Skip to search.
primenumbers · Prime numbers and primality testing

Group Information

  • Members: 944
  • Category: Number Theory
  • Founded: Dec 27, 2000
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 16 - 45 of 24247   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
16 Stephen Taylor
sgt@... Send Email
Jan 1, 2001
5:30 pm
Dear All, This is my first communication with the primenumbers group, (or any group come to that) so I hope that I'm doing eveything right! My interest is with...
17 Milton Brown
miltbrown@... Send Email
Jan 1, 2001
11:35 pm
Here is a complete program which I submitted last year, to do the multiplication as a convolution product. Just compile and run it. It does not require any...
18 Andrey Kulsha
Andrey_601@... Send Email
Jan 1, 2001
11:41 pm
Hello Bill! Please mathematically define the rules of your symmetry, and I (and, probably, some other list members) will try to prove (or disprove) them. ...
19 Milton Brown
miltbrown@... Send Email
Jan 1, 2001
11:49 pm
It is removing attachments? So here it is as text: Milton L. Brown miltbrown@... // // By Milton L. Brown 8-1-2000 (in file Mult.cpp) // It takes...
20 Phil Carmody
fatphil@... Send Email
Jan 2, 2001
12:53 am
Here are some 'linting' problems with the code. - You don't use all of the variables you have declared. - If your char buffer is 100 bytes long, the largest...
21 Milton Brown
miltbrown@... Send Email
Jan 2, 2001
2:06 am
Thanks for the hints. It was quick and dirty but it works, without optimizations. Some of thhe "h-files" that I have downloaded simply do not work. These are...
22 Milton Brown
miltbrown@... Send Email
Jan 2, 2001
3:49 am
Thanks for letting me know. It seems that the new prime pages is some how, cutting off the attachments, which I still don't understand if this is correct, or...
23 Dick Boland
richard042@... Send Email
Jan 2, 2001
8:36 am
Hello all,If you have trouble with the attachment, I will be posting a copy in Primeform's file areaIf you like the proof, please respond to the list with an...
24 Dick Boland
richard042@... Send Email
Jan 2, 2001
10:18 am
Hello, Regarding my proof of Goldbach's Conjecture, I had some trouble with the pictures in HTML as an attachment. You may also view my proof at...
25 Paul Leyland
pleyland@... Send Email
Jan 2, 2001
1:46 pm
I've not yet had chance to check your proof on your web page, but the following two sentences caught my eye. ... Too late. In virtually the entire world, you...
26 Bill Krys
billkrys@... Send Email
Jan 2, 2001
3:01 pm
These 2 statements caught my eye too. you can't claim patent rights without registration and then they are granted to you. Also, Paul is right that most...
27 Chris Caldwell
caldwell@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
12:00 am
... Yes, I set it up that way. I thought we might use the file area. But the attachments can be turned back on if folks prefer it. Attachments can carry...
28 David Broadhurst
d.broadhurst@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
12:16 am
... Please leave them off, as at present. Non-ASCII stuff and/or long files belong in the files area, as successfully managed in PrimeForm and OpenPFGW...
29 Conrad Eaton
ceaton@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
3:47 am
... OK, I agree - leave them off. However, let me display my ignorance here. How does one access the files area? Thanks, Connie...
30 David Broadhurst
d.broadhurst@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
5:49 am
... Click on "Files" to left of message. There is the only file lodged there at present: http://www.egroups.com/files/primenumbers/Articles/antiorders.zip by...
31 Rob Binnekamp
rob.binnekamp@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
1:59 pm
Let o be an odd number,e an even number and p a prime number with 2<p<o. Let o1=p1+e1 ( o1 arbitrary,p1 choosen<o1) Let o2=p2+e2 ( o2 arbitrary,p2...
32 Paul Jobling
Paul.Jobling@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
2:11 pm
But can you guarantee that every even e is represented??? ... __________________________________________________ Virus checked by MessageLabs Virus Control...
33 Dick Boland
richard042@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
6:34 pm
Gentlemen, I have rigidly proven Goldbach's Conjecture. It's amazing because the thing I found to finally prove it is "THE" prime number distribution...
34 David Broadhurst
d.broadhurst@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
6:55 pm
... and others? ... I guess you need a referee of a reputable math journal to adjudicate as to rigidity. ... or, more rigidly: ...
35 omega@... Send Email Jan 3, 2001
7:30 pm
... Hello Dick, I really dont know what to think of this. My first thought is that its a rather early 1 April post after reading your claims in the...
36 Dick Boland
richard042@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
8:59 pm
Hello, Yes I can. The distribution function is simply stated as follows, For any integer k>4, the first k^2 primes will be exactly distributed as follows: ...
37 Hadley, Thomas H (Tom...
thadley@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
9:33 pm
Dick, I'm confused. I'm assuming that your notation p(n) means the nth prime, so for example p(25) = 97, the 25th prime. So if we let k=5, then does your...
38 Phil Carmody
fatphil@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
10:08 pm
... k*(k+1) + k*(k-1) == 2k^2 So you seem to be out by a factor of 2 somewhere. Factoring in that factor of two... Table[{k, k^2, Prime[k^2], (Prime[k^2]+1)/2,...
39 Milton Brown
miltbrown@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
10:17 pm
k^2 - k*(k+1) leaves k remaining not k*(k-1) or k*(k+1) + k*(k-1) = 2*k^2 Does this affect your proof? Could you send you mail with shorter lines, my...
40 Stphn828@... Send Email Jan 3, 2001
10:17 pm
Has anyone noticed this? Finding primes, X to N when (3*X) > N, you do not need all of the primes up to the SQRT of N. Instead all you need is the primes up...
41 Bill Krys
billkrys@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
11:03 pm
Dick, may I get a copy of your proof. I cannot acces your webpage after several attempts. Bill ... ===== Refining my sieve into a simple, non-stochastic...
42 Dick Boland
richard042@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
11:11 pm
I am so sorry, Yes that is what I mean - k*(k+1)/2 in the first half and k*(k-1)/2 in the second half. It is correct in my proof. -Dick "Hadley, Thomas H...
43 Dick Boland
richard042@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
11:15 pm
Sorry Phil, It was a typo. k*(k+1)/2 primes <= (p(k^2)+1)/2 and k*(k-1)/2 primes between ((p(k^2)+1)/2+1) and p(k^2). You won't find a counter example there....
44 Dick Boland
richard042@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
11:22 pm
It does affect it, it was a typo.Should be k*(k+1)/2 and k*(k-1)/2.The best way to see it is at the website,It large and I couldn't get the pictures to go...
45 Phil Carmody
fatphil@... Send Email
Jan 3, 2001
11:38 pm
... I know it was a typo, which is why in the data below I correct that typo. And with the typo corrected I do find counterexamples. Check again please. Phil ...
Messages 16 - 45 of 24247   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help