:52 am
15683
Robin Garcia <sopadeajo2001@...> wrote: Robin Garcia <sopadeajo2001@...> wrote: Would anybody try to speed up the algorith implemented in a simple...
Robin Garcia
sopadeajo2001
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2004
2:45 am
15684
... As far as I know, neither of them has been proven undecidable. But either one of them could conceivably be undecidable....
Jud McCranie
judmccr
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2004
4:02 am
15685
This is true, isn't it? For every epsilon > 0, let x = 1+epsilon. There is always a prime between x^n and x^(n+1) for all n>m, where m depends on epsilon....
Jud McCranie
judmccr
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2004
4:02 am
15686
Under visualization there are four links, I couldn't open. I know that at least one link (my own) is closed for ever. I have tried to tell it to Chriss...
Sren Nielsen
srentospace
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2004
4:06 pm
15687
... Perhaps I can; but what page are you talking about? It always helps to be specific. Perhaps you mean: http://primes.utm.edu/links/visualization/ This is...
Chris Caldwell
primemogul
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2004
10:08 pm
15688
... I also chose to search an easy improvement with a "special" d: 46313478 * 1201#/1302643 + x498 + 2310n, for n = 0..3 Using the special crafted x498 at the...
Jens Kruse Andersen
jkand71
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2004
10:26 pm
15689
Hi, ... By Ohakm's Razor, the long division (x^n+1)/(x+1) is the best proof that x+1 divides. However We also can also argue as follows using Baconian...
cino hilliard
hillcino368
Offline Send Email
Dec 4, 2004
5:13 am
15690
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the primenumbers group. File :...
primenumbers@yahoogro...
Send Email
Dec 4, 2004
9:35 am
15691
Hello members ! The start of a record-breaking run of 170 consecutive integers (4339207185939-4339207186108) that are non-semiprimes. No greater runs less than...
Norman Luhn
nluhn
Offline Send Email
Dec 4, 2004
11:22 am
15692
As I have read, for prime numbers, p, 2^p-1 are called Prime- Exponent Mersenne numbers. These are sub-group of 2^k-1, k positive integers, which are called ...
Michael Gian
pastmyprime2
Offline Send Email
Dec 5, 2004
10:19 pm
15693
... In response to this astonishing (for me at least) claim, I had to try and prove that this is true. I recommend anyone else to try to prove it before ...
Décio Luiz Gazzoni...
deciogazzoni
Offline Send Email
Dec 6, 2004
1:11 am
15694
Hello everyone, I visited the ECMNET page located at: http://www.loria.fr/~zimmerma/records/ecmnet.html and saw that the latest version of ecm available is...
David Cleaver
wraythex
Offline Send Email
Dec 6, 2004
10:39 am
15695
Sunday, December 05, 2004 11:19 PM [GMT+1=CET], ... The sum of the first n odd cubes is S(n) = Sum((2k-1)^3, k, 1, n) = 2n^4 - n^2 = n^2(2n^2 - 1) If n = 2^m,...
Ignacio Larrosa Ca...
ilarrosa
Offline Send Email
Dec 6, 2004
10:55 am
15696
It seems correct, but we can say it in an equivalent way: the set of prime numbers = 2, 5 PLUS all odd numbers > 5, not ending by 5 and not composite. ...
Mazzarello Gianni
mzzgv
Offline Send Email
Dec 6, 2004
11:55 am
Messages 15665 - 15696 of 21095   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help