Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
primenumbers · Prime numbers and primality testing
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 16143 - 16172 of 21093   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
16143
For those not familiar with Wilson's Theory: P is a prime number if, and only if, (P-1)! + 1 is divisible by P. Now take the number 1, (1-1)! + 1 = 0! + 1 = 2....
paxtontravis
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2005
5:06 pm
16144
So I was looking at the Mersenne numbers yesterday and found a curious property: 3^(2^(p-1)) = -3 (mod 2^p - 1) if (2^p - 1) divides S(p-1). For the sake of...
Joseph Moore
jtpk
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2005
5:24 pm
16145
I've started looking at at n^a + (n+1)^b, where a,b <= n+1 . It generates a reasonable number of primes. I'll be examining for any patterns in prime generation...
Mark Underwood
marku606
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2005
5:58 pm
16146
In a message dated 01/03/2005 18:12:37 GMT Standard Time, mark.underwood@... writes: But one thing right off that bat which I find somewhat...
mikeoakes2@...
mikeoakes2
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2005
6:39 pm
16147
Here is the definition of Wilson's Theorem from the Prime Pages: http://www.utm.edu/research/primes/notes/proofs/Wilsons.html Wilson's Theorem. Let p be an...
Hadley, Thomas H (Tom...
kctom99
Offline Send Email
Mar 1, 2005
6:41 pm
16148
... problem ... chance in hell ... that will eventually be in reputable journals is first circulated by preprint; often on the Internet. Mathematicians often...
nick_honolson
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2005
3:01 am
16149
"Erdos proved that there exist at least one prime of the form 4k+1 and at least one prime of the form 4k+3 between n and 2n for all n > 6." This was stated at:...
nick_honolson
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2005
8:32 am
16150
The Erdos proof is available at Ask Dr. Math - not that I understand it! Bob nick_honolson <nick_honolson@...> wrote: "Erdos proved that there exist at...
Bob Gilson
bobgillson
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2005
10:11 am
16151
Thank you Nick, that was helpful! Erdos figured prominently as an amazing 'networker' in the book I recently read called The Music of the Primes. And that...
Mark Underwood
marku606
Offline Send Email
Mar 2, 2005
3:16 pm
16152
Anybody up to checking some calculations?? Sure would be appreciated. See http://www.opertech.com/primes/residues.html in particular the value of C2 (think it...
Tom
thoeng
Offline Send Email
Mar 3, 2005
2:28 am
16153
Hi, Mark, An interesting expression. Let np ( n ) = n^n + (n+1)^(n+1) . I confirm that n = 1, 2, and 3 are the only known primes of this form. If n mod 6...
Walter Nissen
wnissen@...
Send Email
Mar 3, 2005
3:06 am
16154
Hi, If a solution to GC was not couched in formal mathematics but was let's say based on observation and a little arithmetic, easy to understand and short;...
chrisdarroch
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2005
1:04 pm
16155
... Why don't you go ahead and submit it? Supposing you actually have a valid proof of Goldbach's, I'm pretty sure any journal editor would go out of their way...
Décio Luiz Gazzoni...
deciogazzoni
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2005
3:03 pm
16156
I UNDERSTOOD THE LOGIC BUT JUST CANT FINISH IT... IT IS SIMILAR TO THE FROBENIUS PROBLEM ONLY THAT THIS QUESTION DEALS WITH THREE NUMBERS ... COULD ... AS...
rajeevbat
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2005
3:23 pm
16157
WHAT ARE THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF FACTORS THAT THE EXPRESSION n^4-5*(n^2)+4 WILL HAVE IF N IS A SET OF PRIME NUMBERS GREATER THAN 500...
rajeevbat
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2005
3:32 pm
16158
... It helps if you factor n^4 - 5n^2 + 4 as (n-2)(n-1)(n+1)(n+2). Right off the bat you already ensure that it has 4 factors, but you can do better. If n is a...
Décio Luiz Gazzoni...
deciogazzoni
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2005
4:57 pm
16159
I think the below is true, but I can't prove or disprove the statement. Please help. If 3^(3^n)+3^(((3^n)+1)/2)+1 is prime then is 3^(3^n)-3^(((3^n)+1)/2) +1...
eharsh82
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2005
6:02 pm
16160
Define sequence a(n+1)=n*f(n)+a(n), a(1)=2, f(n) is nth term of fibonacci sequence. The first few terms are 2,3,7,13,25,73........... Notice that all terms...
mcnamara_gio
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2005
6:34 pm
16161
... There seems to be a definite pattern to the parity of n*f(n). Try to work from there and see what you can prove about your sequence. Décio [Non-text...
Décio Luiz Gazzoni...
deciogazzoni
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2005
6:58 pm
16162
... Law of small numbers. It's hard to tell if this is true because you can't check much further than that -- n = 15 is about the limit given current ...
Décio Luiz Gazzoni...
deciogazzoni
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2005
7:24 pm
16163
SHOUTING, SHOUTING+1 and SHOUTING-1. Add these together, subtract 2, and multiply by the square root of infinity to get your final result. J. ... ...
Joseph Moore
jtpk
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2005
7:31 pm
16164
... If it was a genuine proof, then yes. It would be monumental. The problem is, though, that it is very unlikely that there is such a proof. ... Well, there...
Jud McCranie
judmccr
Offline Send Email
Mar 4, 2005
11:44 pm
16165
There is a Law of Small Numbers in statistics, but you seem to be using the term incorrectly; just dropping it in where it makes no sense. Milton L. Brown ...
Milton Brown
miltbrown@...
Send Email
Mar 5, 2005
6:44 am
16166
... Googling "Law of Small Numbers" shows something in good agreement with Decio's use of the term, e.g.: ...
Jens Kruse Andersen
jkand71
Offline Send Email
Mar 5, 2005
12:10 pm
16167
... Cosigned, since the "Law of Small Numbers" makes perfect since in this case. Looking at the first 3 tiny pairs of numbers could lead someone to believe...
jim_fougeron
Offline Send Email
Mar 5, 2005
1:54 pm
16168
chrisdarroch <chrisdarr2@...> wrote: Hi, If a solution to GC was not couched in formal mathematics but was let's say based on observation and a little...
Bob Gilson
bobgillson
Offline Send Email
Mar 5, 2005
2:49 pm
16169
... The disdain, at least on my part, is not for assuming a solution, but for the foolish games those who think they have one often play. I get tired of "I got...
Chris Caldwell
primemogul
Offline Send Email
Mar 5, 2005
3:46 pm
16170
Hello, Chris speaks wisdom, take it from a former 8. Anyone can claim proof. Someone who actually has proof does not need to make any claims whatsoever, they...
richard042@...
richard042
Offline Send Email
Mar 5, 2005
7:52 pm
16171
Chris Caldwell <caldwell@...> wrote: ... The disdain, at least on my part, is not for assuming a solution, but for the foolish games those who think they...
Bob Gilson
bobgillson
Offline Send Email
Mar 5, 2005
8:05 pm
16172
richard042@... wrote: Hello, Chris speaks wisdom, take it from a former 8. Anyone can claim proof. Someone who actually has proof does not need to make...
Bob Gilson
bobgillson
Offline Send Email
Mar 5, 2005
8:11 pm
Messages 16143 - 16172 of 21093   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help